Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo

Freewill

Platinum Member
Oct 26, 2011
31,158
5,072
1,130
Some one did ask now that the gays have won what's next. Well here it starts:

Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo

Judge in Australia says incest may no longer be a taboo and the only reason it is criminal is potential birth abnormalities, which can be solved by abortion

Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo - Telegraph

A judge in Australia has been criticised after saying incest may no longer be a taboo and that the community may now accept consensual sex between adult siblings.

Judge Garry Neilson, from the district court in the state of New South Wales, likened incest to homosexuality, which was once regarded as criminal and "unnatural" but is now widely accepted.
 
BTW, homosexuality definitely is accepted now by the courts, but it is not natural.
 
Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo


Hey, a Texas Senator said that shutting down the government was a good idea.

People say crazy shit all the time.
 
Some one did ask now that the gays have won what's next. Well here it starts:

Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo

Judge in Australia says incest may no longer be a taboo and the only reason it is criminal is potential birth abnormalities, which can be solved by abortion

Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo - Telegraph

A judge in Australia has been criticised after saying incest may no longer be a taboo and that the community may now accept consensual sex between adult siblings.

Judge Garry Neilson, from the district court in the state of New South Wales, likened incest to homosexuality, which was once regarded as criminal and "unnatural" but is now widely accepted.

I think this guy is showing his own perverted proclivities. He needs to be removed from his judicial position.

Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo

Judge in Australia says incest may no longer be a taboo and the only reason it is criminal is potential birth abnormalities, which can be solved by abortion

By Jonathan Pearlman in Sydney
12:47PM BST 10 Jul 2014

A judge in Australia has been criticized after saying incest may no longer be a taboo and that the community may now accept consensual sex between adult siblings.

Judge Garry Neilson, from the district court in the state of New South Wales, likened incest to homosexuality, which was once regarded as criminal and "unnatural" but is now widely accepted.

He said incest was now only a crime because it may lead to abnormalities in offspring but this rationale was increasingly irrelevant because of the availability of contraception and abortion.

"A jury might find nothing untoward in the advance of a brother towards his sister once she had sexually matured, had sexual relationships with other men and was now 'available', not having [a] sexual partner," the judge said.

"If this was the 1950s and you had a jury of 12 men there, which is what you'd invariably have, they would say it's unnatural for a man to be interested in another man or a man being interested in a boy. Those things have gone."

Judge Neilson made the comments during the trial of a brother charged with raping his younger sister. The man has pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting his sister when she was 10 or 11 years old in 1973 or 1974 but has pleaded not guilty to charges relating to sex they had in 1981, when she was 18 and he was 26.

"By that stage they are both mature adults," the judge said.

"The complainant has been sexually awoken, shall we say, by having two relationships with men and she had become 'free' when the second relationship broke down. The only thing that might change that is the fact that they were a brother and sister but we've come a long way from the 1950s – when the position of the English Common Law was that sex outside marriage was not lawful."

The comments were labeled misogynistic and "completely disgraceful" by Sally Dowling, the crown prosecutor, who has asked an appeal court to appoint another judge.

"The reference to abortion is particularly repellent," she said.

Dr Cathy Kezelman, an advocate for preventing child sex abuse, said incest was horrific, regardless of the ages of those involved.

"The relational betrayal of the horrors of incest between a brother and sister of any age is abhorrently criminal," she told The Sydney Morning Herald.

This guy is really sick and needs to be fired.


There is absolutely no connection between this issue and homosexuality: only in the minds of nut cases like this judge and the OP.
 
Last edited:
Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo


Hey, a Texas Senator said that shutting down the government was a good idea.

People say crazy shit all the time.

And idiot liberals would rather see incest run rampant than see a partial government shutdown.........:cuckoo:
 
Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo


Hey, a Texas Senator said that shutting down the government was a good idea.

People say crazy shit all the time.

Off topic, but yeah you are right, it is an excellent idea.
 
Some one did ask now that the gays have won what's next. Well here it starts:

Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo

Judge in Australia says incest may no longer be a taboo and the only reason it is criminal is potential birth abnormalities, which can be solved by abortion

Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo - Telegraph

A judge in Australia has been criticised after saying incest may no longer be a taboo and that the community may now accept consensual sex between adult siblings.

Judge Garry Neilson, from the district court in the state of New South Wales, likened incest to homosexuality, which was once regarded as criminal and "unnatural" but is now widely accepted.

I think this guy is showing his own perverted proclivities. He needs to be removed from his judicial position.

Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo

Judge in Australia says incest may no longer be a taboo and the only reason it is criminal is potential birth abnormalities, which can be solved by abortion

By Jonathan Pearlman in Sydney
12:47PM BST 10 Jul 2014

A judge in Australia has been criticized after saying incest may no longer be a taboo and that the community may now accept consensual sex between adult siblings.

Judge Garry Neilson, from the district court in the state of New South Wales, likened incest to homosexuality, which was once regarded as criminal and "unnatural" but is now widely accepted.

He said incest was now only a crime because it may lead to abnormalities in offspring but this rationale was increasingly irrelevant because of the availability of contraception and abortion.

"A jury might find nothing untoward in the advance of a brother towards his sister once she had sexually matured, had sexual relationships with other men and was now 'available', not having [a] sexual partner," the judge said.

"If this was the 1950s and you had a jury of 12 men there, which is what you'd invariably have, they would say it's unnatural for a man to be interested in another man or a man being interested in a boy. Those things have gone."

Judge Neilson made the comments during the trial of a brother charged with raping his younger sister. The man has pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting his sister when she was 10 or 11 years old in 1973 or 1974 but has pleaded not guilty to charges relating to sex they had in 1981, when she was 18 and he was 26.

"By that stage they are both mature adults," the judge said.

"The complainant has been sexually awoken, shall we say, by having two relationships with men and she had become 'free' when the second relationship broke down. The only thing that might change that is the fact that they were a brother and sister but we've come a long way from the 1950s – when the position of the English Common Law was that sex outside marriage was not lawful."

The comments were labeled misogynistic and "completely disgraceful" by Sally Dowling, the crown prosecutor, who has asked an appeal court to appoint another judge.

"The reference to abortion is particularly repellent," she said.

Dr Cathy Kezelman, an advocate for preventing child sex abuse, said incest was horrific, regardless of the ages of those involved.

"The relational betrayal of the horrors of incest between a brother and sister of any age is abhorrently criminal," she told The Sydney Morning Herald.

This guy is really sick and needs to be fired.


There is absolutely no connection between this issue and homosexuality: only in the minds of nut cases like this judge and the OP.

Sorry but one of the arguments about gay marriage was it was a right the state had no right to interfere. Well the counter was then why could the government interfere with siblings marrying. So no the next step is being taken.

BTW homosexuality and the civil rights movement have nothing in common either but the gay lobby sure tries to make that connection.

BTW, what you are saing about incest is what was said about sodomy, as practiced by two men, by the majority of the country.
 
Last edited:
Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo


Hey, a Texas Senator said that shutting down the government was a good idea.

People say crazy shit all the time.

And idiot liberals would rather see incest run rampant than see a partial government shutdown.........:cuckoo:

I'm sure you will see all the liberals running to this thread to support incest. :cuckoo: What a dupe. Are there any conservatives that are not just completely bat shit stupid anymore?
 
Some one did ask now that the gays have won what's next. Well here it starts:

Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo

Judge in Australia says incest may no longer be a taboo and the only reason it is criminal is potential birth abnormalities, which can be solved by abortion

Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo - Telegraph

A judge in Australia has been criticised after saying incest may no longer be a taboo and that the community may now accept consensual sex between adult siblings.

Judge Garry Neilson, from the district court in the state of New South Wales, likened incest to homosexuality, which was once regarded as criminal and "unnatural" but is now widely accepted.

And in related news in Slipperyslopesville... LGBT ??? activists are lining-out age requirements for marriage in an expression of foreshadow for California Uber Alles:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/curre...ering-the-age-of-consent-under-the-radar.html
 
Some one did ask now that the gays have won what's next. Well here it starts:

Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo

Judge in Australia says incest may no longer be a taboo and the only reason it is criminal is potential birth abnormalities, which can be solved by abortion

Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo - Telegraph

A judge in Australia has been criticised after saying incest may no longer be a taboo and that the community may now accept consensual sex between adult siblings.

Judge Garry Neilson, from the district court in the state of New South Wales, likened incest to homosexuality, which was once regarded as criminal and "unnatural" but is now widely accepted.
Amoral people cannot make moral judgments.
 
Some one did ask now that the gays have won what's next. Well here it starts:

Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo

Judge in Australia says incest may no longer be a taboo and the only reason it is criminal is potential birth abnormalities, which can be solved by abortion

Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo - Telegraph

A judge in Australia has been criticised after saying incest may no longer be a taboo and that the community may now accept consensual sex between adult siblings.

Judge Garry Neilson, from the district court in the state of New South Wales, likened incest to homosexuality, which was once regarded as criminal and "unnatural" but is now widely accepted.

I think this guy is showing his own perverted proclivities. He needs to be removed from his judicial position.

Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo

Judge in Australia says incest may no longer be a taboo and the only reason it is criminal is potential birth abnormalities, which can be solved by abortion

By Jonathan Pearlman in Sydney
12:47PM BST 10 Jul 2014

A judge in Australia has been criticized after saying incest may no longer be a taboo and that the community may now accept consensual sex between adult siblings.

Judge Garry Neilson, from the district court in the state of New South Wales, likened incest to homosexuality, which was once regarded as criminal and "unnatural" but is now widely accepted.

He said incest was now only a crime because it may lead to abnormalities in offspring but this rationale was increasingly irrelevant because of the availability of contraception and abortion.

"A jury might find nothing untoward in the advance of a brother towards his sister once she had sexually matured, had sexual relationships with other men and was now 'available', not having [a] sexual partner," the judge said.

"If this was the 1950s and you had a jury of 12 men there, which is what you'd invariably have, they would say it's unnatural for a man to be interested in another man or a man being interested in a boy. Those things have gone."

Judge Neilson made the comments during the trial of a brother charged with raping his younger sister. The man has pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting his sister when she was 10 or 11 years old in 1973 or 1974 but has pleaded not guilty to charges relating to sex they had in 1981, when she was 18 and he was 26.

"By that stage they are both mature adults," the judge said.

"The complainant has been sexually awoken, shall we say, by having two relationships with men and she had become 'free' when the second relationship broke down. The only thing that might change that is the fact that they were a brother and sister but we've come a long way from the 1950s – when the position of the English Common Law was that sex outside marriage was not lawful."

The comments were labeled misogynistic and "completely disgraceful" by Sally Dowling, the crown prosecutor, who has asked an appeal court to appoint another judge.

"The reference to abortion is particularly repellent," she said.

Dr Cathy Kezelman, an advocate for preventing child sex abuse, said incest was horrific, regardless of the ages of those involved.

"The relational betrayal of the horrors of incest between a brother and sister of any age is abhorrently criminal," she told The Sydney Morning Herald.

This guy is really sick and needs to be fired.


There is absolutely no connection between this issue and homosexuality: only in the minds of nut cases like this judge and the OP.

Sorry but one of the arguments about gay marriage was it was a right the state had no right to interfere. Well the counter was then why could the government interfere with siblings marrying. So no the next step is being taken.

BTW homosexuality and the civil rights movement have nothing in common either but the gay lobby sure tries to make that connection.

BTW, what you are saing about incest is what was said about sodomy, as practiced by two men, by the majority of the country.

I'm sorry; I guess I didn't make myself clear: There is no LOGICAL connection between homosexuality and a brother wanting to fuck his sister.
 
Some one did ask now that the gays have won what's next. Well here it starts:

Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo

Judge in Australia says incest may no longer be a taboo and the only reason it is criminal is potential birth abnormalities, which can be solved by abortion

Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo - Telegraph

A judge in Australia has been criticised after saying incest may no longer be a taboo and that the community may now accept consensual sex between adult siblings.

Judge Garry Neilson, from the district court in the state of New South Wales, likened incest to homosexuality, which was once regarded as criminal and "unnatural" but is now widely accepted.

And in related news in Slipperyslopesville... LGBT ??? activists are lining-out age requirements for marriage in an expression of foreshadow for California Uber Alles:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/curre...ering-the-age-of-consent-under-the-radar.html

Got to get to them young, like forming clay.
 
I think this guy is showing his own perverted proclivities. He needs to be removed from his judicial position.



This guy is really sick and needs to be fired.


There is absolutely no connection between this issue and homosexuality: only in the minds of nut cases like this judge and the OP.

Sorry but one of the arguments about gay marriage was it was a right the state had no right to interfere. Well the counter was then why could the government interfere with siblings marrying. So no the next step is being taken.

BTW homosexuality and the civil rights movement have nothing in common either but the gay lobby sure tries to make that connection.

BTW, what you are saing about incest is what was said about sodomy, as practiced by two men, by the majority of the country.

I'm sorry; I guess I didn't make myself clear: There is no LOGICAL connection between homosexuality and a brother wanting to fuck his sister.

Maybe I am not being clear, not long ago sodomizing your brother was criminal as is marrying your sister is today.
 
Some one did ask now that the gays have won what's next. Well here it starts:

Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo

Judge in Australia says incest may no longer be a taboo and the only reason it is criminal is potential birth abnormalities, which can be solved by abortion

Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo - Telegraph

A judge in Australia has been criticised after saying incest may no longer be a taboo and that the community may now accept consensual sex between adult siblings.

Judge Garry Neilson, from the district court in the state of New South Wales, likened incest to homosexuality, which was once regarded as criminal and "unnatural" but is now widely accepted.

incest is creepy and immoral

but there really shouldn't be a law against it


and saying it's ok b/c you can kill the child is just another level of evil.
 
Bringing homosexuality into this discussion is being off topic. Incest and homosexuality are two completely different issues. You people are so fucked up with your religious self righteousness you can't even see the forest for the trees. And, you go on an on about anal sex being perverse. What a joke. As far as I can tell from everything I've heard and read about it, at least half of the men on the planet want to butt fuck their girlfriends/wives. Are they are on the same level as homos as far as you people are concerned? You are such hypocrites.
 
Bringing homosexuality into this discussion is being off topic. Incest and homosexuality are two completely different issues. You people are so fucked up with your religious self righteousness you can't even see the forest for the trees. And, you go on an on about anal sex being perverse. What a joke. As far as I can tell from everything I've heard and read about it, at least half of the men on the planet want to butt fuck their girlfriends/wives. Are they are on the same level as homos as far as you people are concerned? You are such hypocrites.

one thing leads to another

and is, in case you hadn't noticed
 
Bringing homosexuality into this discussion is being off topic. Incest and homosexuality are two completely different issues. You people are so fucked up with your religious self righteousness you can't even see the forest for the trees. And, you go on an on about anal sex being perverse. What a joke. As far as I can tell from everything I've heard and read about it, at least half of the men on the planet want to butt fuck their girlfriends/wives. Are they are on the same level as homos as far as you people are concerned? You are such hypocrites.

one thing leads to another

and is, in case you hadn't noticed

OMG! How absolutely absurd. Incest does not lead to homosexuality and homosexuality does not lead to incest.

These are two COMPLETELY DIFFERENT behaviors. You people are the sick ones, not the gays.
 
Some one did ask now that the gays have won what's next. Well here it starts:

Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo

Judge in Australia says incest may no longer be a taboo and the only reason it is criminal is potential birth abnormalities, which can be solved by abortion

Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo - Telegraph

A judge in Australia has been criticised after saying incest may no longer be a taboo and that the community may now accept consensual sex between adult siblings.

Judge Garry Neilson, from the district court in the state of New South Wales, likened incest to homosexuality, which was once regarded as criminal and "unnatural" but is now widely accepted.

I think people are not as outraged or offended by it as they once were, so in part, the judge is right.
 

Forum List

Back
Top