danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #61
nothing but diversion instead of a valid argument? only the right wing does that.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
ATF allows more guns to be sold to drug dealers...in Florida...
- Thread starter 2aguy
- Start date
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #62
The point is, dear; that we should have no security problems in our free States; it is why well regulated militia are both necessary and proper.gezus you are clueless....you asked WHY we have security problems in our free state.....do you understand what you asked?.....all you are doing is telling me what certain leaders can do with the militia....but that does not say why we have SECURITY problems....so you had better pay some attention dear....Pay attention, dear.that wasnt his question though rocks.....he was asking why we have security problems in our "free" society...Kind of like aiding the police if a group of Sovereign Citizens gets the upper hand. And the Supreme Court has already ruled that the government does have the right to control who has access to certain types of weapons.Did you know, nobody takes the right wing seriously about the law or economics?do you even know what you are talking about?....i will ask again....what do better roads and aqueducts have to do with your question about any security problems we have?....and once again,a militia is not a police force...
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Than means:
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union or the State, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
In our free States. We have Commanders in Chief of that which is declared Necessary to the security of a free State.
we should have no security problems in our free States; it is why well regulated militia are both necessary and proper.The point is, dear; that we should have no security problems in our free States; it is why well regulated militia are both necessary and proper.gezus you are clueless....you asked WHY we have security problems in our free state.....do you understand what you asked?.....all you are doing is telling me what certain leaders can do with the militia....but that does not say why we have SECURITY problems....so you had better pay some attention dear....Pay attention, dear.that wasnt his question though rocks.....he was asking why we have security problems in our "free" society...Kind of like aiding the police if a group of Sovereign Citizens gets the upper hand. And the Supreme Court has already ruled that the government does have the right to control who has access to certain types of weapons.Did you know, nobody takes the right wing seriously about the law or economics?
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
Than means:
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union or the State, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
In our free States. We have Commanders in Chief of that which is declared Necessary to the security of a free State.
we have a well regulated militia .....so whats the security problem you speak of?...
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #64
we don't need the cost of alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror. Stop "hating on the poor".we should have no security problems in our free States; it is why well regulated militia are both necessary and proper.The point is, dear; that we should have no security problems in our free States; it is why well regulated militia are both necessary and proper.gezus you are clueless....you asked WHY we have security problems in our free state.....do you understand what you asked?.....all you are doing is telling me what certain leaders can do with the militia....but that does not say why we have SECURITY problems....so you had better pay some attention dear....Pay attention, dear.that wasnt his question though rocks.....he was asking why we have security problems in our "free" society...Kind of like aiding the police if a group of Sovereign Citizens gets the upper hand. And the Supreme Court has already ruled that the government does have the right to control who has access to certain types of weapons.
In our free States. We have Commanders in Chief of that which is declared Necessary to the security of a free State.
we have a well regulated militia .....so whats the security problem you speak of?...
we dont?....who is going to pay for these things?.....they do exist....and were have i hated on the poor or is this just more daniel talk?...we don't need the cost of alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror. Stop "hating on the poor".we should have no security problems in our free States; it is why well regulated militia are both necessary and proper.The point is, dear; that we should have no security problems in our free States; it is why well regulated militia are both necessary and proper.gezus you are clueless....you asked WHY we have security problems in our free state.....do you understand what you asked?.....all you are doing is telling me what certain leaders can do with the militia....but that does not say why we have SECURITY problems....so you had better pay some attention dear....Pay attention, dear.that wasnt his question though rocks.....he was asking why we have security problems in our "free" society...
In our free States. We have Commanders in Chief of that which is declared Necessary to the security of a free State.
we have a well regulated militia .....so whats the security problem you speak of?...
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #66
Our War on Poverty is more real than Your alleged wars on the abstractions of crime, drugs, and terror. We have a Second Amendment for "national security".we dont?....who is going to pay for these things?.....they do exist....and were have i hated on the poor or is this just more daniel talk?...we don't need the cost of alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror. Stop "hating on the poor".we should have no security problems in our free States; it is why well regulated militia are both necessary and proper.The point is, dear; that we should have no security problems in our free States; it is why well regulated militia are both necessary and proper.gezus you are clueless....you asked WHY we have security problems in our free state.....do you understand what you asked?.....all you are doing is telling me what certain leaders can do with the militia....but that does not say why we have SECURITY problems....so you had better pay some attention dear....Pay attention, dear.
In our free States. We have Commanders in Chief of that which is declared Necessary to the security of a free State.
we have a well regulated militia .....so whats the security problem you speak of?...
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,977
- 52,250
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #68
Of course you can. I have a friend that has a fully automatic .45 Thompson. He did the paper work, and he enjoys shooting it. I have no problem with that. I do have a problem with those that defend selling guns to mentally ill people.How many of the mass shootings have been committed with a .45 Thompson. It is a more lethal weapon in the close range venue that most of these miscreants operate in than the AK or AR. That is how it works, if you cannot have it without jumping through some paper work hoops, most will not get it.On the contrary, the Congress can require the same kind of license for a large capacity semiautomatic rifle or pistol as is required for a .45 Thompson. And I would definately support such a law.Yes.....Dangerous and unusual....since rifles and pistols are in common use....you asswipes have no say over those....
No.......it can't.......
Why would you support that law? Please....explain how that would prevent criminals...who can't own these guns in the first place, and mass shooters, who can own these guns in the second place....would make us safer......
Keep in mind, mass shooters plan their attacks 6 months to 2 years in advance, and criminals don't bother to get licenses for their illegal guns...
So please....explain how licensing works.....
No moron....any gun at close range is lethal.....the reason they don't use the Thompson is it is long, weighs a ton and doesn't have the cool factor you morons have created in the AR-15......and you can still get the Thompson if you want it.......moron....
Who defends that?
now we are talking about the war on poverty?....who is helping you move them goalposts?.....whats the matter daniel,you cant answer questions,you just ramble on to other things?.....you have done this the whole thread....now answer my questions.....1.whats the security problem you speak of?....2.were have i hated on the poor?....Our War on Poverty is more real than Your alleged wars on the abstractions of crime, drugs, and terror. We have a Second Amendment for "national security".we dont?....who is going to pay for these things?.....they do exist....and were have i hated on the poor or is this just more daniel talk?...we don't need the cost of alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror. Stop "hating on the poor".we should have no security problems in our free States; it is why well regulated militia are both necessary and proper.The point is, dear; that we should have no security problems in our free States; it is why well regulated militia are both necessary and proper.gezus you are clueless....you asked WHY we have security problems in our free state.....do you understand what you asked?.....all you are doing is telling me what certain leaders can do with the militia....but that does not say why we have SECURITY problems....so you had better pay some attention dear....
we have a well regulated militia .....so whats the security problem you speak of?...
im feeling that way about daniel....the guy is all over the place,except were he was in his first question...which he has done his best not to answer...Listen fem, it no one any good to argue with you. It's like arguing with a Yosemite Sam toon.Can't argue that can ya son.
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #71
why do we have a thread, if there is no perceived problem?now we are talking about the war on poverty?....who is helping you move them goalposts?.....whats the matter daniel,you cant answer questions,you just ramble on to other things?.....you have done this the whole thread....now answer my questions.....1.whats the security problem you speak of?....2.were have i hated on the poor?....Our War on Poverty is more real than Your alleged wars on the abstractions of crime, drugs, and terror. We have a Second Amendment for "national security".we dont?....who is going to pay for these things?.....they do exist....and were have i hated on the poor or is this just more daniel talk?...we don't need the cost of alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror. Stop "hating on the poor".we should have no security problems in our free States; it is why well regulated militia are both necessary and proper.The point is, dear; that we should have no security problems in our free States; it is why well regulated militia are both necessary and proper.
we have a well regulated militia .....so whats the security problem you speak of?...
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #72
y'all must just not have understood the answer, the first time.im feeling that way about daniel....the guy is all over the place,except were he was in his first question...which he has done his best not to answer...Listen fem, it no one any good to argue with you. It's like arguing with a Yosemite Sam toon.Can't argue that can ya son.
you tell me.....you are the one who says we have security problems but yet cant seem to tell me what they are....you do remember you asking that question,right?....why do we have a thread, if there is no perceived problem?now we are talking about the war on poverty?....who is helping you move them goalposts?.....whats the matter daniel,you cant answer questions,you just ramble on to other things?.....you have done this the whole thread....now answer my questions.....1.whats the security problem you speak of?....2.were have i hated on the poor?....Our War on Poverty is more real than Your alleged wars on the abstractions of crime, drugs, and terror. We have a Second Amendment for "national security".we dont?....who is going to pay for these things?.....they do exist....and were have i hated on the poor or is this just more daniel talk?...we don't need the cost of alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror. Stop "hating on the poor".we should have no security problems in our free States; it is why well regulated militia are both necessary and proper.
we have a well regulated militia .....so whats the security problem you speak of?...
thats because there was no answer.....y'all must just not have understood the answer, the first time.im feeling that way about daniel....the guy is all over the place,except were he was in his first question...which he has done his best not to answer...Listen fem, it no one any good to argue with you. It's like arguing with a Yosemite Sam toon.Can't argue that can ya son.
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #75
Why do we have alleged Wars on Crime, Drugs, and Terror? We have a Second Amendment.you tell me.....you are the one who says we have security problems but yet cant seem to tell me what they are....you do remember you asking that question,right?....why do we have a thread, if there is no perceived problem?now we are talking about the war on poverty?....who is helping you move them goalposts?.....whats the matter daniel,you cant answer questions,you just ramble on to other things?.....you have done this the whole thread....now answer my questions.....1.whats the security problem you speak of?....2.were have i hated on the poor?....Our War on Poverty is more real than Your alleged wars on the abstractions of crime, drugs, and terror. We have a Second Amendment for "national security".we dont?....who is going to pay for these things?.....they do exist....and were have i hated on the poor or is this just more daniel talk?...we don't need the cost of alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror. Stop "hating on the poor".
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #76
red herring specialists, say that.thats because there was no answer.....y'all must just not have understood the answer, the first time.im feeling that way about daniel....the guy is all over the place,except were he was in his first question...which he has done his best not to answer...Listen fem, it no one any good to argue with you. It's like arguing with a Yosemite Sam toon.Can't argue that can ya son.
hey dumbass,you asked a question way back in the beginning of this thread...me and someone else gave you our answers....now answer my question....what security problems are you referring to?...........Why do we have alleged Wars on Crime, Drugs, and Terror? We have a Second Amendment.you tell me.....you are the one who says we have security problems but yet cant seem to tell me what they are....you do remember you asking that question,right?....why do we have a thread, if there is no perceived problem?now we are talking about the war on poverty?....who is helping you move them goalposts?.....whats the matter daniel,you cant answer questions,you just ramble on to other things?.....you have done this the whole thread....now answer my questions.....1.whats the security problem you speak of?....2.were have i hated on the poor?....Our War on Poverty is more real than Your alleged wars on the abstractions of crime, drugs, and terror. We have a Second Amendment for "national security".we dont?....who is going to pay for these things?.....they do exist....and were have i hated on the poor or is this just more daniel talk?...
the only red herrings being thrown around here are coming from you.....red herring specialists, say that.thats because there was no answer.....y'all must just not have understood the answer, the first time.im feeling that way about daniel....the guy is all over the place,except were he was in his first question...which he has done his best not to answer...Listen fem, it no one any good to argue with you. It's like arguing with a Yosemite Sam toon.Can't argue that can ya son.
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #79
Just clueless and Causeless?hey dumbass,you asked a question way back in the beginning of this thread...me and someone else gave you our answers....now answer my question....what security problems are you referring to?...........Why do we have alleged Wars on Crime, Drugs, and Terror? We have a Second Amendment.you tell me.....you are the one who says we have security problems but yet cant seem to tell me what they are....you do remember you asking that question,right?....why do we have a thread, if there is no perceived problem?now we are talking about the war on poverty?....who is helping you move them goalposts?.....whats the matter daniel,you cant answer questions,you just ramble on to other things?.....you have done this the whole thread....now answer my questions.....1.whats the security problem you speak of?....2.were have i hated on the poor?....Our War on Poverty is more real than Your alleged wars on the abstractions of crime, drugs, and terror. We have a Second Amendment for "national security".
Why do we have alleged Wars on Crime, Drugs, and Terror? We have a Second Amendment.
im not asking you to describe yourself......i just want a simple question answered.....Just clueless and Causeless?hey dumbass,you asked a question way back in the beginning of this thread...me and someone else gave you our answers....now answer my question....what security problems are you referring to?...........Why do we have alleged Wars on Crime, Drugs, and Terror? We have a Second Amendment.you tell me.....you are the one who says we have security problems but yet cant seem to tell me what they are....you do remember you asking that question,right?....why do we have a thread, if there is no perceived problem?now we are talking about the war on poverty?....who is helping you move them goalposts?.....whats the matter daniel,you cant answer questions,you just ramble on to other things?.....you have done this the whole thread....now answer my questions.....1.whats the security problem you speak of?....2.were have i hated on the poor?....
Why do we have alleged Wars on Crime, Drugs, and Terror? We have a Second Amendment.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 8
- Views
- 144
- Replies
- 6
- Views
- 361
- Replies
- 40
- Views
- 524
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 207
- Replies
- 21
- Views
- 353
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 18
- Replies
- 8K
- Views
- 51K
- Replies
- 256
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 4K
- Views
- 75K
- Replies
- 4
- Views
- 16
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8084
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 471
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-