Bill de Blasio Reveals That He Wants To Steal From You Using Socialism

[hadit]

a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage is a cost of living adjustment and unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed could solve for simple poverty.

Using your own numbers, I showed you how much it would cost and you could not tell me how you pay for it. You simply kept insisting it would pay for itself.

You don't know what you're talking about.

 

[danielpalos]

a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage is a cost of living adjustment and unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed could solve for simple poverty.

Using your own numbers, I showed you how much it would cost and you could not tell me how you pay for it. You simply kept insisting it would pay for itself.

You don't know what you're talking about.

Business could collect it as a general tax instead of our current regime. Both Employers and Labor could share the cost. The tax is already being collected. The goal is to save money by increasing the efficiency of our social safety net.

 

[hadit]

a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage is a cost of living adjustment and unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed could solve for simple poverty.

Using your own numbers, I showed you how much it would cost and you could not tell me how you pay for it. You simply kept insisting it would pay for itself.

You don't know what you're talking about.

Business could collect it as a general tax instead of our current regime. Both Employers and Labor could share the cost. The tax is already being collected. The goal is to save money by increasing the efficiency of our social safety net.

Businesses should be neither welfare distribution centers not tax collecting agencies. And that still doesn't address how much you're increasing the cost of doing business.

 

[danielpalos]

a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage is a cost of living adjustment and unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed could solve for simple poverty.

Using your own numbers, I showed you how much it would cost and you could not tell me how you pay for it. You simply kept insisting it would pay for itself.

You don't know what you're talking about.

Business could collect it as a general tax instead of our current regime. Both Employers and Labor could share the cost. The tax is already being collected. The goal is to save money by increasing the efficiency of our social safety net.

Businesses should be neither welfare distribution centers not tax collecting agencies. And that still doesn't address how much you're increasing the cost of doing business.

Regulating Commerce is a power delegated to Congress. And, the objective is to lower costs through simplification. Splitting the cost with Labor ensures market based metrics are available to both parties.

 

[hadit]

a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage is a cost of living adjustment and unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed could solve for simple poverty.

Using your own numbers, I showed you how much it would cost and you could not tell me how you pay for it. You simply kept insisting it would pay for itself.

You don't know what you're talking about.

Business could collect it as a general tax instead of our current regime. Both Employers and Labor could share the cost. The tax is already being collected. The goal is to save money by increasing the efficiency of our social safety net.

Businesses should be neither welfare distribution centers not tax collecting agencies. And that still doesn't address how much you're increasing the cost of doing business.

Regulating Commerce is a power delegated to Congress. And, the objective is to lower costs through simplification. Splitting the cost with Labor ensures market based metrics are available to both parties.

How much are you asking to the cost of doing business?

 

[danielpalos]

a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage is a cost of living adjustment and unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed could solve for simple poverty.

Using your own numbers, I showed you how much it would cost and you could not tell me how you pay for it. You simply kept insisting it would pay for itself.

You don't know what you're talking about.

Business could collect it as a general tax instead of our current regime. Both Employers and Labor could share the cost. The tax is already being collected. The goal is to save money by increasing the efficiency of our social safety net.

Businesses should be neither welfare distribution centers not tax collecting agencies. And that still doesn't address how much you're increasing the cost of doing business.

Regulating Commerce is a power delegated to Congress. And, the objective is to lower costs through simplification. Splitting the cost with Labor ensures market based metrics are available to both parties.

How much are you asking to the cost of doing business?

The point is that is less expensive than our current regime. Simplification results in cost savings and improvement in the efficiency of our economy.

 

[hadit]

Using your own numbers, I showed you how much it would cost and you could not tell me how you pay for it. You simply kept insisting it would pay for itself.

You don't know what you're talking about.

Business could collect it as a general tax instead of our current regime. Both Employers and Labor could share the cost. The tax is already being collected. The goal is to save money by increasing the efficiency of our social safety net.

Businesses should be neither welfare distribution centers not tax collecting agencies. And that still doesn't address how much you're increasing the cost of doing business.

Regulating Commerce is a power delegated to Congress. And, the objective is to lower costs through simplification. Splitting the cost with Labor ensures market based metrics are available to both parties.

How much are you asking to the cost of doing business?

The point is that is less expensive than our current regime. Simplification results in cost savings and improvement in the efficiency of our economy.

You claim with no basis in fact that your prescription is cheaper. I already showed you that you would need an additional $3 trillion every year to do what you want, just to start. How is that cheaper than today?

 

[danielpalos]

Business could collect it as a general tax instead of our current regime. Both Employers and Labor could share the cost. The tax is already being collected. The goal is to save money by increasing the efficiency of our social safety net.

Businesses should be neither welfare distribution centers not tax collecting agencies. And that still doesn't address how much you're increasing the cost of doing business.

Regulating Commerce is a power delegated to Congress. And, the objective is to lower costs through simplification. Splitting the cost with Labor ensures market based metrics are available to both parties.

How much are you asking to the cost of doing business?

The point is that is less expensive than our current regime. Simplification results in cost savings and improvement in the efficiency of our economy.

You claim with no basis in fact that your prescription is cheaper. I already showed you that you would need an additional $3 trillion every year to do what you want, just to start. How is that cheaper than today?

Most if not all is already being collected or sunk as a cost. Our current regime is expensive and prone to litigation. Compensation for simply being unemployed is much more cost effective.

If we simply end our current regime in favor of more market friendly means; A State could issue bonds to raise initial funding. General taxes on employers could be assessed when necessary.

States would recover some of that revenue via State and local taxes. The rest would be used to create demand by those who are merely unemployed.