Buttigieg Says He and Same-Sex Husband Hope to Start a Family and May Have Children in White House

[Cecilie1200]

My, aren't YOU the judgmental Puritanical prude all of a sudden. Don't worry, I can hear what you're actually saying: "All topics are about how much I hate Trump!!! I can't talk about my candidates! TTTTRRUUUUUUMMMPPP!!!"

I don't care who he fucks, I enjoy the wingnut hypocrisy.

FYI, "hypocrisy" is still not defined as "practicing beliefs I don't share according to the way I think they should be".

There is nothing in the world to which I look to you for guidance and wisdom, but even less so do I value your approval on moral issues.

I wasn't specifically referring to you now was I? I was talking about the hypocrisy of right wing Christian fundamentalists who take issue with homosexuals yet have no problem voting for an asshole who fucks a porn star while his wife is home with a 5 month old baby.

Your specific problem is you want to defer to what other religious wingnuts abroad think about our president's sexual orientation as if that matters.

Please do not project your own mental issues on me and think that I assume everything is about me personally just because you do that.

My answer still stands.

Did the Mullahs approve of your post?

Pretty hypocritical, coming from a supporter of the party/political group which consistently apologizes for extremist Muslims.

 

[HappyJoy]

I don't care who he fucks, I enjoy the wingnut hypocrisy.

FYI, "hypocrisy" is still not defined as "practicing beliefs I don't share according to the way I think they should be".

There is nothing in the world to which I look to you for guidance and wisdom, but even less so do I value your approval on moral issues.

I wasn't specifically referring to you now was I? I was talking about the hypocrisy of right wing Christian fundamentalists who take issue with homosexuals yet have no problem voting for an asshole who fucks a porn star while his wife is home with a 5 month old baby.

Your specific problem is you want to defer to what other religious wingnuts abroad think about our president's sexual orientation as if that matters.

Please do not project your own mental issues on me and think that I assume everything is about me personally just because you do that.

My answer still stands.

Did the Mullahs approve of your post?

Pretty hypocritical, coming from a supporter of the party/political group which consistently apologizes for extremist Muslims.

Like when?

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Human beings would soon become extinct if only men poked each other in the butt. What more proof does anyone need to show homosexuality is NOT normal? Pete is a troubled man and should NEVER be allowed to raise children. His Presidential campaign is a joke.

Human being are in no way endangered by homosexuality. Homosexuals have ben a fixed percentage of the population all through history, and they do have children . They are not sterile. The threat to humanity is war and climate change perpetuated by conservatives.

Yeah...ALL those "Conservatives" in China destroying the climate.... Just stop already.
China emits more harmful pollution and ecological damage per hour than the US does in a year. Yet you won't chastise China. WHY?
Muslims kill more gays in a month than the West in a decade, yet you won't chastise Islam. WHY?
On the surface, it would appear that the real reason involves hatred for Christians and their nation, rather than true concern for any climate issues.

In light of this stark absurdity and nonsense, who should give you the time of day?

No one.

 

[HappyJoy]

Human beings would soon become extinct if only men poked each other in the butt. What more proof does anyone need to show homosexuality is NOT normal? Pete is a troubled man and should NEVER be allowed to raise children. His Presidential campaign is a joke.

Human being are in no way endangered by homosexuality. Homosexuals have ben a fixed percentage of the population all through history, and they do have children . They are not sterile. The threat to humanity is war and climate change perpetuated by conservatives.

Yeah...ALL those "Conservatives" in China destroying the climate.... Just stop already.
China emits more harmful pollution and ecological damage per hour than the US does in a year. Yet you won't chastise China. WHY?
Muslims kill more gays in a month than the West in a decade, yet you won't chastise Islam. WHY?
On the surface, it would appear that the real reason involves hatred for Christians and their nation, rather than true concern for any climate issues.

In light of this stark absurdity and nonsense, who should give you the time of day?

No one.

China pollutes more in an hour than the U.S. does in a year? The U.S. is the largest polluter per capita.

Nobody approves of killing gays regardless of their religion, put the crack pipe down.

 

[LaDairis]

Allowing homos to adopt = serving up chickens to a fox = a guarantee the kid will be sexually abused

 

[Dana7360]

Now isn't that the most adorable thing you have heard all day from a guy??? that is clearly in second place behind a 79 year old wrinkled white jew that loves communism and what the communists did to HIS PEOPLE!.....Just have yo love the insanity of the left....wonder how historians will write up this event 50 or so years from today....if we are still here!

-----------

“We’re hoping to have a little one soon,” Buttigieg said at an event in Brooklyn, New York on April 15 of last year, where he shared the stage with his husband, Chasten....
HUSBAND?...Does this make him the first woman to become president....in her dreams?

“I imagine it would make me a better president,” he said on CNN the next day.

On June 16, when he appeared on CNN’s “State of the Union," host Jake Tapper asked him: “Do you think, if you are elected president, hypothetically, that you will plan to start a family in the White House?”

“I don’t see why not,” Buttigieg said. “I think it wouldn’t be the first time that children have arrived to a first couple.”

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...

Good for him... u9498516nfortunately I think there are too many homophobes in the country to get him in the whitehouse... but his strong run gets us closer... I predict he will be the first gay president... just don’t think it will be this cycle.

I thought the same thing about Obama. I didn't think that America would elect an African American man but we did.

I have not decided on who to support yet so I don't really care who gets the nomination.

This year I will do what I did in 2004 and 2008, anyone but the republican.

NY and CA elected Obama.

No, the electoral college elected Obama with more than two states. Plus he won the popular vote by a ton. A little honesty Leo, it goes a long way.

Obama won electoral college in 2008 with 365 votes. His popular vote total was 69,498,516 votes.

trump won electoral college in 2016 with 304 votes. his popular vote total was 62,980,160 votes.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Not the only "non-traditional family" setup screwing up kids, but . . .

True. there are many pitfalls that results in kids being screwed. However, living in a homosexual family with two moms or two dads has to be a very confusing environment for a kid.

A child needs the love and nurturing of a mom and the firm loving direction of a dad.

No, actually they don't. They need two parents that love and support them, yes, but the gender is immaterial...as every single study on the subject will tell you.

Since we all know that when people like you say, "Every single study on the subject", what you actually mean is "Every study I will accept as valid because it agrees with me", color me unimpressed.

No, its actually every single study.

How different are the adult children of parents who have same-sex relationships? Findings from the New Family Structures Study - ScienceDirect

Your insistence that "every single study" agrees with you just demonstrates my point that you only notice, listen to, and accept studies which agree with you.

That's the best that you can do?? See post 382

Mark Regnerus, the author of that paper is a phony. A charlatan who was disavowed by his own university, and who was humiliates in court in Michigan when caught in his lies about gay parenting outcomes

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Please post your degrees in child psychology . I'm sure that you have several advanced degrees from prestigious institutions of higher learning

I just heard, "I accept what my leaders tell me, because I'm too dumb to think for myself."

I don't have leaders. You do. I get my information from scientific sources and evaluate it carefully. You get lead by the nose by the bigots, fearmongers, and theocrats

Oh, you're "scientific" and "evaluate carefully", do you? Please cite me the studies you personally have read both supporting and opposing your viewpoint, and explain why the ones supporting are superior to the ones opposing.

I'll wait while you cobble together a completely inane and inadequate response.

You asked for it you got it. I don't have to hobble together anything. I have already done the research:

The Australian Study of Child Health in Same-Sex Families is the world’s largest attempt to study how children raised by same-sex couples compare to children raised by heterosexual couples. According to a preliminary report on the study of 500 children across the country of Australia, these young people are not only thriving, but also have higher rates of family cohesion than other families:

An interim report found there was no statistical difference between children of same-sex couples and the rest of the population on indicators including self-esteem, emotional behavior and the amount of time spent with parents.

However, children of same-sex couples scored higher than the national average for overall health and family cohesion, measuring how well a family gets along. World’s Largest Study Of Same-Sex Parenting Finds That Children Are Thriving

Children raised by same-sex couples appear to do as well as those raised by parents of both sexes, suggests an international research review that challenges the long-ingrained belief that children need male and female parents for healthy adjustment.

"

It's more about the quality of the parenting than the gender of the parents," says Judith Stacey of New York University, co-author of the comprehensive review. It will be published Friday in the Journal of Marriage and Family. http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/health/2010-01-21-parentgender21_ST_N.htm

A sampling of recent studies of same-sex parenting: http://www.religioustolerance.org/hom_pare2.htm

o 1997-APR: Three 3 recent studies from the US, Britain and the Netherlands were presented at the national meeting of the Society for Research on Child Development during 1997-APR .

Charlotte Patterson, a research psychologist at the University of Virginia and author of one of the new studies, said "When you look at kids with standard psychological assessments, you can't tell who has a lesbian parent and who has a heterosexual parent...That's really the main finding from these studies." She agreed that the studies to date are relatively few and open to criticism.

There may be indications that children benefit from having two lesbian parents. Fiona Tasker of Birkbeck College in the Netherlands, "...found that the non-biological lesbian parent was usually more involved with the children than are the fathers of heterosexual couples." There is also anecdotal evidence that children of gay or lesbian parents tend to be less prejudiced.

o 1999-APR: Researcher Fiona Tasker at Birkbeck College, UK, published an article in Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry. A summary reads: "There are an increasing number of children who are being brought up in lesbian-led families. Research on non-clinical samples of children raised in lesbian-led families formed after parental divorce, together with studies of children raised in families planned by a single lesbian mother or lesbian couple, suggest that growing up in a lesbian-led family does not have negative effects on key developmental outcomes. In many ways family life for children growing up in lesbian-led families is similar to that experienced by children in heterosexual families. In other respects there are important distinctions, such as different types of family forms and the impact of social stigma on the family, that may influence how clinicians approach therapeutic work with children in lesbian mother families." 14

o 2001-APR: Researchers Judith Stacey and Timothy Biblarz of the University of Southern California studied sexual orientation and parenting. They reported their findings in the American Sociological Review, a peer-reviewed journal. 1 They :

§ Discussed "...limitations in the definitions, samples and analyses of the studies to date."

§ Examined 21 studies which "almost uniformly reports findings of no notable differences between children reared by heterosexual parents and those reared by lesbian and gay parents..."

Interesting how the actual question was "cite me the studies you personally read for and against your supposition, and tell me why the ones which agree with you are superior", and all you did was link a bunch of studies agreeing with you, with no evidence that you read them.

Thank you for proving my point. You want to believe it, so that's all the "evidence" you need that you're right.

Dismissed.

What the hell are you talking about.?? What kind of evidence do you want. ? I have a lot more as well but won't waste any more of my time on you

 

[WTH_Progs?]

Peter Butt busting for peeing on public play yard: Pete Buttigieg Was Arrested For ‘Indecent Exposure’ In 2001

The Daily World is a satire page! Are you really that fucking stupid that you don't check your source.??

Daily World Update - Media Bias/Fact Check

Founded in 2018 by Christopher Blair, Daily World Update is satire website from the creator of America’s Last Line Of Defense. The purpose of the website it to troll “gullible conservatives” into sharing these satirical stories as truth. Christopher Blair has been called the “Godfather of Fake news.”

100% PANTS ON FIRE:

PolitiFact | Daily World Update

Christ you're a fucking mess!!

Neither of your links so much as mention Pete. Are you really that fucking stupid that you don't check your source.??

Even if I'm half wrong, Peter Butt married a guy named Chasity Lezman, and you can't deny it.

His name is Chasten Glezman and no I don't deny that he married a man. Get the fuck over it!

BS, I looked it up on Snopes. His original name is Churning Manhood. He changed it to Chasity Lezman sometime before he took Peter Buttgendr's name.

I don't give a fuck what his name is or was, you posted a lie about Pete being busted for peeing in public. Churning Manhood ? His original name? Who the fuch would name a kid that? Even if so, you told another lie about it being Chasity. What the fuck is up with you.??You have zero credibility

Um, Peter's parents named Peter Peter Butt.

 

[Slade3200]

The Daily World is a satire page! Are you really that fucking stupid that you don't check your source.??

Daily World Update - Media Bias/Fact Check

100% PANTS ON FIRE:

PolitiFact | Daily World Update

Christ you're a fucking mess!!

Neither of your links so much as mention Pete. Are you really that fucking stupid that you don't check your source.??

Even if I'm half wrong, Peter Butt married a guy named Chasity Lezman, and you can't deny it.

His name is Chasten Glezman and no I don't deny that he married a man. Get the fuck over it!

BS, I looked it up on Snopes. His original name is Churning Manhood. He changed it to Chasity Lezman sometime before he took Peter Buttgendr's name.

I don't give a fuck what his name is or was, you posted a lie about Pete being busted for peeing in public. Churning Manhood ? His original name? Who the fuch would name a kid that? Even if so, you told another lie about it being Chasity. What the fuck is up with you.??You have zero credibility

Um, Peter's parents named Peter Peter Butt.

are you supposed to be using your phone during school hours? Or is it recess time?

 

[Circe]

If you know anything about Seawytch, you know she's an extreme far-leftist nutball who would be quite likely to think that producing children for homosexuals is a dandy idea. Hence my instruction to "consider the source".

I do see your point ---

However, I am interested in this new business of people from deviant postures in life joining up to try to "normalize" the perversion in question by running for election in high-profile races and "coming out" when they have a high-profile position such as movie star, or whatever publicizes their deviance.. Here in Maryland we had that traitor Bradley Manning, now calling himself Chelsea and wearing lipstick and dresses, which has NOT improved his looks, say he would run for election against a long-time Maryland Dem. senator (who paid him no attention at all). This lasted about 17 days, after which "Chelsea" had a nervous breakdown and hasn't been seen or heard from since, happily. But this was pretty clearly part of the effort to "normalize" this transvestite movement where men pretend to turn into women, as if.

A far-left nutball, as you describe Seawytch, would be more likely to spill a pile of lies about having lots of babies for two men to abuse than to actually gestate and abandon to their unlucky fate three real babies, I feel sure. At least I hope that. I'd rather believe this is just an Internet lie than that it's child abuse.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Human beings would soon become extinct if only men poked each other in the butt. What more proof does anyone need to show homosexuality is NOT normal? Pete is a troubled man and should NEVER be allowed to raise children. His Presidential campaign is a joke.

Human being are in no way endangered by homosexuality. Homosexuals have ben a fixed percentage of the population all through history, and they do have children . They are not sterile. The threat to humanity is war and climate change perpetuated by conservatives.

Yeah...ALL those "Conservatives" in China destroying the climate.... Just stop already.
China emits more harmful pollution and ecological damage per hour than the US does in a year. Yet you won't chastise China. WHY?
Muslims kill more gays in a month than the West in a decade, yet you won't chastise Islam. WHY?
On the surface, it would appear that the real reason involves hatred for Christians and their nation, rather than true concern for any climate issues.

In light of this stark absurdity and nonsense, who should give you the time of day?

No one.

China pollutes more in an hour than the U.S. does in a year? The U.S. is the largest polluter per capita.

Nobody approves of killing gays regardless of their religion, put the crack pipe down.

 

[Leo123]

The bottom line is that your fear that homosexuality will endanger the human species, is irrational, bizarre and beyond stupid> The fact is that while homosexuality is more visible and accepted, and that there are population centers where they are more numerous in no way means that there are more gay people than at other times. Furthermore, gay people do have children and are parents. They are not sterile! Do your really believe your own bovine excrement? Sadly, I think that you do

Homosexuality has already threatened the human species and killed a lot of gays. Remember AIDS?

 

[Cecilie1200]

If you know anything about Seawytch, you know she's an extreme far-leftist nutball who would be quite likely to think that producing children for homosexuals is a dandy idea. Hence my instruction to "consider the source".

I do see your point ---

However, I am interested in this new business of people from deviant postures in life joining up to try to "normalize" the perversion in question by running for election in high-profile races and "coming out" when they have a high-profile position such as movie star, or whatever publicizes their deviance.. Here in Maryland we had that traitor Bradley Manning, now calling himself Chelsea and wearing lipstick and dresses, which has NOT improved his looks, say he would run for election against a long-time Maryland Dem. senator (who paid him no attention at all). This lasted about 17 days, after which "Chelsea" had a nervous breakdown and hasn't been seen or heard from since, happily. But this was pretty clearly part of the effort to "normalize" this transvestite movement where men pretend to turn into women, as if.

A far-left nutball, as you describe Seawytch, would be more likely to spill a pile of lies about having lots of babies for two men to abuse than to actually gestate and abandon to their unlucky fate three real babies, I feel sure. At least I hope that. I'd rather believe in an Internet lie than child abuse.

While I am certainly not vouching for the personal veracity of Seawytch, it is a fact that when homosexual couples acquire their children via surrogacy, the surrogate is a friend or even a relative of the couple doing it as a favor to them.

 

[Grace Is Stoked]

Allowing homos to adopt = serving up chickens to a fox = a guarantee the kid will be sexually abused

I’m not sure how you came to that conclusion? Are you saying that all homosexuals are also pedophiles? Are you saying that a straight person that adopts can’t/won’t sexually abuse a child?

 

[Leo123]

While I am certainly not vouching for the personal veracity of Seawytch, it is a fact that when homosexual couples acquire their children via surrogacy, the surrogate is a friend or even a relative of the couple doing it as a favor to them.

And that is a tragedy for the child IMO.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

China pollutes more in an hour than the U.S. does in a year? The U.S. is the largest polluter per capita.
Nobody approves of killing gays regardless of their religion, put the crack pipe down.

This phreak says radical Islamists Do NOT KILL GAYS............(see above quote)
Then tells ME to put down the crack pipe ?

Are you certain you want people like HappyJoy running America?

 

[Leo123]

I’m not sure how you came to that conclusion? Are you saying that all homosexuals are also pedophiles? Are you saying that a straight person that adopts can’t/won’t sexually abuse a child?

Since the only way homosexuals can increase their ranks is to actively recruit, pedophilia is more of a possibility. I had knew a gay guy who 'adopted' a poor kid from South America. Later on I found out that the kid became homosexual. Sad thing is, no one was surprised.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

Fact is gay men are far more likely to have been sexually abused as children by men.

In Butt's case I think his name and family heritage contributed to his gayness. I really mean that.

 

[Circe]

I’m not sure how you came to that conclusion? Are you saying that all homosexuals are also pedophiles? Are you saying that a straight person that adopts can’t/won’t sexually abuse a child?

Yes? Certainly MOST pedophiles are homosexual: this is known. Have you all not been paying attention to the late travails of the Catholic Church with its rampant pedophilia going back a millennium, famed in history and literature? The caricature of the predatory priest -- always against boys -- is all over European literature. And the Boy Scouts going bankrupt is all over the news today 2/18 --- because of all the homosexual predators who got into Scouting to abuse boys and are now suing.

And no, a straight PERSON that adopts may not sexually abuse a child, but a MAN who adopts may well. Could we not overuse this "person" word when the point is that men and women are different?? By far and away most pedophiles are males and most homosexuals are pedophilic, if at all, against male children. Come on, people, you all know this. The fact that so many pedophiles go after boys is, after all, a clue to their sexual orientation.