turzovka
Gold Member
- Nov 20, 2012
- 5,195
- 1,039
- 265
Sexual assault is 'adventurous"? You guys are over the top. No, I have never said anything like Trump said, and the only people that I have heard say things like that have been avoided by other men. You hit on someone's wife with what is criminal sexual assault, and you would get the hell beat out of you among the men I work with.You dont think sexual assault is out of control? Drumpf admitted to sexually assaulting someone.That is very interesting, and yet, not all that surprising.
There is so much dirt on Hillary and her operations that an encyclopedia could not contain all the detail. And yet, it is all so easily covered up by the media and forgotten by the denizens of this nation.
Face it, nobody cares enough. They want to pretend Trump is out of control and Hillary is not as bad as they hear. Sad, but true.
I have a hard time believing there are many male senators or congressmen who have not been as lewd or adventurous as what Trump may have done on occasion. No doubt your odious national media has scoured every hour, crack and cranny of Trump's past and just the fact they have to go back 11 years to find some language tells me they don't have all that much against him in some respects. He never drinks or smokes or drugs, but that doesn't matter. Bill and Hillary did many worse things than what Trump is being accused of (sex, drugs, meanness, etc.) but that doesn't matter.
So go ahead and cast your stones all you holy and pure ones because democrats do not sin.
First off, I never bothered to read what they are specifically accusing Trump of in his past. Until now.
Turns Out Donald Trump Attacked Woman Who Accused Him of Sexual Assault. This Year.
Something about these incidences when they occur with major celebrities makes it a little more difficult to process. I am sure many women are allured the idea some very famous athlete or actor or mogul has interest in them. So they could enjoy the early flirting part. That only opens the door to trouble more times than not.
Then when the law suit comes I am sure many of these victims embellish the nature of the "facts," etc. Now if I have this story properly understood (not sure) here are some quotes from the report.
Harth filed a lawsuit against the real estate mogul in 1997 accusing him of sexual assault, including “groping” her under her dress on several occasions, “forcibly” moving her to his daughter’s bedroom at Mar-a-Lago in an “attempted rape,” and repeatedly and aggressively propositioning her for sex.
In 1997, Harth withdrew her lawsuit after Trump agreed to a settlement with Harth’s then-husband over a contractual dispute.
Ok, so they agreed to a settlement in 1997, but now 19 years later she feels justified to bring it all up again? Because why? Because she wants to make him double for his sins and ruin his career. This happens all the time to celebrities and politicians, they are never free and clear. I do not think this is the most fair thing in this case.
“When your story broke, (again this year, 2016) Donald stuck that lawyer on me right off the bat,” Harth said, “He was out to protect Donald. He didn’t care how this affected me.”
Oh, so sorry. What does she mean "how this affected me?" Like the pain has been so strong she could hold it in for 19 years but it just had to be brought out in the open for healing just at election time? This statement does not sit well with me.
Ok, Trump is not above the law and if was a true assault he should pay for it. And he did. But I do not see him as some kind of serial lecher like so many others --- else we would hear from many more "money grabbers" as this is the perfect moment for them to cash in. Not unlike the Tiger Woods merry go round. But why does your beloved media play the hypocrite? There is a lot of sexual scandal surrounding Hillary and Barack that will never emerge. Bill Clinton apparently is a non-factor.
Anyway, it does not please me Trump had this experience --- but neither that, nor the greatly overblown "bus talk," would prevent me from voting for him and instead voting for the despicable Hillary. Plus the conservative agenda is far more honorable and for the common good than the left's.
The attacks are par for the course for the election cycle. They prove what I know about Trump; that he's not the salt of the Earth. However, the Clintons corruption is beyond the pale. Everyone sees that.
A significant portion of online support for Hillary Clinton is manufactured by paid “astroturf” trolls: a large team of supporters who spend long hours responding to negative news on the internet about her. The Clinton SuperPAC Correct the Record, which is affiliated with her campaign, acknowledged in an April press release that it was spending $1 million on project “Breaking Barriers” to pay people to respond to negative information about Clinton on social media sites like Facebook, Reddit, Instagram and Twitter. That amount has since increased to over $6 million. The trolls create a false impression that Clinton has more support than she really does, because one supporter will frequently create multiple anonymous accounts.
Astroturf ‘Outrage Machine’ of Paid Trolls Floods Social Media to Counteract Negative News About Hillary Clinton
No doubt.
Like Al Davis says --- "just win baby." (scruples be damned)