Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
...especially since Cameron finally put to rest the leftie argument that ISIS is because of Iraq War. He went out of his way to say it was NOT.
...especially since Cameron finally put to rest the leftie argument that ISIS is because of Iraq War. He went out of his way to say it was NOT.
appeal to authority
You said that because an authority thinks something, it must therefore be true.
Gee, if Obama uses drones to kill terrorists, he's wrong; if he does not, he's soft on terrorism. When he uses air power he's criticized and when he honestly admits no strategy can be agreed on, he's criticized.
So, all you critics, tell us what he should do, when and at what cost?
Gee, if Obama uses drones to kill terrorists, he's wrong; if he does not, he's soft on terrorism. When he uses air power he's criticized and when he honestly admits no strategy can be agreed on, he's criticized.
So, all you critics, tell us what he should do, when and at what cost?
Here's a suggestion. Read more and post less on the subject. You show an amazing amount of ignorance about military operations by your post. His half-assed drone drone program was part of the problem as one little bitsy example.
...especially since Cameron finally put to rest the leftie argument that ISIS is because of Iraq War. He went out of his way to say it was NOT.
appeal to authority
You said that because an authority thinks something, it must therefore be true.
And you act like every thing an authority on a subject says cannot be true. Can't you use a little judgment....just a little?
Typical upside down Bizzarro Lib thinking.
There are numerous reasons why one should listen to Cameron. This would be an opportunity for him to throw Tony Blair, who is in the opposite party, under the bus....the way Obama the idiot does. But he has access to a ton more intel YOU have and he's showing he's not playing politics for starters.
ISIS isn't something that popped up a couple of weeks ago, although Obama may have learned of it's existance from the media. It appears that Obama cannot go on vacation, and still do his job. Months have passed, and Obama has no strategy to deal with ISIS? What an incompetent boob.
Stay in town and meet with advisers and Dept.of Defense to determine the best course of action. NOT go to fundraisers.ISIS isn't something that popped up a couple of weeks ago, although Obama may have learned of it's existance from the media. It appears that Obama cannot go on vacation, and still do his job. Months have passed, and Obama has no strategy to deal with ISIS? What an incompetent boob.
What should he do?
Stay in town and meet with advisers and Dept.of Defense to determine the best course of action. Perhaps meet with a coalition of countries to meet this threat. But I am no foreign policy expert. He could call John Bolton. NOT go to fundraisers.ISIS isn't something that popped up a couple of weeks ago, although Obama may have learned of it's existance from the media. It appears that Obama cannot go on vacation, and still do his job. Months have passed, and Obama has no strategy to deal with ISIS? What an incompetent boob.
What should he do?
Why Obama Backed Off More ISIS Strikes: His Own Team Couldn’t Agree on a Syria Strategy
Why Obama Backed Off More ISIS Strikes His Own Team Couldn t Agree on a Syria Strategy - The Daily Beast
Another group of officials -- led by White House and National Security staffers but also including some intelligence and military officials -- favored a more cautious approach that spurned any cooperation with the Free Syrian Army and focused strikes inside Syria on targets near the Iraqi border. The objective: cut off ISIS supply lines to Iraq. That strategy would fall more squarely within the existing limited missions that Obama has already outlined for his war.
Inside the intelligence community, there is a dispute about whether the Free Syrian Army, which has been fighting ISIS in Syria all yearwith little international support,can be a reliable partner for any military mission inside Syria.
Senior U.S. intelligence officials say the official assessment from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence recommended against working with the Free Syrian Army. "The intelligence community assessment has no serious consideration to work with the Free Syrian Army to date," a senior U.S. intelligence official said. "The folks sitting around the table today do not think we can work with them."
Why Obama Backed Off More ISIS Strikes: His Own Team Couldn’t Agree on a Syria Strategy
Why Obama Backed Off More ISIS Strikes His Own Team Couldn t Agree on a Syria Strategy - The Daily Beast
From your link. "National Security staffers but also including some intelligence and military officials -- favored a more cautious approach that spurned any cooperation with the Free Syrian Army and focused strikes inside Syria on targets near the Iraqi border. The objective: cut off ISIS supply lines to Iraq."
Another group of officials -- led by White House and National Security staffers but also including some intelligence and military officials -- favored a more cautious approach that spurned any cooperation with the Free Syrian Army and focused strikes inside Syria on targets near the Iraqi border. The objective: cut off ISIS supply lines to Iraq. That strategy would fall more squarely within the existing limited missions that Obama has already outlined for his war.
Inside the intelligence community, there is a dispute about whether the Free Syrian Army, which has been fighting ISIS in Syria all yearwith little international support,can be a reliable partner for any military mission inside Syria.
Senior U.S. intelligence officials say the official assessment from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence recommended against working with the Free Syrian Army. "The intelligence community assessment has no serious consideration to work with the Free Syrian Army to date," a senior U.S. intelligence official said. "The folks sitting around the table today do not think we can work with them."
The action on the ground in Syria cannot be American troops.
Americans in their right minds wouid be demanding that ground forces from nations in the area be sent in with a combat plan to be coordinated with US air power.
But instead we have foolish Americans who scream bomb now and have a plan later. Like invade Iraq when there was no war and worry about the plan later when a war has been created.
Total fools they are.
Obama looks to be on the best path by focusing on Iraq where ground troops are available and the new government there gets set up to have and develop a clear strategy and then execute it.
The war against ISIS in Syria needs Arab nations in the region to step up and fight these barbarians themselves on the ground. We can't fight their wars for them or conduct a war absolutely only from 5000 feet off the ground and higher. Intelligent Americans would see the need to back Obama's call for leaders in the region to develop and commit forces and resources to an all out assault on IS terrorists positions and assets.
Stay in town and meet with advisers and Dept.of Defense to determine the best course of action. NOT go to fundraisers.ISIS isn't something that popped up a couple of weeks ago, although Obama may have learned of it's existance from the media. It appears that Obama cannot go on vacation, and still do his job. Months have passed, and Obama has no strategy to deal with ISIS? What an incompetent boob.
What should he do?
Why Obama Backed Off More ISIS Strikes: His Own Team Couldn’t Agree on a Syria Strategy
Why Obama Backed Off More ISIS Strikes His Own Team Couldn t Agree on a Syria Strategy - The Daily Beast
From your link. "National Security staffers but also including some intelligence and military officials -- favored a more cautious approach that spurned any cooperation with the Free Syrian Army and focused strikes inside Syria on targets near the Iraqi border. The objective: cut off ISIS supply lines to Iraq."
Another group of officials -- led by White House and National Security staffers but also including some intelligence and military officials -- favored a more cautious approach that spurned any cooperation with the Free Syrian Army and focused strikes inside Syria on targets near the Iraqi border. The objective: cut off ISIS supply lines to Iraq. That strategy would fall more squarely within the existing limited missions that Obama has already outlined for his war.
Inside the intelligence community, there is a dispute about whether the Free Syrian Army, which has been fighting ISIS in Syria all yearwith little international support,can be a reliable partner for any military mission inside Syria.
Senior U.S. intelligence officials say the official assessment from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence recommended against working with the Free Syrian Army. "The intelligence community assessment has no serious consideration to work with the Free Syrian Army to date," a senior U.S. intelligence official said. "The folks sitting around the table today do not think we can work with them."
The action on the ground in Syria cannot be American troops.
Americans in their right minds wouid be demanding that ground forces from nations in the area be sent in with a combat plan to be coordinated with US air power.
But instead we have foolish Americans who scream bomb now and have a plan later. Like invade Iraq when there was no war and worry about the plan later when a war has been created.
Total fools they are.
Obama looks to be on the best path by focusing on Iraq where ground troops are available and the new government there gets set up to have and develop a clear strategy and then execute it.
The war against ISIS in Syria needs Arab nations in the region to step up and fight these barbarians themselves on the ground. We can't fight their wars for them or conduct a war absolutely only from 5000 feet off the ground and higher. Intelligent Americans would see the need to back Obama's call for leaders in the region to develop and commit forces and resources to an all out assault on IS terrorists positions and assets.
I think you just gave more thought to the problem of ISIS in the few seconds you wrote that post than Obama gave in the last three days.