Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If the PEOPLE wanted Murkowski, she would of WON THE PRIMARY.
Miller is right to CONTEST THIS..
If the PEOPLE wanted Murkowski, she would of WON THE PRIMARY.
Miller is right to CONTEST THIS..
If the PEOPLE wanted Murkowski, she would of WON THE PRIMARY.
Miller is right to CONTEST THIS..
If the PEOPLE wanted Murkowski, she would of WON THE PRIMARY.
Miller is right to CONTEST THIS..
Should Ned Lamont have sued when Lieberman beat him in the general election in ought-six?
If the PEOPLE wanted Murkowski, she would of WON THE PRIMARY.
Miller is right to CONTEST THIS..
Should Ned Lamont have sued when Lieberman beat him in the general election in ought-six?
There you go again bringing up facts!
Should Ned Lamont have sued when Lieberman beat him in the general election in ought-six?
There you go again bringing up facts!
ummm, could you show me the FACTS in that statement.
good grief.
One thing nobody is taking into consideration is that the voting rules were changed AFTER the primary and just before the election by a judge appointed by Murkowski's dad, Governor Frank Murkowski who Palin annihilated in the governors race.Good for him. She's the last Republican who should be wagging her finger for not playing by the rules.
Write-in candidates are supposed to be just that: you go in with your list and you them down. But something like a week or two before the election, they announced that there was going to be a printed write-in slate in order to get dumb Dems and RINOs to be able to spell Murkowskis name with some semblance of recognizably.
This whole thing was illegal and manipulated from the get-go.
There you go again bringing up facts!
ummm, could you show me the FACTS in that statement.
good grief.
Are you serious?
There you go again bringing up facts!
ummm, could you show me the FACTS in that statement.
good grief.
Are you serious?
ummm, could you show me the FACTS in that statement.
good grief.
Are you serious?
She can't even remember now that Bush sucked.
Yeah...that was extreme face palm material, wasn't it? Apparently, Stephanie thinks that the primary is the election.
Should Ned Lamont have sued when Lieberman beat him in the general election in ought-six?
There you go again bringing up facts!
ummm, could you show me the FACTS in their question?.
good grief.
There you go again bringing up facts!
ummm, could you show me the FACTS in their question?.
good grief.
stu·pid (stū'pĭd, styū'-)
adj., -er, -est.
n.
- Slow to learn or understand; obtuse.
- Tending to make poor decisions or careless mistakes.
- Marked by a lack of intelligence or care; foolish or careless: a stupid mistake.
- Dazed, stunned, or stupefied.
- Pointless; worthless: a stupid job.
[Latin stupidus, from stupēre, to be stunned.]
- A stupid or foolish person.
- Stephanie on USMB
stupidly stu'pid·ly adv.
stupidness stu'pid·ness n.
ummm, could you show me the FACTS in their question?.
good grief.
stu·pid (stū'pĭd, styū'-)
adj., -er, -est.
n.
- Slow to learn or understand; obtuse.
- Tending to make poor decisions or careless mistakes.
- Marked by a lack of intelligence or care; foolish or careless: a stupid mistake.
- Dazed, stunned, or stupefied.
- Pointless; worthless: a stupid job.
[Latin stupidus, from stupēre, to be stunned.]
- A stupid or foolish person.
- Stephanie on USMB
stupidly stu'pid·ly adv.
stupidness stu'pid·ness n.
fits you.
stu·pid (stū'pĭd, styū'-)
adj., -er, -est.
n.
- Slow to learn or understand; obtuse.
- Tending to make poor decisions or careless mistakes.
- Marked by a lack of intelligence or care; foolish or careless: a stupid mistake.
- Dazed, stunned, or stupefied.
- Pointless; worthless: a stupid job.
[Latin stupidus, from stupēre, to be stunned.]
- A stupid or foolish person.
- Stephanie on USMB
stupidly stu'pid·ly adv.
stupidness stu'pid·ness n.
fits you.
DEFINES you.