Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Zimmerman should have never been charged. The evidence was readily obvious that he was being beaten and feared for his life.
Case closed. He put a cap in dat negro.
Zimmerman should have never been charged. The evidence was readily obvious that he was being beaten and feared for his life.
Case closed. He put a cap in dat negro.
He stalked and confronted an innocent man
Once that confrontation went against him, he pulled a gun
It was you who said he never should have been chargedZimmerman should have never been charged. The evidence was readily obvious that he was being beaten and feared for his life.
Case closed. He put a cap in dat negro.
He stalked and confronted an innocent man
Once that confrontation went against him, he pulled a gun
Ok. Make your own narrative. The jury said not guilty. Americans said Donald Trump is president.
The left has not accepted either outcome. And I really don't give a shit.
Zimmerman used the law to murder a kid, that's the problem with this law; it can too easily be misused/abused. Additionally the silliness of asserting a jury will be mind readers and determine if a proper level of fear was reached to justify the little people’s murdering of each other to reach a verdict is beyond lunacy. The law is very useful as a concept however as a device to further demonize and push fear of the poor. Dovetails very nicely with a wall around society because we’re afraid of poor brown people flowing out of our coups and destabilization efforts in Latin and South America.
What part of "it wasn't part of the defense and was never invoked" do you not understand. Zimmerman was pinned to the ground, he had no option to retreat therefore Stand Your Ground was never in play...
Negative Ghostrider.Zimmerman should have never been charged. The evidence was readily obvious that he was being beaten and feared for his life.
Case closed. He put a cap in dat negro.
He stalked and confronted an innocent man
Once that confrontation went against him, he pulled a gun
Most conservatives believe that young black men are ‘predisposed’ to crime, where ‘preemptive self-defense’ is ‘justified.’Nah, he was black and some folks are scared of black kids, like you for example.Ya cause getting your head pounded in to the ground and having your firearm stolen is no threat right RETARD?Zimmerman used the law to murder a kid, that's the problem with this law; it can too easily be misused/abused. Additionally the silliness of asserting a jury will be mind readers and determine if a proper level of fear was reached to justify the little people’s murdering of each other to reach a verdict is beyond lunacy. The law is very useful as a concept however as a device to further demonize and push fear of the poor. Dovetails very nicely with a wall around society because we’re afraid of poor brown people flowing out of our coups and destabilization efforts in Latin and South America.
That was Zimmie's defense wasn't it. "I'm so much of a pussy I had to shoot the kid". Even had his "trainer" testify as to what a feckless pudgy slob he was.
That "kid" was about 6' tall.....and was on his way to being a career criminal...
Zimmerman used the law to murder a kid, that's the problem with this law; it can too easily be misused/abused. Additionally the silliness of asserting a jury will be mind readers and determine if a proper level of fear was reached to justify the little people’s murdering of each other to reach a verdict is beyond lunacy. The law is very useful as a concept however as a device to further demonize and push fear of the poor. Dovetails very nicely with a wall around society because we’re afraid of poor brown people flowing out of our coups and destabilization efforts in Latin and South America.
What part of "it wasn't part of the defense and was never invoked" do you not understand. Zimmerman was pinned to the ground, he had no option to retreat therefore Stand Your Ground was never in play...
You want to argue over a rationale for murder. Doesn't really matter to me what angle of rationale you wish to attempt to prop up. Zimmerman is simply not a man in my view for the manner in which he handled the entire affair. Had you been followed like that, you may have shot the follower. No skittles, no tea, armed. If a grown ass man cannot manage that situation without murdering a teen, don't complain about teens. Ever. Maybe america doesn't produce the kind of men it used to. Wonder why your kids are violent?
Not true. Words by themselves cannot establish an imminent threat.Stand your ground.....
If you get in an argument with someone and you feel threatened by them
You can shoot them
A man with a gun was stalking an unarmed teenager.Negative Ghostrider.Zimmerman should have never been charged. The evidence was readily obvious that he was being beaten and feared for his life.
Case closed. He put a cap in dat negro.
He stalked and confronted an innocent man
Once that confrontation went against him, he pulled a gun
Fact. Trayvon Martin's physical attack on George Zimmerman was the only illegal action taken by either party. It was legal for Trayvon Martin to be there. It was legal for George Zimmerman to follow, observe, and even confront and question Martin. The attack by Trayvon made the subjective decision by Zimmerman to use deadly force potentially justifiable.
Moral of the story...and it's one all should take to heart...Don't physically attack people. Had Martin not physically attacked Zimmerman, either he would be alive today or Zimmerman would be in prison for life.
Not true. Words by themselves cannot establish an imminent threat.Stand your ground.....
If you get in an argument with someone and you feel threatened by them
You can shoot them
Arkansas is set to add Stand Your Ground language to it's legal process for self defense......and then the writer of the news article gets the Zimmerman case wrong, again.....Stand Your Ground was never part of the Zimmerman defense...the anti-gunners lied and use it to attack self defense by armed civilians, and this so called journalist repeated the lie......
Zimmerman was on the ground getting pounded...he could not retreat, which is the main point to stand your ground defense...you have to have the ability to retreat for it to be a stand your ground defense...
Bill would add 'Stand Your Ground' protection to Arkansas self defense law
A bill set to make its way through the Arkansas legislature would alter the state’s self-defense laws and allow for people to use “stand your ground” provisions in deadly confrontations.
State representative Aaron Pilkington (R – Clarksville) says House Bill 1059 will clear up ambiguities and make Arkansas law line up with our neighboring states.
“there's nowhere in there where I call it a “stand your ground” bill,” Pilkington said. “I call it a right to protect yourself. Other people are calling it a stand your ground bill.”
The label is controversial because Florida neighborhood watchman George Zimmerman avoided jail after he shot and killed Trayvon Martin, a black teenager, in 2012.
Unlike Florida, Arkansas would not have allowed Zimmerman to use the defense, and that’s surprising to some in Pilkington’s district.
(Zimmerman's defense team did not use Stand Your Ground, it was never part of the defense, and did not apply to his situation...)
“I had a constituent reach out to me letting me know that we weren't a stand your ground state and after kind of looking at the laws and how they were he was right,” Pilkington said. “We're one of the few states that are duty to retreat.”
Pilkington would take the retreat requirement out of the law. After the Martin shooting, critics predicted similar killings across the country.
A man with a gun was stalking an unarmed teenager.Negative Ghostrider.Zimmerman should have never been charged. The evidence was readily obvious that he was being beaten and feared for his life.
Case closed. He put a cap in dat negro.
He stalked and confronted an innocent man
Once that confrontation went against him, he pulled a gun
Fact. Trayvon Martin's physical attack on George Zimmerman was the only illegal action taken by either party. It was legal for Trayvon Martin to be there. It was legal for George Zimmerman to follow, observe, and even confront and question Martin. The attack by Trayvon made the subjective decision by Zimmerman to use deadly force potentially justifiable.
Moral of the story...and it's one all should take to heart...Don't physically attack people. Had Martin not physically attacked Zimmerman, either he would be alive today or Zimmerman would be in prison for life.
The teen “felt threatened” and stood his ground.
Most conservatives believe that young black men are ‘predisposed’ to crime, where ‘preemptive self-defense’ is ‘justified.’Nah, he was black and some folks are scared of black kids, like you for example.Ya cause getting your head pounded in to the ground and having your firearm stolen is no threat right RETARD?
That was Zimmie's defense wasn't it. "I'm so much of a pussy I had to shoot the kid". Even had his "trainer" testify as to what a feckless pudgy slob he was.
That "kid" was about 6' tall.....and was on his way to being a career criminal...
Based on the rate at which blacks commit crimes, the evidence tends to point that way.
LolZimmerman used the law to murder a kid, that's the problem with this law; it can too easily be misused/abused. Additionally the silliness of asserting a jury will be mind readers and determine if a proper level of fear was reached to justify the little people’s murdering of each other to reach a verdict is beyond lunacy. The law is very useful as a concept however as a device to further demonize and push fear of the poor. Dovetails very nicely with a wall around society because we’re afraid of poor brown people flowing out of our coups and destabilization efforts in Latin and South America.
LolYa cause getting your head pounded in to the ground and having your firearm stolen is no threat right RETARD?Zimmerman used the law to murder a kid, that's the problem with this law; it can too easily be misused/abused. Additionally the silliness of asserting a jury will be mind readers and determine if a proper level of fear was reached to justify the little people’s murdering of each other to reach a verdict is beyond lunacy. The law is very useful as a concept however as a device to further demonize and push fear of the poor. Dovetails very nicely with a wall around society because we’re afraid of poor brown people flowing out of our coups and destabilization efforts in Latin and South America.
That was Zimmie's defense wasn't it. "I'm so much of a pussy I had to shoot the kid". Even had his "trainer" testify as to what a feckless pudgy slob he was.
LolGeorge should have never gotten his dumbass self in that position anyway. Call it in, obey dispatcher's advice. He fucked up and then he murdered a teenager, panicked little cop wannabe that he was.Zimmerman used the law to murder a kid, that's the problem with this law; it can too easily be misused/abused. Additionally the silliness of asserting a jury will be mind readers and determine if a proper level of fear was reached to justify the little people’s murdering of each other to reach a verdict is beyond lunacy. The law is very useful as a concept however as a device to further demonize and push fear of the poor. Dovetails very nicely with a wall around society because we’re afraid of poor brown people flowing out of our coups and destabilization efforts in Latin and South America.
What part of "it wasn't part of the defense and was never invoked" do you not understand. Zimmerman was pinned to the ground, he had no option to retreat therefore Stand Your Ground was never in play...
Murder.
LolFuck the jury and your justus system, Zimmie lost his shit and killed a kid he didn't need to, then some backwater inbred fuckwits attempted to turn him into a hero. And that's all. Just another dysfunctional day in america.Zimmerman used the law to murder a kid, that's the problem with this law; it can too easily be misused/abused. Additionally the silliness of asserting a jury will be mind readers and determine if a proper level of fear was reached to justify the little people’s murdering of each other to reach a verdict is beyond lunacy. The law is very useful as a concept however as a device to further demonize and push fear of the poor. Dovetails very nicely with a wall around society because we’re afraid of poor brown people flowing out of our coups and destabilization efforts in Latin and South America.
He didn't murder anyone. The jury said so. Don't like the verdict. There isn't a fucking thing you can do about it, boy.
