Atheists Win: Santa Monica City Council Votes to End Religious Displays

I don't find Chanel to be a liar....passionate, yes.

well, she lied right here and the evidence is above.

you may like her, but that is no defense

What did she lie about? The vandalism? Why don't you sue her.

Do you think there is a war on Christianity in the USA?

think? gawd, you're pathetic.

a handful of atheist nitiwts want all religion of of public places and government.

if that's a war, go play with your prick
 
well, she lied right here and the evidence is above.

you may like her, but that is no defense

What did she lie about? The vandalism? Why don't you sue her.

Do you think there is a war on Christianity in the USA?

think? gawd, you're pathetic.

a handful of atheist nitiwts want all religion of of public places and government.

if that's a war, go play with your prick

A handful of miscreant morons are taken seriously by an activist judge and then turn our constitution into a meaningless document. The judge's ruling should be ignored. There is nothing in the US Constitution that states religious symbols cannot be placed on govt property. Arlington Cemetary is full of religious symbols. Why don't you and your pals try and remove those. When are you going to remove the religious symbols at the USSC building? When are you going to remove the bible buried in the cornerstone of the Washington Monument?

Kiss my American ass. Loser.
 
Last edited:
Santa Monica has hosted nativity scenes in Palisades Park for 60 years. Beginning in 1953, a coalition of 13 churches joined a local police organization to put up nativity displays. The displays consisted of more than a dozen scenes from the birth of Jesus as depicted in the Gospels created out of sets and using mannequins dressed in period costumes.

But in the last few years atheist groups have challenged the practice and demanded space for their own displays. Last year, the display area was divided up into small display spaces and split up among dozens of applicants. The coalition of churches which had been using the park got just three of the spaces, meaning the majority of their display remained in storage. One space went to a Jewish group and two to other churches. Eighteen of the spaces went to atheists groups.

Now Santa Monica has simply put an end to the displays altogether. .

Atheists Win: Santa Monica City Council Votes to End Religious Displays

No "War on Christmas"?

Nonsense.

The displays will continue, only on private land:

He added that the hardening of feelings on both sides made it clear to him that the best way for the tradition to continue would be to shift the displays to private property.

And displays will still be allowed on public land:

Assistant City Atty. Joseph Lawrence said a display with an attendant might be permitted during daytime park hours as long as it followed no-camping and other relevant rules.

In the future the OP might want to consider a more comprehensive review of an issue rather than relying on a single ‘source,’ particularly if it’s Breitbart.

Link to the cited above:

Santa Monica to ban private, unattended displays at park - latimes.com
 
They can vote however they choose. Thankfully, future generations can reverse foolish decisions like this.
 
What did she lie about? The vandalism? Why don't you sue her.

Do you think there is a war on Christianity in the USA?

think? gawd, you're pathetic.

a handful of atheist nitiwts want all religion of of public places and government.

if that's a war, go play with your prick

A handful of miscreant morons are taken seriously by an activist judge and then turn our constitution into a meaningless document.

true, it's usually a handful of miscreants -- just like the religious miscreants who start trouble with the rest of society.

activist Judge? Judges by their very nature are activist. :eek:

The US Constitution is doing fine. now stfu
 
think? gawd, you're pathetic.

a handful of atheist nitiwts want all religion of of public places and government.

if that's a war, go play with your prick

A handful of miscreant morons are taken seriously by an activist judge and then turn our constitution into a meaningless document.

true, it's usually a handful of miscreants -- just like the religious miscreants who start trouble with the rest of society.

activist Judge? Judges by their very nature are activist. :eek:

The US Constitution is doing fine. now stfu
Don't you know....if we don't have a lightbulb baby jesus with some plastic figurines all around looking at it adoringly....on PUBLIC PROPERTY....we're all going to HELL!!!!
 
A handful of miscreant morons are taken seriously by an activist judge and then turn our constitution into a meaningless document.

true, it's usually a handful of miscreants -- just like the religious miscreants who start trouble with the rest of society.

activist Judge? Judges by their very nature are activist. :eek:

The US Constitution is doing fine. now stfu
Don't you know....if we don't have a lightbulb baby jesus with some plastic figurines all around looking at it adoringly....on PUBLIC PROPERTY....we're all going to HELL!!!!

:rofl:
 
this Chanel character is a proven liar and a lying Christian is capable of most anything. careful, they have gawd on their side :laugh2:

I don't find Chanel to be a liar....passionate, yes.

well, she lied right here and the evidence is above.

you may like her, but that is no defense

She lied...

...and this is for all the Lonely People (House and company) who are defending her.

[youtube]IRDnEqW1vAc[/youtube]
 

Forum List

Back
Top