Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 66,224
- 16,729
- 2,190
- Thread starter
- #1,101
No, I’ll gladly give you props for backing up your statements... it’s more than most do on this board. Point goes to Oldstyle"Conversely, we found that the FBI’s explanations for its failure to take immediate action after discovering the Weiner laptop in October 2016 to be unpersuasive, and we did not have confidence that the decision of Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the Weiner laptop was free from bias."yes, when you quote parts that aren’t there I’m going to call you on it. Pretty simple.Can you quote where it says that in the IG report?you are correct and if there was evidence of him doing anything of the sort then he should be arrested... Thats a big reason why they investigated the situation. McCabe was fired for lying about a Wall Street journal article. Strozek was simply demoted because of an appearance of impropriety. Something in your narrative is not lining up with the evidence
Appearance of impropriety? Strozek sat on the Anthony Weiner emails for a month...declining to even look into them while he pushed HARD for an announcement that Trump was being investigated for collusion with the Russians!
I thought you read the report, Slade? Now you need me to quote parts of it to you? You STILL haven't read it...have you!
Care to "call me" on that?