Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Why should it be there illiterate ? You’re the dufus that even suggested that “ consensus” is some scientific term. Where is it in any science book ? Do you think it’s a specific science term ? Boz9 ?consensus has exactly nothing to do with the scientific method.
ClimateTV – LIVE at 1PM EDT – ‘Climate and Energy Potpourri’
This week’s Climate Change Roundtable, Climate and Energy Potpourri is a show about nothing and everything. Host Anthony Watts and expert panelists Sterling Burnett and Linnea Lueken disc…wattsupwiththat.com
You're a dope!!
Greg
Sent message. Assume that we find an Earth like exoplanet orbiting a Sun like star in the goldilocks zone of habitability. The Atmosphere is comparable to Earth, 80% nitrogen 19% oxygen, traces of water vapor, argon and 250 parts per million of CO2. Assuming that CO2 increases by 1 PPM a year what experiments can we conduct in an Earth lab to measure the effect the extra CO2would have on temperature of the exoplanet
Searching for: effect of CO2 on temperature
Searching for: effect of CO2 on temperature
Generating answers for you…
Generating answers for you…
That’s a very interesting question. According to the search results, carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas that absorbs and re-emits infrared energy, which causes the atmosphere to warm up1. The warmer atmosphere can hold more water vapor, which is another greenhouse gas that further enhances the warming effect12. The amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has been increasing rapidly due to human activities, such as burning fossil fuels3.
One possible experiment that can be done in an Earth lab to measure the effect of extra CO2 on the temperature of the exoplanet is to use a climate model that simulates the physical processes and feedbacks that govern the climate system4. A climate model can be run with different scenarios of CO2 concentrations and other factors that affect the climate, such as solar radiation, clouds, aerosols, etc. The model can then output the projected changes in temperature and other variables for each scenario. By comparing the results of different scenarios, one can estimate how much extra CO2 would affect the temperature of the exoplanet.
Another possible experiment is to use a controlled chamber that mimics the conditions of the exoplanet’s atmosphere5. The chamber can be filled with a mixture of gases that matches the composition of the exoplanet’s atmosphere, and then exposed to a light source that simulates the solar radiation. The temperature and other variables inside the chamber can be measured with sensors. The experiment can be repeated with different amounts of CO2 added to the chamber, and then compare how the temperature changes with different CO2 levels.
These are some examples of experiments that could be done in an Earth lab to measure the effect of extra CO2 on the temperature of the exoplanet. However, there may be other factors and uncertainties that could affect the accuracy and validity of these experiments, such as the complexity and variability of the climate system, the limitations and assumptions of the models and methods used, and the availability and quality of data and observations. Therefore, these experiments should be interpreted with caution and complemented with other sources of evidence and infor..
Really?A lie since Russia does publicly...
www.cbsnews.com
Why should it be there illiterate ?
No, you Lying stupid twat. I’m not. First, last and always, I’ve been trying to persuade you and/or your fellow Gaia Cultists that it isn’t. Maybe I finally got through to you.You’re the dufus that even suggested that “ consensus” is some scientific term.
You pure making the point I’ve been trying to teach to many or your fellow scientifically illiterate libtards.Dagosa:
Where is it in any science book ?
No. I know you’re too stupid to see your own error.Do you think it’s a specific science term ?
If you say s9 ;Boz9 ?
Take your meds. You are out of your fucking mindNo SHlT for brains I TAUGHT THIS TO YOU/BEAT YOU OVER THE HEAD Several times in the last few weeks.
You FILTHY SCVM BAG.
That was ME Not "Bing."
H2O vs. CO2 Yet another observation the AGW Cult will ignore
Show us one time on the graph when CO2 peaks and temperature subsequently rises. Remember time moves right to left here 410,000 CO2 peaks, temps FALL for the next 60,000 years; temps then start to rise and drag CO2 with them 325,000 CO2 peaks, temps PLUMMET for 75,000 years...etc. The...
www.usmessageboard.com
DISHONEST FRUSADER CRANK was SHUT UP BY THIS POST - TWICE - for WEEKS and many pages ago but keeps trying to bury his loss with BS.
Water Vapor, CO2, and Global Warming
MYTH: Water vapor is the most important, abundant greenhouse gas. So if we’re going to control a greenhouse gas, why don’t we control it instead of carbon dioxide (CO2)?
This is a common Misconception in the debate over greenhouse gases and the causes of global warming. Both water vapor and carbon dioxide are important greenhouse gases that play a crucial role in atmospheric warming. A greenhouse gas is a gas that absorbs and re-emits infrared radiation in Earth’s atmosphere, thereby increasing temperatures. Which gas then is to blame for global warming and should be controlled?
Water vapor accounts for 60-70% of the greenhouse effect while CO2 accounts for 25% —a notable difference when numbers alone are compared. It would seem then that water vapor should be climatologists’ primary focus. However, water vapor cannot be controlled by human intervention; it is simply a Product of its environment.
The amount of water vapor the atmosphere can hold is dependent on temperature. Under normal conditions, most of the heat emitted from Earth’s surface in the form of long wave radiation goes into the atmosphere and out into space. However, the presence of increased greenhouse gases traps more long-wave radiation, which means there is more energy in the atmosphere to warm the Earth’s surface.
As the atmospheric temperature rises, more water is evaporated from ground storage, such as that found in our rivers, oceans, soils, and reservoirs. The released water vapor becomes a greenhouse gas where it then absorbs more energy radiated from the Earth and thus warms the atmosphere. The warmer atmosphere results in further water evaporation and the cycle continues. This mechanism is known as a Positive Feedback Loop.
Scientists then need to focus on what is causing air temperatures to rise in the first place. Heat from Other Greenhouse Gases is Causing atmospheric Warming, Leading to an increase in water evaporation and compounding the greenhouse effect. Anthropogenic, or human-derived, CO2 serves as the Primary source of Warming with water vapor playing a Secondary role.
While CO2 occurs naturally in the atmosphere, human interference has interrupted the carbon cycle through activities, such as burning forests, mining, and burning coal. These activities artificially release more carbon from their solid storage to its gaseous state in the lower atmosphere. The rapid increase in CO2 volume has exceeded the amount oceans and vegetation are able to re-absorb. Furthermore, as deforestation continues around the world, there is less vegetation every year available to sequester the carbon. Thus, excess CO2 remains in the atmosphere where it traps heat and stimulates water evaporation."...."
Water Vapor, CO2, and Global Warming | IEDRO
another Stupid FrusaderCrank post (135,900 and counting) destroyed with One.
He is THEE Stupidest poster on USMB/any MB.
Another Nonsensical post (or dozens) to follow.
EDIT: Now he restarted the BOGUS thread/LOSS Again.
- - - - - -- -- - - - - - -- -
end april 19, 2023
"bing" my ass.
That was me.
and gave you many More 'impossible' CO2 experiments, that actually a child could do at home/teachers do in school to test GHG CO2!
You are too Stupid to debate.
Just hold up for ridicule for your continued obstinance/idiocy.
`
`
You never address my question! Are you functional after the meds?
Is this too difficult for you 12 IQ Jackass!! experiment jar CO2 ?
co2 experiment jar - Google Search
The Greenhouse Effect Experiment and Lesson for Kids
STEAM Powered Family
https://www.steampoweredfamily.com › the-greenhou...
Apr 14, 2021 — In this experiment we are trapping the carbon dioxide gas in the jar. When heat is applied, the carbon dioxide traps more heat in the jar ...
Climate Change Science... · The Greenhouse Effect... · The Greenhouse Science
Greenhouse in a Jar Lab
Stanford University
https://earth.stanford.edu › files › inline-files
Decide on a lab set up as a group. You are designing an experiment that will test the effect of carbon dioxide on the temperature of the atmosphere (air)?. What ...
The Earth in a bottle - CO2 games on my kitchen bench
The Foster Lab
http://www.thefosterlab.org › blog › co2-experiment
Apr 16, 2016 — There are quite a few experiments that you can do at home to demonstrate this underlying physics (e.g. here). Over the last couple of weeks I've ...
AND videos.
`
Now your in a hole. “Consensus” is nothing more than a non specific term outside the glossary of science books. Bottom line is, it has nothing to do with the “ scientific method” and has NO RELATIONSHIP because, the “ scientific method “ is a procedural guild line FOR ALL OF SCIENCE research, not just climate change. ,No, you Lying stupid twat. I’m not. First, last and always, I’ve been trying to persuade you and/or your fellow Gaia Cultists that it isn’t. Maybe I finally got through to you.
It does dufus. When nearly all of the SMARTEST people at every climate research facility in the world “agree on something” and you think you’re smarter, you’re the idiot, not them.Many of your fellow AGW Faithful point to “consensus” as though it proved diddly dog about your religious proclamations. It doesn’t.
You can’t explain can you…..?See? You are a disingenuous gasbag hack.
You’ve been arguing with me all along despite the fact that all along my claim has gone unchanged. Now that you have been exposed, you belatedly attempt to switch the question.
Again, for you and other wickedly stupid hacks like you: consensus has exactly nothing to do with the scientific method. Many of your fellow AGW Faithful point to “consensus” as though it proved diddly dog about your religious proclamations. It doesn’t.
Now your in a hole.
Thank Heaven finally one of you idiot libturds gets it!“Consensus” is nothing more than a non specific term outside the glossary of science books.
Bottom line is, it has nothing to do with the “ scientific method”
False. Ah. You’re reverting now to full retard. Such a pity.It does
Idiot, there is consensus among ALL of the climate science related research in the entire world on AGW. Case closed.Nope. You ARE a hole. An asshole.
Thank Heaven finally one of you idiot libturds gets it!
Exactly right. As I’ve tried for so long to tell so many of you ignorant libturds.
The balance of your post is just you reverting to your usual bleating imbecility.
So, I’ll just cut this reply accordingly. Buh bah, dragQueen.
Consensus…..why does it have to be ?False. Ah. You’re reverting now to full retard. Such a pity.
“Consensus” still has not one fucking thing to do with the scientific method.
Amen.
I did explain. Your inability to comprehend even the basics is all on you.You can’t explain can you…..?
Apu dumfuk is all worked up again.No SHlT for brains I TAUGHT THIS TO YOU/BEAT YOU OVER THE HEAD Several times in the last few weeks.
You FILTHY SCVM BAG.
That was ME Not "Bing."
H2O vs. CO2 Yet another observation the AGW Cult will ignore
Show us one time on the graph when CO2 peaks and temperature subsequently rises. Remember time moves right to left here 410,000 CO2 peaks, temps FALL for the next 60,000 years; temps then start to rise and drag CO2 with them 325,000 CO2 peaks, temps PLUMMET for 75,000 years...etc. The...
www.usmessageboard.com
DISHONEST FRUSADER CRANK was SHUT UP BY THIS POST - TWICE - for WEEKS and many pages ago but keeps trying to bury his loss with BS.
Water Vapor, CO2, and Global Warming
MYTH: Water vapor is the most important, abundant greenhouse gas. So if we’re going to control a greenhouse gas, why don’t we control it instead of carbon dioxide (CO2)?
This is a common Misconception in the debate over greenhouse gases and the causes of global warming. Both water vapor and carbon dioxide are important greenhouse gases that play a crucial role in atmospheric warming. A greenhouse gas is a gas that absorbs and re-emits infrared radiation in Earth’s atmosphere, thereby increasing temperatures. Which gas then is to blame for global warming and should be controlled?
Water vapor accounts for 60-70% of the greenhouse effect while CO2 accounts for 25% —a notable difference when numbers alone are compared. It would seem then that water vapor should be climatologists’ primary focus. However, water vapor cannot be controlled by human intervention; it is simply a Product of its environment.
The amount of water vapor the atmosphere can hold is dependent on temperature. Under normal conditions, most of the heat emitted from Earth’s surface in the form of long wave radiation goes into the atmosphere and out into space. However, the presence of increased greenhouse gases traps more long-wave radiation, which means there is more energy in the atmosphere to warm the Earth’s surface.
As the atmospheric temperature rises, more water is evaporated from ground storage, such as that found in our rivers, oceans, soils, and reservoirs. The released water vapor becomes a greenhouse gas where it then absorbs more energy radiated from the Earth and thus warms the atmosphere. The warmer atmosphere results in further water evaporation and the cycle continues. This mechanism is known as a Positive Feedback Loop.
Scientists then need to focus on what is causing air temperatures to rise in the first place. Heat from Other Greenhouse Gases is Causing atmospheric Warming, Leading to an increase in water evaporation and compounding the greenhouse effect. Anthropogenic, or human-derived, CO2 serves as the Primary source of Warming with water vapor playing a Secondary role.
While CO2 occurs naturally in the atmosphere, human interference has interrupted the carbon cycle through activities, such as burning forests, mining, and burning coal. These activities artificially release more carbon from their solid storage to its gaseous state in the lower atmosphere. The rapid increase in CO2 volume has exceeded the amount oceans and vegetation are able to re-absorb. Furthermore, as deforestation continues around the world, there is less vegetation every year available to sequester the carbon. Thus, excess CO2 remains in the atmosphere where it traps heat and stimulates water evaporation."...."
Water Vapor, CO2, and Global Warming | IEDRO
another Stupid FrusaderCrank post (135,900 and counting) destroyed with One.
He is THEE Stupidest poster on USMB/any MB.
Another Nonsensical post (or dozens) to follow.
EDIT: Now he restarted the BOGUS thread/LOSS Again.
- - - - - -- -- - - - - - -- -
end april 19, 2023
"bing" my ass.
That was me.
and gave you many More 'impossible' CO2 experiments, that actually a child could do at home/teachers do in school to test GHG CO2!
You are too Stupid to debate.
Just hold up for ridicule for your continued obstinance/idiocy.
`
`
Yes. Tell that to all your fellow scientifically illiterate libturd pals.Consensus is a word. The “scientific method” is a procedure
You’re babbling now, illiterate.Yes. Tell that to all your fellow scientifically illiterate libturd pals.
The consensus here is, you’re an idiot.Yes. Tell that to all your fellow scientifically illiterate libturd pals.
