- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,110
- 47,261
- 2,180
You believe that proves I brought up the arm? It proves exactly the opposite, you fucking moron.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You believe that proves I brought up the arm? It proves exactly the opposite, you fucking moron.
You believe that proves I brought up the arm? It proves exactly the opposite, you fucking moron.
If you're surrounded by hundreds of armed hostiles, then it's appropriate to have your finger on the trigger.You believe that proves I brought up the arm? It proves exactly the opposite, you fucking moron.
I am arguing that an innocent person who is doing time for a crime they did not commit and has otherwise exhausted all legal recourse would gladly accept a pardon.
There is actually more to how a pardon actually works. The pardon first has to be delivered to the person being pardoned. Now it's up to them, what to do with that pardon. They can lock it up as a souvenir, and they can continue to fight their legal case.I fully understand that. A person who, according to them, was incorrectly convicted might indeed enjoy a pardon. But if they're going to accept the pardon, then they are conceding their guilt.
Because this is you just making shit up. Because admitting facts and reality Would undermine your narrative.I am arguing that an innocent person who is doing time for a crime they did not commit and has otherwise exhausted all legal recourse would gladly accept a pardon.
But what of the person who has the resources to appeal his conviction, but accepts a pardon instead.I am arguing that an innocent person who is doing time for a crime they did not commit and has otherwise exhausted all legal recourse would gladly accept a pardon.
But what if he's really a God from another planet and on the planet where he lives? Where the rules are better than ours. It's actually legal and his fellow gods advised him to pretend he is guilty so that he wouldn't have to face the courts of our lesser species.But what of the person who has the resources to appeal his conviction, but accepts a pardon instead.
I am about ready to put you back on ignore again.Because this is you just making shit up. Because admitting facts and reality Would undermine your narrative.
You always do that. Whenever anything happens, that doesn't agree with your white nationalist narrative, you just make shit up.
One subtlety of how a pardon works, is removing the penalty but not the guilt, doesn't not refund any fines or penalties paid before the pardon was executed.I am about ready to put you back on ignore again.
I included my thoughts, the text of the pardon (post 42), a link to support my assertions which was written by a distinguished legal scholar at UCLA (post 236).
I would be happy to have a civil discussion with you if you have a point to make on this Law and Justice System forum.
No one who uses a gun to defend himself intends to kill anyone unless the perp makes it necessary, you fucking moron.If you're surrounded by hundreds of armed hostiles, then it's appropriate to have your finger on the trigger.
But if it's just protesters who haven't even breeched your property line, then it's completely reckless, and against all gun safety rules to do so.
Pointing loaded gun at a person you don't intend to kill - Strike one
Putting your finger on the trigger of a loaded gun not pointing at your intended target - Strike two.
Well, duh, that's what this case is all about. [Post #42]One subtlety of how a pardon works, is removing the penalty but not the guilt, doesn't not refund any fines or penalties paid before the pardon was executed.
There is no guilt, moron.One subtlety of how a pardon works, is removing the penalty but not the guilt, doesn't not refund any fines or penalties paid before the pardon was executed.
No one who uses a gun to defend himself intends to kill anyone unless the perp makes it necessary, you fucking moron.
Why is everything you say so stupid?
Thanks for the useless advice, asshole.If, God Forbid you ever have to shoot someone. I’d suggest you shut your mouth and let a lawyer speak for you. You might just be lucky and avoid a trial.
Yet the protesters stayed in the street (didn't violate their property) and the wife pointed a loaded gun at them, ready to shoot, with her finger on the trigger.No one who uses a gun to defend himself intends to kill anyone unless the perp makes it necessary, you fucking moron.
Why is everything you say so stupid?
It was also because relinquishing their weapons was part of the plea agreement they made for the misdemeanor charges.Well, duh, that's what this case is all about. [Post #42]
Actually the person remains convicted of the crime. The record of conviction is not expunged, and remains on the record. The pardon is then annexed to the conviction to show the conviction has no legal force.There is no guilt, moron.
Thanks for the useless advice, asshole.
It was also because relinquishing their weapons was part of the plea agreement they made for the misdemeanor charges.
So they were still bound by the terms of the plea agreement.
Are you sure about that?Actually the person remains convicted of the crime. The record of conviction is not expunged, and remains on the record. The pardon is then annexed to the conviction to show the conviction has no legal force.