Bible criticism

[yiostheoy]

.

Christianity was the first faith that taught loyalty to government.

link ...


however an absurd reasoning their material objectives do coincide.

.

You cannot look up "render to Caesar" on your own?

What are you? Lame?

.

You cannot look up "render to Caesar" on your own?

that was not what you claimed ...

Christianity was the first faith that taught loyalty to government.

few religions have ever been anything but subservient to their governance, christianity veered from breaking that mold for expediency to claim it was a pledge of loyalty would make their faith even less meaningful than it already is.


- which ever religion was the first not to "render to Caesar" was probably the last ...

.

Muslims don't have any provisions in their Quran for loyalty to state.

Put that in your pipe and smoke on that for a while.

Islam like Judaism is a theocracy.

And they are both still around.

 

[emilynghiem]

A Jew is any person whose mother was a Jew or any person who has gone through the formal process of conversionto Judaism.

So Jew is not a race, thank you.

I can also show you many verses of Jews who disagree with that.

Jew is a race AND religion, dufus. Learn to read English.

Well I disagree and so do many rabbis and atheist jews.

it is silly for a person who has no idea what the term
"race" means-----to discuss----the issue

Dear irosie91
If you define race by genetics, then people who descended from Jewish ancestors still carry genetics of their relatives.

What I learned from bone marrow donation drives, is that people are best matched not only by "race" but by nationality that also shows up in genetic factors.

Since Caucasians have a 90% compatibility rate in finding matches, the marketing for recruiting donors has been more focused on reaching out to the Minorities that combined have only 10% chance of finding a match:
* Native American
* African
* Asian
* Latin

So from there, when searching for a match, they will target the nationality of the recipient and focus donor drives on the Vietnamese community, the Indian, the Nigerian, etc. Starting with the family and trying to work with the Community, region and country around the person to find the closest match (at least 8 out of 10 factors need to match to reduce risk of rejection, so family members are more likely to match, then people of the same ethnicity or nationality).

If we wanted to look into how much of "Jewish" descent is genetic and how much is cultural, maybe that approach might help. Assuming that "race" is tied to the actual "genetics" of passing inherited traits from one generation to the next PHYSICALLY. The rest is passed CULTURALLY.

Would that help?

What do you think, would this mean people would identify as "Israeli" or "Palestinian" by region or community? And not necessarily by "Jew" or "Arab."

What labels would you use for the genetic patterns?
Race or region?

 

[BreezeWood]

.

Christianity was the first faith that taught loyalty to government.

link ...


however an absurd reasoning their material objectives do coincide.

.

You cannot look up "render to Caesar" on your own?

What are you? Lame?

.

You cannot look up "render to Caesar" on your own?

that was not what you claimed ...

Christianity was the first faith that taught loyalty to government.

few religions have ever been anything but subservient to their governance, christianity veered from breaking that mold for expediency to claim it was a pledge of loyalty would make their faith even less meaningful than it already is.


- which ever religion was the first not to "render to Caesar" was probably the last ...

.

Muslims don't have any provisions in their Quran for loyalty to state.

Put that in your pipe and smoke on that for a while.

Islam like Judaism is a theocracy.

And they are both still around.

.

Muslims don't have any provisions in their Quran for loyalty to state.

the Iraq caliphate is the attempt for a strict muslim sharia state that may materially already exist elsewhere but is not now recognized nationally as freedom of religion exists in all states presently however your point is correct with the allowances that do exist ...

other religions do recognize the states they exist in and is not a first ever for christanity.

.

 

[irosie91]

A Jew is any person whose mother was a Jew or any person who has gone through the formal process of conversionto Judaism.

So Jew is not a race, thank you.

I can also show you many verses of Jews who disagree with that.

Jew is a race AND religion, dufus. Learn to read English.

Well I disagree and so do many rabbis and atheist jews.

it is silly for a person who has no idea what the term
"race" means-----to discuss----the issue

Dear irosie91
If you define race by genetics, then people who descended from Jewish ancestors still carry genetics of their relatives.

What I learned from bone marrow donation drives, is that people are best matched not only by "race" but by nationality that also shows up in genetic factors.

Since Caucasians have a 90% compatibility rate in finding matches, the marketing for recruiting donors has been more focused on reaching out to the Minorities that combined have only 10% chance of finding a match:
* Native American
* African
* Asian
* Latin

So from there, when searching for a match, they will target the nationality of the recipient and focus donor drives on the Vietnamese community, the Indian, the Nigerian, etc. Starting with the family and trying to work with the Community, region and country around the person to find the closest match (at least 8 out of 10 factors need to match to reduce risk of rejection, so family members are more likely to match, then people of the same ethnicity or nationality).

If we wanted to look into how much of "Jewish" descent is genetic and how much is cultural, maybe that approach might help. Assuming that "race" is tied to the actual "genetics" of passing inherited traits from one generation to the next PHYSICALLY. The rest is passed CULTURALLY.

Would that help?

What do you think, would this mean people would identify as "Israeli" or "Palestinian" by region or community? And not necessarily by "Jew" or "Arab."

What labels would you use for the genetic patterns?
Race or region?

sorry Emily----your understanding of the issue of race is-----
----well------silly. Not quite as idiotic as is that of Penelope.
The subject you have approached is POPULATION GENETICS. ------persons who live in groups-----and --intermarry with each other-----TEND TO SHARE GENETIC
MATERIAL-------the SUM TOTAL OF THE GENETIC MATERIAL AVAILABLE within a given group is called its
""GENE POOL"" There are lots and lots of GROUPS---
of the human species that tend to intermarry-----like thousands.
But some people in those groups do MARRY OUT and mix up
the THOUSANDS of gene pools------Humans INTERMARRY
vigorously over the past MANY MANY millennia-----thus there are NO RACES on the planet with very minor exceptions

 

[Penelope]

A Jew is any person whose mother was a Jew or any person who has gone through the formal process of conversionto Judaism.

So Jew is not a race, thank you.

I can also show you many verses of Jews who disagree with that.

Jew is a race AND religion, dufus. Learn to read English.

Well I disagree and so do many rabbis and atheist jews.

it is silly for a person who has no idea what the term
"race" means-----to discuss----the issue

Dear irosie91
If you define race by genetics, then people who descended from Jewish ancestors still carry genetics of their relatives.

What I learned from bone marrow donation drives, is that people are best matched not only by "race" but by nationality that also shows up in genetic factors.

Since Caucasians have a 90% compatibility rate in finding matches, the marketing for recruiting donors has been more focused on reaching out to the Minorities that combined have only 10% chance of finding a match:
* Native American
* African
* Asian
* Latin

So from there, when searching for a match, they will target the nationality of the recipient and focus donor drives on the Vietnamese community, the Indian, the Nigerian, etc. Starting with the family and trying to work with the Community, region and country around the person to find the closest match (at least 8 out of 10 factors need to match to reduce risk of rejection, so family members are more likely to match, then people of the same ethnicity or nationality).

If we wanted to look into how much of "Jewish" descent is genetic and how much is cultural, maybe that approach might help. Assuming that "race" is tied to the actual "genetics" of passing inherited traits from one generation to the next PHYSICALLY. The rest is passed CULTURALLY.

Would that help?

What do you think, would this mean people would identify as "Israeli" or "Palestinian" by region or community? And not necessarily by "Jew" or "Arab."

What labels would you use for the genetic patterns?
Race or region?

sorry Emily----your understanding of the issue of race is-----
----well------silly. Not quite as idiotic as is that of Penelope.
The subject you have approached is POPULATION GENETICS. ------persons who live in groups-----and --intermarry with each other-----TEND TO SHARE GENETIC
MATERIAL-------the SUM TOTAL OF THE GENETIC MATERIAL AVAILABLE within a given group is called its
""GENE POOL"" There are lots and lots of GROUPS---
of the human species that tend to intermarry-----like thousands.
But some people in those groups do MARRY OUT and mix up
the THOUSANDS of gene pools------Humans INTERMARRY
vigorously over the past MANY MANY millennia-----thus there are NO RACES on the planet with very minor exceptions

Like I said, were all mix breeds.

 

[irosie91]

Jew is a race AND religion, dufus. Learn to read English.

Well I disagree and so do many rabbis and atheist jews.

it is silly for a person who has no idea what the term
"race" means-----to discuss----the issue

Dear irosie91
If you define race by genetics, then people who descended from Jewish ancestors still carry genetics of their relatives.

What I learned from bone marrow donation drives, is that people are best matched not only by "race" but by nationality that also shows up in genetic factors.

Since Caucasians have a 90% compatibility rate in finding matches, the marketing for recruiting donors has been more focused on reaching out to the Minorities that combined have only 10% chance of finding a match:
* Native American
* African
* Asian
* Latin

So from there, when searching for a match, they will target the nationality of the recipient and focus donor drives on the Vietnamese community, the Indian, the Nigerian, etc. Starting with the family and trying to work with the Community, region and country around the person to find the closest match (at least 8 out of 10 factors need to match to reduce risk of rejection, so family members are more likely to match, then people of the same ethnicity or nationality).

If we wanted to look into how much of "Jewish" descent is genetic and how much is cultural, maybe that approach might help. Assuming that "race" is tied to the actual "genetics" of passing inherited traits from one generation to the next PHYSICALLY. The rest is passed CULTURALLY.

Would that help?

What do you think, would this mean people would identify as "Israeli" or "Palestinian" by region or community? And not necessarily by "Jew" or "Arab."

What labels would you use for the genetic patterns?
Race or region?

sorry Emily----your understanding of the issue of race is-----
----well------silly. Not quite as idiotic as is that of Penelope.
The subject you have approached is POPULATION GENETICS. ------persons who live in groups-----and --intermarry with each other-----TEND TO SHARE GENETIC
MATERIAL-------the SUM TOTAL OF THE GENETIC MATERIAL AVAILABLE within a given group is called its
""GENE POOL"" There are lots and lots of GROUPS---
of the human species that tend to intermarry-----like thousands.
But some people in those groups do MARRY OUT and mix up
the THOUSANDS of gene pools------Humans INTERMARRY
vigorously over the past MANY MANY millennia-----thus there are NO RACES on the planet with very minor exceptions

Like I said, were all mix breeds.

so true----and you lost out in the MIX-----my kid knew the grammer of English better than do you when he was three years old-------at age two he still had some babyish pronunciations------like he said "NAKPIN" for "NAPKIN"----
but by age three he had contractions right. ----something seems to have gone badly wrong----probably left BROCA's
area---which is frontal lobe----sorta posterior in the lobe and
just superior to the sylvian fissue. You might benefit from
remediation

 

[irosie91]

for the record----the term "RACE" is very vague not only in humans but in all species------it refers to the GENE POOL of a
GROUP-------but does not EXCLUSE all "mixing" of same species. The definition of "species" is actually animals or plants that INTERBREED IN NATURE.--------"race" refers to
group that PREDOMINANTLY has remained in a specific gene pool for a VERY LONG TIME-----enough to create physical distinctions between MOST of that "racial group" and most of other "racial groups" -------Emily will understand but Penny is hopeless

 

[irosie91]

Jew is a race AND religion, dufus. Learn to read English.

Well I disagree and so do many rabbis and atheist jews.

it is silly for a person who has no idea what the term
"race" means-----to discuss----the issue

Dear irosie91
If you define race by genetics, then people who descended from Jewish ancestors still carry genetics of their relatives.

What I learned from bone marrow donation drives, is that people are best matched not only by "race" but by nationality that also shows up in genetic factors.

Since Caucasians have a 90% compatibility rate in finding matches, the marketing for recruiting donors has been more focused on reaching out to the Minorities that combined have only 10% chance of finding a match:
* Native American
* African
* Asian
* Latin

So from there, when searching for a match, they will target the nationality of the recipient and focus donor drives on the Vietnamese community, the Indian, the Nigerian, etc. Starting with the family and trying to work with the Community, region and country around the person to find the closest match (at least 8 out of 10 factors need to match to reduce risk of rejection, so family members are more likely to match, then people of the same ethnicity or nationality).

If we wanted to look into how much of "Jewish" descent is genetic and how much is cultural, maybe that approach might help. Assuming that "race" is tied to the actual "genetics" of passing inherited traits from one generation to the next PHYSICALLY. The rest is passed CULTURALLY.

Would that help?

What do you think, would this mean people would identify as "Israeli" or "Palestinian" by region or community? And not necessarily by "Jew" or "Arab."

What labels would you use for the genetic patterns?
Race or region?

sorry Emily----your understanding of the issue of race is-----
----well------silly. Not quite as idiotic as is that of Penelope.
The subject you have approached is POPULATION GENETICS. ------persons who live in groups-----and --intermarry with each other-----TEND TO SHARE GENETIC
MATERIAL-------the SUM TOTAL OF THE GENETIC MATERIAL AVAILABLE within a given group is called its
""GENE POOL"" There are lots and lots of GROUPS---
of the human species that tend to intermarry-----like thousands.
But some people in those groups do MARRY OUT and mix up
the THOUSANDS of gene pools------Humans INTERMARRY
vigorously over the past MANY MANY millennia-----thus there are NO RACES on the planet with very minor exceptions

Like I said, were all mix breeds.

try again WE ARE (WE'RE) ALL MIXED BREEDS.-----
[not news to any person with an intellect above that or an
ape----but penny imagines she invented the idea-----in fact---
despite the fact that WE ARE (we're) all mixed genetically,
anthropologists still describe "races" ----a vague concept for
scientists like me------a very confusing statement for penny]

 

[yiostheoy]

Well I disagree and so do many rabbis and atheist jews.

it is silly for a person who has no idea what the term
"race" means-----to discuss----the issue

Dear irosie91
If you define race by genetics, then people who descended from Jewish ancestors still carry genetics of their relatives.

What I learned from bone marrow donation drives, is that people are best matched not only by "race" but by nationality that also shows up in genetic factors.

Since Caucasians have a 90% compatibility rate in finding matches, the marketing for recruiting donors has been more focused on reaching out to the Minorities that combined have only 10% chance of finding a match:
* Native American
* African
* Asian
* Latin

So from there, when searching for a match, they will target the nationality of the recipient and focus donor drives on the Vietnamese community, the Indian, the Nigerian, etc. Starting with the family and trying to work with the Community, region and country around the person to find the closest match (at least 8 out of 10 factors need to match to reduce risk of rejection, so family members are more likely to match, then people of the same ethnicity or nationality).

If we wanted to look into how much of "Jewish" descent is genetic and how much is cultural, maybe that approach might help. Assuming that "race" is tied to the actual "genetics" of passing inherited traits from one generation to the next PHYSICALLY. The rest is passed CULTURALLY.

Would that help?

What do you think, would this mean people would identify as "Israeli" or "Palestinian" by region or community? And not necessarily by "Jew" or "Arab."

What labels would you use for the genetic patterns?
Race or region?

sorry Emily----your understanding of the issue of race is-----
----well------silly. Not quite as idiotic as is that of Penelope.
The subject you have approached is POPULATION GENETICS. ------persons who live in groups-----and --intermarry with each other-----TEND TO SHARE GENETIC
MATERIAL-------the SUM TOTAL OF THE GENETIC MATERIAL AVAILABLE within a given group is called its
""GENE POOL"" There are lots and lots of GROUPS---
of the human species that tend to intermarry-----like thousands.
But some people in those groups do MARRY OUT and mix up
the THOUSANDS of gene pools------Humans INTERMARRY
vigorously over the past MANY MANY millennia-----thus there are NO RACES on the planet with very minor exceptions

Like I said, were all mix breeds.

try again WE ARE (WE'RE) ALL MIXED BREEDS.-----
[not news to any person with an intellect above that or an
ape----but penny imagines she invented the idea-----in fact---
despite the fact that WE ARE (we're) all mixed genetically,
anthropologists still describe "races" ----a vague concept for
scientists like me------a very confusing statement for penny]

A lot of Native Americans are half breeds because the US Cavalry killed off all the males and the fokked all the females.

A lot of American Negroes are also half breeds because the slave traders and President Jefferson fokked all the females.

If you go to Central Africa there are a lot of pure blooded Negroes there and their complexions are ashen blackish grey. You don't see that color of skin in the USA hardly at all, unless it is a visiting African diplomat.

If you go to Iceland there are a lot of snowy haired blue/grey eyed lily white Vikings like Rutger Hauer. Their DNA is pure Nordic. But anywhere south of Iceland and the blondes become more yellowish or reddish and not true albinos.

If you go to central Mongolia there are a lot of pure Mongolians. We have no idea where these people came from but they look like the prototype Asians, Native Americans, and Pacific Islanders.

If you go to N.Korea you get to see the little monkeys that fell out of the trees and were not smart enough to climb back up. Currently they are PRC China's puppet state and are doing all the testing for missiles and submarines for the next war between China and the USA.

 

[irosie91]

A Jew is any person whose mother was a Jew or any person who has gone through the formal process of conversionto Judaism.

So Jew is not a race, thank you.

I can also show you many verses of Jews who disagree with that.

Jew is a race AND religion, dufus. Learn to read English.

Well I disagree and so do many rabbis and atheist jews.

disagree with what? -----there is no MATHEMATICAL DEFINITION OF "race"------it is a very vague term since it
refers to subsets of SPECIES. Species are DEFINED as
organisms (that means animals or plants) that interbreed
IN NATURE. Since all of the organisms that can "fuck" will--------the term RACE has little meaning in the Human Species------since HUMAN BEANS have been wandering the hole early for--------a really long time and did do what comes naturally to the ALL THE MEMBERS OF THE SPECIES.
ARTIFICIALLY bred animals and plants CAN be ARTIFICIALLY separated into RACES

 

[irosie91]

it is silly for a person who has no idea what the term
"race" means-----to discuss----the issue

Dear irosie91
If you define race by genetics, then people who descended from Jewish ancestors still carry genetics of their relatives.

What I learned from bone marrow donation drives, is that people are best matched not only by "race" but by nationality that also shows up in genetic factors.

Since Caucasians have a 90% compatibility rate in finding matches, the marketing for recruiting donors has been more focused on reaching out to the Minorities that combined have only 10% chance of finding a match:
* Native American
* African
* Asian
* Latin

So from there, when searching for a match, they will target the nationality of the recipient and focus donor drives on the Vietnamese community, the Indian, the Nigerian, etc. Starting with the family and trying to work with the Community, region and country around the person to find the closest match (at least 8 out of 10 factors need to match to reduce risk of rejection, so family members are more likely to match, then people of the same ethnicity or nationality).

If we wanted to look into how much of "Jewish" descent is genetic and how much is cultural, maybe that approach might help. Assuming that "race" is tied to the actual "genetics" of passing inherited traits from one generation to the next PHYSICALLY. The rest is passed CULTURALLY.

Would that help?

What do you think, would this mean people would identify as "Israeli" or "Palestinian" by region or community? And not necessarily by "Jew" or "Arab."

What labels would you use for the genetic patterns?
Race or region?

sorry Emily----your understanding of the issue of race is-----
----well------silly. Not quite as idiotic as is that of Penelope.
The subject you have approached is POPULATION GENETICS. ------persons who live in groups-----and --intermarry with each other-----TEND TO SHARE GENETIC
MATERIAL-------the SUM TOTAL OF THE GENETIC MATERIAL AVAILABLE within a given group is called its
""GENE POOL"" There are lots and lots of GROUPS---
of the human species that tend to intermarry-----like thousands.
But some people in those groups do MARRY OUT and mix up
the THOUSANDS of gene pools------Humans INTERMARRY
vigorously over the past MANY MANY millennia-----thus there are NO RACES on the planet with very minor exceptions

Like I said, were all mix breeds.

try again WE ARE (WE'RE) ALL MIXED BREEDS.-----
[not news to any person with an intellect above that or an
ape----but penny imagines she invented the idea-----in fact---
despite the fact that WE ARE (we're) all mixed genetically,
anthropologists still describe "races" ----a vague concept for
scientists like me------a very confusing statement for penny]

A lot of Native Americans are half breeds because the US Cavalry killed off all the males and the fokked all the females.

A lot of American Negroes are also half breeds because the slave traders and President Jefferson fokked all the females.

If you go to Central Africa there are a lot of pure blooded Negroes there and their complexions are ashen blackish grey. You don't see that color of skin in the USA hardly at all, unless it is a visiting African diplomat.

If you go to Iceland there are a lot of snowy haired blue/grey eyed lily white Vikings like Rutger Hauer. Their DNA is pure Nordic. But anywhere south of Iceland and the blondes become more yellowish or reddish and not true albinos.

If you go to central Mongolia there are a lot of pure Mongolians. We have no idea where these people came from but they look like the prototype Asians, Native Americans, and Pacific Islanders.

If you go to N.Korea you get to see the little monkeys that fell out of the trees and were not smart enough to climb back up. Currently they are PRC China's puppet state and are doing all the testing for missiles and submarines for the next war between China and the USA.

yes------the HUMAN BEAN SPECIES has been fucking around
for a very long time-------"race" in human beans is a vague concept-------

 

[irosie91]

A Jew is any person whose mother was a Jew or any person who has gone through the formal process of conversionto Judaism.

So Jew is not a race, thank you.

I can also show you many verses of Jews who disagree with that.

Jew is a race AND religion, dufus. Learn to read English.

Well I disagree and so do many rabbis and atheist jews.

disagree with what? -----there is no MATHEMATICAL DEFINITION OF "race"------it is a very vague term since it
refers to subsets of SPECIES. Species are DEFINED as
organisms (that means animals or plants) that interbreed
IN NATURE. Since all of the organisms that can "fuck" will--------the term RACE has little meaning in the Human Species------since HUMAN BEANS have been wandering the hole early for--------a really long time and did do what comes naturally to the ALL THE MEMBERS OF THE SPECIES.
ARTIFICIALLY bred animals and plants CAN be ARTIFICIALLY separated into RACES

PS---the term "half-breed"----is kinda----NOT NICE

 

[irosie91]

A Jew is any person whose mother was a Jew or any person who has gone through the formal process of conversionto Judaism.

So Jew is not a race, thank you.

I can also show you many verses of Jews who disagree with that.

Jew is a race AND religion, dufus. Learn to read English.

Well I disagree and so do many rabbis and atheist jews.

it is silly for a person who has no idea what the term
"race" means-----to discuss----the issue

Dear irosie91
If you define race by genetics, then people who descended from Jewish ancestors still carry genetics of their relatives.

What I learned from bone marrow donation drives, is that people are best matched not only by "race" but by nationality that also shows up in genetic factors.

Since Caucasians have a 90% compatibility rate in finding matches, the marketing for recruiting donors has been more focused on reaching out to the Minorities that combined have only 10% chance of finding a match:
* Native American
* African
* Asian
* Latin

So from there, when searching for a match, they will target the nationality of the recipient and focus donor drives on the Vietnamese community, the Indian, the Nigerian, etc. Starting with the family and trying to work with the Community, region and country around the person to find the closest match (at least 8 out of 10 factors need to match to reduce risk of rejection, so family members are more likely to match, then people of the same ethnicity or nationality).

If we wanted to look into how much of "Jewish" descent is genetic and how much is cultural, maybe that approach might help. Assuming that "race" is tied to the actual "genetics" of passing inherited traits from one generation to the next PHYSICALLY. The rest is passed CULTURALLY.

Would that help?

What do you think, would this mean people would identify as "Israeli" or "Palestinian" by region or community? And not necessarily by "Jew" or "Arab."

What labels would you use for the genetic patterns?
Race or region?

race is a reasonable term to use if you want to describe organisms bred from specific GENE POOLS ----just reasonable-----not entirely precise -------since-----as all
people know---------wars and traveling salesmen-----and
SAILORS--------invade lots of "gene pools". <<< that is
HUMAN GENE POOLS----------a true factoid is------JOOOOS
TEND TO MARRY EACH OTHER and over time have----more or less---------ended up in a GENE POOL. There is an
AMISH gene pool-------and----it might interest you to know----
a very notable ITALIAN CATHOLIC GENE POOL----of great
interested to geneticists because some of the recessive disorders in that population can be traced to SINGLE progenitors--------out in those HILLS OF ITALY------few strangers came along to MESS in the POOL
precise. For fun-----trace the gene for RED HAIR

 

[irosie91]

PS---skin color is so MULTIALLELIC-----that it is a really poor
indicator of "RACE"---------to make that point a lot more
clear to you------PHENOTYPE -----only rarely reflects
GENOTYPE-------in evaluating --skin color. --------red hair
is a lot better. Find a big population of persons ALL RED HEADS (naturally ---NOT DUE TO STARVATION OR LADY CLAIROL) ---and you got something like genetically related human beans

 

[Penelope]

Well I disagree and so do many rabbis and atheist jews.

it is silly for a person who has no idea what the term
"race" means-----to discuss----the issue

Dear irosie91
If you define race by genetics, then people who descended from Jewish ancestors still carry genetics of their relatives.

What I learned from bone marrow donation drives, is that people are best matched not only by "race" but by nationality that also shows up in genetic factors.

Since Caucasians have a 90% compatibility rate in finding matches, the marketing for recruiting donors has been more focused on reaching out to the Minorities that combined have only 10% chance of finding a match:
* Native American
* African
* Asian
* Latin

So from there, when searching for a match, they will target the nationality of the recipient and focus donor drives on the Vietnamese community, the Indian, the Nigerian, etc. Starting with the family and trying to work with the Community, region and country around the person to find the closest match (at least 8 out of 10 factors need to match to reduce risk of rejection, so family members are more likely to match, then people of the same ethnicity or nationality).

If we wanted to look into how much of "Jewish" descent is genetic and how much is cultural, maybe that approach might help. Assuming that "race" is tied to the actual "genetics" of passing inherited traits from one generation to the next PHYSICALLY. The rest is passed CULTURALLY.

Would that help?

What do you think, would this mean people would identify as "Israeli" or "Palestinian" by region or community? And not necessarily by "Jew" or "Arab."

What labels would you use for the genetic patterns?
Race or region?

sorry Emily----your understanding of the issue of race is-----
----well------silly. Not quite as idiotic as is that of Penelope.
The subject you have approached is POPULATION GENETICS. ------persons who live in groups-----and --intermarry with each other-----TEND TO SHARE GENETIC
MATERIAL-------the SUM TOTAL OF THE GENETIC MATERIAL AVAILABLE within a given group is called its
""GENE POOL"" There are lots and lots of GROUPS---
of the human species that tend to intermarry-----like thousands.
But some people in those groups do MARRY OUT and mix up
the THOUSANDS of gene pools------Humans INTERMARRY
vigorously over the past MANY MANY millennia-----thus there are NO RACES on the planet with very minor exceptions

Like I said, were all mix breeds.

try again WE ARE (WE'RE) ALL MIXED BREEDS.-----
[not news to any person with an intellect above that or an
ape----but penny imagines she invented the idea-----in fact---
despite the fact that WE ARE (we're) all mixed genetically,
anthropologists still describe "races" ----a vague concept for
scientists like me------a very confusing statement for penny]

A Jew is any person whose mother was a Jew or any person who has gone through the formal process of conversionto Judaism.

So Jew is not a race, thank you.

I can also show you many verses of Jews who disagree with that.

Jew is a race AND religion, dufus. Learn to read English.

Well I disagree and so do many rabbis and atheist jews.

disagree with what? -----there is no MATHEMATICAL DEFINITION OF "race"------it is a very vague term since it
refers to subsets of SPECIES. Species are DEFINED as
organisms (that means animals or plants) that interbreed
IN NATURE. Since all of the organisms that can "fuck" will--------the term RACE has little meaning in the Human Species------since HUMAN BEANS have been wandering the hole early for--------a really long time and did do what comes naturally to the ALL THE MEMBERS OF THE SPECIES.
ARTIFICIALLY bred animals and plants CAN be ARTIFICIALLY separated into RACES

PS---the term "half-breed"----is kinda----NOT NICE

No half breed does not sound nice, better to say mixed breed.

 

[irosie91]

it is silly for a person who has no idea what the term
"race" means-----to discuss----the issue

Dear irosie91
If you define race by genetics, then people who descended from Jewish ancestors still carry genetics of their relatives.

What I learned from bone marrow donation drives, is that people are best matched not only by "race" but by nationality that also shows up in genetic factors.

Since Caucasians have a 90% compatibility rate in finding matches, the marketing for recruiting donors has been more focused on reaching out to the Minorities that combined have only 10% chance of finding a match:
* Native American
* African
* Asian
* Latin

So from there, when searching for a match, they will target the nationality of the recipient and focus donor drives on the Vietnamese community, the Indian, the Nigerian, etc. Starting with the family and trying to work with the Community, region and country around the person to find the closest match (at least 8 out of 10 factors need to match to reduce risk of rejection, so family members are more likely to match, then people of the same ethnicity or nationality).

If we wanted to look into how much of "Jewish" descent is genetic and how much is cultural, maybe that approach might help. Assuming that "race" is tied to the actual "genetics" of passing inherited traits from one generation to the next PHYSICALLY. The rest is passed CULTURALLY.

Would that help?

What do you think, would this mean people would identify as "Israeli" or "Palestinian" by region or community? And not necessarily by "Jew" or "Arab."

What labels would you use for the genetic patterns?
Race or region?

sorry Emily----your understanding of the issue of race is-----
----well------silly. Not quite as idiotic as is that of Penelope.
The subject you have approached is POPULATION GENETICS. ------persons who live in groups-----and --intermarry with each other-----TEND TO SHARE GENETIC
MATERIAL-------the SUM TOTAL OF THE GENETIC MATERIAL AVAILABLE within a given group is called its
""GENE POOL"" There are lots and lots of GROUPS---
of the human species that tend to intermarry-----like thousands.
But some people in those groups do MARRY OUT and mix up
the THOUSANDS of gene pools------Humans INTERMARRY
vigorously over the past MANY MANY millennia-----thus there are NO RACES on the planet with very minor exceptions

Like I said, were all mix breeds.

try again WE ARE (WE'RE) ALL MIXED BREEDS.-----
[not news to any person with an intellect above that or an
ape----but penny imagines she invented the idea-----in fact---
despite the fact that WE ARE (we're) all mixed genetically,
anthropologists still describe "races" ----a vague concept for
scientists like me------a very confusing statement for penny]

A Jew is any person whose mother was a Jew or any person who has gone through the formal process of conversionto Judaism.

So Jew is not a race, thank you.

I can also show you many verses of Jews who disagree with that.

Jew is a race AND religion, dufus. Learn to read English.

Well I disagree and so do many rabbis and atheist jews.

disagree with what? -----there is no MATHEMATICAL DEFINITION OF "race"------it is a very vague term since it
refers to subsets of SPECIES. Species are DEFINED as
organisms (that means animals or plants) that interbreed
IN NATURE. Since all of the organisms that can "fuck" will--------the term RACE has little meaning in the Human Species------since HUMAN BEANS have been wandering the hole early for--------a really long time and did do what comes naturally to the ALL THE MEMBERS OF THE SPECIES.
ARTIFICIALLY bred animals and plants CAN be ARTIFICIALLY separated into RACES

PS---the term "half-breed"----is kinda----NOT NICE

No half breed does not sound nice, better to say mixed breed.

when talking about HUMAN BEANS-----it is better not to say
"breed"-------breed is a term used by people who shove champion male horses onto mares in heat-----to make another
FAST RUNNER---------or particularly talented bulls----onto compliant cows-------to make a new one for the TOREOADOR
OLE' OLE' ------or in reference to the specific "breed" of
mosquitos that harbor the ZIKA virus. The word does not
connote a LOVE RELATIONSHIP. In biology "breed"
is a subset of race

 

[irosie91]

A Jew is any person whose mother was a Jew or any person who has gone through the formal process of conversionto Judaism.

So Jew is not a race, thank you.

I can also show you many verses of Jews who disagree with that.

Jew is a race AND religion, dufus. Learn to read English.

Well I disagree and so do many rabbis and atheist jews.

disagree with what? -----there is no MATHEMATICAL DEFINITION OF "race"------it is a very vague term since it
refers to subsets of SPECIES. Species are DEFINED as
organisms (that means animals or plants) that interbreed
IN NATURE. Since all of the organisms that can "fuck" will--------the term RACE has little meaning in the Human Species------since HUMAN BEANS have been wandering the hole early for--------a really long time and did do what comes naturally to the ALL THE MEMBERS OF THE SPECIES.
ARTIFICIALLY bred animals and plants CAN be ARTIFICIALLY separated into RACES

PS thanks for your political insights

 

[Dajjal]

List of contradictions in Genesis.

 

[koshergrl]

All that is parsing. The bible does not contradict itself, and biblical and ancient language scholars can explain each instance, and have.

I suggest anybody who doubts the word of God actually read the bible themselves, with a heart to actually understand instead of only to give meat to their attacks. You approach it as a scholar, and you will appreciate the accuracy and truth of the Bible, as most archaeologists, historians and linguists do.

You approach it as somebody who hates Christianity and seeks to seize on anything you don't understand yourself, with no interest in understanding, but just to find things you can skew in order to discredit..and that's exactly what you'll find.

 

[irosie91]

I don't see any value at all in your list DAJJAL----sorry