Breaking Alert: Joe Miller To Get Injunction To Halt Murkowski Being Certified

[Stephanie]

If the PEOPLE wanted Murkowski, she would of WON THE PRIMARY.

Miller is right to CONTEST THIS..

 

[uscitizen]

I put revere on ignore for a few days, but I missed the entertainment.

 

[del]

If the PEOPLE wanted Murkowski, she would of WON THE PRIMARY.

Miller is right to CONTEST THIS..

if the PEOPLE wanted miller, he would have WON THE ELECTION.

 

[uscitizen]

If the PEOPLE wanted Murkowski, she would of WON THE PRIMARY.

Miller is right to CONTEST THIS..

Good to know you support the 2 party status quo system

 

[Article 15]

If the PEOPLE wanted Murkowski, she would of WON THE PRIMARY.

 

[Luissa]

If the PEOPLE wanted Murkowski, she would of WON THE PRIMARY.

Miller is right to CONTEST THIS..

Not everyone voted in the REPUBLICAN primary.

 

[xotoxi]

If the PEOPLE wanted Murkowski, she would of WON THE PRIMARY.

Miller is right to CONTEST THIS..

Should Ned Lamont have sued when Lieberman beat him in the general election in ought-six?

 

[uscitizen]

If the PEOPLE wanted Murkowski, she would of WON THE PRIMARY.

Miller is right to CONTEST THIS..

Should Ned Lamont have sued when Lieberman beat him in the general election in ought-six?

There you go again bringing up facts!

 

[Stephanie]

If the PEOPLE wanted Murkowski, she would of WON THE PRIMARY.

Miller is right to CONTEST THIS..

Should Ned Lamont have sued when Lieberman beat him in the general election in ought-six?

There you go again bringing up facts!

ummm, could you show me the FACTS in their question?.
good grief.

 

[Luissa]

Should Ned Lamont have sued when Lieberman beat him in the general election in ought-six?

There you go again bringing up facts!

ummm, could you show me the FACTS in that statement.
good grief.

Are you serious?

 

[bodecea]

Good for him. She's the last Republican who should be wagging her finger for not playing by the rules.

One thing nobody is taking into consideration is that the voting rules were changed AFTER the primary and just before the election by a judge appointed by Murkowski's dad, Governor Frank Murkowski who Palin annihilated in the governors race.

Write-in candidates are supposed to be just that: you go in with your list and you them down. But something like a week or two before the election, they announced that there was going to be a printed write-in slate in order to get dumb Dems and RINOs to be able to spell Murkowski’s name with some semblance of recognizably.

This whole thing was illegal and manipulated from the get-go.

There's something really evil about helping people spell a name right, isn't there?

 

[Stephanie]

There you go again bringing up facts!

ummm, could you show me the FACTS in that statement.
good grief.

Are you serious?

are you?

 

[uscitizen]

There you go again bringing up facts!

ummm, could you show me the FACTS in that statement.
good grief.

Are you serious?

She can't even remember now that Bush sucked.

 

[Stephanie]

ummm, could you show me the FACTS in that statement.
good grief.

Are you serious?

She can't even remember now that Bush sucked.

oooooooooooooooo, you be so witty and funny. I laugh

 

[bodecea]

If the PEOPLE wanted Murkowski, she would of WON THE PRIMARY.

Yeah...that was extreme face palm material, wasn't it? Apparently, Stephanie thinks that the primary is the election.

 

[Stephanie]

If the PEOPLE wanted Murkowski, she would of WON THE PRIMARY.

Yeah...that was extreme face palm material, wasn't it? Apparently, Stephanie thinks that the primary is the election.

apparently, you don't know what the hell you're talking about, but carry on.

 

[xotoxi]

Should Ned Lamont have sued when Lieberman beat him in the general election in ought-six?

There you go again bringing up facts!

ummm, could you show me the FACTS in their question?.
good grief.

stu·pid (stū'pĭd, styū'-)

adj., -er, -est.

1. Slow to learn or understand; obtuse.
2. Tending to make poor decisions or careless mistakes.
3. Marked by a lack of intelligence or care; foolish or careless: a stupid mistake.
4. Dazed, stunned, or stupefied.
5. Pointless; worthless: a stupid job.

n.

1. A stupid or foolish person.
2. Stephanie on USMB

[Latin stupidus, from stupēre, to be stunned.]
stupidly stu'pid·ly adv.
stupidness stu'pid·ness n.

 

[Stephanie]

There you go again bringing up facts!

ummm, could you show me the FACTS in their question?.
good grief.

stu·pid (stū'pĭd, styū'-)

adj., -er, -est.

1. Slow to learn or understand; obtuse.
2. Tending to make poor decisions or careless mistakes.
3. Marked by a lack of intelligence or care; foolish or careless: a stupid mistake.
4. Dazed, stunned, or stupefied.
5. Pointless; worthless: a stupid job.

n.

1. A stupid or foolish person.
2. Stephanie on USMB

[Latin stupidus, from stupēre, to be stunned.]
stupidly stu'pid·ly adv.
stupidness stu'pid·ness n.

fits you.

 

[xotoxi]

ummm, could you show me the FACTS in their question?.
good grief.

stu·pid (stū'pĭd, styū'-)

adj., -er, -est.

1. Slow to learn or understand; obtuse.
2. Tending to make poor decisions or careless mistakes.
3. Marked by a lack of intelligence or care; foolish or careless: a stupid mistake.
4. Dazed, stunned, or stupefied.
5. Pointless; worthless: a stupid job.

n.

1. A stupid or foolish person.
2. Stephanie on USMB

[Latin stupidus, from stupēre, to be stunned.]
stupidly stu'pid·ly adv.
stupidness stu'pid·ness n.

fits you.

DEFINES you.

 

[Stephanie]

stu·pid (stū'pĭd, styū'-)

adj., -er, -est.

1. Slow to learn or understand; obtuse.
2. Tending to make poor decisions or careless mistakes.
3. Marked by a lack of intelligence or care; foolish or careless: a stupid mistake.
4. Dazed, stunned, or stupefied.
5. Pointless; worthless: a stupid job.

n.

1. A stupid or foolish person.
2. Stephanie on USMB

[Latin stupidus, from stupēre, to be stunned.]
stupidly stu'pid·ly adv.
stupidness stu'pid·ness n.

fits you.

DEFINES you.

whatEva..Im sure I won't lose any sleep over what you think of me.