MikeK
Gold Member
Exactly!The only thing that an AK or similiar weopon is good for is killing other people.
What do you think was the purpose of the Second Amendment? The citizen needs to be able to defend himself against those who mean to enslave us or kill us and the best way to to that is to kill them first. So why deprive us of the most efficient means of doing that?
You may rest assured the criminal element has access to these weapons so why should you and I not have access to them? Does it make sense to deprive the law-abiding citizen of the same kind of weapons he might be confronted with?Weopons that are rapid firing semi-automatics with a 40 shot clip or more, are military weopons, no less than a tank or hand grenade.
That's right. And the problem is the loons and gangsters will not obey the anti-firearms laws. So you'd better be prepared to defend yourself against them.In the hands of a loon or gangster, they present a horrible danger to law enforcement officers as well as ordinery citizens.
It is better to have a gun and not need it than to need a gun and not have it.
This is America. Guns are an endemic part of our culture. The fact that you don't like it, and that street shootings sometimes take place, doesn't change our reality. Guns are here to stay and your lament is duly noted. But it won't do a bit of good.As a gun owner since I was 12, I do not like these weopons in the hands of the general public, as they represent a real danger. Just experianced that sort of thing in my neighborhood. Someone sprayed a car and home with a weopong that sounded like a buzz. 15 to 20 shots in a second or two. And the home was not someone involved in criminal activities at all. The police stated it just looked random. Oh, yes, a six year old boy grazed by one of the bullets. Since kits are readily available to converty many of these semi-automatics to full automatics, we are putting war weopons on the streets and in the hands of the loons.