easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,087
- 2,645
- Thread starter
- #61
Moreover, there must have been sufficient evidence for the FISA courts to renew the wiretaps every 90 days.
The perception that there was 'sufficient evidence' was provided to the FISA Court in the form of Dossier information presented to them as 'Legitimate Intelligence' with the omission that the source of the information was a Trump-hating spy working with the Russians to pass along Russian-authored data and for the FBI and that the information was Political Opposition Research paid for by Trump's political opponent....SIGNED BY THE DEPUTY US AG who - by signing the application - was swearing the information was verified, substantiated, truthful, and factual - as per the top of the form which stated the information being submitted must be.
The initial warrant was acquired, according to FBI Deputy Director McCabe under oath, because of the Dossier's contents / use. Released evidence shows the Dossier was used initially to acquire spying approval and during 2 renewal applications.