Attempts to Stifle MA Crisis Pregnancy Centers FAIL

[Anathema]

I would of failed two ways because forced to give an answer and I gotta go mango key lime

Never had great results with the line. Thought I might have one night, but turned out to be a bomb.

 

[Curried Goats]

Never had great results with the line. Thought I might have one night, but turned out to be a bomb.

Oh man I'm dyslexic today. I had to go back and read the other post because I was so confused why you were genuinely asking me about pie....

 

[elektra]

It's not my opinion you clown. It's your strawman coupled with you but understanding basic biology.

Stating facts is not a strawman, your attempt to substantiate your opinion with an article from Reuters is

Surgical operations are not basic biology

Smoke more dope pothead

 

[Curried Goats]

Stating facts is not a strawman, your attempt to substantiate your opinion with an article from Reuters is

Surgical operations are not basic biology

Smoke more dope pothead

Surgeries that result in unviable babies or fetuses being "born" however are effectively abortions because those babies aren't going to survive.

 

[gmeyers1944]

If it is believed that a woman's life is in danger late in her pregnancy, the doctor should perform a Ceasarian section to give the baby a chance at life rather than aborting the baby.

 

[Curried Goats]

If it is believed that a woman's life is in danger late in her pregnancy, the doctor should perform a Ceasarian section to give the baby a chance at life rather than aborting the baby.

That is what they do.

 

[elektra]

Surgeries that result in unviable babies or fetuses being "born" however are effectively abortions because those babies aren't going to survive.

In your opinion.

Medically speaking, abortion procedures during a medical emergency will always kill the woman.

That is why you could not link to anything other than a Rueters propaganda piece

 

[Votar Roja]

If it is believed that a woman's life is in danger late in her pregnancy, the doctor should perform a Ceasarian section to give the baby a chance at life rather than aborting the baby.

Amen

 

[cnm]

What was dumb about it Marty? Try to explain in a way that doesn't make you look like a hilarious Bingo.

For you?

Nah. Now go get offended by being called the wrong pronoun.

Now that's hilarious.

 

[cnm]

Because over 3 months to figure out you don't want to give birth is more than enough.

Apart from anything else, the woman doesn't have three months to figure it out, she probably won't even know for at least a month that she's even pregnant.

Then I understand it can takes weeks just to get an appointment to see one's doctor.

Tell you what: You don't have any abortions over your selected time limit.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Who cares about your strawman?

Pregnancies do come with risks and abortions are medical procedures. Those risks don't always have to be life threatening to be valid. No woman should be required to accept health risks to satisfy someone else's morality.

Every successful abortion kills an innocent human being.

It is blatantly dishonest to describe this as a “medical procedure” to protect a woman's health or safety, It is homicide, plain and simple. Cold-blooded murder.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

2. All pregnancies bring with them risk and no one should be compelled to accept risk for the sake of someone else's morality.

You're arguing for imposing a 100% chance of death on an innocent human being, in order to relieve another human being of a much smaller risk.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Fetuses aren't babies or adults are they?

They are human beings, just at a different stage, the same as a baby being at a different stage than an adult.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

I didn't say they weren't homo sapiens. My argument has nothing to do with whether they are human or not. It's to point out that rights exist in varying degrees at different stages of life.

Is it more acceptable, or less acceptable, to murder a young man of about fifteen or sixteen years of age, than it would be to murder an old man like me, just weeks short of sixty-one?

How does one's age reflect on one's right not to be murdered?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

And extending some of those rights to the fetal stage in balance with the rights of the mother is the whole argument.
I put that balance for birth control abortions at 12-16 weeks.

I cannot agree with supporting the murder of a human being at any age. From conception, that person is every bit as much a human being as he is after the arbitrary point that you want to set, and it is no more acceptable to murder him before he reaches that point than afterward.

Murder is still murder, regardless, of the age of the victim.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

MAGAts are all about con-trolling women and their bodies…

If it was about control of a woman's body, then it would be the woman who gets an abortion who dies from it, and not her innocent child.

 

[koshergrl]

People continue breathing of their own volition, not yours. Way to miss the point Marty.

No, we don't miss the point. Abortion is a human rights violation, and it is promoted, funded, taught by NEGATIVE EUGENECISTS whose objective is to reduce population and trample human rights.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

By that logic does that independent life have a right to gestate off you without your consent? Seems like that fetus should respect others peoples bodies if it expects respect for its own in return.

Does a child have a right to be cared for, provided for, and protected by his parents, until he is old enough to support himself? Or is it within the right of the parents, of, say, a five-year-old, to toss that kid out on the streets and let him fend for himself?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

So, it's time to charge fathers with child support from con-ception.

Yes. Absolutely.

It takes two people to create a new human being; and both of those people need to take responsibility for the care and raising of that human being.

 

[Unkotare]

Less and less young people are having kids so that will help greatly.

Help undermine society?