Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Ah, class struggle wrapped up in white guilt. What fun.
Are you fellating yourself while holding your little red book?
I don't have any guilt... I just see this society for what it is.
And it's better to try to ch ange it than keep it as it is.
The change you want would make things worse, not better. A bunch of scared lemmings waiting for whatever government handout some bureaucrat deems them "worthy" of, enforced by the armed police you seem to detest and worship at the same time.
Everyone but you already understands: you want people you disagree with silenced, and you are fine with using thuggery to do so.Did the 60s protestors throw explosives/fireworks into crowds? Did they attack civilians or authority figures?
Yes, they did. They did worse than that.
The weathermen, the SLA, the Black Panthers... sorry, these Antifas you whine about are pussycats compared to 1960's radicals.
And your "...you really should expect this kind of thing." remark is laughable. How did it work out for the Kent State protestors?
Actually, it worked out just fine. We withdrew from Vietnam and Nixon was forced to resign in disgrace. We then got a bunch of reforms in civil rights and government that the GOP has been spending the last 40 years trying to undermine.
Bullshit. The people (most of them anyway) here are talking about Freedom of Speech for everyone. You are the one demanding people's rights be negated because you disagree with them.
No, it should be negated because they are evil and add nothing to the conversation. That your party has embraced these people is just kind of sad. You need to look up a guy named Franz von Papen to see how well hugging Nazis works for regular conservatives (hint- not well).
And ANTIFA is headed for worse. After the initial shock of their behavior, the civilians are fighting back and running the anarchist wannabes off.
guy, Trump's approval rating is dipping below 40 before he's 100 days in. If the people are doing anything, they are getting repulsed by the nastiness you people have brought onto the public forum.
The far right? Yes, you are right.Everyone but you already understands: you want people you disagree with silenced, and you are fine with using thuggery to do so.Did the 60s protestors throw explosives/fireworks into crowds? Did they attack civilians or authority figures?
Yes, they did. They did worse than that.
The weathermen, the SLA, the Black Panthers... sorry, these Antifas you whine about are pussycats compared to 1960's radicals.
And your "...you really should expect this kind of thing." remark is laughable. How did it work out for the Kent State protestors?
Actually, it worked out just fine. We withdrew from Vietnam and Nixon was forced to resign in disgrace. We then got a bunch of reforms in civil rights and government that the GOP has been spending the last 40 years trying to undermine.
Bullshit. The people (most of them anyway) here are talking about Freedom of Speech for everyone. You are the one demanding people's rights be negated because you disagree with them.
No, it should be negated because they are evil and add nothing to the conversation. That your party has embraced these people is just kind of sad. You need to look up a guy named Franz von Papen to see how well hugging Nazis works for regular conservatives (hint- not well).
And ANTIFA is headed for worse. After the initial shock of their behavior, the civilians are fighting back and running the anarchist wannabes off.
guy, Trump's approval rating is dipping below 40 before he's 100 days in. If the people are doing anything, they are getting repulsed by the nastiness you people have brought onto the public forum.
The change you want would make things worse, not better. A bunch of scared lemmings waiting for whatever government handout some bureaucrat deems them "worthy" of, enforced by the armed police you seem to detest and worship at the same time.
again, if Libertarianism was the bees knees, someone would have tried it somewhere,once.
We've tried it your way, it doesn't work. Time for something better.
Everyone but you already understands: you want people you disagree with silenced, and you are fine with using thuggery to do so.
How can you in one sentence say "no one has tried it" and then in the next one say "it's been done before, doesn't work"?
Usually you spread your hypocrisy around a bit, are you getting lazy?
Everyone but you already understands: you want people you disagree with silenced, and you are fine with using thuggery to do so.
Ditchweed, when you have something to actually contribute to a conversation, I'd be happy to listen to you.
How can you in one sentence say "no one has tried it" and then in the next one say "it's been done before, doesn't work"?
Usually you spread your hypocrisy around a bit, are you getting lazy?
No, it's just that your reading comprehension is poor.
Nobody has ever tried libertarianism.
We have tried corporatism, though... and it's kind of fucked up in case you were asleep during 2008. (which might actually explain a lot.)
