It will be up to the voters and Obama is right and has the right to put in his 2 cents. The DNC - OTOH - is a private org whose leaders don't care about what is best for America or Americans … they just wanna win, baby 'cause it's profitable and more fun than losing.So you are against politicians endorsing or speaking against other politicians? You suuuuuuure about that?I agree, although it ought to be up to the voters not Ears or the DNC.
I don't understand your thinking here. Current and former elected officials - they never stop being pols - have the same right and duty to speak on matters of their choosing (or write checks) and others retain the right to agree, disagree, or ignore them.Quit being such a moron, I'm against ex-politicians speaking against other politicians.So you are against politicians endorsing or speaking against other politicians? You suuuuuuure about that?
I don't see how Obama expressing his opinion or actively campaigning for or against candidates is a problem, nor do I see it as unjust as was the DNC renting itself out to Shrillary without openly declaring itself biased.Let them squeeze Bernie out again, and then Repubs can run on informing people about it. It will really piss off their Bernie voters to the point of not coming out on election day.Democrats may have treated Bernie unfairly in 2016. Evidently if it worked back then, why not do it again.
OTOH, what Shrillary has done to Gabbard is way over the line but Tulsi should send her some flowers and candy anyway … Clinton's unhinged criticism has kept Gabbard relevant and could lead to the inception of a viable 3rd party that will quickly eclipse the DNC. Karma, baby!
Last edited: