If they are doing it on my property and I warn them off, I feel I should have the right to shoot them the next time they do it.
And you would have the opportunity to present the above argument during your numerous appeals of your prison sentence.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If they are doing it on my property and I warn them off, I feel I should have the right to shoot them the next time they do it.
If they are doing it on my property and I warn them off, I feel I should have the right to shoot them the next time they do it.
And you would have the opportunity to present the above argument during your numerous appeals of your prison sentence.
They used to go "offroading" in a field near my home. The noise of the engines both day and nite were terribly disquieting. The fact that we are on the Airport pattern didn't help. I would warn them once, but if they kept on, shoot 'em, they're idiots with no respect for others. I feel for the kids, the parents are responsible for putting them in that situation.
From what I read, and correct me if I'm wrong, they weren't on public property but on a right of way owned by them and their neighbors, if they didn't have permission of any of the neighbors or them, they were tresspassing.
I'm confused Shelia. You would shoot them if they didn't listen to you the first time? Was this on your property?
So if someone is trespassing on your property, it's ok to shoot them?
I don't think we're talking about just tresspassing, but the noise and devestation to the area caused by "off roading" is what I'm talking about. If they are doing it on my property and I warn them off, I feel I should have the right to shoot them the next time they do it.
I certainly wouldn't shoot a 7 year old regardless of the reason, but in this case, I think the parent was at fault.
Do you feel you should have the right to go "off roading" on someone else's property when they don't want you there?
The Second Amendment gives Americans have the right to protect their property through force.
Go Constitution!
Yes, it does, but it also stipulates that you must use discretion and reasoning on a level above that of gorillas.
I'm confused Shelia. You would shoot them if they didn't listen to you the first time? Was this on your property?
So if someone is trespassing on your property, it's ok to shoot them?
I don't think we're talking about just tresspassing, but the noise and devestation to the area caused by "off roading" is what I'm talking about. If they are doing it on my property and I warn them off, I feel I should have the right to shoot them the next time they do it.
I certainly wouldn't shoot a 7 year old regardless of the reason, but in this case, I think the parent was at fault.
Do you feel you should have the right to go "off roading" on someone else's property when they don't want you there?
I believe you should only take a life when yours is threatened. for all other matters such as loud noise.. call the authorities.. but that's just me..
The Second Amendment gives Americans have the right to protect their property through force.
Go Constitution!
Be my guest. Explain how having a law that says it's okay to protect your property or your neighbor's property by killing someone you feel is threatening it doesn't lead to fucked up belief that killing someone for stealing your neighbor's tv or killing a seven year old you think is tresspassing is okay.This is Texas after all that allows you to kill someone if you feel threatened by them. I wonder if these people will use the same loophole as that other asshole.FUCK YOU. Moron.
Ohh look another retardo from the left. Maybe you should get someone to explain the reality to you dumb ass.
Be my guest. Explain how having a law that says it's okay to protect your property or your neighbor's property by killing someone you feel is threatening it doesn't lead to fucked up belief that killing someone for stealing your neighbor's tv or killing a seven year old you think is tresspassing is okay.This is Texas after all that allows you to kill someone if you feel threatened by them. I wonder if these people will use the same loophole as that other asshole.
Ohh look another retardo from the left. Maybe you should get someone to explain the reality to you dumb ass.
in nc if you feel threatened you can take action on your own private property....or on public property for that matter...we are a carry and concell state....but who fires into a group of people...note..she fired first then hands him the shotgun....here honey you take your turn..what kinda mentality is that...quads arent a problem around here...most everyone has one....to ride the main road with or to work their property with....the state doesnt like it..and if someone calls the police they will come out and cite you for it...most ignore it....its like a 8 or 9 miles road witha couple of branches....we also use them for floods etc...sometimes quads are the only way to reach points after floods...also disappear in the mountains or get lost on a trail....quad riders are out there...let a little kid wander off...its dogs, horses and quads..there is a lot of mountains...the faster you find the missing the better....flatlanders are just as stupid as can be...
I don't think we're talking about just tresspassing, but the noise and devestation to the area caused by "off roading" is what I'm talking about. If they are doing it on my property and I warn them off, I feel I should have the right to shoot them the next time they do it.
I certainly wouldn't shoot a 7 year old regardless of the reason, but in this case, I think the parent was at fault.
Do you feel you should have the right to go "off roading" on someone else's property when they don't want you there?
I believe you should only take a life when yours is threatened. for all other matters such as loud noise.. call the authorities.. but that's just me..
Can we at least shoot the extreemly rude self absorbed people with paint guns? Please?
Be my guest. Explain how having a law that says it's okay to protect your property or your neighbor's property by killing someone you feel is threatening it doesn't lead to fucked up belief that killing someone for stealing your neighbor's tv or killing a seven year old you think is tresspassing is okay.This is Texas after all that allows you to kill someone if you feel threatened by them. I wonder if these people will use the same loophole as that other asshole.
Ohh look another retardo from the left. Maybe you should get someone to explain the reality to you dumb ass.
Be my guest. Explain how having a law that says it's okay to protect your property or your neighbor's property by killing someone you feel is threatening it doesn't lead to fucked up belief that killing someone for stealing your neighbor's tv or killing a seven year old you think is tresspassing is okay.Ohh look another retardo from the left. Maybe you should get someone to explain the reality to you dumb ass.
You make it sound as if the 7 year old was by himself. The fault lies with the parents that took this child offroading on property that didn't belong to them, nor the public, from what I understand it was an access road that is owned by them and their neighbors.
Unless you've been victim to the noice and abuse caused by offroaders, you wouldn't understand, but it's a heck of a lot more than just "tresspassing".
BTW, I think the minute you commit a crime, you should lose all your rights and killing a person while that person is stealing a tv is perfectly okay in my book. Yeah, I know it doesn't jive with the law, but how would you like to have your most precious possessions stolen? And worse, you could have stopped him if you were allowed to shoot.
There are a whole lot of things wrong with this world. The fact that people defend robbers and tresspassers is one of them.
Be my guest. Explain how having a law that says it's okay to protect your property or your neighbor's property by killing someone you feel is threatening it doesn't lead to fucked up belief that killing someone for stealing your neighbor's tv or killing a seven year old you think is tresspassing is okay.Ohh look another retardo from the left. Maybe you should get someone to explain the reality to you dumb ass.
You make it sound as if the 7 year old was by himself. The fault lies with the parents that took this child offroading on property that didn't belong to them, nor the public, from what I understand it was an access road that is owned by them and their neighbors.
Unless you've been victim to the noice and abuse caused by offroaders, you wouldn't understand, but it's a heck of a lot more than just "tresspassing".
BTW, I think the minute you commit a crime, you should lose all your rights and killing a person while that person is stealing a tv is perfectly okay in my book. Yeah, I know it doesn't jive with the law, but how would you like to have your most precious possessions stolen? And worse, you could have stopped him if you were allowed to shoot.
There are a whole lot of things wrong with this world. The fact that people defend robbers and tresspassers is one of them.
Is it just me or did anyone else take a look at their photographs and think meth addicts?
They look rode hard and put up wet......
Be my guest. Explain how having a law that says it's okay to protect your property or your neighbor's property by killing someone you feel is threatening it doesn't lead to fucked up belief that killing someone for stealing your neighbor's tv or killing a seven year old you think is tresspassing is okay.
You make it sound as if the 7 year old was by himself. The fault lies with the parents that took this child offroading on property that didn't belong to them, nor the public, from what I understand it was an access road that is owned by them and their neighbors.
Unless you've been victim to the noice and abuse caused by offroaders, you wouldn't understand, but it's a heck of a lot more than just "tresspassing".
BTW, I think the minute you commit a crime, you should lose all your rights and killing a person while that person is stealing a tv is perfectly okay in my book. Yeah, I know it doesn't jive with the law, but how would you like to have your most precious possessions stolen? And worse, you could have stopped him if you were allowed to shoot.
There are a whole lot of things wrong with this world. The fact that people defend robbers and tresspassers is one of them.
The fault also lies with the people who murdered a CHILD.
The minute you commit a crime, you should lose all your rights? Ok, great. So the next time you hit 61 mph in a 60 mile per hour zone, I'll just take a rocket launcher to your car. Sounds good to me.
Be my guest. Explain how having a law that says it's okay to protect your property or your neighbor's property by killing someone you feel is threatening it doesn't lead to fucked up belief that killing someone for stealing your neighbor's tv or killing a seven year old you think is tresspassing is okay.Ohh look another retardo from the left. Maybe you should get someone to explain the reality to you dumb ass.
BTW, I think the minute you commit a crime, you should lose all your rights and killing a person while that person is stealing a tv is perfectly okay in my book. .