It's so nuts. Drug addicts would steal a solar panel just to get a fix of heroin, which they shoot up right on the street while walking along.Albuquerque and Santa Fe are crummy cities that are loaded down with moonbats.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's so nuts. Drug addicts would steal a solar panel just to get a fix of heroin, which they shoot up right on the street while walking along.Albuquerque and Santa Fe are crummy cities that are loaded down with moonbats.
You really need to learn to read. Saving money on gasoline is not "market-driven"?What does any of that drivel have to do with what I said?
Neither the "green" electrical generation racket nor the EV fad are market driven, which is the relevant passage in the Reason piece that you posted said.
Of course, you -of all people- positing a piece from Reason to try and make your case is laughable in the first place, so there had to be something that you glossed over, at it was discovered all too easily.
"Saving money on gasoline" at what cost?....$60,000 for a base model Tesla will buy a lot of gasoline....You really do think there's free lunch, don't you?You really need to learn to read. Saving money on gasoline is not "market-driven"?
As for quoting from Reason magazine? I will quote Mother Jones, next time. Will that help?
In other words... you are not interested in answers but just here to whine? Okay dokey.So the Energy policy act was past. Where are the electric power plants?
Between 2022 and 2025, 27.3 gigawatts (GW) of new natural gas-fired capacity is scheduled to come online in the United States, according to our latest Monthly Electric Generator Inventory. This added capacity would increase current capacity (489.1 GW as of August 2021) by 6%. Many of the planned natural gas-fired capacity additions are located close to major shale plays in the Appalachia region and Texas and in Florida.
Wow.. between now and 2025 about 27,300,000,000 kWh to come online. Hmm... given that number, by 2025: 3% of ALL EV trucks/cars will be serviced.
Remember..to service the 3,951,310 trucks (AGAIN no mention of Trucks!!!) and 26,400,000 EVs according to the Biden administration in 7 years we'll need
726,121,801,738 kWh of electricity. So where will that come from?
In 2021 11,070 generated 4,240,000,000,000 kWh of energy or a total of 383 million kWh per power plant.
To get the additional 726,121,801,738 kWh of electricity for all the EV cars/trucks divided by 383 million kWh per plant will require and 1,895 power plants planned,
built and operational by 2030...6.5 years from now.
FACT! And please if you want to use Wind Turbines or Solar panels please me as I've got the data on how many solar panels (3'X5') panel generates (Domestic solar panel systems typically have a capacity of between 1 kW and 4 kW per 12 hour day(remember the sun doesn't shine 24 hours) so to generate 726 billion kWh by
solar panels that cost $200/panel would require..497,343,700 panels or $99,468,739,964 just for the additional EVs.
LOL What cost? In other words, do nothing but just stay hostage to the petroleum industry?"Saving money on gasoline" at what cost?....You really do think there's free lunch, don't you?
I've put this up many times and some of you dummies complain the numbers change! DUH!
Of course numbers change but if the following numbers are off by 50% i.e. there won't be 26,400,000 EV cars on the road or 3,951,310 EV trucks (which Biden's EEI.org apparently doesn't COUNT trucks!) by the time I am no longer here... BUT the rest of you... you will have to figure out where to come up with $600 TRILLION to build the power plants to generate the additional electricity.
I just don't comprehend why more people don't understand.
In 2022, about 4.24 trillion kWh of electricity were generated at utility-scale electricity generation facilities in the United States.
About 60% of this electricity generation was from fossil fuels—coal, natural gas, petroleum, and other gases.
About 18% was from nuclear energy, and about 22% was from renewable energy sources.
Almost 2/3rds of all our electricity comes from what this idiot wants to do away with!
AND NOTE: THE attached doesn't account for the fact that this idiot wants to do away with the electricity generating plants that provide 2/3rds of our electricity!
So folks I'm not going to be bothered with worrying as to where $600 Trillion to $1.2 Quadrillion is going to come from... as I probably won't be around to suffer from
constant electricity shortages due to EVs and the idiot's GUARANTEE!:
Biden guarantees: I guarantee We Are Going To Get Rid of Fossil Fuels” September 06, 2019, 5:49 PM
View attachment 802555
"Hostage", using vehicles with a lower cost, in both terms of out-of-pocket fuel expense and environmental degradation....Oh the horror!LOL What cost? In other words, do nothing but just stay hostage to the petroleum industry?
I read the piece, you didn't....I caught the phrase that you ignored....Deal with it.Again, bud. Learn to read. I posted some good reading materials. And yes, even from Reason magazine. Read up and maybe...just maybe... you may even learn something. Good luck.
Appeal to emotion....Not an argument.Old people like you don’t mind if we live on a shithole rock in space. People like me with years to go and kids that will have kids think you should STFU. Progress happens over people like you.
Exactly. Initially, Rockefeller made his fortune by turning kerosene into oil. Not for automobiles, there weren't that many of them, but to light people's homes Whale oil was coming to an end.The whale oil crisis is fascinating.. It slowly increased in price as kerosene became more available and less expensive. Zaki Yamani said, "The stone age didn't end because we ran out of stones".
"Hostage", using vehicles with a lower cost, in both terms of out-of-pocket fuel expense and environmental degradation....Oh the horror!
I read the piece, you didn't....I caught the phrase that you ignored....Deal with it.
Your argument was that if we develop new energy methods we will all run out of energy because fossil fuels are a big portion of it today. That's not data. That's emotion.Appeal to emotion....Not an argument.
Not my argument at all.....My argument, backed up by basic mathematics, is that your "alternatives" are such a net loss that they need to be subsidized....You really have no economically alternative but nukes, which your ilk rules out out-of-handYour argument was that if we develop new energy methods we will all run out of energy because fossil fuels are a big portion of it today. That's not data. That's emotion.
I've put this up many times and some of you dummies complain the numbers change! DUH!
Of course numbers change but if the following numbers are off by 50% i.e. there won't be 26,400,000 EV cars on the road or 3,951,310 EV trucks (which Biden's EEI.org apparently doesn't COUNT trucks!) by the time I am no longer here... BUT the rest of you... you will have to figure out where to come up with $600 TRILLION to build the power plants to generate the additional electricity.
I just don't comprehend why more people don't understand.
In 2022, about 4.24 trillion kWh of electricity were generated at utility-scale electricity generation facilities in the United States.
About 60% of this electricity generation was from fossil fuels—coal, natural gas, petroleum, and other gases.
About 18% was from nuclear energy, and about 22% was from renewable energy sources.
Almost 2/3rds of all our electricity comes from what this idiot wants to do away with!
AND NOTE: THE attached doesn't account for the fact that this idiot wants to do away with the electricity generating plants that provide 2/3rds of our electricity!
So folks I'm not going to be bothered with worrying as to where $600 Trillion to $1.2 Quadrillion is going to come from... as I probably won't be around to suffer from
constant electricity shortages due to EVs and the idiot's GUARANTEE!:
Biden guarantees: I guarantee We Are Going To Get Rid of Fossil Fuels” September 06, 2019, 5:49 PM
View attachment 802555
The same reason the BIASED MSM kept showing video of Trump saying Drink Bleach THAT BIDEN was saying!Why are you still lying with that edited video? I showed you the whole video where he goes on to explain fossil fuels will be gone by 2050. Not that he is getting rid of fossil fuels.
Paying more for cleaner energy isnt a deal breaker... and scale reduces costs.Not my argument at all.....My argument, backed up by basic mathematics, is that your "alternatives" are such a net loss that they need to be subsidized....You really have no economically alternative but nukes, which your ilk rules out out-of-hand
But you mewling about your cheeeellllrennnn is an appeal to emotion and not an argument.
Why are you still lying with that edited video? I showed you the whole video where he goes on to explain fossil fuels will be gone by 2050. Not that he is getting rid of fossil fuels.
Those Who Pose As the Wave of the Future Will Bring Us TsunamisThe whale oil crisis is fascinating.. It slowly increased in price as kerosene became more available and less expensive. Zaki Yamani said, "The stone age didn't end because we ran out of stones".