Bernie-Mania spreads to Red States

Nutty Old Uncle Bernie is gonna win all the primaries so there's no way The Democrat Party is going to officially choose him but that WILL give them the excuse they need to throw Mrs. Rodham-Clinton/Lewinsky under the bus.

Beware the minority who is articulate and cleans up nice 'cause that's who they're gonna run. George Soros just hasn't told them his (it won't be a female or even "new" female) name yet.
I'd rather see a Trump v Sanders race than a Bush v Clinton race.
 
Hillary will get the nomination, but Sanders won't because she will cut off donors to his campaign.
How will she do that, dopey, since the vast majority of his donations are from regular people, averaging around $50?
How won't she? You don't even read the news. Bureaucrats at a teachers union went against its members to support Hillary over Sanders. It has already begun.
That doesn't explain how she will keep people from donating to Sanders. Try again Short Bus.
I did before, but you must be a Hillary drone to discount it, and deny that a teachers union dropped to the floor and kissed Hillary's feet. If it wasn't for Sanders I wouldn't even be voting a Democrat for President.
I will try one more time, for the retards:

Sanders is getting his donations from small-dollar donors, at an average of $50 each. So how will Hillary keep those people from donating?

She will find a way to steal it.
Business as usual.
 
I think what scares the crap - and there's a lot of crap in right wingers - in the posts above is that Sen. Sanders is honest, the antithesis of all the demagogues in the clown car, and hasn't and won't change his stump speech by the demographics of his audience.

The guy is real, thoughtful and thought provoking. Fools will focus on a word: Socialism; those who understand their use of the word is a pejorative will listen to him, and understand that he is the first Pol to to call attention to the fact that America has become an Oligarchy under the control of the power elite.

The Great Threat to the Republic isn't Communism or Marxism of Socialism - for only the idiot fringe advocate such an extreme change, it is the modern equivalent of fascism ( an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization) where the rules and laws are made by the power elite, plutocrats in industry and on wall street.

Q. Could Sen. Sanders govern, or would he be run into by the Limbaugh, /Murdoch, Koch Propaganda Machine and the RED SCARE
 
I admire Bernie for openly admitting he is a Socialist. At least he's honest and doesn't need to hide behind the "Progressive" misnomer. Like Trump, he's telling his people the truth.

Let it be Trump v Bernie
 
Sanders is honest and would beat Trump, who is brash but not honest, imo.

Kasich is going to be the nominee, and I am going to support him.
 
I admire Bernie for openly admitting he is a Socialist. At least he's honest and doesn't need to hide behind the "Progressive" misnomer. Like Trump, he's telling his people the truth.

Let it be Trump v Bernie

Define what you mean by Socialist, and how in your opinion would Sen. Sanders govern?

[this is your chance frank, the contest between the bigger fool is now between you and Rexx Taylor - I'm rooting for you]
 
I admire Bernie for openly admitting he is a Socialist. At least he's honest and doesn't need to hide behind the "Progressive" misnomer. Like Trump, he's telling his people the truth.

Let it be Trump v Bernie

Define what you mean by Socialist, and how in your opinion would Sen. Sanders govern?

[this is your chance frank, the contest between the bigger fool is now between you and Rexx Taylor - I'm rooting for you]

What I mean? Why don't you ask Bernie what he means, he's the self-described Socalist.

Modern American Socialists don't openly advocate for true government ownership, that would take balls; instead they advocate that the industries are so heavily regulated it's de facto government ownership.

Bernie would not govern, he doesn't have a chance in Hell
 
...It always cracks me up how you liberals both say nuh uh to that Hillary is a weak candidate then you glory in the attention Bernie is getting because Hillary is an unpleasant candidate. She lost to an empty suited nobody loser from Illinois who had never accomplished anything significant on his own in his life, now she's in it in a race with a Democrat who actually admits to being a socialist. Ready to admit Hillary isn't exactly a strong pick?

Good one !!!

laughing-o.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Thanks
Reactions: kaz
Frank is afraid to define socialism, I have noticed before.

He thinks social market democracy is socialism: it's not.
 
I would love to see democrats nominate Sanders. It would clarify the political air and give people an honest choice between socialism and capitalism. Unfortunately the democrat party would probably rather rely on a web of lies promoted by the current socialist and nominate the angry victim/enabler of a sociopath. Keep 'em stupid and they will vote for a democrat.
 
I would love to see democrats nominate Sanders. It would clarify the political air and give people an honest choice between socialism and capitalism. Unfortunately the democrat party would probably rather rely on a web of lies promoted by the current socialist and nominate the angry victim/enabler of a sociopath. Keep 'em stupid and they will vote for a democrat.

I agree with your Sanders point, but what Republican is going to represent capitalism? That would be cool for a change though if it thappened
 
Frank is afraid to define socialism, I have noticed before.

He thinks social market democracy is socialism: it's not.

Jake, I answered. Please find a grown up to read my prior post to you
I read it, and you are afraid to define socialism. Sanders is not a socialist, imo, but, yes, he is very far left liberal.

Jake, since you're the resident expert on Socialism, tell me where I went wrong

here's what I said, "Modern American Socialists don't openly advocate for true government ownership, that would take balls; instead they advocate that the industries are so heavily regulated it's de facto government ownership.
 
Frank is afraid to define socialism, I have noticed before.

He thinks social market democracy is socialism: it's not.

Jake, I answered. Please find a grown up to read my prior post to you
I read it, and you are afraid to define socialism. Sanders is not a socialist, imo, but, yes, he is very far left liberal.

Jake, since you're the resident expert on Socialism, tell me where I went wrong

here's what I said, "Modern American Socialists don't openly advocate for true government ownership, that would take balls; instead they advocate that the industries are so heavily regulated it's de facto government ownership.
That is certainly your unsupported opinion, yes.
 
Frank is afraid to define socialism, I have noticed before.

He thinks social market democracy is socialism: it's not.

Jake, I answered. Please find a grown up to read my prior post to you
Frank is afraid to define socialism, I have noticed before.

He thinks social market democracy is socialism: it's not.

Jake, I answered. Please find a grown up to read my prior post to you
I read it, and you are afraid to define socialism. Sanders is not a socialist, imo, but, yes, he is very far left liberal.

Jake, since you're the resident expert on Socialism, tell me where I went wrong

here's what I said, "Modern American Socialists don't openly advocate for true government ownership, that would take balls; instead they advocate that the industries are so heavily regulated it's de facto government ownership.

You know Jake is an idiot, right?
 

Forum List

Back
Top