Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Similar question: At what point will the USMB Cons admit that Romney could lose?
As for me, at this point either outcome is possible. The race has gotten too close to call after Obama blew the first debate. The problem Romney has though is that he can't open up a lead (or any lead at all) in States like Nevada or Wisconsin where he has some pretty serious advantages, and for the love of God I can't figure out why. Add to that the fact he can't seem to go up in Ohio by even a razor thin margin and he's really screwed in the Electoral college.
Romney can win, but he has got to flip Nevada, Wisconsin, and/or Ohio.
Obama currently leads Romney and there is no reason to think that the President will lose. This is unlikely to change right up till election day.
If Romney were to take Florida and Ohio, I would concede that Romney will probably win. However, if the President takes either Florida or Ohio....I expect an easy victory
Right now.......Obama 303 Romney 235 with the election basically over by 10PM eastern
Oh my, how original. Let's not forget your last prediction, CAIN IS ABLE!
The assertion "CAIN is ABLE" is not a "prediction."
I realize that neither you nor your puppet mistress has any facility for the actual meaning of words, but maybe if she can get her hand out of your colon for a while, Raving Dumbshit can look up the word in the dictionary before hitting "submit."
I laugh at your Ravi obsession. You got it bad, darf!
You predicted Cain was able to win the primary and the Presidency...did you not?
look i admit it on the day. i have admitted romney front runner so bit unfair to say we all in denial.Im sure that most will admit it on election day. I know i wouldnt admit Romney lost before then (He's not going to but still).
But then there will be some who will continue to claim he did win even when he loses. Take Kerrywonohio for example. Look at all the lefties who cannot admit George W Bush won Florida in 2000.
I'll believe it when I see it.
I don't think it's going to happen, and no I don't want to make a bet...
Valerie has spoken.
Or HAS Ravi?
look i admit it on the day. i have admitted romney front runner so bit unfair to say we all in denial.Im sure that most will admit it on election day. I know i wouldnt admit Romney lost before then (He's not going to but still).
But then there will be some who will continue to claim he did win even when he loses. Take Kerrywonohio for example. Look at all the lefties who cannot admit George W Bush won Florida in 2000.
Concern troll: defintion: a concern troll is someone who is on
one side of the discussion, but pretends to be a supporter of the other
Urban Dictionary: concern troll
The ONE term proposition's prediction will prove to be correct. Pres. Obama will NOT be getting a second term.
The assertion "CAIN is ABLE" is not a "prediction."
I realize that neither you nor your puppet mistress has any facility for the actual meaning of words, but maybe if she can get her hand out of your colon for a while, Raving Dumbshit can look up the word in the dictionary before hitting "submit."
I laugh at your Ravi obsession. You got it bad, darf!
You predicted Cain was able to win the primary and the Presidency...did you not?
You got it real bad. I adopted a campaign motto. Cain is Able. And he could have won the nomination but for the successful sordid personal attacks which were almost entirely fictional.
But the latter is not the point.
My acceptance of the motto CAIN is ABLE was predicated on the notion that he was perfectly capable of being a solid President.
You are free to try to spin it any way you want to, sockie-pooh. But your problem remains: you can't back up your bullshit.
i am not a concern troll. i am worried president won,t win and therefore am honest in my viewslook i admit it on the day. i have admitted romney front runner so bit unfair to say we all in denial.
Concern troll: defintion: a concern troll is someone who is on
one side of the discussion, but pretends to be a supporter of the other
Urban Dictionary: concern troll
That is one possibility.
But what if your guess is wrong?
What if he actually does prefer The ONE Term Proposition (for some silly reason) and actually IS concerned that The ONE cannot seal the deal?
agree that obama i perfer to win. i am worried romney will go to right wing more of tea party as he might give in to their deminds. so thats a worry.The ONE term proposition's prediction will prove to be correct. Pres. Obama will NOT be getting a second term.
Eh. I can live with Romney. His record is fairly moderate to liberal leaning. He doesn't differ at all in foreign policy from Bush or Obama. Plus, he's going to face a fairly fierce resistance in the Senate as it's unlikely the GOP will take the Senate. Though if they do, they won't hit the magic 60 number, so we'll see filibusterers just like we did under Bush and Obama.
Should Romney win (and he can at this point if his ground game is good in Ohio), the upside for me is that it effectively kills the careers of quite a few Republicans that I'd like to see stay trapped at the State and local level. Plus, it means the Tea Party gets exposed that the GOP's bitches, so, there's that.
Obama's been a fairly weak leader. So I can't honestly say he deserves a second term at this point. The only reason I'll be voting for him is that I'd rather not see the GOP return to power at this point either. Divided government for the win.
The ONE term proposition's prediction will prove to be correct. Pres. Obama will NOT be getting a second term.
Eh. I can live with Romney. His record is fairly moderate to liberal leaning. He doesn't differ at all in foreign policy from Bush or Obama. Plus, he's going to face a fairly fierce resistance in the Senate as it's unlikely the GOP will take the Senate. Though if they do, they won't hit the magic 60 number, so we'll see filibusterers just like we did under Bush and Obama.
Should Romney win (and he can at this point if his ground game is good in Ohio), the upside for me is that it effectively kills the careers of quite a few Republicans that I'd like to see stay trapped at the State and local level. Plus, it means the Tea Party gets exposed that the GOP's bitches, so, there's that.
Obama's been a fairly weak leader. So I can't honestly say he deserves a second term at this point. The only reason I'll be voting for him is that I'd rather not see the GOP return to power at this point either. Divided government for the win.
well he does not need nv though man. he only need really wi or ohio to win really.Similar question: At what point will the USMB Cons admit that Romney could lose?
As for me, at this point either outcome is possible. The race has gotten too close to call after Obama blew the first debate. The problem Romney has though is that he can't open up a lead (or any lead at all) in States like Nevada or Wisconsin where he has some pretty serious advantages, and for the love of God I can't figure out why. Add to that the fact he can't seem to go up in Ohio by even a razor thin margin and he's really screwed in the Electoral college.
Romney can win, but he has got to flip Nevada, Wisconsin, and/or Ohio.
I laugh at your Ravi obsession. You got it bad, darf!
You predicted Cain was able to win the primary and the Presidency...did you not?
You got it real bad. I adopted a campaign motto. Cain is Able. And he could have won the nomination but for the successful sordid personal attacks which were almost entirely fictional.
But the latter is not the point.
My acceptance of the motto CAIN is ABLE was predicated on the notion that he was perfectly capable of being a solid President.
You are free to try to spin it any way you want to, sockie-pooh. But your problem remains: you can't back up your bullshit.
What bullshit is that, angry fratboi?
Cain is a buffoon and you thought he was ABLE to win. FACT.
Therefore, your political insights are a laughing stock...
well he does not need nv though man. he only need really wi or ohio to win really.
There is still a decent prospect (maybe a tad lower than 50-50) that the senate will go GOP. Even a SPLIT Senate will suffice. Granted, the misuse and abuse of the filibuster will be problematical, but there ARE ways to reign in those schmucks if they go that route.
There is still a decent prospect (maybe a tad lower than 50-50) that the senate will go GOP. Even a SPLIT Senate will suffice. Granted, the misuse and abuse of the filibuster will be problematical, but there ARE ways to reign in those schmucks if they go that route.
It's worse than 50/50. The GOP is going to lose the Akin race in Missouri and Mourdock race in Indiana, and that would make it very difficult to carry the Senate. Note I said "difficult" and not "impossible."
I'd be very careful with messing with filibuster rules though. The GOP considered that back before 2006 when words like "Permanent Majority" were being tossed around. If they'd acted on those ideas Obama would have had two years to just run over the GOP. If you think Obamacare is bad now, without the filibuster we'd have had an immediate implementation of a single payer system. You want to leave that the heck alone.
Yeah, filibusters will be a problem for Mitt, but they were a problem for Bush and Obama. Man up and find a way to actually reach across the aisle like Mitt has promised he will do.
What I'm going to be VERY curious about, should Mitt win, is how closely the TEA Party will watch Mitt and how willing they'll be to hold him accountable. The elements that formed the TEA Party under Obama didn't give a flying **** about the debt or government entitlements under Bush. Rush and Sean couldn't carry water fast enough for the Bush White House. Do you really think anyone on the Right will hold Mitt accountable enough to actually cost him a second term if he decides to give in to his true nature and go Lib once elected?
Mitt IS going to take FL, NC and VA.
It is possible that PA is out of reach, but OH is more than just close, it is already tilting toward Mitt. CO is going to be in the Mitt camp, too. WI is going to surprise lots of libs. Mitt is taking it. MI is likely a distinct prospect. MI is perhaps going to shock some Dims.
The election may not qualify as a "landslide" but it could be big enough to give Mitt some coat-tails. The Senate is within striking distance.
The ONE term proposition's prediction will prove to be correct. Pres. Obama will NOT be getting a second term.
Eh. I can live with Romney. His record is fairly moderate to liberal leaning. He doesn't differ at all in foreign policy from Bush or Obama. Plus, he's going to face a fairly fierce resistance in the Senate as it's unlikely the GOP will take the Senate. Though if they do, they won't hit the magic 60 number, so we'll see filibusterers just like we did under Bush and Obama.
Should Romney win (and he can at this point if his ground game is good in Ohio), the upside for me is that it effectively kills the careers of quite a few Republicans that I'd like to see stay trapped at the State and local level. Plus, it means the Tea Party gets exposed that the GOP's bitches, so, there's that.
Obama's been a fairly weak leader. So I can't honestly say he deserves a second term at this point. The only reason I'll be voting for him is that I'd rather not see the GOP return to power at this point either. Divided government for the win.
Eh.
There is still a decent prospect (maybe a tad lower than 50-50) that the senate will go GOP. Even a SPLIT Senate will suffice. Granted, the misuse and abuse of the filibuster will be problematical, but there ARE ways to reign in those schmucks if they go that route.
And Mitt has been (in the past) been a bit too liberal/"moderate." HOWEVER, he seems to have been open minded enough to recognize the failure inherent in the liberal/socialist philosophy of the liberal Democrat Parody. He will be monitored quite closely. I see him DOING what the conservative base has been insisting upon.
Pres. Obama has been a truly horrendously weak "leader."
Be candid. Beh honest. Give him some props for authorizing the action that took out bin Laden. But other than that, his record is purely one of fail upon fail. His legislative claim to success is Obamacare. It's going to get rescinded. His place in history will be that of a place marker.
The new President has a huge job to do. Limit the damage of the past four years and turn the ship of State the fuck AROUND.
