'Asylum Seekers' Sue Trump For Denying Constitutional Rights?!

[deanrd]

Migrants traveling to US sue Trump, government; claim violation of constitutional rights

1. They are NOT 'ASYLUM SEEKERS'

Asylum Seeker / Asyum' is a very specifically defined word which the vast majority of these criminals do not meet / qualify as.

- 'Asylum Seekers' must be one of a specific group seeking asylum from one of a few specifically defined things. Being poor as hell and wanting to come to the US does not meet that deco Orion.

- 'Asylum Seekers' must by law file for asylum at embassies or designated ports of entries. These criminals have illegally physically pushed their way past Mexical police/military, invading Mexico, and seek to do the same to the US THEN file for asylum.

The reason why is our 'broke ass' system of 'catch and release' that gives them an 'asylum' court date, releases them, tells them to show back up then, and then we never see them again. That's like catching someone breaking into your house, setting up a trial date for the future, letting them go, and telling the show back up at that future date to decide what will happen to them.... of course you're never going to see them again!

2. United States Constitution provides rights for United States citizens.

That's kind of the reason why it's called the United States Constitution. It does not provide constitutional rights to criminal Invaders...


So basically these criminals are coming all this way, already disrespecting this country by ignoring and having the intent of breaking our laws, and now they want to sue to force us to take them as they invade our country, breaking our existing immigration laws...

Oh, HELL NO!

How do you know what they are or aren’t? What of you been listening to, fuking fox news? Walk a mile in my shoes. Better yet try walking 1000 miles with a couple of little kids.

 

[The Original Tree]

Asylum claims made by migrants caught crossing the border illegally would seemingly be summarily denied under Trump's proposal.
I think that's reasonable.
So is ending birthright citizenship for children when both parents are undocumented.

I have a question. The Chinese and Russian women coming here to have their children so they will be US citizens are here legally on a visa, though, so it won't stop the well heeled from taking advantage. Once again, only the poor are going to be punished?
We need to think that through.

Poverty has Zero to do with following The LAW.

 

[Camp]

Illegal Aliens are not Subject To The Jurisdiction of The US. They can't actually file a lawsuit from outside The US for an event which has not happened yet. The lawsuit is being funded by you guessed it....the man the US refuses to extradite to Russia or Hungary for election fraud and other crimes.......George Soros.

You are wrong on several levels. First, how is a person an illegal alien if they have not yet entered the US? See how silly your post is.

 

[busybee01]

Migrants traveling to US sue Trump, government; claim violation of constitutional rights

1. They are NOT 'ASYLUM SEEKERS'

Asylum Seeker / Asyum' is a very specifically defined word which the vast majority of these criminals do not meet / qualify as.

- 'Asylum Seekers' must be one of a specific group seeking asylum from one of a few specifically defined things. Being poor as hell and wanting to come to the US does not meet that deco Orion.

- 'Asylum Seekers' must by law file for asylum at embassies or designated ports of entries. These criminals have illegally physically pushed their way past Mexical police/military, invading Mexico, and seek to do the same to the US THEN file for asylum.

The reason why is our 'broke ass' system of 'catch and release' that gives them an 'asylum' court date, releases them, tells them to show back up then, and then we never see them again. That's like catching someone breaking into your house, setting up a trial date for the future, letting them go, and telling the show back up at that future date to decide what will happen to them.... of course you're never going to see them again!

2. United States Constitution provides rights for United States citizens.

That's kind of the reason why it's called the United States Constitution. It does not provide constitutional rights to criminal Invaders...


So basically these criminals are coming all this way, already disrespecting this country by ignoring and having the intent of breaking our laws, and now they want to sue to force us to take them as they invade our country, breaking our existing immigration laws...

Oh, HELL NO!

They are not criminals. You offer no proof of that whatsoever.

1. They are asylum seekers. The US Citizenship and Immigration Service states the requirement of applying for asylum.

"To obtain asylum through the affirmative asylum process you must be physically present in the United States. You may apply for asylum status regardless of how you arrived in the United States or your current immigration status."

Obtaining Asylum in the United States

That is not true. According to the DOJ, 65-70% do show up. The figures can be even higher under circumstances so your claim is less than the truth.

Majority of undocumented immigrants show up for court

2. The US Constitution protects all people under its jurisdiction or it tries. Donald Trump and you of the alt-right are the biggest threats. You want to push hatred
and hate is all you have.

 

[beautress]

Court case for bilking the good old USA after we've taken a hit for incarcerating criminals sent over here by governments who have no intention of paying for their upkeep after convicting them of every crime known to mankind, with the majority of them repeating their crime life when they arrive here? Oh, hep me.

 

[easyt65]

How do you know what they are or aren’t?

By the very LEGAL DEFINITION of the word 'Asylum', dumbass!

By listening to legal experts, by reading the law, by educating myself, and not allowing myself to be controlled, manipulated, or driven by EMOTION...like you, snowflake.

 

[easyt65]

They are not criminals. You offer no proof of that whatsoever.

Sorry, but I couldn't get past the stupidity of this very first sentence, which is already been proven to be false.

Mexico has already reported that this Caravan stormed their borders and force their way past Mexican police and the military, committing crimes in doing so.

You have to be completely stupid and / or a brainwashed liberal idiot to make such a comment with all the reports in the news, even by CNN, who have reported that they illegally forced their way into Mexico on the way north.

I have no time for such ignorance and stupidity today, to keep reading the so easily proven false crap that you just typed, so I'm just going to ignore you, this post, and anything else you post for a while since what will follow will be another of orang ran in an attempt 're defend this lie.

I's just not worth my time to read such obvious Fake News posts and emotional, hate-driven ignorance.

 

[beautress]

Migrants traveling to US sue Trump, government; claim violation of constitutional rights

1. They are NOT 'ASYLUM SEEKERS'

Asylum Seeker / Asyum' is a very specifically defined word which the vast majority of these criminals do not meet / qualify as.

- 'Asylum Seekers' must be one of a specific group seeking asylum from one of a few specifically defined things. Being poor as hell and wanting to come to the US does not meet that deco Orion.

- 'Asylum Seekers' must by law file for asylum at embassies or designated ports of entries. These criminals have illegally physically pushed their way past Mexical police/military, invading Mexico, and seek to do the same to the US THEN file for asylum.

The reason why is our 'broke ass' system of 'catch and release' that gives them an 'asylum' court date, releases them, tells them to show back up then, and then we never see them again. That's like catching someone breaking into your house, setting up a trial date for the future, letting them go, and telling the show back up at that future date to decide what will happen to them.... of course you're never going to see them again!

2. United States Constitution provides rights for United States citizens.

That's kind of the reason why it's called the United States Constitution. It does not provide constitutional rights to criminal Invaders...


So basically these criminals are coming all this way, already disrespecting this country by ignoring and having the intent of breaking our laws, and now they want to sue to force us to take them as they invade our country, breaking our existing immigration laws...

Oh, HELL NO!

They are not criminals. You offer no proof of that whatsoever.

1. They are asylum seekers. The US Citizenship and Immigration Service states the requirement of applying for asylum.

"To obtain asylum through the affirmative asylum process you must be physically present in the United States. You may apply for asylum status regardless of how you arrived in the United States or your current immigration status."

Obtaining Asylum in the United States

That is not true. According to the DOJ, 65-70% do show up. The figures can be even higher under circumstances so your claim is less than the truth.

Majority of undocumented immigrants show up for court

2. The US Constitution protects all people under its jurisdiction or it tries. Donald Trump and you of the alt-right are the biggest threats. You want to push hatred
and hate is all you have.

We have a national debt to pay before we can pay any more to warehouse the jailhouse of hardened criminals for which other governments do not wish to bear the expense. Their demands are quite unreasonable to use the court system for systematic pickpocketing of the American taxpayer. It's a crime against the common man in America to demand something for nothing when it's on the taxpayer to bail out every criminal government that ever impoverished its own, only to send them packing to be someone else's problem. We've already got our own neighborhoods of able-bodied pickpockets getting fat on welfare here we have to appease. We can't cancel the social security its instigators promised to the payees to dole out to people who did nothing except launch a shameful lawsuit against the taxpayers here. The people they need to sue are the craven politicians in the country they left, not the USA taxpayer.

 

[beautress]

Although La Raza has changed its name to UnidosUS, its goals are clearly the same basis as those demanding freebies at the border. From: Exclusive: The Truth About 'La Raza' | Human Events

1. Denounce the motto “For La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada,” as repugnant, racist, and totally incompatible with American society or citizenship.

2. Acknowledge the right of all Americans to live wherever they choose in the U.S. without segregation.

3. Commit to sponsorship of nationwide educational programs to combat racism and anti-Semitism in the Hispanic community.

4. Denounce and sever all ties with MEChA and any other organizations with which they have ever been associated which held to the racist doctrines held by MEChA.

5. Acknowledge the internationally recognized borders of the U.S., the right of the citizens of the U.S. to determine immigration policy through the democratic process, and the right of the U.S. to undertake any and all necessary steps to effectively enforce immigration law and defend its border against unauthorized entry.

6. Repudiate all claims that current American territory rightfully belongs to Mexico.
​

The trouble is, UnidosUS is still racist. It helps only its own and their collaborators. They do not support equal opportunities for anybody else, and they entitle themselves to all assets earned by people they wouldn't give the time of day for any reason whatever, their hatred is so directed against this nation, based on the myth that they and not the American Indian tribes who lived and still live here ruled the southwestern plains into antiquity.

From here; La Raza Has Changed Its Name But Don’t Be Fooled: It’s Still A SICK, RACIST Group "Juan Sanchez, a National Council of La Raza board member, is CEO of Southwest Key Programs. KXAN of Austin reports that Southwest Key has received $995 million in federal funds since 2015 to house migrant children. Over a three-year period, Southwest Key had “more than 200 violations at its facilities,” including a resident failing to receive proper treatment for a sexually transmitted disease (STD)."

When did this nation grant to its social security payers a billion bucks for our grandchildren's educations? Last time I looked, we were responsible for paying for our own children's educations, and one retiree's share of forced annual contributions to schools alone is over four thousand dollars for public schools who live in my county. This comes from one-third that person's pension, completely and thoroughly expropriated by local officials who have to make sure every child in this border state county learns to read and write. Another third of that same person's pension is removed to pay local upkeep and gifts to keep greedy-for-welfare-benefits of nonworkers of able-bodied people between the ages of 18 - retirement. It pays not to own any property, just collect and scream "racial foul" if anybody objects.

When you elect entitlement-oriented politicians to public office, they use access to what should be private information as their personal piggy bank to lure nonworkers into scamming people's life savings. If you divide $300,000 by the 30 years a retiree hopes to live after retiring, that's only $10,000 a year,. and less if the stock market crashes. So they look at the lump sum and decide that with social security, they're entitled to plunder money from the thrifty person who paid taxes on that nest egg money for every day of their adult life. And they tap the education people to support the atheist agenda to have zero mercy on anyone who was able to save money and earn interest on it (or not) by supporting investment in America through the stock market. Since the stock market can be a gamble, probably 20% of investors put money on stocks that bust, and they lose everything.

I guess I don't make any sense to someone who retires and completely depends on social security because of either bad luck or the bad decision to spend money on drugs, booze and cigarettes, and therefore had nothing to save at the end of the day for old age.

There's always someone at city hall snooping people's savings accounts so they can get their hands on and grab all the money from people who live in the area who did save money for their own use, and entitle the city, county or state to all they can grab. And if it's there they grab like the unfair cheaters that they become when they adopt the give-a-mint policy of usurping other taxpayer's money. It's a never-ending quest to get re-elected by expropriating their loyal opposition's supporters.

And that's what I think.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

This is a good reason not to allow them into the country!

Yep....they're not even here yet and they're already costing the taxpayers.

 

[beautress]

Although La Raza has changed its name to UnidosUS, its goals are clearly the same basis as those demanding freebies at the border. From: Exclusive: The Truth About 'La Raza' | Human Events

1. Denounce the motto “For La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada,” as repugnant, racist, and totally incompatible with American society or citizenship.

2. Acknowledge the right of all Americans to live wherever they choose in the U.S. without segregation.

3. Commit to sponsorship of nationwide educational programs to combat racism and anti-Semitism in the Hispanic community.

4. Denounce and sever all ties with MEChA and any other organizations with which they have ever been associated which held to the racist doctrines held by MEChA.

5. Acknowledge the internationally recognized borders of the U.S., the right of the citizens of the U.S. to determine immigration policy through the democratic process, and the right of the U.S. to undertake any and all necessary steps to effectively enforce immigration law and defend its border against unauthorized entry.

6. Repudiate all claims that current American territory rightfully belongs to Mexico.
​

The trouble is, UnidosUS is still racist. It helps only its own and their collaborators. They do not support equal opportunities for anybody else, and they entitle themselves to all assets earned by people they wouldn't give the time of day for any reason whatever, their hatred is so directed against this nation, based on the myth that they and not the American Indian tribes who lived and still live here ruled the southwestern plains into antiquity.

From here; La Raza Has Changed Its Name But Don’t Be Fooled: It’s Still A SICK, RACIST Group "Juan Sanchez, a National Council of La Raza board member, is CEO of Southwest Key Programs. KXAN of Austin reports that Southwest Key has received $995 million in federal funds since 2015 to house migrant children. Over a three-year period, Southwest Key had “more than 200 violations at its facilities,” including a resident failing to receive proper treatment for a sexually transmitted disease (STD)."

When did this nation grant to its social security payers a billion bucks for our grandchildren's educations? Last time I looked, we were responsible for paying for our own children's educations, and one retiree's share of forced annual contributions to schools alone is over four thousand dollars for public schools who live in my county. This comes from one-third that person's pension, completely and thoroughly expropriated by local officials who have to make sure every child in this border state county learns to read and write. Another third of that same person's pension is removed to pay local upkeep and gifts to keep greedy-for-welfare-benefits of nonworkers of able-bodied people between the ages of 18 - retirement. It pays not to own any property, just collect and scream "racial foul" if anybody objects.

When you elect entitlement-oriented politicians to public office, they use access to what should be private information as their personal piggy bank to lure nonworkers into scamming people's life savings. If you divide $300,000 by the 30 years a retiree hopes to live after retiring, that's only $10,000 a year,. and less if the stock market crashes. So they look at the lump sum and decide that with social security, they're entitled to plunder money from the thrifty person who paid taxes on that nest egg money for every day of their adult life. And they tap the education people to support the atheist agenda to have zero mercy on anyone who was able to save money and earn interest on it (or not) by supporting investment in America through the stock market. Since the stock market can be a gamble, probably 20% of investors put money on stocks that bust, and they lose everything.

I guess I don't make any sense to someone who retires and completely depends on social security because of either bad luck or the bad decision to spend money on drugs, booze and cigarettes, and therefore had nothing to save at the end of the day for old age.

There's always someone at city hall snooping people's savings accounts so they can get their hands on and grab all the money from people who live in the area who did save money for their own use, and entitle the city, county or state to all they can grab. And if it's there they grab like the unfair cheaters that they become when they adopt the give-a-mint policy of usurping other taxpayer's money. It's a never-ending quest to get re-elected by expropriating their loyal opposition's supporters.

This is a good reason not to allow them into the country!

Yep....they're not even here yet and they're already costing the taxpayers.

Oh, not to worry. They will send $20 billion a year of their earnings back to support the Mexican/other Latino country economy with all that money they will have lavished on them when they get over here. Nothing satisfies the goliath LaRaza agenda. And I do mean absolutely nothing except further plundering by any means available to them.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Although La Raza has changed its name to UnidosUS, its goals are clearly the same basis as those demanding freebies at the border. From: Exclusive: The Truth About 'La Raza' | Human Events

1. Denounce the motto “For La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada,” as repugnant, racist, and totally incompatible with American society or citizenship.

2. Acknowledge the right of all Americans to live wherever they choose in the U.S. without segregation.

3. Commit to sponsorship of nationwide educational programs to combat racism and anti-Semitism in the Hispanic community.

4. Denounce and sever all ties with MEChA and any other organizations with which they have ever been associated which held to the racist doctrines held by MEChA.

5. Acknowledge the internationally recognized borders of the U.S., the right of the citizens of the U.S. to determine immigration policy through the democratic process, and the right of the U.S. to undertake any and all necessary steps to effectively enforce immigration law and defend its border against unauthorized entry.

6. Repudiate all claims that current American territory rightfully belongs to Mexico.
​

The trouble is, UnidosUS is still racist. It helps only its own and their collaborators. They do not support equal opportunities for anybody else, and they entitle themselves to all assets earned by people they wouldn't give the time of day for any reason whatever, their hatred is so directed against this nation, based on the myth that they and not the American Indian tribes who lived and still live here ruled the southwestern plains into antiquity.

From here; La Raza Has Changed Its Name But Don’t Be Fooled: It’s Still A SICK, RACIST Group "Juan Sanchez, a National Council of La Raza board member, is CEO of Southwest Key Programs. KXAN of Austin reports that Southwest Key has received $995 million in federal funds since 2015 to house migrant children. Over a three-year period, Southwest Key had “more than 200 violations at its facilities,” including a resident failing to receive proper treatment for a sexually transmitted disease (STD)."

When did this nation grant to its social security payers a billion bucks for our grandchildren's educations? Last time I looked, we were responsible for paying for our own children's educations, and one retiree's share of forced annual contributions to schools alone is over four thousand dollars for public schools who live in my county. This comes from one-third that person's pension, completely and thoroughly expropriated by local officials who have to make sure every child in this border state county learns to read and write. Another third of that same person's pension is removed to pay local upkeep and gifts to keep greedy-for-welfare-benefits of nonworkers of able-bodied people between the ages of 18 - retirement. It pays not to own any property, just collect and scream "racial foul" if anybody objects.

When you elect entitlement-oriented politicians to public office, they use access to what should be private information as their personal piggy bank to lure nonworkers into scamming people's life savings. If you divide $300,000 by the 30 years a retiree hopes to live after retiring, that's only $10,000 a year,. and less if the stock market crashes. So they look at the lump sum and decide that with social security, they're entitled to plunder money from the thrifty person who paid taxes on that nest egg money for every day of their adult life. And they tap the education people to support the atheist agenda to have zero mercy on anyone who was able to save money and earn interest on it (or not) by supporting investment in America through the stock market. Since the stock market can be a gamble, probably 20% of investors put money on stocks that bust, and they lose everything.

I guess I don't make any sense to someone who retires and completely depends on social security because of either bad luck or the bad decision to spend money on drugs, booze and cigarettes, and therefore had nothing to save at the end of the day for old age.

There's always someone at city hall snooping people's savings accounts so they can get their hands on and grab all the money from people who live in the area who did save money for their own use, and entitle the city, county or state to all they can grab. And if it's there they grab like the unfair cheaters that they become when they adopt the give-a-mint policy of usurping other taxpayer's money. It's a never-ending quest to get re-elected by expropriating their loyal opposition's supporters.

This is a good reason not to allow them into the country!

Yep....they're not even here yet and they're already costing the taxpayers.

Oh, not to worry. They will send $20 billion a year of their earnings back to support the Mexican/other Latino country economy with all that money they will have lavished on them when they get over here. Nothing satisfies the goliath LaRaza agenda. And I do mean absolutely nothing except further plundering by any means available to them.

In my mind thats one of the most egregious assaults on our country.
Al that money that should be supporting the communities they live in gets sent south of the border.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Remittances should have been taxed long ago. I hope Trump does it.

This lawsuit should be dismissed and the organizations that filed it heavily fined. There is no right to come here. To declare otherwise would be to declare the borders nonexistent.

 

[Defiant1]

Migrants traveling to US sue Trump, government; claim violation of constitutional rights

1. They are NOT 'ASYLUM SEEKERS'

Asylum Seeker / Asyum' is a very specifically defined word which the vast majority of these criminals do not meet / qualify as.

- 'Asylum Seekers' must be one of a specific group seeking asylum from one of a few specifically defined things. Being poor as hell and wanting to come to the US does not meet that deco Orion.

- 'Asylum Seekers' must by law file for asylum at embassies or designated ports of entries. These criminals have illegally physically pushed their way past Mexical police/military, invading Mexico, and seek to do the same to the US THEN file for asylum.

The reason why is our 'broke ass' system of 'catch and release' that gives them an 'asylum' court date, releases them, tells them to show back up then, and then we never see them again. That's like catching someone breaking into your house, setting up a trial date for the future, letting them go, and telling the show back up at that future date to decide what will happen to them.... of course you're never going to see them again!

2. United States Constitution provides rights for United States citizens.

That's kind of the reason why it's called the United States Constitution. It does not provide constitutional rights to criminal Invaders...


So basically these criminals are coming all this way, already disrespecting this country by ignoring and having the intent of breaking our laws, and now they want to sue to force us to take them as they invade our country, breaking our existing immigration laws...

Oh, HELL NO!

This is what happens when you vote for Democrats.

Isn't he a white pole smoker?

 

[buckeye45_73]

Asylum claims made by migrants caught crossing the border illegally would seemingly be summarily denied under Trump's proposal.
I think that's reasonable.
So is ending birthright citizenship for children when both parents are undocumented.

I have a question. The Chinese and Russian women coming here to have their children so they will be US citizens are here legally on a visa, though, so it won't stop the well heeled from taking advantage. Once again, only the poor are going to be punished?
We need to think that through.

Ending birthright citizen ship should end the Russians and Chinese as well. I agree, we need to end this stupid idea and get control of who we want in and make people assimilate to us.....no more press 1 for English!

 

[EvilCat Breath]

This caravan has been offered asylum in Mexico. They declined. They are ineligible to ask for asylum here.

They have no basis for an asylum claim anyway.

 

[iceberg]

I dunno why we even bother with this crap.

Publicity


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

it's a pure LOOK AT ME move so they can mock *anything* that is done to stop them.

 

[kyzr]

Maybe the wetbacks don't understand US Law. How do you say "standing" in Spanish? (not the opposite of sitting, but legal standing)

 

[easyt65]

Maybe the wetbacks don't understand US Law. How do you say "standing" in Spanish? (not the opposite of sitting, but legal standing)

I think, like Democrats, they understand it just fine - they just reject it / ignore it / believe it does not apply to them.

 

[beautress]

Although La Raza has changed its name to UnidosUS, its goals are clearly the same basis as those demanding freebies at the border. From: Exclusive: The Truth About 'La Raza' | Human Events

1. Denounce the motto “For La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada,” as repugnant, racist, and totally incompatible with American society or citizenship.

2. Acknowledge the right of all Americans to live wherever they choose in the U.S. without segregation.

3. Commit to sponsorship of nationwide educational programs to combat racism and anti-Semitism in the Hispanic community.

4. Denounce and sever all ties with MEChA and any other organizations with which they have ever been associated which held to the racist doctrines held by MEChA.

5. Acknowledge the internationally recognized borders of the U.S., the right of the citizens of the U.S. to determine immigration policy through the democratic process, and the right of the U.S. to undertake any and all necessary steps to effectively enforce immigration law and defend its border against unauthorized entry.

6. Repudiate all claims that current American territory rightfully belongs to Mexico.
​

The trouble is, UnidosUS is still racist. It helps only its own and their collaborators. They do not support equal opportunities for anybody else, and they entitle themselves to all assets earned by people they wouldn't give the time of day for any reason whatever, their hatred is so directed against this nation, based on the myth that they and not the American Indian tribes who lived and still live here ruled the southwestern plains into antiquity.

From here; La Raza Has Changed Its Name But Don’t Be Fooled: It’s Still A SICK, RACIST Group "Juan Sanchez, a National Council of La Raza board member, is CEO of Southwest Key Programs. KXAN of Austin reports that Southwest Key has received $995 million in federal funds since 2015 to house migrant children. Over a three-year period, Southwest Key had “more than 200 violations at its facilities,” including a resident failing to receive proper treatment for a sexually transmitted disease (STD)."

When did this nation grant to its social security payers a billion bucks for our grandchildren's educations? Last time I looked, we were responsible for paying for our own children's educations, and one retiree's share of forced annual contributions to schools alone is over four thousand dollars for public schools who live in my county. This comes from one-third that person's pension, completely and thoroughly expropriated by local officials who have to make sure every child in this border state county learns to read and write. Another third of that same person's pension is removed to pay local upkeep and gifts to keep greedy-for-welfare-benefits of nonworkers of able-bodied people between the ages of 18 - retirement. It pays not to own any property, just collect and scream "racial foul" if anybody objects.

When you elect entitlement-oriented politicians to public office, they use access to what should be private information as their personal piggy bank to lure nonworkers into scamming people's life savings. If you divide $300,000 by the 30 years a retiree hopes to live after retiring, that's only $10,000 a year,. and less if the stock market crashes. So they look at the lump sum and decide that with social security, they're entitled to plunder money from the thrifty person who paid taxes on that nest egg money for every day of their adult life. And they tap the education people to support the atheist agenda to have zero mercy on anyone who was able to save money and earn interest on it (or not) by supporting investment in America through the stock market. Since the stock market can be a gamble, probably 20% of investors put money on stocks that bust, and they lose everything.

I guess I don't make any sense to someone who retires and completely depends on social security because of either bad luck or the bad decision to spend money on drugs, booze and cigarettes, and therefore had nothing to save at the end of the day for old age.

There's always someone at city hall snooping people's savings accounts so they can get their hands on and grab all the money from people who live in the area who did save money for their own use, and entitle the city, county or state to all they can grab. And if it's there they grab like the unfair cheaters that they become when they adopt the give-a-mint policy of usurping other taxpayer's money. It's a never-ending quest to get re-elected by expropriating their loyal opposition's supporters.

This is a good reason not to allow them into the country!

Yep....they're not even here yet and they're already costing the taxpayers.

Oh, not to worry. They will send $20 billion a year of their earnings back to support the Mexican/other Latino country economy with all that money they will have lavished on them when they get over here. Nothing satisfies the goliath LaRaza agenda. And I do mean absolutely nothing except further plundering by any means available to them.

In my mind thats one of the most egregious assaults on our country.
Al that money that should be supporting the communities they live in gets sent south of the border.

The lawsuit should be thrown out because of the people who have been on an entry waiting list to come to America for over ten years from other parts of the world.

I'm sorry the higher echelons of society to the south have an ambition to push out of their country people they despise and have no use for. I hope they rethink redistribution of wealth to these poor whom they have badly used. If they don't, we need to instigate programs to educate the people to care for themselves, send them back with their own savings accounts with which they can purchase themselves an adobe hacienda back home.

How dare they sue the people of the United States when they should be suing the corrupt political machine that screws them out of jobs with decent pay so a few already wealthy kingpins can be megabillionnaires off the near-free laborers they command to work hard for a tortilla or two per diem. That's nothing but dervish.