Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski is putting together a net neutrality proposal and plans to take action on the controversial issue as early as next month, according to several sources with knowledge of the situation.
Details of the proposal being developed by Genachowskis office are unclear, but sources say it could be similar to the deal stakeholders tried to reach with Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) earlier this fall.
The long-running net neutrality debate centers around rules that would require Internet service providers to treat all web traffic equally. Internet companies like Google and Skype want net neutrality rules applied to both wireline and wireless networks, but network operators including AT&T, Verizon and Comcast say they need flexibility to manage web traffic on their lines
Read more: Sources: FCC chief working on net neutrality proposal - Kim Hart - POLITICO.com
Really?
That's what you think it is?
And just who do you think developed "the backbone" in the first place?
It's making you carry another provider's traffic on your network, crone. You develop the backbone and they use it as they wish.
It's making you carry another provider's traffic on your network, crone. You develop the backbone and they use it as they wish.
is that what they're telling you?
it's not letting corporations block content....
information is power.
Really?
That's what you think it is?
And just who do you think developed "the backbone" in the first place?
Sprint, Verizon, etc.
Don't embarrass yourself by claiming their 3g or 4g networks owe their exsitence to the internet Al Gore invented decades ago.
That, and the FCC has no authority over the internet. The SCOTUS already said so. This is a naked power grab by a discredited President who can't get anything passed through the legislative process anymore.
You're one of those fucknuts who think the internet is a public good, aren't you, fucknuts?
It's making you carry another provider's traffic on your network, crone. You develop the backbone and they use it as they wish.
It's making you carry another provider's traffic on your network, crone. You develop the backbone and they use it as they wish.
But they pay you for that use, just like the electrical and telephone grids.
It's making you carry another provider's traffic on your network, crone. You develop the backbone and they use it as they wish.
is that what they're telling you?
it's not letting corporations block content....
information is power.
Why should government tell you what content you must carry on your private network?
Really?
That's what you think it is?
And just who do you think developed "the backbone" in the first place?
Sprint, Verizon, etc.
Don't embarrass yourself by claiming their 3g or 4g networks owe their exsitence to the internet Al Gore invented decades ago.
That, and the FCC has no authority over the internet. The SCOTUS already said so. This is a naked power grab by a discredited President who can't get anything passed through the legislative process anymore.
You're one of those fucknuts who think the internet is a public good, aren't you, fucknuts?
Back down there sonny boy. You could get hurt.
And yeah..the government developed the telecommunications backbone..and keeps sinking money into it. The FCC should have jurisdiction. Content should not be controlled by people with the most money.
It's making you carry another provider's traffic on your network, crone. You develop the backbone and they use it as they wish.
But they pay you for that use, just like the electrical and telephone grids.
Who cares? Who is government to demand you give access or provide content on your network?
is that what they're telling you?
it's not letting corporations block content....
information is power.
Why should government tell you what content you must carry on your private network?
Sherman Antitrust Act
Sprint, Verizon, etc.
Don't embarrass yourself by claiming their 3g or 4g networks owe their exsitence to the internet Al Gore invented decades ago.
That, and the FCC has no authority over the internet. The SCOTUS already said so. This is a naked power grab by a discredited President who can't get anything passed through the legislative process anymore.
You're one of those fucknuts who think the internet is a public good, aren't you, fucknuts?
Back down there sonny boy. You could get hurt.
And yeah..the government developed the telecommunications backbone..and keeps sinking money into it. The FCC should have jurisdiction. Content should not be controlled by people with the most money.
Networks are private property. Those backbones are long gone.
Bullshit. Government didn't develop the FIOS network, or the Road Runner Network.
In December.
Obama doesnt' believe in a representative republic.
Just a lot of rules by agencies he controls and who answer to nobody.
Sources: FCC chief working on net neutrality proposal - Kim Hart - POLITICO.com
Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski is putting together a net neutrality proposal and plans to take action on the controversial issue as early as next month, according to several sources with knowledge of the situation.
Details of the proposal being developed by Genachowskis office are unclear, but sources say it could be similar to the deal stakeholders tried to reach with Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) earlier this fall.
The long-running net neutrality debate centers around rules that would require Internet service providers to treat all web traffic equally. Internet companies like Google and Skype want net neutrality rules applied to both wireline and wireless networks, but network operators including AT&T, Verizon and Comcast say they need flexibility to manage web traffic on their lines
Read more: Sources: FCC chief working on net neutrality proposal - Kim Hart - POLITICO.com
In December.
Obama doesnt' believe in a representative republic.
Just a lot of rules by agencies he controls and who answer to nobody.
Sources: FCC chief working on net neutrality proposal - Kim Hart - POLITICO.com
Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski is putting together a net neutrality proposal and plans to take action on the controversial issue as early as next month, according to several sources with knowledge of the situation.
Details of the proposal being developed by Genachowskis office are unclear, but sources say it could be similar to the deal stakeholders tried to reach with Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) earlier this fall.
The long-running net neutrality debate centers around rules that would require Internet service providers to treat all web traffic equally. Internet companies like Google and Skype want net neutrality rules applied to both wireline and wireless networks, but network operators including AT&T, Verizon and Comcast say they need flexibility to manage web traffic on their lines
Read more: Sources: FCC chief working on net neutrality proposal - Kim Hart - POLITICO.com
This is something I have yet to understand. Are you really arguing that your ISP should have the right to decide what websites you can visit?
What if USMessageBoard isn't on their list?
Back down there sonny boy. You could get hurt.
And yeah..the government developed the telecommunications backbone..and keeps sinking money into it. The FCC should have jurisdiction. Content should not be controlled by people with the most money.
Networks are private property. Those backbones are long gone.
Bullshit. Government didn't develop the FIOS network, or the Road Runner Network.
Yes..but it did develop UNIX, DNS, TCPIP and a wealth of other protocols used to make the whole shebang work.
In December.
Obama doesnt' believe in a representative republic.
Just a lot of rules by agencies he controls and who answer to nobody.
Sources: FCC chief working on net neutrality proposal - Kim Hart - POLITICO.com
This is something I have yet to understand. Are you really arguing that your ISP should have the right to decide what websites you can visit?
What if USMessageBoard isn't on their list?
If you work for a company that has internet access, they already do.
If you want the same NFL package on FIOS cable as you do DirecTV, you're screwed.
