Trump: US will act unilaterally on North Korea if necessary

shockedcanadian

Diamond Member
Aug 6, 2012
28,130
24,916
2,405
It's not as if most of the NATO countries even pay their fair dues anyways, does anyone expect they would confront a tyrant? As for China, they are fully responsible for N Korea and have been using them as a proxy to rattle the Americans cage while they focus on stealing U.S jobs and expanding their own economy and military

As for the UN, they are too busy embracing human right abusers to help topple one.

Trump: US will act unilaterally on North Korea if necessary - CNNPolitics.com

Washington (CNN)President Donald Trump has declared he would be willing to go it alone to restrain North Korea's nuclear weapons program should China fail to change the situation, saying if Beijing won't help solve it, then "we will" alone.

"China will either decide to help us with North Korea or they won't," Trump said in an interview published Sunday in the Financial Times. "If they do, that will be very good for China, and if they don't, it won't be good for anyone."
Trump's administration has repeatedly emphasized its high concern over the North Korean nuclear threat. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson visited China last month to press North Korea's neighbor for help in mitigating that threat, and Trump is scheduled to host Chinese President Xi Jinping this week in the US, where he intends to bring the issue up.


On the campaign trail and since taking office, Trump has argued China is responsible for the continued nuclear proliferation in North Korea. He said in his Financial Times interview that he planned to talk with Xi about that situation and use trade as "the incentive" to talk China into fixing it.
 

Let's not play politics with this, Obama had no love lost for N Korea either. What would not be fun would be a nuclear attack on America or any other nation in the world. This guy has concentration camps, lifelong labour camps, it is the most closed and secretive nation in the world.

The world has to confront difficult choices, and should have been done before WW2. You act before a threat becomes far more dangerous than wait for it to blossom into a danger to Mankind. Nuclear weapons have unfortunately allowed global threats to rise from single nations with crazy leaders.
 
It's not as if most of the NATO countries even pay their fair dues anyways, does anyone expect they would confront a tyrant? As for China, they are fully responsible for N Korea and have been using them as a proxy to rattle the Americans cage while they focus on stealing U.S jobs and expanding their own economy and military

As for the UN, they are too busy embracing human right abusers to help topple one.

Trump: US will act unilaterally on North Korea if necessary - CNNPolitics.com

Washington (CNN)President Donald Trump has declared he would be willing to go it alone to restrain North Korea's nuclear weapons program should China fail to change the situation, saying if Beijing won't help solve it, then "we will" alone.

"China will either decide to help us with North Korea or they won't," Trump said in an interview published Sunday in the Financial Times. "If they do, that will be very good for China, and if they don't, it won't be good for anyone."
Trump's administration has repeatedly emphasized its high concern over the North Korean nuclear threat. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson visited China last month to press North Korea's neighbor for help in mitigating that threat, and Trump is scheduled to host Chinese President Xi Jinping this week in the US, where he intends to bring the issue up.


On the campaign trail and since taking office, Trump has argued China is responsible for the continued nuclear proliferation in North Korea. He said in his Financial Times interview that he planned to talk with Xi about that situation and use trade as "the incentive" to talk China into fixing it.
If you are going to talk about something then talk about it and don't get sidetracked beating around the bush about other irrelevant things.

Your mind must be hearting too many different voices inside of it.
 

Let's not play politics with this, Obama had no love lost for N Korea either. What would not be fun would be a nuclear attack on America or any other nation in the world. This guy has concentration camps, lifelong labour camps, it is the most closed and secretive nation in the world.

The world has to confront difficult choices, and should have been done before WW2. You act before a threat becomes far more dangerous than wait for it to blossom into a danger to Mankind. Nuclear weapons have unfortunately allowed global threats to rise from single nations with crazy leaders.
The cacophony of voices in your head must be getting you all confused about N.Korea and Obama.

BHO took a fairly passive non-aggressive approach to N.Korea.

Once N.Korea found this out they ignored him too.

But the past is proverbially in the past.

Don't let the voices in your head confuse you more.
 

Let's not play politics with this, Obama had no love lost for N Korea either. What would not be fun would be a nuclear attack on America or any other nation in the world. This guy has concentration camps, lifelong labour camps, it is the most closed and secretive nation in the world.

The world has to confront difficult choices, and should have been done before WW2. You act before a threat becomes far more dangerous than wait for it to blossom into a danger to Mankind. Nuclear weapons have unfortunately allowed global threats to rise from single nations with crazy leaders.
The cacophony of voices in your head must be getting you all confused about N.Korea and Obama.

BHO took a fairly passive non-aggressive approach to N.Korea.

Once N.Korea found this out they ignored him too.

But the past is proverbially in the past.

Don't let the voices in your head confuse you more.

You don't offer anything to the discussion but instead insult and you yourself go off the rails.

This is a fairly serious subject matter and a reality that free nation are going to have to address one way or another, sooner rather than later I presume. If you want to use it as an opportunity to take shots at me than why reply at all?
 

Forum List

Back
Top