Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No it wouldn't. If you would do more than pay attention to the Washington Times, you'd learn that even they now admit they were wrong.
Here is the law, dated and effective 25 Feb 92.
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a272176.pdf
Fucking dimwit teabagger lemming.
Bullshit. The army directive came in Feb of '92. The change in U.S. Army regulations was issued in March of 1993, two months after President Clinton assumed office.
Give up. You're just looking more and more stupid with every keystroke.
G. EFFECTIVE DATE AND IMPLEMENTATION
1. This Directive is effective immediately. Forward one
copy of implementing documents to the Assistant Secretary of
Defense (Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence) and
the Inspector General, Department of Defense within 120 days.
2. Documents that implement this Directive in overseas
areas should be framed in a manner to satisfy applicable
provisions of international agreements or arrangements relating
to law enforcement and security matters.
Fox blames Obama and so do I. The left needs to realize the level of incompetence they gave a second term to. Amateurish at best...He is getting this country in a hole we may not get out of in our lifetime.
You and fox are both idiots. If anyone should be blamed, it's the far right that keeps attacking mental health care and services to help those that need it.
Can't hide the man love.
I guess you can't.
Whatever floats your boat.
But just for the record, I don't "whack off" to Obama posters.
Or any other poster for that matter.
I generally let my girlfriend "handle" that.
do you also give HIM the "handle" ?????...
So from this response we can gather that you have NO evidence to support your conclusion but that you believe your elected representatives nonetheless have the right to restrict the inalienable right to self defense and to override the 2nd amendment.
Brilliant...
Excuse me?
Re-read your post.
And case law has over-ridden and corrupted the original intent of the second amendment.
1. It says absolutely nothing about guns.
2. It does have in it 2 requirements. Arms are used to defend the state and as part of a militia.
What we have now is the result of the gun lobby and the NRA.
And from your follow up, we see you STILL have nothing to support your conclusion.
Telling.
As to case law over ridding the 2nd, well, you feel free to quote that with specificity. And your take on the "2 requirements" doesn't jive with the findings of the Supreme Court. But, hey, you know better, right?
Do you actually have anything to add about the Ft Hood shooting???
Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Excuse me?
Re-read your post.
And case law has over-ridden and corrupted the original intent of the second amendment.
1. It says absolutely nothing about guns.
2. It does have in it 2 requirements. Arms are used to defend the state and as part of a militia.
What we have now is the result of the gun lobby and the NRA.
And from your follow up, we see you STILL have nothing to support your conclusion.
Telling.
As to case law over ridding the 2nd, well, you feel free to quote that with specificity. And your take on the "2 requirements" doesn't jive with the findings of the Supreme Court. But, hey, you know better, right?
Do you actually have anything to add about the Ft Hood shooting???
What's "no evidence"?
Some whacko got a gun legally and shot up an army base.
This isn't the only time that's happened either. And it's happened in the same spot.
Your contention that "if everyone had guns this wouldn't happen" is really crazy.
And most gun deaths in the United States aren't the result of a "crime". They are generally the results of accidents or a temper tantrum.
There are thousands of deaths per year that are completely preventable.
Additionally, my point about the Constitution is supported by, guess what? The Constitution.
Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
It says nothing about guns.
It does have a militia component and recognizes that component to be necessary to the security of the state.
Additionally the constitution places the control of militia to Congress.
Case law has corrupted original intent.
Excuse me?
Re-read your post.
And case law has over-ridden and corrupted the original intent of the second amendment.
1. It says absolutely nothing about guns.
2. It does have in it 2 requirements. Arms are used to defend the state and as part of a militia.
What we have now is the result of the gun lobby and the NRA.
And from your follow up, we see you STILL have nothing to support your conclusion.
Telling.
As to case law over ridding the 2nd, well, you feel free to quote that with specificity. And your take on the "2 requirements" doesn't jive with the findings of the Supreme Court. But, hey, you know better, right?
Do you actually have anything to add about the Ft Hood shooting???
What's "no evidence"?
Some whacko got a gun legally and shot up an army base.
This isn't the only time that's happened either. And it's happened in the same spot.
Your contention that "if everyone had guns this wouldn't happen" is really crazy.
And most gun deaths in the United States aren't the result of a "crime". They are generally the results of accidents or a temper tantrum.
There are thousands of deaths per year that are completely preventable.
Additionally, my point about the Constitution is supported by, guess what? The Constitution.
Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
It says nothing about guns.
It does have a militia component and recognizes that component to be necessary to the security of the state.
Additionally the constitution places the control of militia to Congress.
Case law has corrupted original intent.
Fox blames Obama and so do I. The left needs to realize the level of incompetence they gave a second term to. Amateurish at best...He is getting this country in a hole we may not get out of in our lifetime.
You and fox are both idiots. If anyone should be blamed, it's the far right that keeps attacking mental health care and services to help those that need it.
Fox blames Obama and so do I. The left needs to realize the level of incompetence they gave a second term to. Amateurish at best...He is getting this country in a hole we may not get out of in our lifetime.
You and fox are both idiots. If anyone should be blamed, it's the far right that keeps attacking mental health care and services to help those that need it.
You don't care that you have a president that lies at the drop of a hat and I'm an idiot? no sir you're the idiot for voting for a man that wipes his black ass with our constitution every fucking day you fucking idiot.
Fox blames Obama and so do I. The left needs to realize the level of incompetence they gave a second term to. Amateurish at best...He is getting this country in a hole we may not get out of in our lifetime.
You and fox are both idiots. If anyone should be blamed, it's the far right that keeps attacking mental health care and services to help those that need it.
Fox blames Obama and so do I. The left needs to realize the level of incompetence they gave a second term to. Amateurish at best...He is getting this country in a hole we may not get out of in our lifetime.
You and fox are both idiots. If anyone should be blamed, it's the far right that keeps attacking mental health care and services to help those that need it.
Gee, and we can't arm our armed forces on a military base of all places? Do you realize how stupid you sound?
You and fox are both idiots. If anyone should be blamed, it's the far right that keeps attacking mental health care and services to help those that need it.
Gee, and we can't arm our armed forces on a military base of all places? Do you realize how stupid you sound?
No, YOU don't realize that we don't need people shooting at each other over minor disagreements.
Do Teabaggers know why the regulation was put in place to limit firearms on military bases?
You and fox are both idiots. If anyone should be blamed, it's the far right that keeps attacking mental health care and services to help those that need it.
Gee, and we can't arm our armed forces on a military base of all places? Do you realize how stupid you sound?
No, YOU don't realize that we don't need people shooting at each other over minor disagreements.
30k gun deaths per year in the general public that is flooded with guns. How many gun deaths per year on military bases where gun access is restricted?
What? You want the regulation?Do Teabaggers know why the regulation was put in place to limit firearms on military bases?
Yes I do you piece of gutter trash - I'll be waiting for you to cite each relevant regulation.
I'm waiting.........
More deaths are caused by heart disease, as well, and that has fuck all to do with what I asked?30k gun deaths per year in the general public that is flooded with guns. How many gun deaths per year on military bases where gun access is restricted?
More folks in the USA die as a result of medical malpractice than guns deaths each year even though there are more guns in the USA than there are doctors.
What? You want the regulation?Do Teabaggers know why the regulation was put in place to limit firearms on military bases?
Yes I do you piece of gutter trash - I'll be waiting for you to cite each relevant regulation.
I'm waiting.........
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a272176.pdf
That was dated February 1992. Clinton was President in 1992, right?
