Are the Democrats Finished?

[NoNukes]

This thread is probably a response to all of the Are the Republucans Dead threads. Nothing to actually back it up.

It is a response to all those troll threads. Kudos to you for noticing. I didn't think you had it in you.

Good to see that you are thinking, for a change.

 

[The Rabbi]

This seems to go in cycles. For years the Democrats couldn't get out of their own way. They were the party of nutjobs, fruitcakes, and guilty white men. The GOP reigned supreme as the party that defeated the Soviet Union, gave us the peace divididend and about 20 years of economic growth and prosperity.
Then the GOP screwed up and tried to out-Dem the Dems. That didnt work.
SO the Dems came in on fairness, equality, and other issues that appeal to their not very bright base.
The results have been, um, sub-par to say the least. Stagnation. Poverty. Dependence. Debt.
So the GOP looks like it will kick butt in the midterms and if 2006 is any indication will go on to take the presidency as well. Democrat policies and programs look to be thoroughly discredited for the failuires they are.
But can the Dems come back? What can they do to junk the special interest gravy train, the whack jobs, the nutcases, the Stalinists that have taken over their party? Do the Dems need to stage the equivalent of the Beer Hall Putsch to cleanse the party of the toxic elements that are costing them elections?

You people really are deluded, with the demographic shift there is NO way the white christian party can survive, there just aren't enough bitter white people, the white christer party is a regional party and have been rightly marginalized to the uneducated bible thumping states also known as jesusland, The christer party cannot win national elections without the latino vote, the womens vote and the educated whites vote

Keep telling yourself that.
Those non white christian people are about to deliver a drubbing to the Dems they will remember for a generation.

 

[The Rabbi]

The results have been, um, sub-par to say the least. Stagnation. Poverty. Dependence. Debt.
So the GOP looks like it will kick butt in the midterms and if 2006 is any indication will go on to take the presidency as well. Democrat policies and programs look to be thoroughly discredited for the failuires they are.

Guy, that's retarded. The ONLY Reason why the Republicans will do well is most of the Senate contests are happening in Red States this year with small, rural populations full of white people whose family trees don't fork.

This is the Special Olympics Mid-Term. Even if you win, you're still retarded.

2016, the GOP is going to have the same problem. Women and People of Color won't vote for you, and t here aren't enough angry old white guys to keep you afloat.

Aand the rationalizations flow like water.
I wonder what happens when every Dem except those in California and the north east loses.

 

[The Rabbi]

You have any facts or statistics at all to back up that swill.

Because the membership rolls of the Democratic Party, the voter registration stats in the 31 states that do them according to party affiliation, mid-term polling for the Senate horseraces, key HOR races and the generic meter do not back up your strange claims at all.

Were the Democratic Party finished, then Tillis would be swamping Hagan in North Carolina, a traditionally deep Red state that Mitt Romney reclaimed for the GOP in 2012. And yet, Hagan is still ahead and likely to win re-election.

Were the Democratic Party finished, then why must the RNC all of a sudden have to dump money into the South Dakota race?

We hear this meaningless crap from political hacks like you all the time and the swill never comes to fruition.

You are just frustrated because not everyone thinks like you think and this makes you angry like a 2nd grader who just lost his favorite toy.

The GOP is VERY likely to take the Senate, because electoral history patterns for mid-terms point clearly to the opposition party having the upper-hand in mid-terms, totally irregardless of the popularity of the sitting president (see: Eisenhower 1954, 1958. see: Reagan 1986. see: Clinton 1994. see Bush: 2006. see: LBJ 1966. See: Truman 1946 and 1950. See: FDR 1938 and 1942. See: Hoover 1930. See: Wilson 1918. See: Taft 1910. The list goes on and one and on).

Neither major political party is finished. One of the two major political parties is in danger of being shut out of presidential victories for a good long time due to demographic shifts across our great Union and that party's unwillingness to accept people who are not White and ultra-conservative, but neither party is "finished".

Your thread, as usual, is trash. And lacking in any real substance.

Now, go play with your tonka-toys.

. This is rich. You as a member of the party who founded the KKK sayIng the GOP is "unwilling to accept people who are not white" is laughable coming from the party who wrote Jim Crowe laws. Hell, even uber-liberal FDR put Klansman Hugo Black on the Supreme Court. Who really doesn't accept non-whites?

The facts are the GOP never enslaved a black, never hung one from a tree, never prevented him from voting. That is your party's heritage. And if you think times have changed, the only difference now is only your methods have changed to keep blacks on the plantation.

So much ignorance, willing ignorance, in your posting.

You have to go back 160 years to call Democrats "racists".

What you forget is that back then, the Democratic Party, with it's base in the South, was the Conservative party and the fledgling Republican Party was the more Liberal party.

Through the 1950s, 60s and 70s, essentially, the two parties switched places.

Your ignorance is no less than astounding.

You calling anyone ignorant is amazing, ass-clown.
Democrats are still racists. They prove it every day. Their policies have resulted in the worst results for black families since slavery.

 

[The Rabbi]

You have any facts or statistics at all to back up that swill.

Because the membership rolls of the Democratic Party, the voter registration stats in the 31 states that do them according to party affiliation, mid-term polling for the Senate horseraces, key HOR races and the generic meter do not back up your strange claims at all.

Were the Democratic Party finished, then Tillis would be swamping Hagan in North Carolina, a traditionally deep Red state that Mitt Romney reclaimed for the GOP in 2012. And yet, Hagan is still ahead and likely to win re-election.

Were the Democratic Party finished, then why must the RNC all of a sudden have to dump money into the South Dakota race?

We hear this meaningless crap from political hacks like you all the time and the swill never comes to fruition.

You are just frustrated because not everyone thinks like you think and this makes you angry like a 2nd grader who just lost his favorite toy.

The GOP is VERY likely to take the Senate, because electoral history patterns for mid-terms point clearly to the opposition party having the upper-hand in mid-terms, totally irregardless of the popularity of the sitting president (see: Eisenhower 1954, 1958. see: Reagan 1986. see: Clinton 1994. see Bush: 2006. see: LBJ 1966. See: Truman 1946 and 1950. See: FDR 1938 and 1942. See: Hoover 1930. See: Wilson 1918. See: Taft 1910. The list goes on and one and on).

Neither major political party is finished. One of the two major political parties is in danger of being shut out of presidential victories for a good long time due to demographic shifts across our great Union and that party's unwillingness to accept people who are not White and ultra-conservative, but neither party is "finished".

Your thread, as usual, is trash. And lacking in any real substance.

Now, go play with your tonka-toys.

. This is rich. You as a member of the party who founded the KKK sayIng the GOP is "unwilling to accept people who are not white" is laughable coming from the party who wrote Jim Crowe laws. Hell, even uber-liberal FDR put Klansman Hugo Black on the Supreme Court. Who really doesn't accept non-whites?

The facts are the GOP never enslaved a black, never hung one from a tree, never prevented him from voting. That is your party's heritage. And if you think times have changed, the only difference now is only your methods have changed to keep blacks on the plantation.

So much ignorance, willing ignorance, in your posting.

You have to go back 160 years to call Democrats "racists".

What you forget is that back then, the Democratic Party, with it's base in the South, was the Conservative party and the fledgling Republican Party was the more Liberal party.

Through the 1950s, 60s and 70s, essentially, the two parties switched places.

Your ignorance is no less than astounding.

We never switched places. Those democrats died democrats. Even the liberal side of your party weren't the friends of blacks. FDR installing Hugo Black on the SCOTUS, remember? So stop with the bullshit that republicans are the racists here. Our party was founded to free the slaves.

Why do so few Blacks vote Republican?

Because they've been sold a bill of goods by Democrats going back to LBJ. Good shoes, good sex, and a warm place to pee. Unfortunately that's about all they've gotten from Democrat policies while other minority groups are eating their lunch.

 

[kaz]

rw'ers sure seem to be doing quite a bit of premature end zone dancing, just like they did in 2012. I remember The Rabbi was awfully quiet after that.

Like you guys did in 2004

 

[kaz]

The point is, both parties were pretty cool with Jim Crow until 1964. And while the democrats were willing to lose the South for a couple generations to do the right thing, the Republicans were happy to give all the Cleetuses a home.

Your delusional world. The Democrats did not lose the South because of civil rights, you lost the South because since the 60s you have dashed headlong into socialism and then Marxism. I live in North Carolina and lived in Georgia, the racists are still overwhelmingly with the right party, yours. They are Neanderthals. The biggest racist I know has an Obama sticker on his truck. Economics is why you lost the south.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

The Democrats are so much better at messaging than the Republicans at this point that they're really not even in the same league.

And the Republicans don't even see it. How can that be?

Because once again, it's not the message- it's the Product.

"Hey, we want you wage slaves to work harder for less money so a few rich assholes can have mansions and dressage horses!"

No amount of messaging in the world is going to make that sound good.

The real problem the GOP has is the "Shiny Things" like gays and abortion to get stupid white people like Rabbid to vote against their own economic interests don't work anymore either.

We do know that the Rs have no message and the dems are toxic and have failed miserably over the last six years. If the dems continue to exploit blacks, hispanics, minorities, and ethnicities, they may find themselves wandering in the desert for a few years.

Another minorities are too stupid to know what is good for them post.

No no. Im making note of dems incessant hatred of minorities.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Everything is cyclical... they have fallen out of favor for a variety of reasons. Obama's been a disaster, his fringe base has abandoned him for not being radical enough. The "vote for the cool black guy" crowd is totally over him.

I think November is going to be a bloodbath for the Dems. But, if the GOP sticks to Dem-light, it will be short-lived. A message, a vision, no matter ho wacky, seems to play better than the "at least we're not them" message.

 

[NoNukes]

The Democrats are so much better at messaging than the Republicans at this point that they're really not even in the same league.

And the Republicans don't even see it. How can that be?

Because once again, it's not the message- it's the Product.

"Hey, we want you wage slaves to work harder for less money so a few rich assholes can have mansions and dressage horses!"

No amount of messaging in the world is going to make that sound good.

The real problem the GOP has is the "Shiny Things" like gays and abortion to get stupid white people like Rabbid to vote against their own economic interests don't work anymore either.

We do know that the Rs have no message and the dems are toxic and have failed miserably over the last six years. If the dems continue to exploit blacks, hispanics, minorities, and ethnicities, they may find themselves wandering in the desert for a few years.

Another minorities are too stupid to know what is good for them post.

No no. Im making note of dems incessant hatred of minorities.

Oh, you are delusional? Why do minorities support the Democrats?

 

[Statistikhengst]

The Democrats are so much better at messaging than the Republicans at this point that they're really not even in the same league.

And the Republicans don't even see it. How can that be?

Because once again, it's not the message- it's the Product.

"Hey, we want you wage slaves to work harder for less money so a few rich assholes can have mansions and dressage horses!"

No amount of messaging in the world is going to make that sound good.

The real problem the GOP has is the "Shiny Things" like gays and abortion to get stupid white people like Rabbid to vote against their own economic interests don't work anymore either.

We do know that the Rs have no message and the dems are toxic and have failed miserably over the last six years. If the dems continue to exploit blacks, hispanics, minorities, and ethnicities, they may find themselves wandering in the desert for a few years.

Another minorities are too stupid to know what is good for them post.

No no. Im making note of dems incessant hatred of minorities.

Oh, so that explains why minorites vote in hypermajorities for DEMS. You are nutz.

 

[NoNukes]

The Democrats are so much better at messaging than the Republicans at this point that they're really not even in the same league.

And the Republicans don't even see it. How can that be?

Because once again, it's not the message- it's the Product.

"Hey, we want you wage slaves to work harder for less money so a few rich assholes can have mansions and dressage horses!"

No amount of messaging in the world is going to make that sound good.

The real problem the GOP has is the "Shiny Things" like gays and abortion to get stupid white people like Rabbid to vote against their own economic interests don't work anymore either.

We do know that the Rs have no message and the dems are toxic and have failed miserably over the last six years. If the dems continue to exploit blacks, hispanics, minorities, and ethnicities, they may find themselves wandering in the desert for a few years.

Another minorities are too stupid to know what is good for them post.

No no. Im making note of dems incessant hatred of minorities.

Oh, you are delusional? Why do minorities support th

The Democrats are so much better at messaging than the Republicans at this point that they're really not even in the same league.

And the Republicans don't even see it. How can that be?

Because once again, it's not the message- it's the Product.

"Hey, we want you wage slaves to work harder for less money so a few rich assholes can have mansions and dressage horses!"

No amount of messaging in the world is going to make that sound good.

The real problem the GOP has is the "Shiny Things" like gays and abortion to get stupid white people like Rabbid to vote against their own economic interests don't work anymore either.

We do know that the Rs have no message and the dems are toxic and have failed miserably over the last six years. If the dems continue to exploit blacks, hispanics, minorities, and ethnicities, they may find themselves wandering in the desert for a few years.

Another minorities are too stupid to know what is good for them post.

No no. Im making note of dems incessant hatred of minorities.

Oh, so that explains why minorites vote in hypermajorities for DEMS. You are nutz.

She is one of these people on the right who think that minorities are too stupid to know who is really on their side. She wants to help the poor ignorant souls. Very touching.

 

[NoNukes]

You have any facts or statistics at all to back up that swill.

Because the membership rolls of the Democratic Party, the voter registration stats in the 31 states that do them according to party affiliation, mid-term polling for the Senate horseraces, key HOR races and the generic meter do not back up your strange claims at all.

Were the Democratic Party finished, then Tillis would be swamping Hagan in North Carolina, a traditionally deep Red state that Mitt Romney reclaimed for the GOP in 2012. And yet, Hagan is still ahead and likely to win re-election.

Were the Democratic Party finished, then why must the RNC all of a sudden have to dump money into the South Dakota race?

We hear this meaningless crap from political hacks like you all the time and the swill never comes to fruition.

You are just frustrated because not everyone thinks like you think and this makes you angry like a 2nd grader who just lost his favorite toy.

The GOP is VERY likely to take the Senate, because electoral history patterns for mid-terms point clearly to the opposition party having the upper-hand in mid-terms, totally irregardless of the popularity of the sitting president (see: Eisenhower 1954, 1958. see: Reagan 1986. see: Clinton 1994. see Bush: 2006. see: LBJ 1966. See: Truman 1946 and 1950. See: FDR 1938 and 1942. See: Hoover 1930. See: Wilson 1918. See: Taft 1910. The list goes on and one and on).

Neither major political party is finished. One of the two major political parties is in danger of being shut out of presidential victories for a good long time due to demographic shifts across our great Union and that party's unwillingness to accept people who are not White and ultra-conservative, but neither party is "finished".

Your thread, as usual, is trash. And lacking in any real substance.

Now, go play with your tonka-toys.

. This is rich. You as a member of the party who founded the KKK sayIng the GOP is "unwilling to accept people who are not white" is laughable coming from the party who wrote Jim Crowe laws. Hell, even uber-liberal FDR put Klansman Hugo Black on the Supreme Court. Who really doesn't accept non-whites?

The facts are the GOP never enslaved a black, never hung one from a tree, never prevented him from voting. That is your party's heritage. And if you think times have changed, the only difference now is only your methods have changed to keep blacks on the plantation.

So much ignorance, willing ignorance, in your posting.

You have to go back 160 years to call Democrats "racists".

What you forget is that back then, the Democratic Party, with it's base in the South, was the Conservative party and the fledgling Republican Party was the more Liberal party.

Through the 1950s, 60s and 70s, essentially, the two parties switched places.

Your ignorance is no less than astounding.

We never switched places. Those democrats died democrats. Even the liberal side of your party weren't the friends of blacks. FDR installing Hugo Black on the SCOTUS, remember? So stop with the bullshit that republicans are the racists here. Our party was founded to free the slaves.

Why do so few Blacks vote Republican?

Because they've been sold a bill of goods by Democrats going back to LBJ. Good shoes, good sex, and a warm place to pee. Unfortunately that's about all they've gotten from Democrat policies while other minority groups are eating their lunch.

Another they are too stupid to know what is good for them post. And you guys wonder why they vote Democrat?

 

[NYcarbineer]

The point is, both parties were pretty cool with Jim Crow until 1964. And while the democrats were willing to lose the South for a couple generations to do the right thing, the Republicans were happy to give all the Cleetuses a home.

Your delusional world. The Democrats did not lose the South because of civil rights, you lost the South because since the 60s you have dashed headlong into socialism and then Marxism. I live in North Carolina and lived in Georgia, the racists are still overwhelmingly with the right party, yours. They are Neanderthals. The biggest racist I know has an Obama sticker on his truck. Economics is why you lost the south.

That is probably the biggest lie ever posted on this forum.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

The Democrats are so much better at messaging than the Republicans at this point that they're really not even in the same league.

And the Republicans don't even see it. How can that be?

Because once again, it's not the message- it's the Product.

"Hey, we want you wage slaves to work harder for less money so a few rich assholes can have mansions and dressage horses!"

No amount of messaging in the world is going to make that sound good.

The real problem the GOP has is the "Shiny Things" like gays and abortion to get stupid white people like Rabbid to vote against their own economic interests don't work anymore either.

We do know that the Rs have no message and the dems are toxic and have failed miserably over the last six years. If the dems continue to exploit blacks, hispanics, minorities, and ethnicities, they may find themselves wandering in the desert for a few years.

Another minorities are too stupid to know what is good for them post.

No no. Im making note of dems incessant hatred of minorities.

Oh, you are delusional? Why do minorities support th

Because once again, it's not the message- it's the Product.

"Hey, we want you wage slaves to work harder for less money so a few rich assholes can have mansions and dressage horses!"

No amount of messaging in the world is going to make that sound good.

The real problem the GOP has is the "Shiny Things" like gays and abortion to get stupid white people like Rabbid to vote against their own economic interests don't work anymore either.

We do know that the Rs have no message and the dems are toxic and have failed miserably over the last six years. If the dems continue to exploit blacks, hispanics, minorities, and ethnicities, they may find themselves wandering in the desert for a few years.

Another minorities are too stupid to know what is good for them post.

No no. Im making note of dems incessant hatred of minorities.

Oh, so that explains why minorites vote in hypermajorities for DEMS. You are nutz.

She is one of these people on the right who think that minorities are too stupid to know who is really on their side. She wants to help the poor ignorant souls. Very touching.

I was confident that you wouldn't comprehend my statement. You failed exceedingly. Congrats.

 

[Statistikhengst]

The point is, both parties were pretty cool with Jim Crow until 1964. And while the democrats were willing to lose the South for a couple generations to do the right thing, the Republicans were happy to give all the Cleetuses a home.

Your delusional world. The Democrats did not lose the South because of civil rights, you lost the South because since the 60s you have dashed headlong into socialism and then Marxism. I live in North Carolina and lived in Georgia, the racists are still overwhelmingly with the right party, yours. They are Neanderthals. The biggest racist I know has an Obama sticker on his truck. Economics is why you lost the south.

That is probably the biggest lie ever posted on this forum.

Probably.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

The Democrats are so much better at messaging than the Republicans at this point that they're really not even in the same league.

And the Republicans don't even see it. How can that be?

Because once again, it's not the message- it's the Product.

"Hey, we want you wage slaves to work harder for less money so a few rich assholes can have mansions and dressage horses!"

No amount of messaging in the world is going to make that sound good.

The real problem the GOP has is the "Shiny Things" like gays and abortion to get stupid white people like Rabbid to vote against their own economic interests don't work anymore either.

We do know that the Rs have no message and the dems are toxic and have failed miserably over the last six years. If the dems continue to exploit blacks, hispanics, minorities, and ethnicities, they may find themselves wandering in the desert for a few years.

Another minorities are too stupid to know what is good for them post.

No no. Im making note of dems incessant hatred of minorities.

Oh, so that explains why minorites vote in hypermajorities for DEMS. You are nutz.

It just explains how dems exploit minorities. That's all.

 

[paulitician]

God let's hope so. I can't fathom why anyone would rush out to vote for Communist/Progressive Democrats at this point. I mean, we know the Freebie Moochers will be voting for em. But why anyone else would, i'm stumped. Let's hope the Communists do get the boot come November. It's time.

 

[gipper]

God let's hope so. I can't fathom why anyone would rush out to vote for Communist/Progressive Democrats at this point. I mean, we know the Freebie Moochers will be voting for em. But why anyone else would, i'm stumped. Let's hope the Communists do get the boot come November. It's time.

Problem is about 50% of Americans are moochers...receiving some sort of government assistance.

50 Percent Of American Households Now Receive Some Type Of Government Help

It seems likely that they vote for the socialist party.

 

[paulitician]

God let's hope so. I can't fathom why anyone would rush out to vote for Communist/Progressive Democrats at this point. I mean, we know the Freebie Moochers will be voting for em. But why anyone else would, i'm stumped. Let's hope the Communists do get the boot come November. It's time.

Problem is about 50% of Americans are moochers...receiving some sort of government assistance.

50 Percent Of American Households Now Receive Some Type Of Government Help

It seems likely that they vote for the socialist party.

Obviously Millions of Moochers will be bussed in to vote for the Communists/Progressives. We all know that. But i can't fathom why anyone else would be Gung-ho about voting for em at this point. It's perplexing.