Breaking! Congress To Step In And Give Immunities to Immunize President Trump From Jack Smith ( 18 U.S. Code § 6002 – 3)

[MAGA Macho Man]

This is why the founding fathers gave separation of powers. It's time to put this fanatical abuse of Lawfare against Trump by Jack Smith.

From a commenter on another forum:

[It immunizes him from anything that he might say under oath to the congress. If he says that the election was stolen in that testimony then he is immune from any prosecutions related to that statement. Jack Smith is currently charging Trump based upon him saying that the election was stolen. See how that might work now. All that has to be done is to be asked questions that somehow relate to any of the charges and the charges go away as long as he has immunity when he says them.]

"We Can Utilize Congressional Immunities to Immunize President Trump" - GOP Rep. Gaetz Reveals Plan to Fight Back Against Jack Smith's Abuse (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

GOP Representative Matt Gaetz revealed a plan to fight back against Special Counsel Jack Smith after his latest charges against Trump.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[Dekster]

This is why the founding fathers gave separation of powers. It's time to put this fanatical abuse of Lawfare against Trump by Jack Smith.

From a commenter on another forum:

[It immunizes him from anything that he might say under oath to the congress. If he says that the election was stolen in that testimony then he is immune from any prosecutions related to that statement. Jack Smith is currently charging Trump based upon him saying that the election was stolen. See how that might work now. All that has to be done is to be asked questions that somehow relate to any of the charges and the charges go away as long as he has immunity when he says them.]

"We Can Utilize Congressional Immunities to Immunize President Trump" - GOP Rep. Gaetz Reveals Plan to Fight Back Against Jack Smith's Abuse (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

GOP Representative Matt Gaetz revealed a plan to fight back against Special Counsel Jack Smith after his latest charges against Trump.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

LOL Good luck getting Trump to confess to these crimes to Congress to get immunity. He would be done for.

 

[Clipper]

This is why the founding fathers gave separation of powers. It's time to put this fanatical abuse of Lawfare against Trump by Jack Smith.

From a commenter on another forum:

[It immunizes him from anything that he might say under oath to the congress. If he says that the election was stolen in that testimony then he is immune from any prosecutions related to that statement. Jack Smith is currently charging Trump based upon him saying that the election was stolen. See how that might work now. All that has to be done is to be asked questions that somehow relate to any of the charges and the charges go away as long as he has immunity when he says them.]

"We Can Utilize Congressional Immunities to Immunize President Trump" - GOP Rep. Gaetz Reveals Plan to Fight Back Against Jack Smith's Abuse (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

GOP Representative Matt Gaetz revealed a plan to fight back against Special Counsel Jack Smith after his latest charges against Trump.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Riiiiiiight. And the Apollo moon landings were filmed in a studio in Burbank, California.

 

[Catsnmeters]

This is why the founding fathers gave separation of powers. It's time to put this fanatical abuse of Lawfare against Trump by Jack Smith.

From a commenter on another forum:

[It immunizes him from anything that he might say under oath to the congress. If he says that the election was stolen in that testimony then he is immune from any prosecutions related to that statement. Jack Smith is currently charging Trump based upon him saying that the election was stolen. See how that might work now. All that has to be done is to be asked questions that somehow relate to any of the charges and the charges go away as long as he has immunity when he says them.]

"We Can Utilize Congressional Immunities to Immunize President Trump" - GOP Rep. Gaetz Reveals Plan to Fight Back Against Jack Smith's Abuse (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

GOP Representative Matt Gaetz revealed a plan to fight back against Special Counsel Jack Smith after his latest charges against Trump.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

I pity you.

Seriously.

 

[Rambunctious]

I've already sent a letter to McCarthy pleading with him to pursue in action....

 

[Magnus]

This is why the founding fathers gave separation of powers. It's time to put this fanatical abuse of Lawfare against Trump by Jack Smith.

From a commenter on another forum:

[It immunizes him from anything that he might say under oath to the congress. If he says that the election was stolen in that testimony then he is immune from any prosecutions related to that statement. Jack Smith is currently charging Trump based upon him saying that the election was stolen. See how that might work now. All that has to be done is to be asked questions that somehow relate to any of the charges and the charges go away as long as he has immunity when he says them.]

"We Can Utilize Congressional Immunities to Immunize President Trump" - GOP Rep. Gaetz Reveals Plan to Fight Back Against Jack Smith's Abuse (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

GOP Representative Matt Gaetz revealed a plan to fight back against Special Counsel Jack Smith after his latest charges against Trump.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Is this part of the same fantasy where JFK jr then comes down to anoint the orange one right after he gets immunized?

Or, is this a different one?

 

[toobfreak]

You are a fucking imbecile.

You are fucking an imbecile? Hope she's no relation!

Hey, break a leg, dickwad.

 

[toobfreak]

The OP clown is like a deranged cartoon character.

Then you two ought to hit it off.

 

[Catsnmeters]

I've already sent a letter to McCarthy pleading with him to pursue in action....

BWAHAHAHA!

Are you 4 years old?

McCarthy is to busy getting his marching orders from Trump to read a bunch of whiny victim nonsense peddled by the right wing media.

Thanks for the chuckle.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Riiiiiiight. And the Apollo moon landings were filmed in a studio in Burbank, California.

Didnt Hillary say over and over that 2016 was stolen.

She is knowingly lying.

 

[BULLDOG]

Didnt Hillary say over and over that 2016 was stolen.

She is knowingly lying.

Trump isn't indicted for lying. He's not indicted for anything he said. At the very beginning of the indictment, Jack Smith said trump had the right to say anything he wanted. He even had a right to lie. Trump is indicted for what he did.

The Trump Jan. 6 Indictment, Annotated

The federal indictment unveiled on Tuesday charges former President Donald J. Trump with four crimes related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election, culminating in the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021.

www.nytimes.com

 

[JGalt]

LOL Good luck getting Trump to confess to these crimes to Congress to get immunity. He would be done for.

Someone has to set the precedence to prevent the future prosecution of Joe Biden. It would be like Trump's gift from the Republicans to the Democrats.

What a guy!

 

[two_iron]

Well, you rattled their cages and they're throwing shit at each other....

 

[Skylar]

This is why the founding fathers gave separation of powers. It's time to put this fanatical abuse of Lawfare against Trump by Jack Smith.

From a commenter on another forum:

[It immunizes him from anything that he might say under oath to the congress. If he says that the election was stolen in that testimony then he is immune from any prosecutions related to that statement. Jack Smith is currently charging Trump based upon him saying that the election was stolen. See how that might work now. All that has to be done is to be asked questions that somehow relate to any of the charges and the charges go away as long as he has immunity when he says them.]

"We Can Utilize Congressional Immunities to Immunize President Trump" - GOP Rep. Gaetz Reveals Plan to Fight Back Against Jack Smith's Abuse (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

GOP Representative Matt Gaetz revealed a plan to fight back against Special Counsel Jack Smith after his latest charges against Trump.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Wouldn't the Senate have to pass this too....and the president sign it?

Good luck with that.

 

[Orangecat]

You are a fucking imbecile.

True story!

Such irony.

 

[Orangecat]

You are fucking an imbecile? Hope she's no relation!

Hey, break a leg, dickwad.

You assume it’s a she?

 

[OKTexas]

This is why the founding fathers gave separation of powers. It's time to put this fanatical abuse of Lawfare against Trump by Jack Smith.

From a commenter on another forum:

[It immunizes him from anything that he might say under oath to the congress. If he says that the election was stolen in that testimony then he is immune from any prosecutions related to that statement. Jack Smith is currently charging Trump based upon him saying that the election was stolen. See how that might work now. All that has to be done is to be asked questions that somehow relate to any of the charges and the charges go away as long as he has immunity when he says them.]

"We Can Utilize Congressional Immunities to Immunize President Trump" - GOP Rep. Gaetz Reveals Plan to Fight Back Against Jack Smith's Abuse (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

GOP Representative Matt Gaetz revealed a plan to fight back against Special Counsel Jack Smith after his latest charges against Trump.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

He doesn't need to be immunized any more than the clinton bitch or the black pig abrahams does. All are immunized by the 1st amendment.

.

 

[Skylar]

He doesn't need to immunized any more than the clinton bitch or the black pig abrahams does. All are immunized by the 1st amendment.

.

The 1st amendment doesn't immunize you from a conspiracy to forge fake election documents....and then send them in to NARA in an attempt to defraud the American people and overturn a lawful election.

But good luck with the 1st amendment argument. Rudy tried that shit too. It hasn't been working out for him either.

 

[OKTexas]

The 1st amendment doesn't immunize you from a conspiracy to forge fake election documents....and then send them in to NARA in an attempt to defraud the American people and overturn a lawful election.

But good luck with the 1st amendment argument. Rudy tried that shit too. It hasn't been working out for him either.

You might want to read the indictment again, Smith admitted there was election fraud in 2020. He just claimed there wasn't enough to effect the outcome. Do you have any clue how much discovery will be done on just that one statement or how many potential witnesses it may cause? Just the trial prep could go on for a decade. That said, I haven't seen any evidence that Trump was involved in the bogus slates of electors.

..

 

[Skylar]

You might want to read the indictment again, Smith admitted there was election fraud in 2020. He just claimed there wasn't enough to effect the outcome. Do you have any clue how much discovery will be done on just that one statement or how many potential witnesses it may cause? Just the trial prep could go on for a decade. That said, I haven't seen any evidence that Trump was involved in the bogus slates of electors.

..

You might want to read the indictment again. As nothing you just said in anyway justifies conspiring to forge fake election documents and sending them in to NARA. In these documents, fake electors lied and said they had been selected by their respective states. They never were. These forged election documents were then turned over to NARA to be recorded.

Not a bit of that is covered by the 1st amendment.

As for discovery, good luck with that. I think you wildly overestimate Judge Chutkan's tolerance for baseless conspiracy theories backed by jackshit.

I'd be happy to take a bet with you that your estimate of a 'decade' is laughably inaccurate. And that the trial will be scheduled to begin before the convention next year occurs.

Say.....a week's exile from from the board? Winner stays, loser leaves? After openly admitting the loss of course. If the convention next year occurs before the trial starts, you win. If the trial is even *scheduled* after the convention next year, you win. If its scheduled before the convention, but is delayed until after the convention for any reason short of threats of violence, you win.

If Trump's trial begins anytime before it, I win.

How does that sound? July 15th, 2024, I believe.