Wyatt earp
Diamond Member
- Apr 21, 2012
- 69,975
- 16,383
- 2,180
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I liked the USN and USMC Cobra, but that was before your time and not on your list.
Warning: Terrorists died in the making of this video.
Warning: Terrorists died in the making of this video.
The A10 is cool, probably the only airplane they made the main gun first (from what I read) and built the airplane around it.
.
I was in Afghan and worked with the AAF on Mi-24 aircraft. Really awesome platform. Russian tech is brilliant in its simplicity and durability. These were truly the tanks of the sky. Brilliant simplicity.I chose the Havoc gunship (Mil Mi-28) because it improved upon the legendary Mi-24 hind's attack capabilities in almost every way. It's fast and maneuverable. It is heavily armored and has an advanced electronic surveillance and targeting system. It is highly weather resilient and produces low noise for night operations. Furthermore, it has a 3 seat passenger compartment for transporting specialty units and rescue missions.
That looks like a platform that has a lot of room for expansion. Odd horizontal stab design. I wonder the logic for that?All heavy attack helicopters. I included the most prolific today. I excluded some gunships which are in limited service, being phased out, have specialty roles, ect.
The best, by far, is the AH 56 Cheyenne which lost out to the Apache for political reasons.
It is. It's actually a SA 330 Puma reconfigured to look like a Hind.
It is. It's actually a SA 330 Puma reconfigured to look like a Hind.
Red Dawn (1984) - Internet Movie Firearms Database - Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games
It looks like it incorporates a tailwheel. A twofer. Such design would keep the fuselage level on landing.That looks like a platform that has a lot of room for expansion. Odd horizontal stab design. I wonder the logic for that?All heavy attack helicopters. I included the most prolific today. I excluded some gunships which are in limited service, being phased out, have specialty roles, ect.
The best, by far, is the AH 56 Cheyenne which lost out to the Apache for political reasons.
I was in Afghan and worked with the AAF on Mi-24 aircraft. Really awesome platform. Russian tech is brilliant in its simplicity and durability. These were truly the tanks of the sky. Brilliant simplicity.
I was in Afghan and worked with the AAF on Mi-24 aircraft. Really awesome platform. Russian tech is brilliant in its simplicity and durability. These were truly the tanks of the sky. Brilliant simplicity.
The Russian's literally nicknamed them Flying Tanks.
Russian engineering is brilliant. They focus on practicality and efficiency like no one else. Western countries like the United States tend to spend a lot of time and money on unnecessary features and technological add ons for their equipment, which sacrifices basic efficiency.
Not budget per say. Older Soviet designs were based upon available technology. Russian design favors utility and ease of maintenance. This is transferred across the board on any number of weapon systems from their field rifle to their aircraft. Russian systems, contrary to popular belief are not necessarily low tech. They are systems which are designed to function at a much lower break rate. The Russians simply implement systems which are tried and true. They are amazing in their ability to break down the complex into the in-complex.I was in Afghan and worked with the AAF on Mi-24 aircraft. Really awesome platform. Russian tech is brilliant in its simplicity and durability. These were truly the tanks of the sky. Brilliant simplicity.
The Russian's literally nicknamed them Flying Tanks.
Russian engineering is brilliant. They focus on practicality and efficiency like no one else. Western countries like the United States tend to spend a lot of time and money on unnecessary features and technological add ons for their equipment, which sacrifices basic efficiency.
I think it has to be more budget conscious more then anything else, I remember NASA spending big bucks to get a pen to write in space, and the Russians answer was to use a pencil
.