Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Its important to remember that. Had McCain been in the White House, we would still be trading steel in Iraq and we may have had boots on the ground in Libya. Obama kept us out of the entanglement.
If it is important to remember that why isn't it important that Obama tried to extend the agreement to keep troops in Iraq beyond the date negotiated by Bush?
I
It's important to remember we're out of Iraq and we didn't get entangled in Libya. Well done Mr. President.
If this Middle East tragedy is indicative of what is wrong with this WH,
4 Americans killed,
then Beirut 1983, the Marine barracks bombing, was indicative of what was wrong with the Reagan White House,
241 Americans killed,
and the disaster of Iraq was indicative of what was wrong with the GW Bush White House,
4000+ Americans killed.
Put in that perspective, where does the Obama administration fall on the 'what is wrong' scale?
Except this you partisan hack, Reagan and Bush did not try and spin terrorism as the reaction to an obscure video and then go after the maker of that video! They had not ignored requests for more security...MY GOD, but you have your head so far up your liberal ass you can't see this as bigger then dem V rep- really???
Four thousand + Americans died needlessly in Iraq because the Bush administration made up tall tales about WMD's.
You're saying that is less of a tragedy than this White House, after the fact, offering a poor explanation initially??
What kind of heartless old bag are you?
Fail YOU FAIL
This thread is about OBAMAS FAILURE and no ammount of pointing at someone else is going to change that. It just makes you look pathetically childish
You can sputter and spit all over yourself all you want you senile old fool but unless this forum bans putting topics into relevant historical perspective,
you're fucked.
And my personal position is secure and consistent because I said we should never have gotten involved in Libya in the first place.
If your personal position was secure you wouldn't feel an obsessive need to defend Obama by flailing around pointing at the endless fuck ups of the US government, you would just step forward and agree that this is a monumental screw up that proves that Obama isn't as smart as he thinks he is, and that no one on the planet is stupid enough to actually fall for the BS that the administration is trying to spin.
This thread needs to be moved to conspiracy theories.
This thread needs to be moved to conspiracy theories.
Biden blatantly lied about Chris Stevens wanting more Security
The Fact Checker
“We weren’t told they wanted more security there. We did not know they wanted more security.”
— Biden, speaking of the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya
Biden’s bold statement was directly contradicted by State Department officials just this week, in testimony before a congressional panel and in unclassified cables released by a congressional committee.
“All of us at post were in sync that we wanted these resources,” said Eric Nordstrom, the top regional security officer in Libya earlier this year. A Utah national guardsman who led a security team, Lt. Col. Andrew Wood, said: “We felt great frustration that those requests were ignored or just never met.”
Maybe Biden was too busy in debate prep to watch?
Carney maintains Libya attack was not preplanned - YouTube
Who is responsible for the attack in Benghazi? - YouTube
WHY THE FUCK DIDN'T WE HAVE MARINES DEFENDING CHRIS STEVENS? The fucking place was a war zone.
On Fox News Sunday David Axelrod was asked if Obama met with his intelligence advisors about the attack before he left for his party in Vegas. David COULDN'T answer the question. It was a SIMPLE yes or no question.
Its quite clear the answer was no and David was flustered.
This situation proves to me that Obama only cares about himself and his fucked up agenda.
This thread needs to be moved to conspiracy theories.
On Fox News Sunday David Axelrod was asked if Obama met with his intelligence advisors about the attack before he left for his party in Vegas. David COULDN'T answer the question. It was a SIMPLE yes or no question.
Its quite clear the answer was no and David was flustered.
This situation proves to me that Obama only cares about himself and his fucked up agenda.
Yep
Video at link
Axelrod Refuses to Say Whether Obama Met with Natl Security Team Before Heading to Las Vegas - By Eliana Johnson - The Corner - National Review Online
This isn't a game for a man to call in sick anytime he wants. This is dead serious.
On Fox News Sunday David Axelrod was asked if Obama met with his intelligence advisors about the attack before he left for his party in Vegas. David COULDN'T answer the question. It was a SIMPLE yes or no question.
Its quite clear the answer was no and David was flustered.
This situation proves to me that Obama only cares about himself and his fucked up agenda.
Yep
Video at link
Axelrod Refuses to Say Whether Obama Met with Natl Security Team Before Heading to Las Vegas - By Eliana Johnson - The Corner - National Review Online
He was skipping out on his job.
This is how Obama has handled his entire presidency. If it's not on HIS AGENDA, he is disengaged.
If it is important to remember that why isn't it important that Obama tried to extend the agreement to keep troops in Iraq beyond the date negotiated by Bush?
I
It's important to remember we're out of Iraq and we didn't get entangled in Libya. Well done Mr. President.
I think the important thing to remember is why we aren't entangled in Iraq and who signed the agreement. That was Bush, not Obama.
As for Libya, since we are currently hunting down the people who attacked our embassy, I think we are at least a little entangled there. Funny thing is, we weren't until Obama decided to interfere with the sovereign government of a foreign country.
It's important to remember we're out of Iraq and we didn't get entangled in Libya. Well done Mr. President.
I think the important thing to remember is why we aren't entangled in Iraq and who signed the agreement. That was Bush, not Obama.
As for Libya, since we are currently hunting down the people who attacked our embassy, I think we are at least a little entangled there. Funny thing is, we weren't until Obama decided to interfere with the sovereign government of a foreign country.
Obama got us out of Iraq and kept us from being entangled in Libya. Well done Mr. President.
Why the deception? Because if you conclude the Benghazi massacre had nothing to do with a cockamamie video no one has seen, you soon realize Obamas favorite campaign theme namely, that killing bin Laden decimated the terror network is nonsense. And you realize that what happened in Benghazi on September 11 is directly traceable to Obamas Middle East policy.
As noted above, the recent intelligence weve just reviewed arose in a historic context. Beginning in 2009, the Obama administration, echoing the Republican establishment, told Americans that Qaddafi had become a key ally of the United States against terrorism. Obama even substantially increased the American aid the Bush administration had begun providing to Qaddafis regime. The rationale for embracing the dictator was straightforward: Not only had Qaddafi abandoned his nuclear program; he was providing vital intelligence about jihadist cauldrons throughout his country. By percentage of population, more Libyans traveled to Iraq to wage terrorist war against American troops than did citizens of any other country. And in Libya, Benghazi was the epicenter of the jihad.
In 2011, however, President Obama initiated an unprovoked war against the Qaddafi regime. Though Qaddafi had taken no intervening hostile action against the United States, and though no vital American national interest would be served by Qaddafis removal, Obama chose to side with the Islamist rebellion against him. Why? As demonstrated in my new book, Spring Fever: The Illusion of Islamic Democracy, the president was determined to sell the Arab Spring fantasy of a Middle East seized by the desire for freedom rather than strangled by the ambitions of freedom-killing Islamic supremacists.
In Libya, Islamists were the backbone of the rebellion: the Muslim Brotherhood partnering, as it is wont to do, with violent jihadists in this instance, al-Qaeda and its affiliates. Toppling Qaddafi would necessarily result in their empowerment. Theyd insinuate themselves into any new government. Theyd set up sharia enclaves where they were strong enough to do so. And theyd strengthen themselves by seizing chunks of Qaddafis arsenal of high-powered weaponry. Being incorrigibly anti-American, theyd use their new influence and power against the United States.
cont.. Denying the Libya Scandal - National Review Online
I didn't vote for him on account of his frightening Senate record of voting for too much spending and nothing for national security that would have attracted him to me for leadership. Even so, I waited an entire year on the grounds of liberal enthusiasm that he would be America's greatest leader ever. I even extended it to another six months because he was black. After that, it was clear to me he had no intention of cutting the national debt in half when it doubled under his tutelage, or should I say now, lack of it.This is how Obama has handled his entire presidency. If it's not on HIS AGENDA, he is disengaged.
I think he likes to delegate responsibility because of lack of knowledge but mostly so he'll have someone else to blame...
