BREAKING: Judicial Watch Files $30 Million Wrongful Death Lawsuit against U.S. Government on Behalf of Ashli Babbitt’s Husband and Estate

[martybegan]

Got any proof of massive fraud 3 years out bro?

No?

Carry on loser boy.

Didn't have to be massive, just correctly targeted.

 

[candycorn]

Didn't have to be massive, just correctly targeted.

Any proof of the “correctly targeted” voter fraud that took place multiple states?

Any explanation on how the GOP gained seats during all of this voter fraud?

Any answers, boy?

 

[martybegan]

Any proof of the “correctly targeted” voter fraud that took place multiple states?

Any explanation on how the GOP gained seats during all of this voter fraud?

Any answers, boy?

There is plenty of evidence of shenanigans, but of course not enough to force the system to admit to it.

It's not worth debating with you because first even if we found overwhelming proof you would deny it, and 2nd, deep down you don't care about it since it worked if it happened.

 

[Marener]

Not rewarding lawbreaking is what's good for the country.

Unless it’s Trump or his MAGA cultists.

 

[Marener]

You can't guarantee that.

Plessey was as much as an abomination as Roe and Chevron.

Plessey was based on the same fundamentally flawed legal philosophy that you losers constantly promote.

That's why you would have supported it.

Not that you'll ever admit it, because you don't actually have any intellectual honesty, you just want to feel good about yourself.

 

[martybegan]

Unless it’s Trump or his MAGA cultists.

Political crimes are being prosecuted in those cases, or exacerbated in the examples we see from the J6 Reichstag fire.

Meanwhile two lawyers hand out molotov cocktails and burn an NYPD vehicle and get wrist slaps.

 

[martybegan]

Plessey was based on the same fundamentally flawed legal philosophy that you losers constantly promote.

That's why you would have supported it.

Not that you'll ever admit it, because you don't actually have any intellectual honesty, you just want to feel good about yourself.

No, it was based on the "Constitution means what we want it to mean" found in Roe, Obergfell, Chevron, and a host of others.

I am a strict constructionist and a federalist. Plessey was 100% unconstitutional by those standards.

 

[Marener]

Political crimes are being prosecuted in those cases, or exacerbated in the examples we see from the J6 Reichstag fire.

Meanwhile two lawyers hand out molotov cocktails and burn an NYPD vehicle and get wrist slaps.

Fleeing poverty and crime, settling in the United States to work and live a peaceful life seems like a lot less of a crime than Trump trying to steal an election and sending mob to the capitol to riot.

Those are crimes with actual victims.

 

[martybegan]

Fleeing poverty and crime, settling in the United States to work and live a peaceful life seems like a lot less of a crime than Trump trying to steal an election and sending mob to the capitol to riot.

Those are crimes with actual victims.

But they are claiming to be asylum seekers, and they are clearly not that, they are economic refugees, and we should decide which of them get to come here, not let them show up illegally and be coddled by twats like you.

No, they are not crimes, they are part of the political process you are trying to criminalize.

 

[Marener]

No, it was based on the "Constitution means what we want it to mean" found in Roe, Obergfell, Chevron, and a host of others.

I am a strict constructionist and a federalist. Plessey was 100% unconstitutional by those standards.

Plessy said that the 14th amendment was never intended to desegregate and saying so would be stretching the language to enforce a liberal agenda of racial equity on people who don’t want it.

It mirrors modern conservative judicial philosophy perfectly.

Brown actually has a lot in common with Obergfell than Plessy.

 

[Marener]

But they are claiming to be asylum seekers, and they are clearly not that, they are economic refugees, and we should decide which of them get to come here, not let them show up illegally and be coddled by twats like you.

No, they are not crimes, they are part of the political process you are trying to criminalize.

That’s true in recent years but not true for the millions of illegal immigrants who have lived here for decades and whom have been the focus of efforts to provide amnesty in the past.

Those claiming to seek asylum aren’t even breaking the law. The law says people can request asylum.

Trying to deprive millions of Americans of their right to vote for president isn’t a crime? It sure has victims.

 

[martybegan]

Plessy said that the 14th amendment was never intended to desegregate and saying so would be stretching the language to enforce a liberal agenda of racial equity on people who don’t want it.

It mirrors modern conservative judicial philosophy perfectly.

Brown actually has a lot in common with Obergfell than Plessy.

Plessey said separate can be equal, which was shown to be a lie.

No, it does not if those conservatives were strict constructionists. Read Harlan's dissent as an example.

Obergfell was made up hooey just like Roe.

 

[martybegan]

That’s true in recent years but not true for the millions of illegal immigrants who have lived here for decades and whom have been the focus of efforts to provide amnesty in the past.

Those claiming to seek asylum aren’t even breaking the law. The law says people can request asylum.

Trying to deprive millions of Americans of their right to vote for president isn’t a crime? It sure has victims.

They broke the laws, they pay the consequences. The current situation just shows how terrible the past few decades of doing nothing have been.

The only ones doing that now are Dems in Colorado and New Hampshire.

 

[Marener]

Plessey said separate can be equal, which was shown to be a lie.

No, it does not if those conservatives were strict constructionists. Read Harlan's dissent as an example.

Obergfell was made up hooey just like Roe.

Plessy used the same argument that separate is equal as those who argued against gay marriage. Specifically that segregation applied equally. Whites can’t go to a black school but blacks can’t go to a white school.

The same argument was made by the opponents of gay marriage. Gay men couldn’t marry another men, but neither could straight men. Therefore it was equal.

Plessy argued that the original intent of the 14th amendment wasn’t to enforce desegregation. That’s the kind of originalism that conservatives use to defend anything they want.

 

[Dr.Know]

They needed blood in order to increase the severity of the scam so they could use it to prevent Trump from running.

THE DEEP STATE ( AND THEIR DEMOCRAT LACKEYS ) MUST STOP TRUMP AT ALL COSTS IF THEY ARE GOING TO SUCCEED AT DESTROYING THE WESTERN COUNTRIES. The Western economic structure is no longer viable and it must be de-constructed into a world government that of course THE SUPER CLASS controls.

There is no Rainbow Utopia waiting at the end of this rainbow.

 

[martybegan]

Plessy used the same argument that separate is equal as those who argued against gay marriage. Specifically that segregation applied equally. Whites can’t go to a black school but blacks can’t go to a white school.

The same argument was made by the opponents of gay marriage. Gay men couldn’t marry another men, but neither could straight men. Therefore it was equal.

Plessy argued that the original intent of the 14th amendment wasn’t to enforce desegregation. That’s the kind of originalism that conservatives use to defend anything they want.

Race and sexuality are not the same thing. It's the same reason Loving is not the same as Obergfell.

What Obergfell should have done is allow States to decide if they want to ISSUE SSM licenses, but force them to accept SSM licences from other States as equals.

 

[Marener]

They broke the laws, they pay the consequences. The current situation just shows how terrible the past few decades of doing nothing have been.

The only ones doing that now are Dems in Colorado and New Hampshire.

Again, consequences are for little people. Not your political tribe who can do whatever they want.

Trump tried to take away millions of our votes. No one is trying to stop people from voting in Colorado and New Hampshire. That’s just a fact.

But it’s fine to break the law if you’re a Trump MAGA elite. No consequences. Insider trading? No big deal. Fraud? Nah. Lying to the FBI? Don’t even. Stealing donor money? Just fine.

 

[Marener]

Race and sexuality are not the same thing. It's the same reason Loving is not the same as Obergfell.

What Obergfell should have done is allow States to decide if they want to ISSUE SSM licenses, but force them to accept SSM licences from other States as equals.

Not sexuality. Gender. Race and gender. There is no equal treatment of gender if you can’t marry the person you want depending on their gender.

 

[martybegan]

Again, consequences are for little people. Not your political tribe who can do whatever they want.

Trump tried to take away millions of our votes. No one is trying to stop people from voting in Colorado and New Hampshire. That’s just a fact.

But it’s fine to break the law if you’re a Trump MAGA elite. No consequences. Insider trading? No big deal. Fraud? Nah. Lying to the FBI? Don’t even. Stealing donor money? Just fine.

Those are laws on the books that are not in question. Your political assaults on your political opponents are in question.

Fraudsters are trying to take away valid votes.

They are denying your right to vote for who you want to vote. Note in Colorado even a Trump write in would not be counted.

And yet Biden's decades of famliy graft and grift is A-OK with you.

 

[martybegan]

Not sexuality. Gender. Race and gender. There is no equal treatment of gender if you can’t marry the person you want depending on their gender.

Sexuality.

Marriage has always been between men and women from antiquity. Trying to say SSM is "equal" is wrong on it's face.

That being said I was OK with NY legalizing it via Legislative action, which was the proper way to bring up a new concept.

Still not equal to traditional marriage.