Bernie-Mania spreads to Red States

How will she do that, dopey, since the vast majority of his donations are from regular people, averaging around $50?
How won't she? You don't even read the news. Bureaucrats at a teachers union went against its members to support Hillary over Sanders. It has already begun.
That doesn't explain how she will keep people from donating to Sanders. Try again Short Bus.
I did before, but you must be a Hillary drone to discount it, and deny that a teachers union dropped to the floor and kissed Hillary's feet. If it wasn't for Sanders I wouldn't even be voting a Democrat for President.
I will try one more time, for the retards:

Sanders is getting his donations from small-dollar donors, at an average of $50 each. So how will Hillary keep those people from donating?

She will find a way to steal it.
Business as usual.
Still, a few in this thread think light shines out of Hillary's ass, and were asleep during the 2008 primaries - which was a far from clean campaign.
 
Are Americans really stupid enough to vote for Sanders?

Yeah, they really are.

The only differences between Sanders and Hillary are that Sanders is honest and Hillary sold out. What other actual policy difference is there?
 
best we can hope for is that Hillary is not the second choice of these crowds, if they like bernie, and hillary just barely wins the primary, and bernie voters will turn to the GOP winner as their second choice, hillary is toast.
If Bernie loses I will most likely vote for the Green party candidate, as I have no faith in Hillary to support the poor or middle class.

Then your vote will ensure two ounces of spinach and a pound of broccoli every four years to all poor or middle class families.

Congratulations on your wise choice.
I hope not, as it would likely come from Monsanto, unless it is the Green party.
 
Are Americans really stupid enough to vote for Sanders?

Yeah, they really are.

The only differences between Sanders and Hillary are that Sanders is honest and Hillary sold out. What other actual policy difference is there?
Sanders supports implementing UHC, has a good record on supporting veterans, and opposes the TPP deal. So quite a few differences.
 
How won't she? You don't even read the news. Bureaucrats at a teachers union went against its members to support Hillary over Sanders. It has already begun.
That doesn't explain how she will keep people from donating to Sanders. Try again Short Bus.
I did before, but you must be a Hillary drone to discount it, and deny that a teachers union dropped to the floor and kissed Hillary's feet. If it wasn't for Sanders I wouldn't even be voting a Democrat for President.
I will try one more time, for the retards:

Sanders is getting his donations from small-dollar donors, at an average of $50 each. So how will Hillary keep those people from donating?

She will find a way to steal it.
Business as usual.
Still, a few in this thread think light shines out of Hillary's ass, and were asleep during the 2008 primaries - which was a far from clean campaign.

that was the campaign Hillary took the birther movement national. before that, the only birthers were Obama and his lovely bride
 
Are Americans really stupid enough to vote for Sanders?

Yeah, they really are.

The only differences between Sanders and Hillary are that Sanders is honest and Hillary sold out. What other actual policy difference is there?
Sanders supports implementing UHC, has a good record on supporting veterans, and opposes the TPP deal. So quite a few differences.

You: Sanders supports implementing UHC

- So does Obama, Obama just took what he can get. He couldn't get UHC.

Obama: "I happen to be a proponent of a single-payer universal health care program. I see no reason why the United States of America, the wealthiest country in the history of the world, spending 14 percent of its gross national product on health care, cannot provide basic health insurance to everybody"

- has a good record on supporting veterans

Don't know what that means. Did he speak out when Democrats kept calling them murderers and terrorists? I haven't seen those quotes. Provide some please

- and opposes the TPP deal.

You don't know that, and you don't know Obama supports it or even what it is. There is no TPP deal. All they agreed to so far is an up or down vote on whatever Obama negotiates, there isn't any actual difference at this point.

- So quite a few differences

Which are? You haven't done well so far. My point exactly, all you can do is split some hairs
 
Are Americans really stupid enough to vote for Sanders?

Yeah, they really are.

You sure like to call people stupid, or morons or idiots. Yet you've rarely - if ever - posted anything of substance, sagacious or thought provoking. Now, that doesn't correlate to you being stupid, but it does +1 that you are an unimaginative partisan hack, which doesn't suggest high intelligence.

I've posted many times that we need a leader to save Capitalism form the greed of the capitalists. Greed, notwithstanding Reagan's admonitions, remains a deadly sin. Sen. Sanders is offering a Fair Deal to the Middle class, the working poor and a helping hand to those in need.

The fundamental character or spirit of a callous conservative naturally rejects such an effort, and they act as if they believe, "I've got mine, fuck the rest of you".
 
Are Americans really stupid enough to vote for Sanders?

Yeah, they really are.

The only differences between Sanders and Hillary are that Sanders is honest and Hillary sold out. What other actual policy difference is there?
Sanders supports implementing UHC, has a good record on supporting veterans, and opposes the TPP deal. So quite a few differences.

You: Sanders supports implementing UHC

- So does Obama, Obama just took what he can get. He couldn't get UHC.

Obama: "I happen to be a proponent of a single-payer universal health care program. I see no reason why the United States of America, the wealthiest country in the history of the world, spending 14 percent of its gross national product on health care, cannot provide basic health insurance to everybody"

- has a good record on supporting veterans

Don't know what that means. Did he speak out when Democrats kept calling them murderers and terrorists? I haven't seen those quotes. Provide some please

- and opposes the TPP deal.

You don't know that, and you don't know Obama supports it or even what it is. There is no TPP deal. All they agreed to so far is an up or down vote on whatever Obama negotiates, there isn't any actual difference at this point.

- So quite a few differences

Which are? You haven't done well so far. My point exactly, all you can do is split some hairs
Thought I had linked it before, but had only linked to thehill article, here's the Salon article on it: Chris Matthews dumb Bernie Sanders disdain Dopey pundit drools over W s mission accomplished doesn t think vets advocate can be commander in chief - Salon.com
 
Are Americans really stupid enough to vote for Sanders?

Yeah, they really are.

The only differences between Sanders and Hillary are that Sanders is honest and Hillary sold out. What other actual policy difference is there?
Sanders supports implementing UHC, has a good record on supporting veterans, and opposes the TPP deal. So quite a few differences.

You: Sanders supports implementing UHC

- So does Obama, Obama just took what he can get. He couldn't get UHC.

Obama: "I happen to be a proponent of a single-payer universal health care program. I see no reason why the United States of America, the wealthiest country in the history of the world, spending 14 percent of its gross national product on health care, cannot provide basic health insurance to everybody"

- has a good record on supporting veterans

Don't know what that means. Did he speak out when Democrats kept calling them murderers and terrorists? I haven't seen those quotes. Provide some please

- and opposes the TPP deal.

You don't know that, and you don't know Obama supports it or even what it is. There is no TPP deal. All they agreed to so far is an up or down vote on whatever Obama negotiates, there isn't any actual difference at this point.

- So quite a few differences

Which are? You haven't done well so far. My point exactly, all you can do is split some hairs
Thought I had linked it before, but had only linked to thehill article, here's the Salon article on it: Chris Matthews dumb Bernie Sanders disdain Dopey pundit drools over W s mission accomplished doesn t think vets advocate can be commander in chief - Salon.com

Did you read that? Three quarters of the way through it still was repeating how devoted to veterans he is without ever backing it up. I gave up there.

And the most malignant thing the Democrats have done is picking up, repeating and knee jerk believing every accusation against the troops. Has Bernie stood up to the Democrats and criticized them for that or at least said stop when they did it?

That article is pure begging the question
 
Are Americans really stupid enough to vote for Sanders?

Yeah, they really are.

You sure like to call people stupid, or morons or idiots. Yet you've rarely - if ever - posted anything of substance, sagacious or thought provoking. Now, that doesn't correlate to you being stupid, but it does +1 that you are an unimaginative partisan hack, which doesn't suggest high intelligence.

I've posted many times that we need a leader to save Capitalism form the greed of the capitalists. Greed, notwithstanding Reagan's admonitions, remains a deadly sin. Sen. Sanders is offering a Fair Deal to the Middle class, the working poor and a helping hand to those in need.

The fundamental character or spirit of a callous conservative naturally rejects such an effort, and they act as if they believe, "I've got mine, fuck the rest of you".

Yeah your opinion is irrelevant and meaningless. I've posted plenty that was substantial and thought provoking. You disagree because you are a left wing nut hack.

Then in the above post you proceed to build this giant Strawman and think we are supposed to be impressed as you beat it up.

You are still, as always, an idiot.
 
The fundamental character or spirit of a callous conservative naturally rejects such an effort, and they act as if they believe, "I've got mine, fuck the rest of you".

Yeah, I CAN Profit from that!

I think I'll start with tee-shirts......

They'll be a big hit as "swag" for Air Farce One frequent flyers......

Thanks for reading my post. Next time try to comprehend its essence.
 
Are Americans really stupid enough to vote for Sanders?

Yeah, they really are.

You sure like to call people stupid, or morons or idiots. Yet you've rarely - if ever - posted anything of substance, sagacious or thought provoking. Now, that doesn't correlate to you being stupid, but it does +1 that you are an unimaginative partisan hack, which doesn't suggest high intelligence.

I've posted many times that we need a leader to save Capitalism form the greed of the capitalists. Greed, notwithstanding Reagan's admonitions, remains a deadly sin. Sen. Sanders is offering a Fair Deal to the Middle class, the working poor and a helping hand to those in need.

The fundamental character or spirit of a callous conservative naturally rejects such an effort, and they act as if they believe, "I've got mine, fuck the rest of you".

Yeah your opinion is irrelevant and meaningless. I've posted plenty that was substantial and thought provoking. You disagree because you are a left wing nut hack.

Then in the above post you proceed to build this giant Strawman and think we are supposed to be impressed as you beat it up.

You are still, as always, an idiot.

Thanks for reading my post. Next time you choose to respond, it would help to first read the definition of the Straw Man Fallacy, and then respond with acute mental discernment and keen practical sense. Both missing in most of your rants.

You might also tame ;your use of pejoratives, calling everyone who disagrees with the new right a left winger ("a left wing nut hack") seems to be the only rebuttal most of you on the right have. And the use of a pejorative in place of a sagacious rebuttal to a well formed opinion is to employ a logical fallacy.
 
Are Americans really stupid enough to vote for Sanders?

Yeah, they really are.

You sure like to call people stupid, or morons or idiots. Yet you've rarely - if ever - posted anything of substance, sagacious or thought provoking. Now, that doesn't correlate to you being stupid, but it does +1 that you are an unimaginative partisan hack, which doesn't suggest high intelligence.

I've posted many times that we need a leader to save Capitalism form the greed of the capitalists. Greed, notwithstanding Reagan's admonitions, remains a deadly sin. Sen. Sanders is offering a Fair Deal to the Middle class, the working poor and a helping hand to those in need.

The fundamental character or spirit of a callous conservative naturally rejects such an effort, and they act as if they believe, "I've got mine, fuck the rest of you".

Yeah your opinion is irrelevant and meaningless. I've posted plenty that was substantial and thought provoking. You disagree because you are a left wing nut hack.

Then in the above post you proceed to build this giant Strawman and think we are supposed to be impressed as you beat it up.

You are still, as always, an idiot.

Thanks for reading my post. Next time you choose to respond, it would help to first read the definition of the Straw Man Fallacy, and then respond with acute mental discernment and keen practical sense. Both missing in most of your rants.

You might also tame ;your use of pejoratives, calling everyone who disagrees with the new right a left winger ("a left wing nut hack") seems to be the only rebuttal most of you on the right have. And the use of a pejorative in place of a sagacious rebuttal to a well formed opinion is to employ a logical fallacy.

Bull shit. You misrepresented your opponents position in such a way as to make it easy for you to criticise it. That is the essence of a Straw man argument.

I have stated quite clearly in two threads and countless posts as to why I no longer argue with you people. I explained it, I backed it up with proof. It is a complete waste of time to have a discussion with you idiot left wing nutters and all I will do is point at you and laugh, and that includes calling you the idiots and morons that you are.

You don't like it? I just do not care. Go play in the street, do the world a favor.
 
I admire Bernie for openly admitting he is a Socialist. At least he's honest and doesn't need to hide behind the "Progressive" misnomer. Like Trump, he's telling his people the truth.

Let it be Trump v Bernie

Define what you mean by Socialist, and how in your opinion would Sen. Sanders govern?

[this is your chance frank, the contest between the bigger fool is now between you and Rexx Taylor - I'm rooting for you]

What I mean? Why don't you ask Bernie what he means, he's the self-described Socalist.

Modern American Socialists don't openly advocate for true government ownership, that would take balls; instead they advocate that the industries are so heavily regulated it's de facto government ownership.

Bernie would not govern, he doesn't have a chance in Hell

Socialism as defined by CrusaderFrank is a government which regulates business. And of course he knows the hidden agenda of these regulators, he listens to their leaders, the commies hiding in his closet and under his bed.

Sadly he can never corner them, but he knows they're there, and he knows they will soon take over America unless he is vigilant and sounds the clarion call of fear to all who will listen.
 
Are Americans really stupid enough to vote for Sanders?

Yeah, they really are.

You sure like to call people stupid, or morons or idiots. Yet you've rarely - if ever - posted anything of substance, sagacious or thought provoking. Now, that doesn't correlate to you being stupid, but it does +1 that you are an unimaginative partisan hack, which doesn't suggest high intelligence.

I've posted many times that we need a leader to save Capitalism form the greed of the capitalists. Greed, notwithstanding Reagan's admonitions, remains a deadly sin. Sen. Sanders is offering a Fair Deal to the Middle class, the working poor and a helping hand to those in need.

The fundamental character or spirit of a callous conservative naturally rejects such an effort, and they act as if they believe, "I've got mine, fuck the rest of you".

Yeah your opinion is irrelevant and meaningless. I've posted plenty that was substantial and thought provoking. You disagree because you are a left wing nut hack.

Then in the above post you proceed to build this giant Strawman and think we are supposed to be impressed as you beat it up.

You are still, as always, an idiot.

Thanks for reading my post. Next time you choose to respond, it would help to first read the definition of the Straw Man Fallacy, and then respond with acute mental discernment and keen practical sense. Both missing in most of your rants.

You might also tame ;your use of pejoratives, calling everyone who disagrees with the new right a left winger ("a left wing nut hack") seems to be the only rebuttal most of you on the right have. And the use of a pejorative in place of a sagacious rebuttal to a well formed opinion is to employ a logical fallacy.

Bull shit. You misrepresented your opponents position in such a way as to make it easy for you to criticise it. That is the essence of a Straw man argument.

I have stated quite clearly in two threads and countless posts as to why I no longer argue with you people. I explained it, I backed it up with proof. It is a complete waste of time to have a discussion with you idiot left wing nutters and all I will do is point at you and laugh, and that includes calling you the idiots and morons that you are.

You don't like it? I just do not care. Go play in the street, do the world a favor.

Rant on.
 
I admire Bernie for openly admitting he is a Socialist. At least he's honest and doesn't need to hide behind the "Progressive" misnomer. Like Trump, he's telling his people the truth.

Let it be Trump v Bernie

Define what you mean by Socialist, and how in your opinion would Sen. Sanders govern?

[this is your chance frank, the contest between the bigger fool is now between you and Rexx Taylor - I'm rooting for you]

What I mean? Why don't you ask Bernie what he means, he's the self-described Socalist.

Modern American Socialists don't openly advocate for true government ownership, that would take balls; instead they advocate that the industries are so heavily regulated it's de facto government ownership.

Bernie would not govern, he doesn't have a chance in Hell

Socialism as defined by CrusaderFrank is a government which regulates business. And of course he knows the hidden agenda of these regulators, he listens to their leaders, the commies hiding in his closet and under his bed.

Sadly he can never corner them, but he knows they're there, and he knows they will soon take over America unless he is vigilant and sounds the clarion call of fear to all who will listen.

You're just totally hopeless.
 

Forum List

Back
Top