BREAKING: Pope & Russian Orthodox Church Publicly Denounce Gay Marriage: Goodbye Hispanic Votes

[Syriusly]

It is to overly-sensitive pussies that make up The Daesh. lol

Did you know that pornography subscriptions and traffic are highest in the Daesh? They also have the highest rate of child porn and torture porn, lol, and no, I cannot share my source.

Hardly a surprise- clearly religious zealotry is part of the slippery slope to child porn.....

No, doofus, you got your cause and effect backwards again. The pedos are attracted to positions of authority that parents trust, like Scout Troop leaders and clergy. But they were scum bags BEFORE they get in usually and worm their way into the trust of their victims.

That is why clergymen should never be drawn from the pervert demographics of any sort, to include fagots.

My post was sarcasm- of course the issue is the child molesters are attracted to positions of authority.

That you think that you can somehow eliminate child molesters by eliminating open homosexuals just shows how perverted your understanding of the issue is.

 

[Syriusly]

Nope! You're just as crazy and prejudiced as he is, that's all, JimButtwipe.

Most people who actually believe in God, not you American-Taliban scumbags of course, are quite tolerant, as Jesus taught, and can easily honor and respect the love binding couples together, including the gay ones. Neither God nor spiritual people "hate these 'marriages'"....only you sexually hung-up, fear-filled, intolerant, homophobic retards do that.....

MOST Christians still believe in God and live by the teachings of the Bible, dickless mooch. And the first chapter of Romans makes Gods attitude toward fudg packers very clear, and Islam's Quran also makes it clear there too. Of the three major religions that follow Abraham's God,their holy scriptures regard fagotry as nothing more than the perversion of Gods design that it is.

Actually it is far clearer in the Bible that Jesus condemned adultery- and that includes divorce and remarriage.

Donald Trump's remarriage is far more clearly a "perversion of God's design"- according to Jesus- than homosexuality.

Jesus replied, “Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning. 9I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.”

I look forward to seeing the masses of Christians who condemn Trump(and Reagan's and Gingrich's) divorces and remarriage.

 

[Syriusly]

Jesus Christ taught about hatred to sins, the only mean to get rid of them. If you don't fight sins, you will fall in them. That is all. And, yes, perversion is a death sin (sex apart of church marriage too). Death sin - after that you are going to hell very likely.

Hate the sin, love the sinner. That's what Jesus taught. That's why Jude 1 says to reach out to individual homosexuals,..

Jude 1 doesn't mention homosexuals.

 

[Silhouette]

Jude 1 doesn't mention homosexuals.

It does. But more specifically, Romans 1 does. "Men who burn in their lust towards one another" "women also working that which is unseemly".

 

[JimBowie1958]

Actually it is far clearer in the Bible that Jesus condemned adultery- and that includes divorce and remarriage.

Donald Trump's remarriage is far more clearly a "perversion of God's design"- according to Jesus- than homosexuality.

Jesus replied, “Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning. 9I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.”

I look forward to seeing the masses of Christians who condemn Trump(and Reagan's and Gingrich's) divorces and remarriage.

Meh, it isnt 'far more clearer' as both are condemned.

But then I would consider voting for Trump even if he was a closet fag. At least he wouldnt be a fruit and he would be standing up for the right things, except presumably gay marriage.

The middle class in the USA is being destroyed and we need to put a stop to it, even if the effort is led by Satan himself..

 

[Syriusly]

Jude 1 doesn't mention homosexuals.

It does. But more specifically, Romans 1 does. "Men who burn in their lust towards one another" "women also working that which is unseemly".

Jude 1 doesn't mention homosexuals.

Which is why you are unable to provide a quote to back up your repeated lie about Jude 1.

 

[Syriusly]

Actually it is far clearer in the Bible that Jesus condemned adultery- and that includes divorce and remarriage.

Donald Trump's remarriage is far more clearly a "perversion of God's design"- according to Jesus- than homosexuality.

Jesus replied, “Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning. 9I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.”

I look forward to seeing the masses of Christians who condemn Trump(and Reagan's and Gingrich's) divorces and remarriage.

Meh, it isnt 'far more clearer' as both are condemned.

But then I would consider voting for Trump even if he was a closet fag. At least he wouldnt be a fruit and he would be standing up for the right things, except presumably gay marriage.

The middle class in the USA is being destroyed and we need to put a stop to it, even if the effort is led by Satan himself..

Yeah- that is some religious rationalization going on there.

No surprise there- it is rather the theme of the religious right- focus on 'gay marriage'- ignore the politicians that they approve of divorcing and remarrying.

Anyone who condemns 'gay marriage' because of their "Christians Beliefs" and is silent on Trump's and Reagan's and Gingrich's repeated marriages is a hypocrite.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Actually it is far clearer in the Bible that Jesus condemned adultery- and that includes divorce and remarriage.

Donald Trump's remarriage is far more clearly a "perversion of God's design"- according to Jesus- than homosexuality.

Jesus replied, “Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning. 9I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.”

I look forward to seeing the masses of Christians who condemn Trump(and Reagan's and Gingrich's) divorces and remarriage.

Meh, it isnt 'far more clearer' as both are condemned.

But then I would consider voting for Trump even if he was a closet fag. At least he wouldnt be a fruit and he would be standing up for the right things, except presumably gay marriage.

The middle class in the USA is being destroyed and we need to put a stop to it, even if the effort is led by Satan himself..

Yeah- that is some religious rationalization going on there.

No surprise there- it is rather the theme of the religious right- focus on 'gay marriage'- ignore the politicians that they approve of divorcing and remarrying.

Anyone who condemns 'gay marriage' because of their "Christians Beliefs" and is silent on Trump's and Reagan's and Gingrich's repeated marriages is a hypocrite.

Lol, did you actually READ my post, dipthong?

I did condemn Trumps multiple marriages and I said that I would vote for a candidate who would save the middle class, even if they were 'gay' or Satan himself.

So, no, there were no religious rationalizations, jack ass.

Damn.

 

[Syriusly]

Actually it is far clearer in the Bible that Jesus condemned adultery- and that includes divorce and remarriage.

Donald Trump's remarriage is far more clearly a "perversion of God's design"- according to Jesus- than homosexuality.

Jesus replied, “Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning. 9I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.”

I look forward to seeing the masses of Christians who condemn Trump(and Reagan's and Gingrich's) divorces and remarriage.

Meh, it isnt 'far more clearer' as both are condemned.

But then I would consider voting for Trump even if he was a closet fag. At least he wouldnt be a fruit and he would be standing up for the right things, except presumably gay marriage.

The middle class in the USA is being destroyed and we need to put a stop to it, even if the effort is led by Satan himself..

Yeah- that is some religious rationalization going on there.

No surprise there- it is rather the theme of the religious right- focus on 'gay marriage'- ignore the politicians that they approve of divorcing and remarrying.

Anyone who condemns 'gay marriage' because of their "Christians Beliefs" and is silent on Trump's and Reagan's and Gingrich's repeated marriages is a hypocrite.

Lol, did you actually READ my post, dipthong?

I did condemn Trumps multiple marriages and I said that I would vote for a candidate who would save the middle class, even if they were 'gay' or Satan himself.

So, no, there were no religious rationalizations, jack ass.

Damn.

Wrap it up and put a bow on it- still a rationalization for how you can support Trump- while attacking gays- for the same behavior.

 

[Silhouette]

Why are you always telling people to stop expressing their views Syriusly? You think your cult has a monopoly on free speech do you? Yes?

 

[Silhouette]

Lol, did you actually READ my post, dipthong?

I did condemn Trumps multiple marriages and I said that I would vote for a candidate who would save the middle class, even if they were 'gay' or Satan himself...So, no, there were no religious rationalizations, jack ass.

Damn.

So how to you feel Jim about having a mom and dad growing up? How do you feel about other children having a mom and dad growing up? Vote in the poll here: (running about 80-90% who feel it's important to kids) Poll. Please Vote. Did You Have a Mother & Father in Your Life?

I can't say for sure but knowing Hispanics like I do, having grown up around them my entire life, I'd venture to guess that closer to 100% of them feel it's important. And they're running what, around 20% of the vote this Fall?....

 

[JimBowie1958]

Lol, did you actually READ my post, dipthong?

I did condemn Trumps multiple marriages and I said that I would vote for a candidate who would save the middle class, even if they were 'gay' or Satan himself...So, no, there were no religious rationalizations, jack ass.

Damn.

So how to you feel Jim about having a mom and dad growing up? How do you feel about other children having a mom and dad growing up? Vote in the poll here: (running about 80-90% who feel it's important to kids) Poll. Please Vote. Did You Have a Mother & Father in Your Life?

I can't say for sure but knowing Hispanics like I do, having grown up around them my entire life, I'd venture to guess that closer to 100% of them feel it's important. And they're running what, around 20% of the vote this Fall?....

I think it is child abuse for a child to be raised by a couple that is not a father-mother natural pairing.

Adoption should be limited to natural male-female couples for the sake of the children.

But if two fags want to bugger each other and have a civil union to give them the legal rights of couples, I am OK with that.

 

[Syriusly]

Why are you always telling people to stop expressing their views Syriusly? You think your cult has a monopoly on free speech do you? Yes?

Silhouette- always confusing "Freedom of Speech" with "Freedom from Criticism"

 

[Silhouette]

I think it is child abuse for a child to be raised by a couple that is not a father-mother natural pairing.

Adoption should be limited to natural male-female couples for the sake of the children.

But if two fags want to bugger each other and have a civil union to give them the legal rights of couples, I am OK with that.

No doubt. Adults can have all sorts of contracts with each other. It's just that when they want to join in with a contract that was started for children over a thousand years ago, they can't change the terms to children's demise at their whims. Even the Supreme Court has held that a standing adult civil right cannot impede on the physical or mental well being of children. (USSC: New York vs Ferber 1982) If it does, the adults don't get to exercise it. Without kids...do WHATEVER you want folks...just don't call it "married" because of the people who share that contract (children) it ain't "married"...

 

[Syriusly]

Lol, did you actually READ my post, dipthong?

I did condemn Trumps multiple marriages and I said that I would vote for a candidate who would save the middle class, even if they were 'gay' or Satan himself...So, no, there were no religious rationalizations, jack ass.

Damn.

So how to you feel Jim about having a mom and dad growing up? ..

I loved having a mom and a dad growing up. I was lucky- my parents are fantastic. About a quarter of my neighborhood had at least one pretty crappy parent- one 'dad' molested his daughter- another dad beat his kids badly enough so that they missed school.

I am in favor of children having good parents- preferably good married parents.

Preventing the gay parents of children from marrying helps no children- it only harms their children.

Which is what you want to happen.

 

[mdk]

Even the Supreme Court has held that a standing adult civil right cannot impede on the physical or mental well being of children. If it does, the adults don't get to exercise

That is exactly why divorce is illegal for those that have children. Oh wait...

Repeating your Ferber gibberish over and over doesn't make it true.

 

[Syriusly]

Lol, did you actually READ my post, dipthong?

I did condemn Trumps multiple marriages and I said that I would vote for a candidate who would save the middle class, even if they were 'gay' or Satan himself...So, no, there were no religious rationalizations, jack ass.

Damn.

So how to you feel Jim about having a mom and dad growing up? How do you feel about other children having a mom and dad growing up? Vote in the poll here: (running about 80-90% who feel it's important to kids) Poll. Please Vote. Did You Have a Mother & Father in Your Life?

I can't say for sure but knowing Hispanics like I do, having grown up around them my entire life, I'd venture to guess that closer to 100% of them feel it's important. And they're running what, around 20% of the vote this Fall?....

I think it is child abuse for a child to be raised by a couple that is not a father-mother natural pairing.

Adoption should be limited to natural male-female couples for the sake of the children.
.

At any point there are about 100,000 children in the United States awaiting adoption. Around 33,000 will wait 3 years or longer to be adopted- thousands age out of the system every year with no family to support them. Virtually all of those children were abandoned by their 'father-mother natural pairing'.

What you propose is to reduce the pool of adoptive parents so even fewer of these children are ever adopted. No more single parents adopting. No more same gender couples adopting needy kids.

I think that is child abuse. To deliberately prevent children from having homes with a parent or parents who actually volunteer to be their parents for the rest of their lives.

 

[Syriusly]

I think it is child abuse for a child to be raised by a couple that is not a father-mother natural pairing.

Adoption should be limited to natural male-female couples for the sake of the children.

But if two fags want to bugger each other and have a civil union to give them the legal rights of couples, I am OK with that.

Without kids...do WHATEVER you want folks...just don't call it "married" because of the people who share that contract (children) it ain't "married"...

Preventing a gay couple with children from marrying doesn't protect a single child from harm.

It only harms children.

Which apparently is Silhouette's intent.

 

[MaryL]

Feel the wrath of the Vatican tooth fairy! illegal aliens, gays, Latinos all feel empowered by pope Outatouch Withreality IIIV. Instead, this man is alienating the people of his church.