Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You guys love to lie and claim things about other people that are totally false. But what' we've come to expect . Yes, we all worship Obama.
MOre like we have hard time with all the petty, nonsense, dishonest partisan hack attacks. I'll gladly hear some real criticism of Obama and his policies, but most of the time, at least on this forum, all you hear is the petty dishonest, partisan hack mudslinging
So once again....nothing to add to the debate.
A little clue for you .....
When an opponent in a debate responds with an effort to discredit the opposition and not the words of the opposition, the debate is deemed as lost.
Now before you cherry pick the times I have insulted your credibility, I must warn you....you will find it was only done AFTER you admitted defeat by putting into question my credibility...or in question the credibility of one on my side of the debate.
I have never done it when you respoinded with an actual response to the topic being debated.
Learn from the doc.......you admit defeat daily on here.
You are absolutely nuts,your ramblings are getting worse. I guess you can't read either. Or can't stand I constantly show how full of shit you are. Oh, but you live in old and tired's make believe land.
"Not all of them are clueless... A few of them use their gray matter...
"The 0bamatools are the ones who have a hard time with anything that is anti-administration... ANYTHING..."
This is what I replied to? You telling me this isn't exactly what you are accusing me of?
"When an opponent in a debate responds with an effort to discredit the opposition and not the words of the opposition, the debate is deemed as lost."
Is this not exactly what Dr. House did?
you are such a loser.
So once again....nothing to add to the debate.
A little clue for you .....
When an opponent in a debate responds with an effort to discredit the opposition and not the words of the opposition, the debate is deemed as lost.
Now before you cherry pick the times I have insulted your credibility, I must warn you....you will find it was only done AFTER you admitted defeat by putting into question my credibility...or in question the credibility of one on my side of the debate.
I have never done it when you respoinded with an actual response to the topic being debated.
Learn from the doc.......you admit defeat daily on here.
LOL, you just love to be obviously contradictory and hypocritical don't you? So this post is contributing to the thread? I think not, of course, one more time, you get outed for the phony and hypocrite you are.
So once again....nothing to add to the debate.
A little clue for you .....
When an opponent in a debate responds with an effort to discredit the opposition and not the words of the opposition, the debate is deemed as lost.
Now before you cherry pick the times I have insulted your credibility, I must warn you....you will find it was only done AFTER you admitted defeat by putting into question my credibility...or in question the credibility of one on my side of the debate.
I have never done it when you respoinded with an actual response to the topic being debated.
Learn from the doc.......you admit defeat daily on here.
You are absolutely nuts,your ramblings are getting worse. I guess you can't read either. Or can't stand I constantly show how full of shit you are. Oh, but you live in old and tired's make believe land.
"Not all of them are clueless... A few of them use their gray matter...
"The 0bamatools are the ones who have a hard time with anything that is anti-administration... ANYTHING..."
This is what I replied to? You telling me this isn't exactly what you are accusing me of?
"When an opponent in a debate responds with an effort to discredit the opposition and not the words of the opposition, the debate is deemed as lost."
Is this not exactly what Dr. House did?
you are such a loser.
Listen up doc...
House responded with that once THEY started to question the credibility of those that were interested in the topic.
They admitted defeat by casting insults at the debaters.....
So as I said earl;er....that is when the debate is over and we thank them by reminding them that we see them as assholes as well....but we still got in the last word before they resorted to insults.
You just lost again Doc.
A really bad habit of yours.
So once again....nothing to add to the debate.
A little clue for you .....
When an opponent in a debate responds with an effort to discredit the opposition and not the words of the opposition, the debate is deemed as lost.
Now before you cherry pick the times I have insulted your credibility, I must warn you....you will find it was only done AFTER you admitted defeat by putting into question my credibility...or in question the credibility of one on my side of the debate.
I have never done it when you respoinded with an actual response to the topic being debated.
Learn from the doc.......you admit defeat daily on here.
LOL, you just love to be obviously contradictory and hypocritical don't you? So this post is contributing to the thread? I think not, of course, one more time, you get outed for the phony and hypocrite you are.
And seeing as you once again could not offer a substantial response other than insults at my description of a debate...
All I can say is....
YOU BROKE THE RECORD....you lost 3 debates in 3 posts in one thread.
CONGRATULATIONS
You guys love to lie and claim things about other people that are totally false. But what' we've come to expect . Yes, we all worship Obama.
MOre like we have hard time with all the petty, nonsense, dishonest partisan hack attacks. I'll gladly hear some real criticism of Obama and his policies, but most of the time, at least on this forum, all you hear is the petty dishonest, partisan hack mudslinging
Thank you, Dr. 0bamatool... I find it interesting that you self-associated with "0bamatools"...lol
In case you missed it, adults here are trying to discuss the topic at hand... If you want to discuss the existance of 0bamatools or not, please start another thread and I'll be ahppy to join the discussion...
? Yeah, adults call other's obamatools and make shit up
Man you guys are such phonies.
Asking questions and discussing the matter is what we do here... The fact that this is coming from a Democrat makes it even more interesting...
If you'd like to just casually dismiss it as meritless without discussion, that's certainly your perrogative...
Drl HOuse "Dr. 0bamatool... Fuck off and die..."
yes, that's how adults debate. WHat the fuck is it with all these idiots and trolls on this forum
So I am curious.....was Haliburton a left wing talking point?
Waterboarding?
Iraq and WMD?
What do you define as a talking point...somnething that you personally decide is NOT important to you?
Sestak won't say what the job was or who offered it because he doesn't think it is right to do so. Bullshit. He needs to come clean or he just looks like a liar with a bad case of sour grapes...which is my bet.
I don't know... That has yet to be determined... If the man was offered an admin position as a favor to drop out of a primary race it doesn't seem right to me...Asking questions and discussing the matter is what we do here... The fact that this is coming from a Democrat makes it even more interesting...
If you'd like to just casually dismiss it as meritless without discussion, that's certainly your perrogative...
To which I ask the question that I asked before, that no-one answered...
What, specifically, did the Obama administration receive that was a "thing of value" in reciprocation for appointing these people to governmental posts?
I don't know... The article doesn't mention this at all...Did the Senators in question, that these people would have otherwise run against, pay the members of the Obama administration for their efforts?
Perhaps the 0bama admin has a case against Sestak then...If they did not, then no crime was committed, and making such base accusations is otherwise known as "slander".
Anyone remember Vince Foster? These Democrats making these accusations might just be a tad bit worried. They might have good reason to be worried. Hmm? Stay tuned.
I provided multiple links of newspapers discussing it...
Even one to HuffyPuffy...
You remain wrong...
Fort........Marcy.......Park.Anyone remember Vince Foster? These Democrats making these accusations might just be a tad bit worried. They might have good reason to be worried. Hmm? Stay tuned.
Yes I remember Vince Foster. What about him?
Not once did I say the 0bama admin was involved in criminal behavior...I provided multiple links of newspapers discussing it...
Even one to HuffyPuffy...
You remain wrong...
None of the links you provided associated the actions with criminal behavior.
The talking point is "Did the 0bama admin break the rules." The answer is unknown at this point...Accusing the Obama administration of criminal behavior is the talking point, which was my original statement.
I don't care... Wasn't involved in that discussion....The other talking point accusing someone of criminality this week is Inholfe's accusation that Al Gore is somehow behaving in a criminal manner, which was brought up in another thread.
Fort........Marcy.......Park.Anyone remember Vince Foster? These Democrats making these accusations might just be a tad bit worried. They might have good reason to be worried. Hmm? Stay tuned.
Yes I remember Vince Foster. What about him?
