Black Studies?? Really?

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,904
60,285
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
1. The multicultural project and the National History Standards were major ideological assaults on our nation’s mission. Besides an emphasis on group consciousness over individual citizenship, and on ethnic subcultures over national identity, the standards described the Cold War in terms of moral equivalence (e.g., the “sword play of the US and the USSR”) and actually reversed our history (“Americans believed in the perfectibility of man”).
Where was the belief and emphasis on equality of individual citizenship, strong American identity, anticommunism, and they faith of the Fathers of our Nation?

a. Substituted was the progressive utopianism of the Soviet-leaning Vice-President Henry Wallace. No wonder sentient Liberals such as Arthur Schlesinger, jr. launched vigorous attacks on multiculturalism in his book “The Disuniting of America: Reflections on a Multicultural Society.”
Fonte, “Sovereignty of Submission,” p.79

2. Based on their influence on the New Left from the ‘60’s, these neo-Marxists have largely succeeded in terms of secularizing American culture and undermining traditional values and institutions, and much of its ideology, inspiration and tactics were gleaned from the Frankfurt School’s Institute of Social Research. Thus, there is a straight line from the Frankfurt School to the formation in many colleges and universities of programs, and departments of African-American Studies, Ethnic Studies, Feminist Studies, Peace Studies, and LGBT (Lesbian/Gay/Bi-sexual/Transgender) Studies.
Breitbart, “Righteous Indignation.”






3. Shelby Steele graduated in 1968, and immediately went on to design the first Black Studies programs in the country. He refers to this as his "far-left liberal days." "I was one of those who invented the idea. It was about Black Power. We wanted separate departments, we wanted to grant degrees, we wanted our own curriculum..." But the scales soon fell from his eyes: he realized that what they were putting together had nothing to do with education.

4. He describes the people involved, not as educators, but as hustlers. "Very few of the people I was working with were more than minimally literate. Anything we asked for, we got. So I learned what white guilt was."

a. "Every time I attend a conference of white writers, I have a method for finding out if my colleagues are racist. It consists of uttering stupidities and maintaining absurd theses. If they listen respectfully, and, at the end, overwhelm me with applause, there isn't the slightest doubt: They are filthy racists."
James Baldwin, 'Professing Feminism'

b. The point? Honest folk treat blacks, women, Chicanos, etc., the way they'd treat anyone else, and tell them when they're full of baloney.

5. When white guilt is combined with the lust for power by the hustlers that Steele speaks of, society winds up with the likes of Leonard Jeffries, who, despite a long record of venomously anti-white and anti-Semitic statements, including his famous distinction between brutal, violent "ice people" (whites) and gentle, warmhearted "sun people" (blacks), served for more than two decades as chairman of the Black Studies Department as CCNY- and remains a professor to this day.






6. Over time, there came to be two kinds of black professors...indeed, two kinds of black, and Chicano, and women professors. There were the "mediocrities and hustlers, who wanted independent departments so that they would not be under the purview of serious academic standards, so that they could hide out there and enjoy all the perks of tenure, and not have to be judged according to any standards of achievement.
And, at the same time, black, Hispanic, women scholars who were first-rate, serious people."

a. In comparison, Steele points to the Black Studies program at Harvard (the W.E.B. Du Bois Institute for African American Research) directed by Henry Louis Gates, Jr., in which every one if those invited by Gates said "I'll teach for you, but my professional credibility requires that I be appointed to the English Department, or the Sociology Department, or whatever."

b. "It's a shame...My generation has been ruined by this....It's made us into hustlers....That's how you move ahead: you keep trading on your race."






7. W.E.B. Du Bois (1868-1963) was the first African American to be awarded a doctorate; we was an educator, activist, and author, and a cofounder of the NAACP. While his 1903 book, "The Souls of Black Folk," is probably the seminal work of Black Studies, his emphasis would most likely be considered anathema to many taught today. He pointed out that, to both blacks and whites, the necessity of a thorough grounding in Western history and culture. His constantly repeated point was that the heritage of the West was the heritage of all.

8. He wrote this, in "The Souls of Black Folk,"...

I sit with Shakespeare and he winces not;
I move arm in arm with Balzac and with Dumas,
where smiling men and welcoming women glide in gilded halls.

From out the caves of evening
that swing between the strong-limbed earth
and the tracery of the stars,
I summon Aristotle and Aurelius and what soul I will,
and they come with no scorn or condescension. I Sit With Shakespeare





9.Sadly, this is not the direction most Black Studies takes. Rather than focus on the commonality, Black Studies looks to imbue hostility and anger, to separate the races. It remains for history to determine whether it was Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Du Bois,.... or Robert F. Williams and Ron Karenga were the most helpful to American blacks.
Bruce Bawer, "The Victim's Revolution."



I have my suspicions.
 
Last edited:
Black studies in the humanities is as valid an approach to humanity's scholarship as any other ethnocentric scholarship.

Do you also object oEuropean studies, Asiatic studies, history of immigration?

Of course you don't...unless you do not understand the entire concept of focused inter-diciplinary studies.
 
Black studies in the humanities is as valid an approach to humanity's scholarship as any other ethnocentric scholarship.

Do you also object oEuropean studies, Asiatic studies, history of immigration?

Of course you don't...unless you do not understand the entire concept of focused inter-diciplinary studies.



It seems you make a habit of simply reading titles.

It certainly is a time saver....

...as is the hubris of deciding what I believe, e.g., "....Of course you don't..."



Your surmise would be very different if you had read the OP.


To let you in on a little secret, I wrote the title to rope in some of the lesser intellectually endowed participants.

What a surprise to find you were one of them.
 
Black studies in the humanities is as valid an approach to humanity's scholarship as any other ethnocentric scholarship.

Do you also object oEuropean studies, Asiatic studies, history of immigration?

Of course you don't...unless you do not understand the entire concept of focused inter-diciplinary studies.



It seems you make a habit of simply reading titles.

It certainly is a time saver....

...as is the hubris of deciding what I believe, e.g., "....Of course you don't..."



Your surmise would be very different if you had read the OP.


To let you in on a little secret, I wrote the title to rope in some of the lesser intellectually endowed participants.

What a surprise to find you were one of them.

Titles matter, PC.

Clearly the point of this thread was to question Black Studies.

When the point of an editorial starts out like that, reponding to THAT is the responsibility of those who can answer the question.
 
Black studies in the humanities is as valid an approach to humanity's scholarship as any other ethnocentric scholarship.

Do you also object oEuropean studies, Asiatic studies, history of immigration?

Of course you don't...unless you do not understand the entire concept of focused inter-diciplinary studies.



It seems you make a habit of simply reading titles.

It certainly is a time saver....

...as is the hubris of deciding what I believe, e.g., "....Of course you don't..."



Your surmise would be very different if you had read the OP.


To let you in on a little secret, I wrote the title to rope in some of the lesser intellectually endowed participants.

What a surprise to find you were one of them.

Titles matter, PC.

Clearly the point of this thread was to question Black Studies.

When the point of an editorial starts out like that, reponding to THAT is the responsibility of those who can answer the question.



Sure glad that you didn't deny that you only read the title.

I figured that folks who only read that would look pretty stupid....



So...here, for perspective, is part:

1. The multicultural project and the National History Standards were major ideological assaults on our nation’s mission. Besides an emphasis on group consciousness over individual citizenship, and on ethnic subcultures over national identity, the standards described the Cold War in terms of moral equivalence (e.g., the “sword play of the US and the USSR”) and actually reversed our history (“Americans believed in the perfectibility of man”).
Where was the belief and emphasis on equality of individual citizenship, strong American identity, anticommunism, and they faith of the Fathers of our Nation?

a. Substituted was the progressive utopianism of the Soviet-leaning Vice-President Henry Wallace. No wonder sentient Liberals such as Arthur Schlesinger, jr. launched vigorous attacks on multiculturalism in his book “The Disuniting of America: Reflections on a Multicultural Society.”
Fonte, “Sovereignty of Submission,” p.79

2. Based on their influence on the New Left from the ‘60’s, these neo-Marxists have largely succeeded in terms of secularizing American culture and undermining traditional values and institutions, and much of its ideology, inspiration and tactics were gleaned from the Frankfurt School’s Institute of Social Research. Thus, there is a straight line from the Frankfurt School to the formation in many colleges and universities of programs, and departments of African-American Studies, Ethnic Studies, Feminist Studies, Peace Studies, and LGBT (Lesbian/Gay/Bi-sexual/Transgender) Studies.
Breitbart, “Righteous Indignation.”


Care to comment?
 
Last edited:
I remember when my middle son was in the 6th grade. He was very disappointed in his history teacher (black) for spending far too much class time covering black history, culture, and issues. He understood the importance of it, but was puzzled why they hardly covered other moments in U.S. history.

I did bring it up to his teacher. I forget her exact response but it did impress me as a bunch of doubletalk.
 
Black studies in the humanities is as valid an approach to humanity's scholarship as any other ethnocentric scholarship.

Do you also object oEuropean studies, Asiatic studies, history of immigration?

Of course you don't...unless you do not understand the entire concept of focused inter-diciplinary studies.

humm, If I recall Kagan had funding for a Western civilization studies dept. ands yale voted it down....:doubt:


can you direct me please to several colleges ( not duckpond state either) that offer degrees in European studies dept.s?

and if you actually did any reading, you'd find that these ethnic/gender( Queer) and diversity studies are nothing but hate capitalism/whitey- Marxist Leninist grist mills, black studies, chican@/Chicana/o studies ( and no the @ is not a mistake, thats what they want used so as to NOT denote any gender bis :lol:)

and now theres actually some blowback becasue all of those liberal arts depts are being either agglomerated or losing funding by or to these ethnic studies....which are really just closed loop brainwashing factories...they never should have given them dept. status ......to bad, the old liberal arts ed. that anyone over 45 understood ,are vaporizing as we knew them....
 
I remember when my middle son was in the 6th grade. He was very disappointed in his history teacher (black) for spending far too much class time covering black history, culture, and issues. He understood the importance of it, but was puzzled why they hardly covered other moments in U.S. history.

I did bring it up to his teacher. I forget her exact response but it did impress me as a bunch of doubletalk.

Perceptive young fella' ya' got there, Mr. H.

Without knowing the teacher or the specifics, I'd like to take the opportunity to remind all that education system itself is the problem. From the top down, content has been cast out in favor of indoctrination.

1. The indoctrination by ‘educators’ was intensified via the National History Standards. The document, supposed to examine what was most important for students to learn about America did not mention Daniel Webster, Robert E. Lee, Thomas Edison, or Albert Einstein.

a. “The federally funded “National History Standards” for elementary schools were released in 1994, cemented a revisionist view of American Communism for schoolteachers, as the guide mentions McCarthy over twenty times, while Edison and the Wright Brothers got no mention. “It …repeatedly condemns McCarthyism as an unmitigated evil…[but] the Hiss-Chambers and Rosenberg cases, the two dominant controversies of the anticommunist era, are described with bland, neutral language crafted to keep from implying guilt while not being quite so foolhardy as to actually assert innocence..’National Standards’…implies that the cases are part and parcel of the McCartyite horror.”
From “In Denial,” by Haynes and Klehr, pg. 151

b. Issues of race, ethnicity and gender were emphasized nearly three times as much as political liberty and democracy.

c. In fact, the term “Left” refers to the values associated with the Western welfare state, secularism, and the vast array of attitudes and positions identified as Left from Karl Marx to contemporary socialist democrat parties and today’s Democratic Party in the United States. The Left-wing ‘trinity’ is race, gender, class.
Prager, "Still The Best Hope."



Whether that teacher is a bigot or not, the worker in the system picks up the cues as to what 'kind' of education is to be provided.

I don't believe that teachers themselves are even aware of the damage they are doing.
 
Black studies in the humanities is as valid an approach to humanity's scholarship as any other ethnocentric scholarship.

Do you also object oEuropean studies, Asiatic studies, history of immigration?

Of course you don't...unless you do not understand the entire concept of focused inter-diciplinary studies.

"black studies" courses are pure propaganda. Yeah, they are "just as valid an approach to humanity's scholarship as any other ethnocentric scholarship." In other words, they aren't valid at all. They are crap.

Is there such a thing as "European studies?" Not that I'm aware of. Nor is there any such thing as Asiatic Studies nor "history of immigration."
 

Forum List

Back
Top