More democrat tastelessness. No appreciation for aesthetics.
Democrats are the dumbest snobs in history.
Democrats are the dumbest snobs in history.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yeah, thank them for your future slavery to the government, because of them. They spend you future monies, you will to pick up the tab at a later date...Think about that, you moron...Weren't you around when FDR and Keynes were still alive? Both of them were part of the New Deal/World War II economy...you know that. Now stay on topic of the wind farms, Sparky
Then, like someone else pointed out, wait until the next hurricaneIt costs three times the cost of one windmill to service one that is offshore...are you people freaking mad?.....the reason they are looking offshore is because there isn't enough wind on shore to do any good....what's next?...solar panels in space?....shit it will cost $300 bucks just to flip on a light....
With the hot air the comes whistling out of D.C., they should ring the entire District with these. All facing inward. I'll bet they could surpass the 220 gWatt range.Darn, they sure are pretty....
The White House on Monday detailed an ambitious plan to expand wind farms along the East Coast and jump-start the country’s nascent offshore wind industry, saying it hoped to trigger a massive clean-energy effort in the fight against climate change.
The plan would generate 30 gigawatts of offshore wind power by the end of the decade — enough to power more than 10 million American homes and cut 78 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions. To accomplish that, the Biden administration said, it would speed permitting for projects off the East Coast, invest in research and development, provide low-interest loans to industry and fund changes to U.S. ports.
The initiative represents a major stretch for the United States. The country has only one offshore wind project online at this time, generating 30 megawatts, off Rhode Island.
--------In addition, they will partner with corporate America to help map out data regarding ocean climate and bio-diversity.--------
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has entered a memorandum of agreement with Ørsted Wind Power North America LLC, an offshore wind development company to share physical and biological data in Ørsted-leased waters subject to U.S. jurisdiction. NOAA anticipates that Ørsted’s data will fill gaps in ocean mapping and observing to help NOAA better understand weather, climate and ocean processes and build resilient coastal communities and economies. As part of the agreement, NOAA will also share its publicly available data with Ørsted. Together, this information sharing will be used to ensure that offshore renewable energy technologies and infrastructure are developed, deployed, and maintained effectively.
Well, looks like they want to move towards cleaner energy. They want it to look like this:
View attachment 473947
Maybe we should put a bunch of those wind turbines just offshore of Obungles' house in Martha's Vinyard where he can enjoy the view!!!!!
A whole 30 gigawatts. Wow, just enough to light a candle or two.
The White House on Monday detailed an ambitious plan to expand wind farms along the East Coast and jump-start the country’s nascent offshore wind industry, saying it hoped to trigger a massive clean-energy effort in the fight against climate change.
The plan would generate 30 gigawatts of offshore wind power by the end of the decade — enough to power more than 10 million American homes and cut 78 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions. To accomplish that, the Biden administration said, it would speed permitting for projects off the East Coast, invest in research and development, provide low-interest loans to industry and fund changes to U.S. ports.
The initiative represents a major stretch for the United States. The country has only one offshore wind project online at this time, generating 30 megawatts, off Rhode Island.
--------In addition, they will partner with corporate America to help map out data regarding ocean climate and bio-diversity.--------
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has entered a memorandum of agreement with Ørsted Wind Power North America LLC, an offshore wind development company to share physical and biological data in Ørsted-leased waters subject to U.S. jurisdiction. NOAA anticipates that Ørsted’s data will fill gaps in ocean mapping and observing to help NOAA better understand weather, climate and ocean processes and build resilient coastal communities and economies. As part of the agreement, NOAA will also share its publicly available data with Ørsted. Together, this information sharing will be used to ensure that offshore renewable energy technologies and infrastructure are developed, deployed, and maintained effectively.
Well, looks like they want to move towards cleaner energy. They want it to look like this:
View attachment 473947
The blades on wind turbines can retreat in and reduce its likelihood of being dragged in a hurricane.Then, like someone else pointed out, wait until the next hurricaneIt costs three times the cost of one windmill to service one that is offshore...are you people freaking mad?.....the reason they are looking offshore is because there isn't enough wind on shore to do any good....what's next?...solar panels in space?....shit it will cost $300 bucks just to flip on a light....
Weren't you around when FDR and Keynes were still alive? Both of them were part of the New Deal/World War II economy...you know that. Now stay on topic of the wind farms, Sparky
Fishermen strongly oppose them--they are giant, destroy bottom and put big dents in where they can fish.The blades on wind turbines can retreat in and reduce its likelihood of being dragged in a hurricane.Then, like someone else pointed out, wait until the next hurricaneIt costs three times the cost of one windmill to service one that is offshore...are you people freaking mad?.....the reason they are looking offshore is because there isn't enough wind on shore to do any good....what's next?...solar panels in space?....shit it will cost $300 bucks just to flip on a light....
The White House on Monday detailed an ambitious plan to expand wind farms along the East Coast and jump-start the country’s nascent offshore wind industry, saying it hoped to trigger a massive clean-energy effort in the fight against climate change.
The plan would generate 30 gigawatts of offshore wind power by the end of the decade — enough to power more than 10 million American homes and cut 78 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions. To accomplish that, the Biden administration said, it would speed permitting for projects off the East Coast, invest in research and development, provide low-interest loans to industry and fund changes to U.S. ports.
The initiative represents a major stretch for the United States. The country has only one offshore wind project online at this time, generating 30 megawatts, off Rhode Island.
-In addition, they will partner with corporate America to help map out data regarding ocean climate and bio-diversity.-
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has entered a memorandum of agreement with Ørsted Wind Power North America LLC, an offshore wind development company to share physical and biological data in Ørsted-leased waters subject to U.S. jurisdiction. NOAA anticipates that Ørsted’s data will fill gaps in ocean mapping and observing to help NOAA better understand weather, climate and ocean processes and build resilient coastal communities and economies. As part of the agreement, NOAA will also share its publicly available data with Ørsted. Together, this information sharing will be used to ensure that offshore renewable energy technologies and infrastructure are developed, deployed, and maintained effectively.
Well, looks like they want to move towards cleaner energy.
You might want to watch a documentary made by an environmentalist to look behind the curtain:
Planet of the Humans | By Jeff Gibbs, Executive Producer Michael Moore
This eco-documentary takes a harsh look at how the environmental movement has lost the battle through well-meaning but disastrous choices.planetofthehumans.com
.
The blades on wind turbines can retreat in and reduce its likelihood of being dragged in a hurricane.
The White House on Monday detailed an ambitious plan to expand wind farms along the East Coast and jump-start the country’s nascent offshore wind industry, saying it hoped to trigger a massive clean-energy effort in the fight against climate change.
The plan would generate 30 gigawatts of offshore wind power by the end of the decade — enough to power more than 10 million American homes and cut 78 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions. To accomplish that, the Biden administration said, it would speed permitting for projects off the East Coast, invest in research and development, provide low-interest loans to industry and fund changes to U.S. ports.
The initiative represents a major stretch for the United States. The country has only one offshore wind project online at this time, generating 30 megawatts, off Rhode Island.
-In addition, they will partner with corporate America to help map out data regarding ocean climate and bio-diversity.-
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has entered a memorandum of agreement with Ørsted Wind Power North America LLC, an offshore wind development company to share physical and biological data in Ørsted-leased waters subject to U.S. jurisdiction. NOAA anticipates that Ørsted’s data will fill gaps in ocean mapping and observing to help NOAA better understand weather, climate and ocean processes and build resilient coastal communities and economies. As part of the agreement, NOAA will also share its publicly available data with Ørsted. Together, this information sharing will be used to ensure that offshore renewable energy technologies and infrastructure are developed, deployed, and maintained effectively.
Well, looks like they want to move towards cleaner energy.
Well, no Kennedys in Congress, so it might pass.
Do you have any idea how many electricians, apprentices, helpers, and supporting trades those projects employ?
How much they pay?
Or commercial solar projects?
Let someone who has worked them help you out.
A hell of a lot more than all fossil fuel jobs, and pipeline jobs combined.
Electricians make $8000-$20,000 a month, depending on the project. Apprentices, make $20-$35 an hour depending on the project. Helpers make $600-$1000 a week depending on the project.
Those are the on shore jobs. The off shore jobs pay more.
Once renewable energy installations hit the residential market at a faster pace than they are now, there's your green energy economy, and it will be huge for decades to come.
Anybody that hasn't grasped this fact yet is an idiot. And trust me when I tell you, none of the guys currently working those jobs, give a rats ass what the naysayers think.
The article goes over the costs and the CO2 savings.
Oh right...I forgot. Facts are lies, windmills cause cancer, and Trump is still President.......how silly of me. I'm talking to westwall.
Nuclear is the best option but extremists mislead people about that.I'm all for renewable energy; we have to have the power, so there's no argument it has to come from somewhere. Just be aware nothing's free. There is always a cost.