Are the deniers selfish about the environment??

Discussion in 'Environment' started by skookerasbil, Apr 23, 2011.

  1. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    24,202
    Thanks Received:
    2,912
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +6,212
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2011
  2. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,470
    Thanks Received:
    5,416
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,313
    Selfish, stupid, and shortsighted. Some exceptionally so.
     
  3. uscitizen
    Offline

    uscitizen Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    45,941
    Thanks Received:
    4,791
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    My Shack
    Ratings:
    +4,807
    Most are users, just use up our planet with no regard to future generations.
     
  4. Foxfyre
    Offline

    Foxfyre Eternal optimist Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Messages:
    47,678
    Thanks Received:
    10,789
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Desert Southwest USA
    Ratings:
    +14,379
    Contrary to what the ultra-partisan, brainwashed, kool-aid drinking, tree hugging left would have you believe, there are very few 'deniers'. There are a LOT of skeptics that think we are being forced into bad policy, regulation, and products based on flawed science and opportunistic speculation.

    Contrary to what that same group from the left would try to convince you, we skeptics do not want dirty water, dirty air, contaminated soil, extinction of God's wonderful creatures on Earth, or spoiling of aesthetic beauty. And the more affluent we are, the more important clean water, clean air, uncontaminated soil, God's wonderful creatures, and aesthetic beauty becomes.

    That group on the left would attempt to force a more pristine world by taking away rights, liberties, options, choices, and opportunities from those they deem to be 'greedy' and 'uncaring'. That is a fool's errand of course based on faulty perceptions, and it will inevitably be futile to accomplish a purer environment. It could be very effective in making all pawns and slaves of the state.

    The skeptics think the better way is to look for efficiencies and conservation wherever reasonable and possible, and otherwise help the poor become more affluent so they too can have the luxury of caring about God's creatures and aesthetic beauty as well as clean water, air, and soil.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2011
  5. The T
    Offline

    The T George S. Patton Party Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2009
    Messages:
    48,072
    Thanks Received:
    5,473
    Trophy Points:
    1,773
    Location:
    What USED TO BE A REPUBLIC RUN BY TYRANTS
    Ratings:
    +5,502
  6. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    24,202
    Thanks Received:
    2,912
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +6,212

    You know......you're right s0n............

    The best course of action would be to go a fully green economy tomorrow and lose another 2.3 million jobs!!!! THAT sounds like a plan!!!

    And by the way...........I am "exceptional".


    Call me...........Captain..............

    [​IMG]
     

Share This Page