BS Alert: Wray Says Under Oath He's Not Sure If FBI Assets Were At Capitol on J6

[occupied]

Not a good look. At best as noted, he is saying he isn't aware of that the FBI might or might not be doing. I don't even see an issue with him saying there was agents there.

No one cares except for the conspiracy nuts. They take "I'm not sure" as complete confirmation.

 

[occupied]

Answer the question.

How would I know? I'm not in the FBI...or am I? <sinister laugh>

 

[pknopp]

No one cares except for the conspiracy nuts. They take "I'm not sure" as complete confirmation.

Sorry, I condemned many in government for their lies under oath and I'm certainly not going to brush if off here.

He lied. The other possible answer is he is incompetent. Either way, not good.

 

[Catsnmeters]

So....Why wasn't Ray Epps arrested?

You may find out soon. I read he is suing Fox and Tucker for defamation.

But the actual answer is because he didn't enter the captial or do any violence.

 

[Rawley]

FBI Agents testified during the J6 Committee hearings there were undercover FBI Agents in the crowd on J6...

...so WTF does Wray think he is doing declaring he isn't sure if there was or not?

At the least Wray just claimed he has no idea what is going on in his FBI and must be removed. At worst he just lied under oath and should be arrested.

Christopher Wray 'Not Sure' if There Were FBI Agents at Capitol on Jan. 6

pjmedia.com

I saw that exchange. What a weasel.

 

[yidnar]

Yes, by all means let's make our country more vulnerable to another terrorist attack.

tell that to Secretary Mayorkas ...

 

[Leo123]

You may find out soon. I read he is suing Fox and Tucker for defamation.

But the actual answer is because he didn't enter the captial or do any violence.

Protestors who didn't enter the capitol were arrested and charged with 'storming' the capitol. Epps qualifies.

 

[WEATHER53]

No one cares except for the conspiracy nuts. They take "I'm not sure" as complete confirmation.

I’m wondering if the head of the agency is required to be sure?

 

[Catsnmeters]

Protestors who didn't enter the capitol were arrested and charged with 'storming' the capitol. Epps qualifies.

Name one.

 

[WEATHER53]

Name one.

I dont think they have provided a list of who they are holding and for what.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

How is going into the building any worse than Epps telling people they need to go into the U.S. Capitol and directing them toward the building? If you haven't figured out by now who he is and who he was working for, I don't know what more I could tell you.

"Massie showed video and images of Epps during the hearing, then asked Garland, "as far as we can find, this individual has not been charged with anything. You said this is one of the most sweeping investigations in history."

Arizona man who was at U.S. Capitol Jan. 6 featured in video during House hearing with AG Merrick Garland

What law did he break by telling people to go into the building?

 

[okfine]

Since the insurrectionists were all over social media planning their attack for months ahead of time, and were being egged on by Trump and his MAGA media fan bois, I would consider the federal government derelict in their duties if they did not have agents in the crowd that day.

"agents"
Of course they had agents in the crowd, but the spooks are smart enough not to blab to a bunch of idiots.

 

[excalibur]

FBI whistleblower: Deputy director told subordinates to hide Jan. 6 informants

An FBI agent told the House Judiciary Committee that Deputy Director Paul Abbate suggested that at least 25 FBI confidential human sources, or informants, involved in reporting to the bureau from the Jan. 6, 2021, protest should not be publicly acknowledged.

www.washingtontimes.com

 

[excalibur]

 

[WEATHER53]

What law did he break by telling people to go into the building?

Directed A Storming

 

[Leo123]

Fox is going to take another Tucker Carlson caused defamation hit on that one too.

For what, asking a question?

 

[occupied]

Directed A Storming

Do you think Trump followers are so easily misled? I think that too but we all know who actually misled them.

 

[occupied]

For what, asking a question?

There's a thread about it. If you don't already know what's going on you should refrain from commenting.

 

[Leo123]

Name one.

'I can't comment on an on going investigation' means nothing to you?

 

[Leo123]

There's a thread about it. If you don't already know what's going on you should refrain from commenting.

'There's a thread about it' is no answer, dunderhead.