BREAKING:Federal Snipers squads roost in Ferguson aiming at OATHKEEPERS providing Free Security

[The2ndAmendment]

Oathkeepers vs Oathbreakers, who will win this political showdown? (If the feds fire even one shot, they lose politically).

Exclusive Called 8220 domestic terrorists 8221 by the feds Oath Keepers help stop Ferguson from burning Ben Swann Truth In Media

Oath Keepers Armed Militia in Ferguson

Feds Enable Arsonists Target Oath Keepers Protecting Ferguson Businesses Alex Jones Infowars There s a war on for your mind

Almost immediately after receiving praise in a local paper for protecting vulnerable residents, Oath Keepers standing watch on top of a locally-owned bakery witnessed a three-man sniper team exiting a silver Suburban on the ground below.

The three men were then seen setting up sniper hides in a nearby building before aiming their rifles directly at the group. Across the street, on top of the fire hall, a seperate sniper team began setting up as well.

A Missouri Oath Keeper named Sam Andrews, who spoke briefly with Infowars, immediately called Unified Command to find out why snipers had taken up an aggressive position against them.

According to Andrews, local police, a large portion of which have been supportive of the Oath Keepers, were completely unaware of the feds movements.

Shortly after, a St. Louis County police officer appeared on scene and began telling Andrews that business owners wanted them off their roofs.

After calling the store owners, Andrews and his team quickly confirmed that no such request was ever made. That is when the officer admitted that his chief was being pressured by the feds to keep Oath Keepers from protecting buildings.

Further reports revealed that the feds had told police earlier that day that Oath Keepers were “domestic terrorists,” an unsurprising claim given the federal government’s baseless targeting of the group.

The owner of a Chinese restaurant receiving free protection was reportedly confronted by federal agents also and told to kick the Oath Keepers out.

Failing to remove the businesses’ and homes’ much needed protection, other officers began telling Andrews that his group was in violation of state law. Police claimed the group needed to posses security licenses, despite the fact that the law only applies to paid security, not volunteers.

“We’re volunteers. We read the statute. We had three attorneys read the statute,” Andrews told Infowars.

Andrews began speaking with other volunteers not affiliated with the Oath Keepers, including a group of young Ferguson residents protecting a local gas station, and learned that none had been approached or told to obtain licenses by police.

Stewart Rhodes, founder and president of Oath Keepers, told Infowars that the American people are being presented with a false choice by those running the show in Ferguson.

“They want to create a false paradigm… They are presenting a false choice between lawlessness, looting, arson, assault, murder on the one side, unrestrained, or a hyper-militarized police state on the other,” Rhodes said. “They are failing to do the intelligent thing and protect businesses without trampling on rights.”

 

[Roadrunner]

Oathkeepers vs Oathbreakers, who will win this political showdown? (If the feds fire even one shot, they lose politically).

Almost immediately after receiving praise in a local paper for protecting vulnerable residents, Oath Keepers standing watch on top of a locally-owned bakery witnessed a three-man sniper team exiting a silver Suburban on the ground below.

The three men were then seen setting up sniper hides in a nearby building before aiming their rifles directly at the group. Across the street, on top of the fire hall, a seperate sniper team began setting up as well.

A Missouri Oath Keeper named Sam Andrews, who spoke briefly with Infowars, immediately called Unified Command to find out why snipers had taken up an aggressive position against them.

According to Andrews, local police, a large portion of which have been supportive of the Oath Keepers, were completely unaware of the feds movements.

Shortly after, a St. Louis County police officer appeared on scene and began telling Andrews that business owners wanted them off their roofs.

After calling the store owners, Andrews and his team quickly confirmed that no such request was ever made. That is when the officer admitted that his chief was being pressured by the feds to keep Oath Keepers from protecting buildings.

Further reports revealed that the feds had told police earlier that day that Oath Keepers were “domestic terrorists,” an unsurprising claim given the federal government’s baseless targeting of the group.

The owner of a Chinese restaurant receiving free protection was reportedly confronted by federal agents also and told to kick the Oath Keepers out.

Failing to remove the businesses’ and homes’ much needed protection, other officers began telling Andrews that his group was in violation of state law. Police claimed the group needed to posses security licenses, despite the fact that the law only applies to paid security, not volunteers.

“We’re volunteers. We read the statute. We had three attorneys read the statute,” Andrews told Infowars.

Andrews began speaking with other volunteers not affiliated with the Oath Keepers, including a group of young Ferguson residents protecting a local gas station, and learned that none had been approached or told to obtain licenses by police.

Stewart Rhodes, founder and president of Oath Keepers, told Infowars that the American people are being presented with a false choice by those running the show in Ferguson.

“They want to create a false paradigm… They are presenting a false choice between lawlessness, looting, arson, assault, murder on the one side, unrestrained, or a hyper-militarized police state on the other,” Rhodes said. “They are failing to do the intelligent thing and protect businesses without trampling on rights.”

Holder wants an armed confrontation.

Fools may give it to him, but I hope not.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Holder wants an armed confrontation.

Fools may give it to him, but I hope not.

And since Obama and Gov Nixon withheld the National Guard (when it was needed the most), who can blame these business owners for accepting volunteer security from active/retired servicemen/police.

 

[Roadrunner]

Holder wants an armed confrontation.

Fools may give it to him, but I hope not.

And since Obama and Gov Nixon withheld the National Guard (when it was needed the most), who can blame these business owners for accepting volunteer security from active/retired servicemen/police.

Damn, when the Guard and police made their presence known in the August riots, they were "confrontational", when they restrained themselves as asked by the "protestors", and the arson and looting started, the are criticized for being "withheld".

I don't think white cops or the Guard should protect any community that does not want them.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Holder wants an armed confrontation.

Fools may give it to him, but I hope not.

And since Obama and Gov Nixon withheld the National Guard (when it was needed the most), who can blame these business owners for accepting volunteer security from active/retired servicemen/police.

Damn, when the Guard and police made their presence known in the August riots, they were "confrontational", when they restrained themselves as asked by the "protestors", and the arson and looting started, the are criticized for being "withheld".

I don't think white cops or the Guard should protect any community that does not want them.

Because of how they did it.

Take last week's riot for instance.

On day 1, the police acted like tyrants, swinging their clubs and gassing an entire crowd because someone threw an empty plastic bottle, making battle against the peaceful bystanders while the arsonists and looters were always 500 yards ahead of them.

If it weren't for non-lethal weaponry, it would have been a repeat of the Boston Massacre, which started over snowballs being thrown.

On day 2, the police did the right thing, they went into the crowd to arrest individual violent offenders, and chased the looters and arsonists, instead of the bystanders to witnessed the arson and looting.


It also would have helped on Day 1 if the Guard was deployed with orders to arrest/detain violent offenders.

 

[TheOldSchool]

What a crock of bullshit. I'm gonna write an article about people claiming to see faries and elves setting up in the building across from them.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Let's us know when Clive Bundy and ilk show up?

He call tell them ******* how much better life was when they were in chains.

 

[Rozman]

It seems things are a bit better in Ferguson...
I would like to know if the WH in any way shape or form had any sort
of order to the Gov to keep the National Guard out of Ferguson....
Of all the places they needed to be and were not.
An explantion is needed.

 

[Coloradomtnman]

Crowd sourced, volunteer security is at best a poor substitute for professional security and at worst a provocation disguised as "security". Remember the Boston Marathon bombings and the results of the crowd sourced "investigation" into the identities of the perpetrators?

 

[The2ndAmendment]

What a crock of bullshit. I'm gonna write an article about people claiming to see faries and elves setting up in the building across from them.

TheOldSchool are you claiming that the local police are partaking in a conspiracy to lie about these events? It's on public record.

 

[TheOldSchool]

What a crock of bullshit. I'm gonna write an article about people claiming to see faries and elves setting up in the building across from them.

TheOldSchool are you claiming that the local police are partaking in a conspiracy to lie about these events? It's on public record.

I'm claiming infowars is a tabloid for nutters. Your article is based on hearsay. They should've said it was 30 snipers instead of 3 to really up the drama.

 

[Roadrunner]

Holder wants an armed confrontation.

Fools may give it to him, but I hope not.

And since Obama and Gov Nixon withheld the National Guard (when it was needed the most), who can blame these business owners for accepting volunteer security from active/retired servicemen/police.

Damn, when the Guard and police made their presence known in the August riots, they were "confrontational", when they restrained themselves as asked by the "protestors", and the arson and looting started, the are criticized for being "withheld".

I don't think white cops or the Guard should protect any community that does not want them.

Because of how they did it.

Take last week's riot for instance.

On day 1, the police acted like tyrants, swinging their clubs and gassing an entire crowd because someone threw an empty plastic bottle, making battle against the peaceful bystanders while the arsonists and looters were always 500 yards ahead of them.

If it weren't for non-lethal weaponry, it would have been a repeat of the Boston Massacre, which started over snowballs being thrown.

On day 2, the police did the right thing, they went into the crowd to arrest individual violent offenders, and chased the looters and arsonists, instead of the bystanders to witnessed the arson and looting.


It also would have helped on Day 1 if the Guard was deployed with orders to arrest/detain violent offenders.

In Louisiana, when the guard is deployed for a civil emergency, it is given the order to shoot to kill looters.

Works pretty well, unless like during Katrina a flood cuts the Guard off from people who defy evacuation orders so they can stay behind and loot.

Many found out you cannot swim with stolen goods though.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

What a crock of bullshit. I'm gonna write an article about people claiming to see faries and elves setting up in the building across from them.

TheOldSchool are you claiming that the local police are partaking in a conspiracy to lie about these events? It's on public record.

I'm claiming infowars is a tabloid for nutters. Your article is based on hearsay. They should've said it was 30 snipers instead of 3 to really up the drama.

You can always call the police department of the local businesses involved to confirm the story. Would you like their phone number?

And knowing you, only confirmation from CNN, MSNBC or the NYT will ever suffice to legitimize a story for you.

 

[TheOldSchool]

What a crock of bullshit. I'm gonna write an article about people claiming to see faries and elves setting up in the building across from them.

TheOldSchool are you claiming that the local police are partaking in a conspiracy to lie about these events? It's on public record.

I'm claiming infowars is a tabloid for nutters. Your article is based on hearsay. They should've said it was 30 snipers instead of 3 to really up the drama.

You can always call the police department of the local businesses involved to confirm the story. Would you like their phone number?

Why don't you call and post the recording? Because as of right now the entire story this whole thread are based on nothing.

 

[Theowl32]

What a crock of bullshit. I'm gonna write an article about people claiming to see faries and elves setting up in the building across from them.

TheOldSchool are you claiming that the local police are partaking in a conspiracy to lie about these events? It's on public record.

I'm claiming infowars is a tabloid for nutters. Your article is based on hearsay. They should've said it was 30 snipers instead of 3 to really up the drama.

You can always call the police department of the local businesses involved to confirm the story. Would you like their phone number?

And knowing you, only confirmation from CNN, MSNBC or the NYT will ever suffice to legitimize a story for you.

Dude is absolutely hopeless to debate. He is so stupid that he still thinks Wilson shot the fat thug in the back in cold blood.

 

[TheOldSchool]

What a crock of bullshit. I'm gonna write an article about people claiming to see faries and elves setting up in the building across from them.

TheOldSchool are you claiming that the local police are partaking in a conspiracy to lie about these events? It's on public record.

I'm claiming infowars is a tabloid for nutters. Your article is based on hearsay. They should've said it was 30 snipers instead of 3 to really up the drama.

You can always call the police department of the local businesses involved to confirm the story. Would you like their phone number?

And knowing you, only confirmation from CNN, MSNBC or the NYT will ever suffice to legitimize a story for you.

Dude is absolutely hopeless to debate. He is so stupid that he still thinks Wilson shot the fat thug in the back in cold blood.

Link or STFU

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Why don't you call and post the recording? Because as of right now the entire story this whole thread are based on nothing.

They told me to call back after 4:00 to speak to a Captain since it's Sunday, but just for you buddy, I will.

For now, here's an article from your socialist comrades:
Oath Keepers Armed Militia in Ferguson

The police in Ferguson have threatened to arrest these guys if they don't stand down. Dear god, what is this country coming to when I agree with the actions of the Ferguson PD?
Need I point out that volatile doesn't even begin to describe this situation.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Why don't you call and post the recording? Because as of right now the entire story this whole thread are based on nothing.

They told me to call back after 4:00 to speak to a Captain since it's Sunday, but just for you buddy, I will.

For now, here's an article from your socialist comrades:
Oath Keepers Armed Militia in Ferguson

I don't doubt that the "Oathkeeper's" are there fulfilling their commando fantasies. What I doubt is that there are government snipers waiting to shoot them.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Why don't you call and post the recording? Because as of right now the entire story this whole thread are based on nothing.

They told me to call back after 4:00 to speak to a Captain since it's Sunday, but just for you buddy, I will.

For now, here's an article from your socialist comrades:
Oath Keepers Armed Militia in Ferguson

I don't doubt that the "Oathkeeper's" are there fulfilling their commando fantasies. What I doubt is that there are government snipers waiting to shoot them.

Damn shame.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

I don't doubt that the "Oathkeeper's" are there fulfilling their commando fantasies. What I doubt is that there are government snipers waiting to shoot them.

Why? There were fed snipers waiting to shoot them at the Bundy Ranch, what makes you think they'd play the game any differently this time? Especially when the leader of the Oath Keepers himself has come out and said it


But hey, you were going to deny the entire existence of the story until you ran into a newspiece by your own communist comrades. I suppose this is a good start.

And Gruber never happened, because left-wing MSM never ran stories on it.