- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,490
- 32,453
- 2,300
- Thread starter
- #61
Of course you do, just as sure as when CON$ say all Libs parrot MediaMatters or the Daily Kos. You are a perfect example of how CON$ can dish it out but cry like babies when it comes back in kind.Your MessiahRushie would be proud of how you dodged any explanation of how taxing charities like everybody else would get rid of the honest ones, just like he programmed you to do.
Good job!
How many times do I have to say this, I dont listen to Limbaugh. On my drive home I either listen to 101.9 (rock) or the FAT FUCK (Mike Francesa). I havent listened to either hannity or rush in years.
It seems I can form these opinions, ALL BY MYSELF, which must be a troubling concept for you, as you seem to think anyone who disagrees with you is a slobbering rush-bot. That is one of the crucial mistakes of debating, not being able to place a valid reason you opponent has a view opposite of yours.
And I wasnt answering the charity part, I was answering your quip about conservatives having a low opinion of people. My point is progressives do to, seeing that they feel the need to use government to force people to pay for the social programs they want.
Reading is fundemental, or in your case, not so much.
As you will see, I only use established CON$ervative techniques on this board so CON$ will have no room to object. Funny thing is, object they do!!!
Time for my favorite picture response:
If the only thing you are going to do is keep calling me a limbaugh listener, and spout your skewed view of things, then this debate (if there was one) is pretty much over.