- Nov 10, 2019
- 45,206
- 28,637
- 2,490
- Moderator
- #21
You got a link to this "republican plan"?Not sure. It was a republican plan. I didn't get the details.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You got a link to this "republican plan"?Not sure. It was a republican plan. I didn't get the details.
Good deal. Sort of like the late justice Scalia?I'm a Constitutional Conservative.
They are ALL from the left. Reagan was a leftist.I applaud your integrity, just showing that attacks on the 2nd are not just from the left.
Sure.You got a link to this "republican plan"?
Lol. Ok. Reagan is a leftist now. FFS.They are ALL from the left. Reagan was a leftist.
Incorrect. He always was.Lol. Ok. Reagan is a leftist now. FFS.
That link does not show or quote what you say or even the words put in by USA Today article, or attributed. The article does show even DJT in favor of greater screenings and age restrictions for sale.Sure.
“Or, Mike, take the firearms first and then go to court, because that’s another system. Because a lot of times, by the time you go to court, it takes so long to go to court, to get the due process procedures. I like taking the guns early. Like in this crazy man’s case that just took place in Florida, he had a lot of firearms – they saw everything – to go to court would have taken a long time, so you could do exactly what you’re saying, but take the guns first, go through due process second.” ~DJT
Fact check: Trump, not Biden, made comment about taking guns without due process
Former President Donald Trump suggested the strategy in 2018 after a fatal school shooting.www.usatoday.com
Sure.Incorrect. He always was.
It shows that the Republican President's plan is to bypass the courts and take the guns from the crazies early. That is his direct quote and that is what my post stated.That link does not show or quote what you say or even the words put in by USA Today article, or attributed. The article does show even DJT in favor of greater screenings and age restrictions for sale.
Sure.
The problem with the asshole Libtards is that think anybody that doesn't want the US to be a Socialist shithole is crazy.Stupid. We need to just find the crazies and take their guns, everyone else should be good to go.
They were wrong and it was unconstitutional.
All Republicans have deficit spent. Save social security? So Biden was right? Republicans don't want SS?Reagan deficit spent, banned guns, saved social security, expanded tax credits, raised taxes etc. Thats big govt bulshit. IE leftism.
Dont blame me you dont know what left and right means.
Western US. Don't want to be more specific then that.
maybe we can make a law that says you cant harm other people with or without a gun??Beats me, but it needs to be done. You have to bypass the courts because they take to long.
I applaud your integrity, just showing that attacks on the 2nd are not just from the left.
The problem with the asshole Libtards is that think anybody that doesn't want the US to be a Socialist shithole is crazy.
For instance, remember when the Worthless Negro Administration Justice Department said that veterans that believe in god and who own firearms are potential terrorists?
You can't trust Republicans either. Especially if they decide you're crazy, they may just show up and take your guns.You can't trust Democrat assholes like this Potatohead peice of shit to decide who is deserving to keep and bear arms and who can not. That is not how the Bill of Rights works.
Cue the spin doctors to rush in and explain that he didn't mean what he said and they'll tell us what he really meant.If I laid these challenges once, I laid them a thousand times:Biden vows to ban assault weapons 'come hell or high water'
President Biden said in a speech on Wednesday night that he will ban assault weapons and high capacity magazines “come hell or high water.”www.foxnews.com
-Please explain to the class why you think a ban - federal or state - on 'assault weapons' will survive the inevitable trip to the USSC.
-Please explain to us how 'assault weapons' do not fall under the umbrella of "all bearable arms".
As many times as these challenges have been laid, there has been exactly zero meaningful response.