Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I cannot believe that claiming taking wealth from the private sector will not be a job killer.
If you take 50,000 from a person who earned 1 million dollars a year (5%) it will effect some-ones bottom line
That wealth will no longer be put to work.
We were within 163 billion of a balanced budget in 2007 with Iraq at its highest level of winning that war
More spin fron the Dems
Go back to 07 levels, add 5%, that makes the defict 500 billion with a real 5% UE rate
Thats the fix
Then tax reform that eliminates income/capital/corporate tax with a Fair tax type system and we balance the budget
It is that simple
Create wealth
I cannot believe that claiming taking wealth from the private sector will not be a job killer.
If you take 50,000 from a person who earned 1 million dollars a year (5%) it will effect some-ones bottom line
That wealth will no longer be put to work.
We were within 163 billion of a balanced budget in 2007 with Iraq at its highest level of winning that war
More spin fron the Dems
Go back to 07 levels, add 5%, that makes the defict 500 billion with a real 5% UE rate
Thats the fix
Then tax reform that eliminates income/capital/corporate tax with a Fair tax type system and we balance the budget
It is that simple
Create wealth
It is so sad that so few of you understand how our economy really works. Government and private industry are so intertwined that your what you say makes no sense at all. Here is the truth; if you leave the money in the hands of the wealthy, they tend to sit on it. They invest some, but much of it is not put to very good use. When the government gets their hands on money, one thing and only one thing happens; the money gets spent and put right back into the economy. It really doesn't matter what it is spent on, it is put back into the economy time and time again, leading to growth. How many jobs are created from the defense industry? Without government, there is no defense industry. I can go on and on, but talking to most of you is like talking to a brick wall.
well thank you for the Grammer lesson
well thank you for the Grammer lesson
Now that is one you couldn't make up.
Do you understand capital gains?
It's taxed at the corporate level prior to being realized as a capital gain to the individual shareholder, hence the reason many people refer to a capital gains tax as double taxation.
Well that is because you are to stupid to know what the truth isWhat kills me is that you'd flunk a 3rd grade English class and then go on to call other people idiots.Grammer?
you want to make this personal?
you libs kill me
You're sentences if we can call them that can't get any more smple.
See here is the problem your English skills are so poor that its hard to even know what you are saying.
You're logic is retarded. You can't spend money that you dont have. What are you going to say next that people are eating food that doesn't exists.
See this is part of your problem you're English skills are so shitty that you didn't understand the part of your source that stated that the reason it concludes that Obamacare increase the deficit is because they excluded all the measures in Obamacare that reduced the deficit
Nope according to the CBO's news analysis Obamacare is expected to reduce the deficit by 50billiion more then thought over the same time periods. Perhaps if you could read you'd know this.
I'll make a deal, you stop insulting yourself with your stupid posts and then I'll stop insulting you for your stupid posts
The last time we had a banking crises similar in size to the current one. The result was the Great depression. So under the Democrats we've recovered far better then under republicans in similar economic circumstances.And one more thing English teacher
WHO SAID I BLAMED THE HOUSING BUBBLE ON THE DEMS?
YOU DID
The fact that the bubble bursting and the Dems taking congress has nothing to do with the bubble
It is the failure to recover from it
retarded?
at least I am not a liar
Its not that you disagree i9ts that you are completely clueless on reality hell if Liberals said the world was round you'd say its flat and call us liars for making fun of your stupidityYou Liberals take a class in lying followed up by insulting your fellow Americans just because we dis agree?
Its not that I'm calling you retarded, its that you are.Calling me retarded shows your age dude
Coming from the person whose English skills is that of a 6 year old.12 maybe 14
ROTFL. Here some advice actually go to the CBO site that Heritage is sourcing. According to the CBO site Obamacare reduces the deficit by 210billino from 2010-2020 and by over 1 trillion from 2020-2030. Second also according to the CBO cite Obamacare will reduce premiums by at least 20-40%.Oh yea another lie added to you total
New CBO Report Proves We Cannot Afford Obamacare
The Info is from the CBO, Heritage is just reporting it
No actuallyu all you're posting is stupididiy and incorect information. Informaiton that you'd realize is bogus if you had an IQ greater then 65.Dude this is just information, stop taking it so personal
ROTFL yes you claiming that Obamacare doesn't reduce the deficit because we can't count the measures in it that reduce the deficit, and you claiming that Obama care doesn't reduce the deficit because of other legislation that has nothing to do with expanding the deficit is totally you catching me lie.Grammer good enough for you to understand that?
Grow up, Chill out
Learn to do some DD, your making a fool of yourself calling people retarded when you have been caught in a lie 3 times in just the last 10 minutes
Really so you think we should cut spending that creates $9 in economic benefits for every dollar spent is a good idea. Like seriously is thinking beyond you?Cutting government spending does the same thing and would, in fact, be far more effective since the Buffett Rule barely makes a dent in the annual budget deficits, which Obama himself admits. It is an election year gimmick attempt to stir up division between the haves and the have-nots and nothing more.
Yes but there really is no wasteful government spending to cut besides military/immigration spend of which republicans refuse to cut
If we go back to the 07 budget
adjust for inflation
Fossil fuels cost twice that of clean energy. So I ask why you are an oil company tool? Is it because you like pollution or you like being poor?Allow domestic drilling on public lands as well as the expansion of the same in states such as Florida (well regulated as well as land based)
I see so accordgin to you oil spilling into our drinking water is going to help us out.Allow the expansion of refinaries and Pipelines (well regulated)
Obamacare doesn't require you to buy insurance dipshit, it raises your taxes if you don't get it.Repeal Obamcare and replace with a common sense plan that excludes madatory purchasing of coverage
ROTFL so according to you oil in drinking water, cutting spending on things that create 10 times the benefits for the money spent and repealing Obamacare which creates 250,000 jobs per year in 2020 and reduces wasteful health spending by trillions will make the UE drop to 5%That would balance our budget with a 5% UE rate
Democrats already passed one while you busy droolingThen we could take our time with a real health-care plan and true tax reform
Already done Obamacare makes Medicare 10% more effcient.Then of course, the Social Security retirement age could be raised gradually and it could be means tested. Medicare can be reformed,
Scaleing back earmarks doesn't reduce spending. Earmark funds have already been appropriated all earmarks are is Congress directing the spending if there were no earmarks then the Executive branch would just direct where more of the funding goesforeign aid should be completely eliminated, in my opinion, and earmarks can be scaled back.
Read you dumbass capital gains taxes are taxes on THE profit of those gains.Capital gains typically have been taxed, Where would one get the wealth to invest to start with?
Yes the Left wanting to reduce billions in wasteful money is total a lack of leadership. IdiotI see the left offer resolutions that start with the Military. That is just because there leadership never will discuss the issues as they really are
think about it
This is why it is impossible to take you seriously. Because instead of cutting wasteful spending you suggest we just cut everything. It be like a household trying to cut expensive by cutting transportation funding that gets the to workThe issue is not with the Military, if it was in 2007 we wuld have had a 1.4 trillion dollar defict, not the 163 billion we did have
TARP so far has resulted in the governemnt gaining money. So far of the stuff repaid we got 8% more then what was in TARPThe purpose of the failed stimulus along with grabbing 50% of Tarp (as Obama did) was to re-set the budget base-line (Obama only used about 250 billion of his 1/2 of tarp, little of that we got back)
It is not that difficult to understand how we got here, nor what it will take to fix it
There has been talk of going back to the 07 baseline with inflation as a way to deal with this Obama creation
I think it is great place to start
How can you think it is a great place to start when you can't think period?
First of it is "stagnant". Second you clearly do not know what Stagnat means because GDP has been increasing at 2-3%, while employment has been increasing at 200,000 a month neither of which are stagnatIf what you say is true then explain to us this
2007 spending 2.73 trillion
2011 spending 3.4 trillion
Yet the GDP is stagnet
Job creation is stagnet
No dumbass in 2011 GDP was 1 trillion dollars higher then in 2007in 2007 we had 5% UE with a GDP about the same as 2011 with the housing bubble starting to explode 4th quarter
http://www.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?ReqID=9&step=1
Well the stimulus actually created 4million jobs and made key investments that will in the next ten years save the economy 1-3trillion dollras.Based on your theroy this should not be
Based on you theroy this extra 700 billion, well what does your theroy claim this extra 700 billion is to have done?
First of cutting spending that increased GDP growth isn't going to make GDP better. Furthermore cutting spending that decreases the deficit wont reduce the deficit. Of which both are things you propose doing because you are to cluelessThats real wealth with a 1.5 trillion dollar defict in 2011
Let me add that in 2007 we had the war in Iraq going wide open
in 2011 it was not, that expense was in reality all but gone
No-one that I am aware of has claimed the federal govt does nothing as it relates to growth (some times it does more harm than good)
Now explain to us brick walls how this works again?
Bullshit.The money collected in the Buffett tax goes into revenues and decreases the deficit by paying for something we are currently borrowing to fund.
Cutting government spending does the same thing and would, in fact, be far more effective since the Buffett Rule barely makes a dent in the annual budget deficits, which Obama himself admits. It is an election year gimmick attempt to stir up division between the haves and the have-nots and nothing more.
Yes but there really is no wasteful government spending to cut besides military/immigration spend of which republicans refuse to cut
Bullshit.Cutting government spending does the same thing and would, in fact, be far more effective since the Buffett Rule barely makes a dent in the annual budget deficits, which Obama himself admits. It is an election year gimmick attempt to stir up division between the haves and the have-nots and nothing more.
Yes but there really is no wasteful government spending to cut besides military/immigration spend of which republicans refuse to cut
There's shitloads of wasteful spending in the domestic socialistic welfare state, which socialist progressives refuse to cut.
I cannot believe that claiming taking wealth from the private sector will not be a job killer.
Sure I can...Bullshit.Yes but there really is no wasteful government spending to cut besides military/immigration spend of which republicans refuse to cut
There's shitloads of wasteful spending in the domestic socialistic welfare state, which socialist progressives refuse to cut.
Odd how there is so much but you can't even give us 10billion worth
Now let's deal with reality........
Sure I can...Bullshit.
There's shitloads of wasteful spending in the domestic socialistic welfare state, which socialist progressives refuse to cut.
Odd how there is so much but you can't even give us 10billion worth
The entire Departments of Energy, Commerce, Labor, Education, HHS, HUD, DHS & TSA...Then we can extensively devolve to the states or privatize most of the DoT and sell off BLM lands...Then we can junk chickenshit trifles like the CPB/NPR/PBS, NEA, NEH, EEOC, NLRB...After that we can shitcan the DEA and BATF...
That enough for ya, comrade?
Just because the feds don't piss away zillions of dollars on something doesn't mean that states, localities and private interests won't do them.Sure I can...Odd how there is so much but you can't even give us 10billion worth
The entire Departments of Energy, Commerce, Labor, Education, HHS, HUD, DHS & TSA...Then we can extensively devolve to the states or privatize most of the DoT and sell off BLM lands...Then we can junk chickenshit trifles like the CPB/NPR/PBS, NEA, NEH, EEOC, NLRB...After that we can shitcan the DEA and BATF...
That enough for ya, comrade?
ROTFL I see so according to you education, energy production, healthcare, eating, food saftey, roads, railroads, health research, and having shelter are all a waste.
So according to you no one sohuld buy food because it is a waste.
Come back when you've got a clue.
The money collected in the Buffett tax goes into revenues and decreases the deficit by paying for something we are currently borrowing to fund.