Bin Laden Liked Lefty Authors

Spare_change

Gold Member
Jun 27, 2011
8,690
1,293
280
The English-language bookshelf in Usama bin Laden’s personal library featured a collection of anti-U.S. polemics and left-wing conspiracy theories from some celebrated darlings of American academia, according to critics who analyzed the terror mastermind's reading list.

Anti-American conspiracy tomes on everything from the CIA to the Federal Reserve were among the 39 English books seized from the Al Qaeda leader’s compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, where a team of Navy SEALs took him out in May 2011.

“Bin Laden's bookshelf showed a generous tolerance for bad prose and an undergraduate's faith in bad ideas," said retired U.S. Army Lt. Col. Ralph Peters, a Fox News contributor and author of nine non-fiction works and more than 20 novels. "With his career as a master terrorist in decline, he would have made a popular Ivy League professor: a great opportunity missed."

The Bin Laden books were listed among some 103 documents, including newspaper clippings and Arabic-language works, declassified Wednesday by the U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence and released under the title, "Bin Laden's bookshelf."

Noam Chomsky, William Blum and Bob Woodward appeared to be among the terrorist kingpin’s favorite authors to curl up with. Chomsky, the liberal icon and MIT professor known for his disparaging view of the U.S., had two of his works in the Bin Laden collection, "Necessary Illusions: Thought Control in Democratic Societies" and "Hegemony or Survival: America’s Quest for Global Dominance."

It was already known that bin Laden was a big fan of Blum, a onetime State Department employee who became disillusioned during the Vietnam War and became a harsh critic of U.S. foreign policy. Blum’s "Rogue State: A Guide to the World’s Only Superpower" and "Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Interventions since World War II" were recovered from Bin Laden’s compound.

Bin Laden had already endorsed “Killing Hope,” recommending in a 2006 audiotape that all Americans read the book. Blum was “amused” with the endorsement, quipping that it was “almost as good as being an Oprah book." Indeed, the then-six-year-old book shot up to No. 30 on Amazon.com's best seller list by the next day.
 
And I have a copy of the Holey Babble on my shelf.

What's yer point?

Simply that it's clear that the leftist philosophy is more attractive to terrorists than is the conservative point of view.
 
And I have a copy of the Holey Babble on my shelf.

What's yer point?

Simply that it's clear that the leftist philosophy is more attractive to terrorists than is the conservative point of view.

You think you can tell what's "attractive" by what's on the bookshelf huh? :lol:
And a terrorist is only a terrorist, right? Like full-time 24/7?

Hitler liked dogs.
 
The English-language bookshelf in Usama bin Laden’s personal library featured a collection of anti-U.S. polemics and left-wing conspiracy theories from some celebrated darlings of American academia, according to critics who analyzed the terror mastermind's reading list.

Anti-American conspiracy tomes on everything from the CIA to the Federal Reserve were among the 39 English books seized from the Al Qaeda leader’s compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, where a team of Navy SEALs took him out in May 2011.

“Bin Laden's bookshelf showed a generous tolerance for bad prose and an undergraduate's faith in bad ideas," said retired U.S. Army Lt. Col. Ralph Peters, a Fox News contributor and author of nine non-fiction works and more than 20 novels. "With his career as a master terrorist in decline, he would have made a popular Ivy League professor: a great opportunity missed."

The Bin Laden books were listed among some 103 documents, including newspaper clippings and Arabic-language works, declassified Wednesday by the U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence and released under the title, "Bin Laden's bookshelf."

Noam Chomsky, William Blum and Bob Woodward appeared to be among the terrorist kingpin’s favorite authors to curl up with. Chomsky, the liberal icon and MIT professor known for his disparaging view of the U.S., had two of his works in the Bin Laden collection, "Necessary Illusions: Thought Control in Democratic Societies" and "Hegemony or Survival: America’s Quest for Global Dominance."

It was already known that bin Laden was a big fan of Blum, a onetime State Department employee who became disillusioned during the Vietnam War and became a harsh critic of U.S. foreign policy. Blum’s "Rogue State: A Guide to the World’s Only Superpower" and "Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Interventions since World War II" were recovered from Bin Laden’s compound.

Bin Laden had already endorsed “Killing Hope,” recommending in a 2006 audiotape that all Americans read the book. Blum was “amused” with the endorsement, quipping that it was “almost as good as being an Oprah book." Indeed, the then-six-year-old book shot up to No. 30 on Amazon.com's best seller list by the next day.
He liked reading intelligent authors. What is your point?
 
The entire lifetime reading list of Joe McCarthy:

1. Mein Kampf

(end of list)

-- pray, what shall we make of that?
 
And I have a copy of the Holey Babble on my shelf.

What's yer point?

Simply that it's clear that the leftist philosophy is more attractive to terrorists than is the conservative point of view.

You think you can tell what's "attractive" by what's on the bookshelf huh? :lol:
And a terrorist is only a terrorist, right? Like full-time 24/7?

Hitler liked dogs.

What an amazing lack of logic all packed into a single post.
 
(CNSNews.com) - Among the papers found in Osama bin Laden's compound is a 15-page document that urges bomb-makers to join al Qaeda to kill "drunkard, sinful" American voters who permit "alien satanic practices" such as same-sex marriage and abortion.

Written by Abu-Salih Al Somali, a senior al Qaeda operative, the attempt to recruit explosives experts and other Muslim scientists explains who they will be killing:

"It is the VOTERS, who choose their leaders who deploy their armies against Muslims, and pay billions of (their produced tax money) to Israel to massacre our brothers and sister(s). It is the voters who vote on laws against the purity and chastity of Hijab and Minarets, While they are the ones who vote in favor of human alien satanic practices such as homosexual marriages and infant butchery in the wombs of their selfish heartless prostitute mothers.

"The voters are the ones, who demanded America's pullout from Vietnam, and they are the ones who pulled out their Spanish troops from Afghanistan and they are the ones who turned the evil Tony Blair into a lame duck and ended his ten-year carrier of arrogance and American subordination with disgrace!!

"The American and European citizens are the switch to shut down this heartless damned Zio-crusade machine of Evil and greed..."
 
And I have a copy of the Holey Babble on my shelf.

What's yer point?

Simply that it's clear that the leftist philosophy is more attractive to terrorists than is the conservative point of view.

You think you can tell what's "attractive" by what's on the bookshelf huh? :lol:
And a terrorist is only a terrorist, right? Like full-time 24/7?

Hitler liked dogs.

What an amazing lack of logic all packed into a single post.

Now you're getting it. That was exactly my thought upon reading the title of this thread.
 
The inconvenient truth for you liberals is you have a lot in common n with the likes of bin Laden. So scoff all you like but this is proof of that.
 
The inconvenient truth for you liberals is you have a lot in common n with the likes of bin Laden. So scoff all you like but this is proof of that.

Like what? Strong religious beliefs? Hatred for gay people? Suspicion of Hollywood Jews and their money? Absolute refusal to allow abortions? Thinking that women aren't worth as much as men?

You fucking idiot.

What is proof? That he has some books? You fucking retard.
 
The inconvenient truth for you liberals is you have a lot in common n with the likes of bin Laden. So scoff all you like but this is proof of that.

Funny, I have a ton of books (way too many) yet not one of the books or authors mentioned in the OP.
What's that mean?


Safe to say though, that the OP's bookshelf apparently does not contain one on logical fallacies.
 
The inconvenient truth for you liberals is you have a lot in common n with the likes of bin Laden. So scoff all you like but this is proof of that.

Like what? Strong religious beliefs? Hatred for gay people? Suspicion of Hollywood Jews and their money? Absolute refusal to allow abortions? Thinking that women aren't worth as much as men?

You fucking idiot.

What is proof? That he has some books? You fucking retard.

Oh fuck off with your strawmen, twit.

How's about hatred of America, hatred of Israel, hatred of Christianity, hatred of Jews.

Take a look of what is in a man's bookshelf tells you a lot about a man. Bin Laden was a lib. Deal with it.
 
The inconvenient truth for you liberals is you have a lot in common n with the likes of bin Laden. So scoff all you like but this is proof of that.

Funny, I have a ton of books (way too many) yet not one of the books or authors mentioned in the OP.
What's that mean?


Safe to say though, that the OP's bookshelf apparently does not contain one on logical fallacies.

That means you and Bin Laden are both libs. You guys probably would have gotten along great.
 
The inconvenient truth for you liberals is you have a lot in common n with the likes of bin Laden. So scoff all you like but this is proof of that.

Like what? Strong religious beliefs? Hatred for gay people? Suspicion of Hollywood Jews and their money? Absolute refusal to allow abortions? Thinking that women aren't worth as much as men?

You fucking idiot.

What is proof? That he has some books? You fucking retard.

Oh fuck off with your strawmen, twit.

How's about hatred of America, hatred of Israel, hatred of Christianity, hatred of Jews.

Take a look of what is in a man's bookshelf tells you a lot about a man. Bin Laden was a lib. Deal with it.


There is no definition in the English language by which OBL can be described as a "Lib". The entire thread is built on a cum hoc fallacy.

I've got a physician's desk reference. Does that make me a doctor? Or a druggie?

Dumbass....
 
The inconvenient truth for you liberals is you have a lot in common n with the likes of bin Laden. So scoff all you like but this is proof of that.

Funny, I have a ton of books (way too many) yet not one of the books or authors mentioned in the OP.
What's that mean?


Safe to say though, that the OP's bookshelf apparently does not contain one on logical fallacies.

That means you and Bin Laden are both libs. You guys probably would have gotten along great.

Ssssoooooo... because I and Bin Laden have no books in common... that makes us... the same thing.

Fucking wacko.
 

Forum List

Back
Top