Breaking the Silence holds exhibition in Zurich

[Phoenall]

The report describes taking the testimonies of large numbers of officers and soldiers involved in the planning and execution of the strike. Unsuccessful efforts were made to "co-ordinate " testimonies from Gaza witnesses, the report said.

"Regretfully, despite the prior coordination, the witnesses eventually declined to meet the investigators, and instead provided affidavits," it added.

However, journalists who reported seeing the incident - at least one of them British - said that no attempt was made to interview them, although they brought it to the military advocate general's attention that they had witness testimony.

In summary, the report said the strike was consistent with "Israeli domestic law and international law requirements", adding that it was "aimed at figures who were understood to be militants from Hamas's Naval Forces, who had gathered in order to prepare to carry out military activities". The investigation concluded that the Israeli personnel involved had not realised they were targeting children.
Israel exonerates itself over killing of Gaza boys on beach - Telegraph

OH DEAR WHAT A PITY NEVER MIND

 

[montelatici]

This Islamic news fart has been brought to you by bullshit Middle East News Monitor, and mr Goozo who just fangered himself again.

Israeli veterans group comes under fire amid boycott threat - Yahoo News

JERUSALEM (AP) — An organization of former Israeli soldiers dedicated to shedding light on the dark side of the country's military is coming increasingly under fire, roiling a country in the grips of a battle against the burgeoning threat of international isolation and boycotts.

Since its founding in 2004, Breaking the Silence has collected the testimonies of more than 1,000 veterans in a bid to expose the underbelly of the decades-old occupation of the West Bank. It has taken those accounts to audiences in Israel and around the world, including a recent 10-day photo exhibit in Zurich, Switzerland.

You put your faith in paid and political rivals of Yaalon, that was exposed for the materials reachable for the public only just like you and me no more no less...but how about...
Ex-generals diplomats absolve Israel of Gaza war crimes - Israel News - Jerusalem Post

Israel absolves Israel of War Crimes. What a surprise. LOL The UN's report will be issued shortly.

Too late freddy boy as it was issued last month and states that it will not be taking action against Israel

Really? Is Netanyahu going nuts? Why is he already complaining about the upcoming UN Report? As always, you are full full of crap.

Israeli leader criticizes upcoming UN report on Gaza war

JERUSALEM – Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday criticized an upcoming United Nations report into last year's war in the Gaza Strip, calling it a waste of time.

Published June 14, 2015

Israeli leader criticizes upcoming UN report on Gaza war Fox News

 

[Roudy]

Why are journalists surprised that Israel kills children?
There was nothing surprising about Israel finding itself not culpable for the killing of four boys on a Gaza beach in July last year, as it did in a military judgment released a few days ago.

Israel’s investigations into its own crimes aren’t known for delivering guilty verdicts.

What was interesting, however, was the reaction of some mainstream journalists — journalists who felt they had a vested interest in this case because they had witnessed the strikes which killed the four boys from the Baker family as they played football one afternoon during Israel’s 51-day assault on Gaza.

Articles by Peter Beaumont in The Guardian and Robert Tait in The Daily Telegraph give off a sense of disbelief and indignation that the investigation by the Israeli army into the attack cleared all personnel involved and declared the incident “a tragic accident.”

Both these journalists, and Paul Mason in his blog for Channel 4 News, describe how their own observations, both during and after the attack, refute Israel’s allegations that it was targeting Palestinian fighters.

But the sense that there has been a miscarriage of justice by a reputable organization, rather than an outright cover-up by a rogue army, remains.

Struck in error?
This journalistic respect for Israel’s army is highlighted in Tait’s article, as he writes that the slaughter of the boys was “surely an indication that something had gone badly wrong in Israel’s military procedures for such a deadly strike to have been aimed at what were clearly children.”

Why are journalists surprised that Israel kills children The Electronic Intifada

Another fart from mr Goozo brought to you by The Electronic Inti-FARTA. Yup, one of the most reliable jihadi farting sites on the internet.

Fanger fangers himself again!

Fanger
To finger a girl so hard she needs medical attention.
"Mate, did you hear about Emili being fangered"

"Why is Julie in hospital?"
"Oh, I heard she was fangered"

"A little bit of fanger is good for you"

 

[RoccoR]

montelatici, et al,

What is this nonsense.

Top World Generals No Israeli War Crimes in Gaza - Israel Today Israel News

Israel absolves Israel. I am surprised. But I'll wait for the UN report due shortly for an independent assessment.

(COMMENT)

First, Israel is --- without question --- allowed to defense itself and declare its innocence. Just as anyone is allowed to declare its innocence when accused of a crime. Trying to attach some significants to that is rather unscrupulous.

Second, the Multinational Military Group (MNMG) that conducted the investigation, was NOT something that the Israelis had assembled. They were 11 former chiefs of staff, generals, senior officers, political leaders and officials from the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, Australia and Colombia.

"We were well aware of the allegations made by some governments, the United Nations, human rights groups and the media, that Israel acted outside the laws of armed conflict in Gaza. Some have suggested that the IDF lacked restraint or even deliberately targeted innocent civilians.

Our findings lead us to the opposite conclusion."
SOURCE: MNMG Report to UN Independent Commission of Inquiry

The evaluation of the allegation that Israel committed "War Crimes" was a sort of peer review in which other members of senior leadership in various Armed Forces examined the circumstances and the incidents, to reach a conclusion relative to Customary Law relative to Warfare.

There is no question that the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) generally cries that someone (particularly the one with the military advantage --- especially true in the case of Israel) committed a "war crime." But it is rare, when the military and legal experts examine the actual situation and conditions, that such allegations are substantiated.

This is not to say that there are issues, subject to the permanent status of negotiations, that may need litigated or mediated. Nor am I implying that war reparations or civil claims might need special settlement. But overall, these are not war crime issues.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Roudy]

This Islamic news fart has been brought to you by bullshit Middle East News Monitor, and mr Goozo who just fangered himself again.

Israeli veterans group comes under fire amid boycott threat - Yahoo News

JERUSALEM (AP) — An organization of former Israeli soldiers dedicated to shedding light on the dark side of the country's military is coming increasingly under fire, roiling a country in the grips of a battle against the burgeoning threat of international isolation and boycotts.

Since its founding in 2004, Breaking the Silence has collected the testimonies of more than 1,000 veterans in a bid to expose the underbelly of the decades-old occupation of the West Bank. It has taken those accounts to audiences in Israel and around the world, including a recent 10-day photo exhibit in Zurich, Switzerland.

You put your faith in paid and political rivals of Yaalon, that was exposed for the materials reachable for the public only just like you and me no more no less...but how about...
Ex-generals diplomats absolve Israel of Gaza war crimes - Israel News - Jerusalem Post

Israel absolves Israel of War Crimes. What a surprise. LOL The UN's report will be issued shortly.

Too late freddy boy as it was issued last month and states that it will not be taking action against Israel

Really? Is Netanyahu going nuts? Why is he already complaining about the upcoming UN Report? As always, you are full full of crap.

Israeli leader criticizes upcoming UN report on Gaza war

JERUSALEM – Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday criticized an upcoming United Nations report into last year's war in the Gaza Strip, calling it a waste of time.

Published June 14, 2015

Israeli leader criticizes upcoming UN report on Gaza war Fox News

Remember the build up before the flottila incident that you guys kept jerking yourself off to?

So all you have now is something else to jerk yourself off to.

 

[Roudy]

Why are journalists surprised that Israel kills children?
There was nothing surprising about Israel finding itself not culpable for the killing of four boys on a Gaza beach in July last year, as it did in a military judgment released a few days ago.

Israel’s investigations into its own crimes aren’t known for delivering guilty verdicts.

What was interesting, however, was the reaction of some mainstream journalists — journalists who felt they had a vested interest in this case because they had witnessed the strikes which killed the four boys from the Baker family as they played football one afternoon during Israel’s 51-day assault on Gaza.

Articles by Peter Beaumont in The Guardian and Robert Tait in The Daily Telegraph give off a sense of disbelief and indignation that the investigation by the Israeli army into the attack cleared all personnel involved and declared the incident “a tragic accident.”

Both these journalists, and Paul Mason in his blog for Channel 4 News, describe how their own observations, both during and after the attack, refute Israel’s allegations that it was targeting Palestinian fighters.

But the sense that there has been a miscarriage of justice by a reputable organization, rather than an outright cover-up by a rogue army, remains.

Struck in error?
This journalistic respect for Israel’s army is highlighted in Tait’s article, as he writes that the slaughter of the boys was “surely an indication that something had gone badly wrong in Israel’s military procedures for such a deadly strike to have been aimed at what were clearly children.”

Why are journalists surprised that Israel kills children The Electronic Intifada

E.I.? Why don't you scour the Iranian sites for their analysis? Oh, you did? Carry on.

He starts with E.I., the the Iranian sites, then RT, then he resorts to fangering himself.

 

[Phoenall]

This Islamic news fart has been brought to you by bullshit Middle East News Monitor, and mr Goozo who just fangered himself again.

Israeli veterans group comes under fire amid boycott threat - Yahoo News

JERUSALEM (AP) — An organization of former Israeli soldiers dedicated to shedding light on the dark side of the country's military is coming increasingly under fire, roiling a country in the grips of a battle against the burgeoning threat of international isolation and boycotts.

Since its founding in 2004, Breaking the Silence has collected the testimonies of more than 1,000 veterans in a bid to expose the underbelly of the decades-old occupation of the West Bank. It has taken those accounts to audiences in Israel and around the world, including a recent 10-day photo exhibit in Zurich, Switzerland.

You put your faith in paid and political rivals of Yaalon, that was exposed for the materials reachable for the public only just like you and me no more no less...but how about...
Ex-generals diplomats absolve Israel of Gaza war crimes - Israel News - Jerusalem Post

Israel absolves Israel of War Crimes. What a surprise. LOL The UN's report will be issued shortly.

Too late freddy boy as it was issued last month and states that it will not be taking action against Israel

Really? Is Netanyahu going nuts? Why is he already complaining about the upcoming UN Report? As always, you are full full of crap.

Israeli leader criticizes upcoming UN report on Gaza war

JERUSALEM – Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday criticized an upcoming United Nations report into last year's war in the Gaza Strip, calling it a waste of time.

Published June 14, 2015

Israeli leader criticizes upcoming UN report on Gaza war Fox News

What is it team Palestine say about fox news again...............something about hasbara propaganda...........



But from your link we find this


Israel says Gaza's Hamas rulers are responsible for the civilian casualties because it launched attacks from residential areas. Palestinians have said that the Israeli army violated the rules of war, which include giving adequate warning to civilians, using proportionate force and distinguishing between civilians and combatants.

The U.N. Human Rights Council's report is expected to be released this week. In anticipation, Israel prepared a report it says proves Hamas' criminal intentions and exonerates Israel of the war crimes allegations against it.


In a boost to the Israeli case, the High Level International Military Group, made up of 11 former chiefs of staff, generals and other senior American and European officials who conducted a fact-finding mission, came to similar conclusions. It said: "None of us is aware of any army that takes such extensive measures as did the (Israeli military) last summer to protect the lives of the civilian population in such circumstances."


Any comment on the experts views ?

 

[Daniyel]

The full report was just passed on to the UNHRC - Key Preliminary Findings of the High Level International Military Group on the Gaza Conflict View from Geneva

 

[Daniyel]

Israeli veterans group comes under fire amid boycott threat - Yahoo News

JERUSALEM (AP) — An organization of former Israeli soldiers dedicated to shedding light on the dark side of the country's military is coming increasingly under fire, roiling a country in the grips of a battle against the burgeoning threat of international isolation and boycotts.

Since its founding in 2004, Breaking the Silence has collected the testimonies of more than 1,000 veterans in a bid to expose the underbelly of the decades-old occupation of the West Bank. It has taken those accounts to audiences in Israel and around the world, including a recent 10-day photo exhibit in Zurich, Switzerland.

You put your faith in paid and political rivals of Yaalon, that was exposed for the materials reachable for the public only just like you and me no more no less...but how about...
Ex-generals diplomats absolve Israel of Gaza war crimes - Israel News - Jerusalem Post

Israel absolves Israel of War Crimes. What a surprise. LOL The UN's report will be issued shortly.

Ten of the worlds top generals say Israel committed no war crimes. They surely outweigh the motley Hamas terrorists who do all the pissing and moaning with all their BS claims.


Israel at the weekend published the findings of 10 of the world’s top generals who concluded that, contrary to widespread allegations, the Jewish state had not committed war crimes during last summer’s Gaza war.

The delegation, headed by Chairman of the NATO Military Committee General Klaus Naumann (pictured), said in a statement that its “mission to Israel was unprecedented. We were the first such multi-national group of senior officers to visit the country. We were granted a level of access to the Israeli government and Defense Force that has not been afforded to any other group…”

After vigorously investigating the Israeli army’s conduct during the war, the group found that “Israeli forces acted proportionately as required by the laws of armed conflict and often went beyond the required legal principles of proportionality, necessity and discrimination.”



Top World Generals No Israeli War Crimes in Gaza - Israel Today Israel News

Israel absolves Israel. I am surprised. But I'll wait for the UN report due shortly for an independent assessment.

".............But I'll wait for the UM report.............."

There, fixed it for ya. That's United Muslims, not UN.

You mean UNRWA? UN Rockets Warehousing Agency?

 

[montelatici]

montelatici, et al,

What is this nonsense.

Top World Generals No Israeli War Crimes in Gaza - Israel Today Israel News

Israel absolves Israel. I am surprised. But I'll wait for the UN report due shortly for an independent assessment.

(COMMENT)

First, Israel is --- without question --- allowed to defense itself and declare its innocence. Just as anyone is allowed to declare its innocence when accused of a crime. Trying to attach some significants to that is rather unscrupulous.

Second, the Multinational Military Group (MNMG) that conducted the investigation, was NOT something that the Israelis had assembled. They were 11 former chiefs of staff, generals, senior officers, political leaders and officials from the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, Australia and Colombia.

"We were well aware of the allegations made by some governments, the United Nations, human rights groups and the media, that Israel acted outside the laws of armed conflict in Gaza. Some have suggested that the IDF lacked restraint or even deliberately targeted innocent civilians.

Our findings lead us to the opposite conclusion."
SOURCE: MNMG Report to UN Independent Commission of Inquiry

The evaluation of the allegation that Israel committed "War Crimes" was a sort of peer review in which other members of senior leadership in various Armed Forces examined the circumstances and the incidents, to reach a conclusion relative to Customary Law relative to Warfare.

There is no question that the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) generally cries that someone (particularly the one with the military advantage --- especially true in the case of Israel) committed a "war crime." But it is rare, when the military and legal experts examine the actual situation and conditions, that such allegations are substantiated.

This is not to say that there are issues, subject to the permanent status of negotiations, that may need litigated or mediated. Nor am I implying that war reparations or civil claims might need special settlement. But overall, these are not war crime issues.

Most Respectfully,
R

Are you being serious? It would be as if the USSR put together a Commission on Russian actions in occupied Afghanistan made up of generals from armies of the Warsaw pact, Vietnam and Cuba. You people are nuts.

 

[Phoenall]

montelatici, et al,

What is this nonsense.

Top World Generals No Israeli War Crimes in Gaza - Israel Today Israel News

Israel absolves Israel. I am surprised. But I'll wait for the UN report due shortly for an independent assessment.

(COMMENT)

First, Israel is --- without question --- allowed to defense itself and declare its innocence. Just as anyone is allowed to declare its innocence when accused of a crime. Trying to attach some significants to that is rather unscrupulous.

Second, the Multinational Military Group (MNMG) that conducted the investigation, was NOT something that the Israelis had assembled. They were 11 former chiefs of staff, generals, senior officers, political leaders and officials from the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, Australia and Colombia.

"We were well aware of the allegations made by some governments, the United Nations, human rights groups and the media, that Israel acted outside the laws of armed conflict in Gaza. Some have suggested that the IDF lacked restraint or even deliberately targeted innocent civilians.

Our findings lead us to the opposite conclusion."
SOURCE: MNMG Report to UN Independent Commission of Inquiry

The evaluation of the allegation that Israel committed "War Crimes" was a sort of peer review in which other members of senior leadership in various Armed Forces examined the circumstances and the incidents, to reach a conclusion relative to Customary Law relative to Warfare.

There is no question that the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) generally cries that someone (particularly the one with the military advantage --- especially true in the case of Israel) committed a "war crime." But it is rare, when the military and legal experts examine the actual situation and conditions, that such allegations are substantiated.

This is not to say that there are issues, subject to the permanent status of negotiations, that may need litigated or mediated. Nor am I implying that war reparations or civil claims might need special settlement. But overall, these are not war crime issues.

Most Respectfully,
R

Are you being serious? It would be as if the USSR put together a Commission on Russian actions in occupied Afghanistan made up of generals from armies of the Warsaw pact, Vietnam and Cuba. You people are nuts.

You don't know what you are rambling on about, the military leaders come from nations that have no affiliations to Israel and are truly neutral. They only look at facts and are not racially or religiously motivated like you, so they came to the conclusion that Israel acted above and beyond what was expected in the circumstances. This is what gets up your nose isn't it when other people see the reality and come out in favour of Israel, even devout R.C's

 

[montelatici]

montelatici, et al,

What is this nonsense.

Top World Generals No Israeli War Crimes in Gaza - Israel Today Israel News

Israel absolves Israel. I am surprised. But I'll wait for the UN report due shortly for an independent assessment.

(COMMENT)

First, Israel is --- without question --- allowed to defense itself and declare its innocence. Just as anyone is allowed to declare its innocence when accused of a crime. Trying to attach some significants to that is rather unscrupulous.

Second, the Multinational Military Group (MNMG) that conducted the investigation, was NOT something that the Israelis had assembled. They were 11 former chiefs of staff, generals, senior officers, political leaders and officials from the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, Australia and Colombia.

"We were well aware of the allegations made by some governments, the United Nations, human rights groups and the media, that Israel acted outside the laws of armed conflict in Gaza. Some have suggested that the IDF lacked restraint or even deliberately targeted innocent civilians.

Our findings lead us to the opposite conclusion."
SOURCE: MNMG Report to UN Independent Commission of Inquiry

The evaluation of the allegation that Israel committed "War Crimes" was a sort of peer review in which other members of senior leadership in various Armed Forces examined the circumstances and the incidents, to reach a conclusion relative to Customary Law relative to Warfare.

There is no question that the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) generally cries that someone (particularly the one with the military advantage --- especially true in the case of Israel) committed a "war crime." But it is rare, when the military and legal experts examine the actual situation and conditions, that such allegations are substantiated.

This is not to say that there are issues, subject to the permanent status of negotiations, that may need litigated or mediated. Nor am I implying that war reparations or civil claims might need special settlement. But overall, these are not war crime issues.

Most Respectfully,
R

Are you being serious? It would be as if the USSR put together a Commission on Russian actions in occupied Afghanistan made up of generals from armies of the Warsaw pact, Vietnam and Cuba. You people are nuts.

You don't know what you are rambling on about, the military leaders come from nations that have no affiliations to Israel and are truly neutral. They only look at facts and are not racially or religiously motivated like you, so they came to the conclusion that Israel acted above and beyond what was expected in the circumstances. This is what gets up your nose isn't it when other people see the reality and come out in favour of Israel, even devout R.C's

Hahahahahahaha!

 

[Phoenall]

montelatici, et al,

What is this nonsense.

Top World Generals No Israeli War Crimes in Gaza - Israel Today Israel News

Israel absolves Israel. I am surprised. But I'll wait for the UN report due shortly for an independent assessment.

(COMMENT)

First, Israel is --- without question --- allowed to defense itself and declare its innocence. Just as anyone is allowed to declare its innocence when accused of a crime. Trying to attach some significants to that is rather unscrupulous.

Second, the Multinational Military Group (MNMG) that conducted the investigation, was NOT something that the Israelis had assembled. They were 11 former chiefs of staff, generals, senior officers, political leaders and officials from the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, Australia and Colombia.

"We were well aware of the allegations made by some governments, the United Nations, human rights groups and the media, that Israel acted outside the laws of armed conflict in Gaza. Some have suggested that the IDF lacked restraint or even deliberately targeted innocent civilians.

Our findings lead us to the opposite conclusion."
SOURCE: MNMG Report to UN Independent Commission of Inquiry

The evaluation of the allegation that Israel committed "War Crimes" was a sort of peer review in which other members of senior leadership in various Armed Forces examined the circumstances and the incidents, to reach a conclusion relative to Customary Law relative to Warfare.

There is no question that the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) generally cries that someone (particularly the one with the military advantage --- especially true in the case of Israel) committed a "war crime." But it is rare, when the military and legal experts examine the actual situation and conditions, that such allegations are substantiated.

This is not to say that there are issues, subject to the permanent status of negotiations, that may need litigated or mediated. Nor am I implying that war reparations or civil claims might need special settlement. But overall, these are not war crime issues.

Most Respectfully,
R

Are you being serious? It would be as if the USSR put together a Commission on Russian actions in occupied Afghanistan made up of generals from armies of the Warsaw pact, Vietnam and Cuba. You people are nuts.

You don't know what you are rambling on about, the military leaders come from nations that have no affiliations to Israel and are truly neutral. They only look at facts and are not racially or religiously motivated like you, so they came to the conclusion that Israel acted above and beyond what was expected in the circumstances. This is what gets up your nose isn't it when other people see the reality and come out in favour of Israel, even devout R.C's

Hahahahahahaha!

Maniacal laughter again freddy boy because you have been shown up as a NAZI JEW HATER

 

[montelatici]

montelatici, et al,

What is this nonsense.

Israel absolves Israel. I am surprised. But I'll wait for the UN report due shortly for an independent assessment.

(COMMENT)

First, Israel is --- without question --- allowed to defense itself and declare its innocence. Just as anyone is allowed to declare its innocence when accused of a crime. Trying to attach some significants to that is rather unscrupulous.

Second, the Multinational Military Group (MNMG) that conducted the investigation, was NOT something that the Israelis had assembled. They were 11 former chiefs of staff, generals, senior officers, political leaders and officials from the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, Australia and Colombia.

"We were well aware of the allegations made by some governments, the United Nations, human rights groups and the media, that Israel acted outside the laws of armed conflict in Gaza. Some have suggested that the IDF lacked restraint or even deliberately targeted innocent civilians.

Our findings lead us to the opposite conclusion."
SOURCE: MNMG Report to UN Independent Commission of Inquiry

The evaluation of the allegation that Israel committed "War Crimes" was a sort of peer review in which other members of senior leadership in various Armed Forces examined the circumstances and the incidents, to reach a conclusion relative to Customary Law relative to Warfare.

There is no question that the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) generally cries that someone (particularly the one with the military advantage --- especially true in the case of Israel) committed a "war crime." But it is rare, when the military and legal experts examine the actual situation and conditions, that such allegations are substantiated.

This is not to say that there are issues, subject to the permanent status of negotiations, that may need litigated or mediated. Nor am I implying that war reparations or civil claims might need special settlement. But overall, these are not war crime issues.

Most Respectfully,
R

Are you being serious? It would be as if the USSR put together a Commission on Russian actions in occupied Afghanistan made up of generals from armies of the Warsaw pact, Vietnam and Cuba. You people are nuts.

You don't know what you are rambling on about, the military leaders come from nations that have no affiliations to Israel and are truly neutral. They only look at facts and are not racially or religiously motivated like you, so they came to the conclusion that Israel acted above and beyond what was expected in the circumstances. This is what gets up your nose isn't it when other people see the reality and come out in favour of Israel, even devout R.C's

Hahahahahahaha!

Maniacal laughter again freddy boy because you have been shown up as a NAZI JEW HATER

How can I possibly be a Nazi Jew hater? You are the BNP member. I am a Roosevelt Democrat. And, I have no hate for Jews.

 

[Roudy]

montelatici, et al,

What is this nonsense.

Top World Generals No Israeli War Crimes in Gaza - Israel Today Israel News

Israel absolves Israel. I am surprised. But I'll wait for the UN report due shortly for an independent assessment.

(COMMENT)

First, Israel is --- without question --- allowed to defense itself and declare its innocence. Just as anyone is allowed to declare its innocence when accused of a crime. Trying to attach some significants to that is rather unscrupulous.

Second, the Multinational Military Group (MNMG) that conducted the investigation, was NOT something that the Israelis had assembled. They were 11 former chiefs of staff, generals, senior officers, political leaders and officials from the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, Australia and Colombia.

"We were well aware of the allegations made by some governments, the United Nations, human rights groups and the media, that Israel acted outside the laws of armed conflict in Gaza. Some have suggested that the IDF lacked restraint or even deliberately targeted innocent civilians.

Our findings lead us to the opposite conclusion."
SOURCE: MNMG Report to UN Independent Commission of Inquiry

The evaluation of the allegation that Israel committed "War Crimes" was a sort of peer review in which other members of senior leadership in various Armed Forces examined the circumstances and the incidents, to reach a conclusion relative to Customary Law relative to Warfare.

There is no question that the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) generally cries that someone (particularly the one with the military advantage --- especially true in the case of Israel) committed a "war crime." But it is rare, when the military and legal experts examine the actual situation and conditions, that such allegations are substantiated.

This is not to say that there are issues, subject to the permanent status of negotiations, that may need litigated or mediated. Nor am I implying that war reparations or civil claims might need special settlement. But overall, these are not war crime issues.

Most Respectfully,
R

Are you being serious? It would be as if the USSR put together a Commission on Russian actions in occupied Afghanistan made up of generals from armies of the Warsaw pact, Vietnam and Cuba. You people are nuts.

Monte thinks he knows better than American generals, and accuses our military of being corrupt liars.

What else can you expect from a scumbag Islamo terrorist worshipper?

 

[Roudy]

montelatici, et al,

What is this nonsense.

(COMMENT)

First, Israel is --- without question --- allowed to defense itself and declare its innocence. Just as anyone is allowed to declare its innocence when accused of a crime. Trying to attach some significants to that is rather unscrupulous.

Second, the Multinational Military Group (MNMG) that conducted the investigation, was NOT something that the Israelis had assembled. They were 11 former chiefs of staff, generals, senior officers, political leaders and officials from the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, Australia and Colombia.

​

The evaluation of the allegation that Israel committed "War Crimes" was a sort of peer review in which other members of senior leadership in various Armed Forces examined the circumstances and the incidents, to reach a conclusion relative to Customary Law relative to Warfare.

There is no question that the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) generally cries that someone (particularly the one with the military advantage --- especially true in the case of Israel) committed a "war crime." But it is rare, when the military and legal experts examine the actual situation and conditions, that such allegations are substantiated.

This is not to say that there are issues, subject to the permanent status of negotiations, that may need litigated or mediated. Nor am I implying that war reparations or civil claims might need special settlement. But overall, these are not war crime issues.

Most Respectfully,
R

Are you being serious? It would be as if the USSR put together a Commission on Russian actions in occupied Afghanistan made up of generals from armies of the Warsaw pact, Vietnam and Cuba. You people are nuts.

You don't know what you are rambling on about, the military leaders come from nations that have no affiliations to Israel and are truly neutral. They only look at facts and are not racially or religiously motivated like you, so they came to the conclusion that Israel acted above and beyond what was expected in the circumstances. This is what gets up your nose isn't it when other people see the reality and come out in favour of Israel, even devout R.C's

Hahahahahahaha!

Maniacal laughter again freddy boy because you have been shown up as a NAZI JEW HATER

How can I possibly be a Nazi Jew hater? You are the BNP member. I am a Roosevelt Democrat. And, I have no hate for Jews.

It's obvious and you've been exposed many times. You adore Islamic terrorists only because they hate Jews almost as much as you do.

 

[montelatici]

montelatici, et al,

What is this nonsense.

Israel absolves Israel. I am surprised. But I'll wait for the UN report due shortly for an independent assessment.

(COMMENT)

First, Israel is --- without question --- allowed to defense itself and declare its innocence. Just as anyone is allowed to declare its innocence when accused of a crime. Trying to attach some significants to that is rather unscrupulous.

Second, the Multinational Military Group (MNMG) that conducted the investigation, was NOT something that the Israelis had assembled. They were 11 former chiefs of staff, generals, senior officers, political leaders and officials from the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, Australia and Colombia.

"We were well aware of the allegations made by some governments, the United Nations, human rights groups and the media, that Israel acted outside the laws of armed conflict in Gaza. Some have suggested that the IDF lacked restraint or even deliberately targeted innocent civilians.

Our findings lead us to the opposite conclusion."
SOURCE: MNMG Report to UN Independent Commission of Inquiry

The evaluation of the allegation that Israel committed "War Crimes" was a sort of peer review in which other members of senior leadership in various Armed Forces examined the circumstances and the incidents, to reach a conclusion relative to Customary Law relative to Warfare.

There is no question that the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) generally cries that someone (particularly the one with the military advantage --- especially true in the case of Israel) committed a "war crime." But it is rare, when the military and legal experts examine the actual situation and conditions, that such allegations are substantiated.

This is not to say that there are issues, subject to the permanent status of negotiations, that may need litigated or mediated. Nor am I implying that war reparations or civil claims might need special settlement. But overall, these are not war crime issues.

Most Respectfully,
R

Are you being serious? It would be as if the USSR put together a Commission on Russian actions in occupied Afghanistan made up of generals from armies of the Warsaw pact, Vietnam and Cuba. You people are nuts.

You don't know what you are rambling on about, the military leaders come from nations that have no affiliations to Israel and are truly neutral. They only look at facts and are not racially or religiously motivated like you, so they came to the conclusion that Israel acted above and beyond what was expected in the circumstances. This is what gets up your nose isn't it when other people see the reality and come out in favour of Israel, even devout R.C's

Hahahahahahaha!

Maniacal laughter again freddy boy because you have been shown up as a NAZI JEW HATER

They came from NATO nations and close U.S. allies. How can they possibly be neutral?

 

[Roudy]

montelatici, et al,

What is this nonsense.

(COMMENT)

First, Israel is --- without question --- allowed to defense itself and declare its innocence. Just as anyone is allowed to declare its innocence when accused of a crime. Trying to attach some significants to that is rather unscrupulous.

Second, the Multinational Military Group (MNMG) that conducted the investigation, was NOT something that the Israelis had assembled. They were 11 former chiefs of staff, generals, senior officers, political leaders and officials from the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, Australia and Colombia.

​

The evaluation of the allegation that Israel committed "War Crimes" was a sort of peer review in which other members of senior leadership in various Armed Forces examined the circumstances and the incidents, to reach a conclusion relative to Customary Law relative to Warfare.

There is no question that the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) generally cries that someone (particularly the one with the military advantage --- especially true in the case of Israel) committed a "war crime." But it is rare, when the military and legal experts examine the actual situation and conditions, that such allegations are substantiated.

This is not to say that there are issues, subject to the permanent status of negotiations, that may need litigated or mediated. Nor am I implying that war reparations or civil claims might need special settlement. But overall, these are not war crime issues.

Most Respectfully,
R

Are you being serious? It would be as if the USSR put together a Commission on Russian actions in occupied Afghanistan made up of generals from armies of the Warsaw pact, Vietnam and Cuba. You people are nuts.

You don't know what you are rambling on about, the military leaders come from nations that have no affiliations to Israel and are truly neutral. They only look at facts and are not racially or religiously motivated like you, so they came to the conclusion that Israel acted above and beyond what was expected in the circumstances. This is what gets up your nose isn't it when other people see the reality and come out in favour of Israel, even devout R.C's

Hahahahahahaha!

Maniacal laughter again freddy boy because you have been shown up as a NAZI JEW HATER

They came from NATO nations and close U.S. allies. How can they possibly be neutral?

You mean all those NATO generals from various countries conspired to lie for Israel? Nah, you're fulla shit as usual.

Jew hating whiner.

 

[Phoenall]

montelatici, et al,

What is this nonsense.

(COMMENT)

First, Israel is --- without question --- allowed to defense itself and declare its innocence. Just as anyone is allowed to declare its innocence when accused of a crime. Trying to attach some significants to that is rather unscrupulous.

Second, the Multinational Military Group (MNMG) that conducted the investigation, was NOT something that the Israelis had assembled. They were 11 former chiefs of staff, generals, senior officers, political leaders and officials from the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, Australia and Colombia.

​

The evaluation of the allegation that Israel committed "War Crimes" was a sort of peer review in which other members of senior leadership in various Armed Forces examined the circumstances and the incidents, to reach a conclusion relative to Customary Law relative to Warfare.

There is no question that the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) generally cries that someone (particularly the one with the military advantage --- especially true in the case of Israel) committed a "war crime." But it is rare, when the military and legal experts examine the actual situation and conditions, that such allegations are substantiated.

This is not to say that there are issues, subject to the permanent status of negotiations, that may need litigated or mediated. Nor am I implying that war reparations or civil claims might need special settlement. But overall, these are not war crime issues.

Most Respectfully,
R

Are you being serious? It would be as if the USSR put together a Commission on Russian actions in occupied Afghanistan made up of generals from armies of the Warsaw pact, Vietnam and Cuba. You people are nuts.

You don't know what you are rambling on about, the military leaders come from nations that have no affiliations to Israel and are truly neutral. They only look at facts and are not racially or religiously motivated like you, so they came to the conclusion that Israel acted above and beyond what was expected in the circumstances. This is what gets up your nose isn't it when other people see the reality and come out in favour of Israel, even devout R.C's

Hahahahahahaha!

Maniacal laughter again freddy boy because you have been shown up as a NAZI JEW HATER

How can I possibly be a Nazi Jew hater? You are the BNP member. I am a Roosevelt Democrat. And, I have no hate for Jews.

Once again you make this false claim without producing any evidenced to support it. are you destined to be a LIAR all your life and get into serious trouble. Now produce the evidence supporting your claim or I will report you for SPAMMING, TROLLING and INCITEMENT.

And you are still a proven NAZI JEW HATER by your constant RACIST posts

 

[Phoenall]

montelatici, et al,

What is this nonsense.

(COMMENT)

First, Israel is --- without question --- allowed to defense itself and declare its innocence. Just as anyone is allowed to declare its innocence when accused of a crime. Trying to attach some significants to that is rather unscrupulous.

Second, the Multinational Military Group (MNMG) that conducted the investigation, was NOT something that the Israelis had assembled. They were 11 former chiefs of staff, generals, senior officers, political leaders and officials from the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, Australia and Colombia.

​

The evaluation of the allegation that Israel committed "War Crimes" was a sort of peer review in which other members of senior leadership in various Armed Forces examined the circumstances and the incidents, to reach a conclusion relative to Customary Law relative to Warfare.

There is no question that the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) generally cries that someone (particularly the one with the military advantage --- especially true in the case of Israel) committed a "war crime." But it is rare, when the military and legal experts examine the actual situation and conditions, that such allegations are substantiated.

This is not to say that there are issues, subject to the permanent status of negotiations, that may need litigated or mediated. Nor am I implying that war reparations or civil claims might need special settlement. But overall, these are not war crime issues.

Most Respectfully,
R

Are you being serious? It would be as if the USSR put together a Commission on Russian actions in occupied Afghanistan made up of generals from armies of the Warsaw pact, Vietnam and Cuba. You people are nuts.

You don't know what you are rambling on about, the military leaders come from nations that have no affiliations to Israel and are truly neutral. They only look at facts and are not racially or religiously motivated like you, so they came to the conclusion that Israel acted above and beyond what was expected in the circumstances. This is what gets up your nose isn't it when other people see the reality and come out in favour of Israel, even devout R.C's

Hahahahahahaha!

Maniacal laughter again freddy boy because you have been shown up as a NAZI JEW HATER

They came from NATO nations and close U.S. allies. How can they possibly be neutral?

If you cant see how then you are an idiot