Bill Clinton shanking and macking the GOP

Liar and chief

Clinton admits misleading testimony, avoids charges in Lewinsky probe
President's law license suspended for 5 years

CNN.com - Clinton admits misleading testimony, avoids charges in Lewinsky probe - January 19, 2001

I apologize for being direct, I see you fly an American and Israeli flag. Based on my understanding of the traditional Jewish marriage. Getting blow jobs are not on the table, I don't wanna overstep my bounds. I can comprehend your frustration sexually, by fixating your frustrations on a guy getting some action.:eusa_whistle:

Ummm...What? I could care less what Clinton did, just not in the oval office, and no perjury. Now crawl back under your rock loon before you embarrass yourself further:cuckoo:
 
Have conventions ever been shown to effect an election? I would think debates have more impact than a parade of stump speeches.

Don't diminish the American opportunity, to have a full blown masturbation fest.



And yes I feel Regan and kennedy's conventions had substantial meaning.


An absolutely debates, can bring home the win.
 
Last edited:
Bill Clinton’s Democratic Convention speech tonight will no doubt be loaded with references to his great economic achievements as president, plus warnings that a vote for Mitt Romney will be a vote to return to the economic disaster of the Bush era.

In other words, Clinton won’t mention a whole bunch of inconvenient facts — about what brought the prosperity of the 1990s, and how he himself helped put America on the path to the 2008 financial crisis.

He’ll tell us that a vote for President Obama will bring back the glory days of the 1990s — but those days weren’t so great until Republicans won control of Congress in the 1994 elections. That’s when Clinton turned right, and joined the GOP to put a hold on spending and lower taxes — allowing the technology boom to sustain the US economy through the Clinton years.

It’s an absurd distortion of reality that the Bush-era tax cuts or spending on Iraq were even remotely responsible for the 2008 banking collapse and the Great Recession — though both claims are now core to the left’s talking points in defense of President Obama’s failures as president (and largely unchallenged by a sympathetic media).

Yet the reality of what caused the banking collapse has the fingerprints of tonight’s keynote speaker all over it. Consider two Bubba boo-boos that trace straight to the housing bubble and the 2008 financial crisis.

The first is his obsession with pushing homeownership to new highs via government coercion. The second is his unleashing of Wall Street risk-taking.

Clinton charged his Housing secretaries, Henry Cisneros and Andrew Cuomo, with driving homeownership rates up to about 70 percent of households from around 64 percent in the early ’90s.

How did they do this? Through rigorous enforcement of housing mandates such as theCommunity Reinvestment Act, and by prodding mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to make loans to people with lower credit scores (and to buy loans that had been made by banks and, later, “innovators” like Countrywide).

The Housing Department was Fannie and Freddie’s top regulator — and under Cuomo the mortgage giants were forced to start ramping up programs to issue more subprime loans to the riskiest of borrowers.

We know how that turned out: Fannie and Freddie help stoke a housing bubble that actually made homeownership less affordable unless borrowers took out ever-more-risky loans. Eventually, both agencies imploded (along with the housing market); bailing them out since 2008 has already cost taxpayers more than $100 billion

Bubba & the housing bubble - NYPOST.com
 
There's only one problem, Kiddies...as wonderful as Bill Clinton is...he's not our President. We're stuck with Barack Obama. You know the guy that didn't pivot to the center after he got his ass handed to him in the mid-term elections of his first term. The guy that made enemies of everyone across the aisle with how he handled his Democratic majorities in the House and Senate and then was too proud to meet them half way when the electorate gave a blistering rebuke of his policies? The guy that not only can't balance a budget but can't get people in his own party to vote for the one he submits? The guy that hasn't HAD a plan to get the economy moving since Larry Summers tucked tail and ran back to Harvard? The guy that's added 5 trillion dollars to the national debt in less than four years with trillions more on the way?

THAT'S the guy we're stuck with. Bill Clinton? He's the guy we DON'T have!!!
 

LMAO. Obama will speak tomorrow, and I expect he'll drive the nail in deeper. Clinton was incredible, but Obama is no slouch when it comes to oration.

So why didn't Romney use Bush instead of Eastwood?
President Clinton mentioned President Bush more times tonight than all of the RNC did last week.

They are clearly ashamed of their support of Shrub.
 

I apologize for being direct, I see you fly an American and Israeli flag. Based on my understanding of the traditional Jewish marriage. Getting blow jobs are not on the table, I don't wanna overstep my bounds. I can comprehend your frustration sexually, by fixating your frustrations on a guy getting some action.:eusa_whistle:

Ummm...What? I could care less what Clinton did, just not in the oval office, and no perjury. Now crawl back under your rock loon before you embarrass yourself further:cuckoo:

I find it fascinating, from the time of the American revolution to now. You cannot accept the possibility that a whole lotta man, got a whole lotta blowjobs in the oval office. The republicans can't rack up points on Clinton on the policy front. And during the same time several individuals were exposed of being hypocrites. So they went for the only option that was available. And that most of the members practice nightly in the house and the senate truly on a nightly basis. Come back to me when you can get over sexual frustrations.
 

LMAO. Obama will speak tomorrow, and I expect he'll drive the nail in deeper. Clinton was incredible, but Obama is no slouch when it comes to oration.

So why didn't Romney use Bush instead of Eastwood?

Because Romney can stand on his own two feet. He has a vision for the future, he doesnt need to turn to leaders of the past.

And what is that, other than a planet of his very own. :lol:
 
Class warfare, race baiting, mendacity, spin, and demagoguery. Yeah, he hit a lot of the typical democrat favorites.
 
President Clinton detailed facts and truth about Romney/Ryan lies and their destructive plans for America - and his speech will echo until Election Day.
 
"In Tampa," said Clinton, "the Republican argument against the president's re-election was pretty simple: We left him a total mess, he hasn't finished cleaning it up yet, so fire him and put us back in."
 
gop-keep-dig.jpg
 
I watched it i thought it was an eye opener to all the lies we have been fed lately not to mention he owned the republicans in one night. And there response was what i expected it to be trying to turn it around somehow someway but they couldn't.
 
I watched it i thought it was an eye opener to all the lies we have been fed lately not to mention he owned the republicans in one night. And there response was what i expected it to be trying to turn it around somehow someway but they couldn't.

Hey stupid

its-the-economy-stupid-congress-president-reid-pelosi-obama-political-poster-1260158963.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top