Rye Catcher
Platinum Member
- Nov 21, 2019
- 12,780
- 7,607
- 940
- Banned
- #81
LOL, you really are a kook. If you had read the link you would understand that smoking creates COPD. But you never read anything which might upset your beliefs.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Are the anti-science zealots accepting anthropogenic climate change yet?
- Thread starter schmidlap
- Start date
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,125
- 47,278
- 2,180
We are talking about CO2, not smoke.LOL, you really are a kook. If you had read the link you would understand that smoking creates COPD. But you never read anything which might upset your beliefs.That's a claim with no visible means of support.C02 is not a pollutant, moron. Plants need it to live.The ideological dogma that decrees one is free to poop into the heavens with impunity appears to be tenacious.More accurate than predictions from Conservatives saying there is no climate change
Housebreaking the obstinate is a challenge.
Spewing greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere impacts the atmosphere.
Statement: "C02 is not a pollutant, moron. Plants need it to live."
Response: Retention of CO2 is deadly in Human Beings.
Yes. 0.04 % is not dangerous in any way, moron. Much higher levels are beneficial to plants. That's why they add CO2 in greenhouses.
Or is this also fake news and lying scientists, in your opinion?
- Sep 19, 2020
- 7,237
- 8,367
- 2,138
Your link says that CO2 levels would have to be 100 times higher than normal in order to be life threatening.C02 is not a pollutant, moron. Plants need it to live.The ideological dogma that decrees one is free to poop into the heavens with impunity appears to be tenacious.More accurate than predictions from Conservatives saying there is no climate change
Housebreaking the obstinate is a challenge.
Spewing greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere impacts the atmosphere.
Statement: "C02 is not a pollutant, moron. Plants need it to live."
Response: Retention of CO2 is deadly in Human Beings.
Or is this also fake news and lying scientists, in your opinion?
That's like saying water is deadly, as if you consume 100 times the normal amount, you will most certainly die.
How people can be so patently STUPID is a question for Darwin.
All these imbeciles screeching about climate change and soaring temperatures are clueless that there is currently a global increase in VOLCANIC activity that is spewing very high levels of Sulfur Dioxide, CO2 and many other pollutants into the air. Billions of tons of it every day.
IT IS NATURAL for God's sake people !
Get a life.
All these imbeciles screeching about climate change and soaring temperatures are clueless that there is currently a global increase in VOLCANIC activity that is spewing very high levels of Sulfur Dioxide, CO2 and many other pollutants into the air. Billions of tons of it every day.
IT IS NATURAL for God's sake people !
Get a life.
Rigby5
Diamond Member
Scientific Consensus: Earth's Climate Is WarmingView attachment 511064
[Scientific Consensus: Earth's Climate is Warming]
The residue of anti-scientific ideologues cite Trump's rectal thermometer.
Oh My GAIA, it's gone up a degree in only 140 years...
Fucking anti-science Nazi loon....
Sure only 1 degree in 40 years does not seem like much, but consider the mass of the earth, oceans, and atmosphere.
That is huge, so that is a massive amount of retained energy, and it is not only already having deadly effects, such as desertification, floods, storms, heat waves, etc., but is a rapidly accelerating curve that is an indicator of far more harmful problems in the future. For example, they estimate that an increase of 9 degrees more would end all life on the planet
Rigby5
Diamond Member
How people can be so patently STUPID is a question for Darwin.
All these imbeciles screeching about climate change and soaring temperatures are clueless that there is currently a global increase in VOLCANIC activity that is spewing very high levels of Sulfur Dioxide, CO2 and many other pollutants into the air. Billions of tons of it every day.
IT IS NATURAL for God's sake people !
View attachment 511141
Get a life.
Wrong.
While volcanoes do spew CO2, they also spew even more of aerosols, and particulates, that result in more cooling than warming.
Volcanoes always cool a planet.
After Krakatoa eruption, there was no summer that year, and it stayed winter for several years straight.
{...
The explosion of Krakatoa (Krakatau) may have contributed to volcanic winter-like conditions. The four years following the explosion were unusually cold, and the winter of 1887–1888 included powerful blizzards. Record snowfalls were recorded worldwide.
...}
Volcanic winter - Wikipedia
Say that's true....Where is any physically testable, quantifiable, and falsifiable evidence, that the activities of industrialized humans have anything at all to do with it.
Scientific Consensus: Earth's Climate Is WarmingView attachment 511064
[Scientific Consensus: Earth's Climate is Warming]
The residue of anti-scientific ideologues cite Trump's rectal thermometer.
Oh My GAIA, it's gone up a degree in only 140 years...
Fucking anti-science Nazi loon....
Sure only 1 degree in 40 years does not seem like much, but consider the mass of the earth, oceans, and atmosphere.
That is huge, so that is a massive amount of retained energy, and it is not only already having deadly effects, such as desertification, floods, storms, heat waves, etc., but is a rapidly accelerating curve that is an indicator of far more harmful problems in the future. For example, they estimate that an increase of 9 degrees more would end all life on the planet
schmidlap
Platinum Member
- Oct 30, 2020
- 10,010
- 6,571
- 938
- Thread starter
- #88
Because "they", the consensus of climatologists and international climatological authorities, out of pure cussedness, in conspiring to pretend that spewing greenhouse gases into the atmosphere has a predictable impact on the atmosphere, keep refining their data.
Why do they keep adjusting the "measured" temperatures?
Of course, Trump has told us that it is all a Chinese hoax.
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,125
- 47,278
- 2,180
That's all bullshit. Deserts are not expanding. They are contracting. Storms are decreasing. The same for floods, storms, heat waves, etc.
Scientific Consensus: Earth's Climate Is WarmingView attachment 511064
[Scientific Consensus: Earth's Climate is Warming]
The residue of anti-scientific ideologues cite Trump's rectal thermometer.
Oh My GAIA, it's gone up a degree in only 140 years...
Fucking anti-science Nazi loon....
Sure only 1 degree in 40 years does not seem like much, but consider the mass of the earth, oceans, and atmosphere.
That is huge, so that is a massive amount of retained energy, and it is not only already having deadly effects, such as desertification, floods, storms, heat waves, etc., but is a rapidly accelerating curve that is an indicator of far more harmful problems in the future. For example, they estimate that an increase of 9 degrees more would end all life on the planet
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,125
- 47,278
- 2,180
"Consensus" is not science. It's politics. The so-called "scientists" are doing it out of self interest.Because "they", the consensus of climatologists and international climatological authorities, out of pure cussedness, in conspiring to pretend that spewing greenhouse gases into the atmosphere has a predictable impact on the atmosphere, keep refining their data.
Why do they keep adjusting the "measured" temperatures?
Of course, Trump has told us that it is all a Chinese hoax.
Last edited:
"Consensus" isn't science, sock puppet bot blockhead.Because "they", the consensus of climatologists and international climatological authorities, out of pure cussedness, in conspiring to pretend that spewing greenhouse gases into the atmosphere has a predictable impact on the atmosphere, keep refining their data.
Why do they keep adjusting the "measured" temperatures?
Of course, Trump has told us that it is all a Chinese hoax.
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,060
- 52,342
- 2,290
The planet accommodates life, but is indifferent when life is self-destructive.There is nothing humans can do to harm the planet
The planet is one tough son of a bitch piece of rock
We can reduce our chances of surviving on this planet though
when the man made global warming high priests stop buying multi million dollar mansions on ocean beachfront property we will begin to take their snake oil scam seriously.
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,060
- 52,342
- 2,290
You mean your predictions that are 100% wrong every time? There is climate change it got into the 70's last night and will get in the mid eighties today.More accurate than predictions from Conservatives saying there is no climate changeWell you know it was predicted that we were going to run out of food by the year 2000. I don't know about you, but I'm still eating. Oh and, all of Gore's predictions have been crap also. You be a good little pawn though.The resolution of the ideologues vs the climatologists squabble over who had a better grasp of climate was always silly.
"I don’t know about you guys, but I think climate change is...
'BULLSHIT!’ [Sen. Ron Johnson mouths to Republican luncheon that climate change is ‘bullsh—’]
...‘By the way, it is!"
Knowledge respects reality. Ignorance must have reality forced upon it. When ignorance is sustained by ideological dogma, it's a bitch to overcome, particularly in especially resistant cases.
The predictions are being validated. The theoretical is becoming blatant. The forecasts are being realized. Denial is becoming an increasingly costly ideological self-indulgence - agricultural failures, wildfires, flooding, soaring energy costs, droughts, mass starvation, relentless human migrations, etc., etc., etc.
By midcentury, if greenhouse gas emissions are not significantly curtailed, the coldest and warmest daily temperatures are expected to increase by at least 5 degrees F in most areas by mid-century rising to 10 degrees F by late century. The National Climate Assessment estimates 20-30 more days over 90 degrees F in most areas by mid-century. A recent study projects that the annual number of days with a heat index above 100 degrees F will double, and days with a heat index above 105 degrees F will triple, nationwide, when compared to the end of the 20th century.Extreme heat can increase the risk of other types of disasters. Heat can exacerbate drought, and hot dry conditions can in turn create wildfire conditions. In cities, buildings roads and infrastructure can be heated to 50 to 90 degrees hotter than the air while natural surfaces remain closer to air temperatures. The heat island effect is most intense during the day, but the slow release of heat from the infrastructure overnight (or an atmospheric heat island) can keep cities much hotter than surrounding areas. Rising temperatures across the country poses a threat to people, ecosystems and the economy...An early summer heatwave across the western United States broke all-time records in multiple states, with temperatures above 100 degrees Fahrenheit for days on end in some places. This event marked yet another climate extreme for residents of a region already suffering through a devastating drought and with memories of last year’s horrific wildfire season likely still fresh on people’s minds.Truth not only endures. It has an irresistible way of imposing itself upon even the most willfully obtuse:
Expect Americans to demand their elected representatives confront reality.
Some may be a bit slow, but eventually, everybody will get it, one way or another.
There is no doubt that climate change is having an impact. Liberal predictions may not be happening as soon as predicted but they are still happening.
How are Conservative claims that THERE IS NO CLIMATE CHANGE working out?
what predictions? There havent been any predictions coming true especially when you watch the snow come down at their global warming summits
schmidlap
Platinum Member
- Oct 30, 2020
- 10,010
- 6,571
- 938
- Thread starter
- #94
So what's the evidence?
Your ideological dogma appears to be impervious to science, but if you are really trying to grasp reality, I'll provide it with little hope that you are capable of accepting it.
The research falls into nine independently studied, but physically related, lines of evidence:
- Simple chemistry – When we burn carbon-based materials, carbon dioxide (CO2) is emitted (research beginning in the 1900s).
- Basic accounting of what we burn, and therefore how much CO2 we emit (data collection beginning in the 1970s).
- Measuring CO2 and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere and trapped in ice to find they are increasing, with levels higher than anything we've seen in nearly a million years (measurements beginning in the 1950s).
- Chemical analysis of the atmospheric CO2 that reveals the increase is coming from burning fossil fuels (research beginning in the 1950s).
- Basic physics that shows us that CO2 absorbs heat (research beginning in the 1820s).
- Monitoring climate conditions to find that the air, sea and land is warming, as we would expect with rising greenhouse gas emissions; as a response, ice is melting and sea level is rising (research beginning in the 1930s).
- Ruling out natural factors that can influence climate like the sun and ocean cycles (research beginning in the 1830s).
- Employing computer models to run experiments of natural versus human-influenced simulations of Earth (research beginning in the 1960s).
- Consensus among scientists who consider all previous lines of evidence and make their own conclusions (polling beginning in the 1990s).
9 ways we know humans caused climate change
Scientists have amassed an overwhelming amount of evidence that humans are the main cause of climate change. Here are 9 ways the evidence stacks up.
www.edf.org
If you prefer a failed casino operator's evidence-free claim that it is all a Chinese hoax, there is nothing that could convince you of the truth, of course.You can vehemently reject all the scientific authorities that differ with your failed casino operator. Here are a few of the Trump apostates as compiled by NASA:
AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC SOCIETIES
Statement on Climate Change from 18 Scientific Associations
"Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver."
American Association for the Advancement of Science
"Based on well-established evidence, about 97% of climate scientists have concluded that human-caused climate change is happening."
American Chemical Society
"The Earth’s climate is changing in response to increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and particulate matter in the atmosphere, largely as the result of human activities."
American Geophysical Union
"Based on extensive scientific evidence, it is extremely likely that human activities, especially emissions of greenhouse gases, are the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century. There is no alterative explanation supported by convincing evidence."
American Medical Association
"Our AMA ... supports the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s fourth assessment report and concurs with the scientific consensus that the Earth is undergoing adverse global climate change and that anthropogenic contributions are significant." (2019)6
American Meteorological Society
"Research has found a human influence on the climate of the past several decades ... The IPCC (2013), USGCRP (2017), and USGCRP (2018) indicate that it is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-twentieth century." (2019)7
American Physical Society
"Earth's changing climate is a critical issue and poses the risk of significant environmental, social and economic disruptions around the globe. While natural sources of climate variability are significant, multiple lines of evidence indicate that human influences have had an increasingly dominant effect on global climate warming observed since the mid-twentieth century." (2015)8
The Geological Society of America
"The Geological Society of America (GSA) concurs with assessments by the National Academies of Science (2005), the National Research Council (2011), the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2013) and the U.S. Global Change Research Program (Melillo et al., 2014) that global climate has warmed in response to increasing concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases ... Human activities (mainly greenhouse-gas emissions) are the dominant cause of the rapid warming since the middle 1900s (IPCC, 2013)." (2015)9
SCIENCE ACADEMIES
International Academies: Joint Statement
"Climate change is real. There will always be uncertainty in understanding a system as complex as the world’s climate. However there is now strong evidence that significant global warming is occurring. The evidence comes from direct measurements of rising surface air temperatures and subsurface ocean temperatures and from phenomena such as increases in average global sea levels, retreating glaciers, and changes to many physical and biological systems. It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities (IPCC 2001)." (2005, 11 international science academies)10
U.S. National Academy of Sciences
"Scientists have known for some time, from multiple lines of evidence, that humans are changing Earth’s climate, primarily through greenhouse gas emissions."11
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
U.S. Global Change Research Program
"Earth’s climate is now changing faster than at any point in the history of modern civilization, primarily as a result of human activities." (2018, 13 U.S. government departments and agencies)12
INTERGOVERNMENTAL BODIES
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
“Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, and since the 1950s, many of the observed changes are unprecedented over decades to millennia. The atmosphere and ocean have warmed, the amounts of snow and ice have diminished, and sea level has risen.”13
“Human influence on the climate system is clear, and recent anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases are the highest in history. Recent climate changes have had widespread impacts on human and natural systems.”14
OTHER RESOURCES
List of Worldwide Scientific Organizations
The following page lists the nearly 200 worldwide scientific organizations that hold the position that climate change has been caused by human action.List of Worldwide Scientific Organizations - Office of Planning and Research
U.S. Agencies
The following page contains information on what federal agencies are doing to adapt to climate change.https://www.c2es.org/site/assets/up...daptation-what-federal-agencies-are-doing.pdf
Scientific Consensus - NASA Science
It’s important to remember that scientists always focus on the evidence, not on opinions. Scientific evidence continues to show that human activities (primarily the human burning of fossil fuels) have warmed Earth’s surface and its ocean basins, which in turn have continued to impact Earth’s...
climate.nasa.gov
So I'll score that a big "NO"....You have no physically testable, repeatable, quantifiable, and falsifiable evidence.
So what's the evidence?
Your ideological dogma appears to be impervious to science, but if you are really trying to grasp reality, I'll provide it with little hope that you are capable of accepting it.
The research falls into nine independently studied, but physically related, lines of evidence:
- Simple chemistry – When we burn carbon-based materials, carbon dioxide (CO2) is emitted (research beginning in the 1900s).
- Basic accounting of what we burn, and therefore how much CO2 we emit (data collection beginning in the 1970s).
- Measuring CO2 and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere and trapped in ice to find they are increasing, with levels higher than anything we've seen in nearly a million years (measurements beginning in the 1950s).
- Chemical analysis of the atmospheric CO2 that reveals the increase is coming from burning fossil fuels (research beginning in the 1950s).
- Basic physics that shows us that CO2 absorbs heat (research beginning in the 1820s).
- Monitoring climate conditions to find that the air, sea and land is warming, as we would expect with rising greenhouse gas emissions; as a response, ice is melting and sea level is rising (research beginning in the 1930s).
- Ruling out natural factors that can influence climate like the sun and ocean cycles (research beginning in the 1830s).
- Employing computer models to run experiments of natural versus human-influenced simulations of Earth (research beginning in the 1960s).
- Consensus among scientists who consider all previous lines of evidence and make their own conclusions (polling beginning in the 1990s).
9 ways we know humans caused climate change
Scientists have amassed an overwhelming amount of evidence that humans are the main cause of climate change. Here are 9 ways the evidence stacks up.If you prefer a failed casino operator's evidence-free claim that it is all a Chinese hoax, there is nothing that could convince you of the truth, of course.
You can vehemently reject all the scientific authorities that differ with you failed casino operator. Here are a few of the Trump apostates as compiled by NASA:
AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC SOCIETIES
Statement on Climate Change from 18 Scientific Associations
"Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver."
American Association for the Advancement of Science
"Based on well-established evidence, about 97% of climate scientists have concluded that human-caused climate change is happening."
American Chemical Society
"The Earth’s climate is changing in response to increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and particulate matter in the atmosphere, largely as the result of human activities."
American Geophysical Union
"Based on extensive scientific evidence, it is extremely likely that human activities, especially emissions of greenhouse gases, are the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century. There is no alterative explanation supported by convincing evidence."
American Medical Association
"Our AMA ... supports the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s fourth assessment report and concurs with the scientific consensus that the Earth is undergoing adverse global climate change and that anthropogenic contributions are significant." (2019)6
American Meteorological Society
"Research has found a human influence on the climate of the past several decades ... The IPCC (2013), USGCRP (2017), and USGCRP (2018) indicate that it is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-twentieth century." (2019)7
American Physical Society
"Earth's changing climate is a critical issue and poses the risk of significant environmental, social and economic disruptions around the globe. While natural sources of climate variability are significant, multiple lines of evidence indicate that human influences have had an increasingly dominant effect on global climate warming observed since the mid-twentieth century." (2015)8
The Geological Society of America
"The Geological Society of America (GSA) concurs with assessments by the National Academies of Science (2005), the National Research Council (2011), the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2013) and the U.S. Global Change Research Program (Melillo et al., 2014) that global climate has warmed in response to increasing concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases ... Human activities (mainly greenhouse-gas emissions) are the dominant cause of the rapid warming since the middle 1900s (IPCC, 2013)." (2015)9SCIENCE ACADEMIES
International Academies: Joint Statement
"Climate change is real. There will always be uncertainty in understanding a system as complex as the world’s climate. However there is now strong evidence that significant global warming is occurring. The evidence comes from direct measurements of rising surface air temperatures and subsurface ocean temperatures and from phenomena such as increases in average global sea levels, retreating glaciers, and changes to many physical and biological systems. It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities (IPCC 2001)." (2005, 11 international science academies)10
U.S. National Academy of Sciences
"Scientists have known for some time, from multiple lines of evidence, that humans are changing Earth’s climate, primarily through greenhouse gas emissions."11U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
U.S. Global Change Research Program
"Earth’s climate is now changing faster than at any point in the history of modern civilization, primarily as a result of human activities." (2018, 13 U.S. government departments and agencies)12INTERGOVERNMENTAL BODIES
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
“Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, and since the 1950s, many of the observed changes are unprecedented over decades to millennia. The atmosphere and ocean have warmed, the amounts of snow and ice have diminished, and sea level has risen.”13
“Human influence on the climate system is clear, and recent anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases are the highest in history. Recent climate changes have had widespread impacts on human and natural systems.”14OTHER RESOURCES
List of Worldwide Scientific Organizations
The following page lists the nearly 200 worldwide scientific organizations that hold the position that climate change has been caused by human action.
List of Worldwide Scientific Organizations - Office of Planning and Research
U.S. Agencies
The following page contains information on what federal agencies are doing to adapt to climate change.
https://www.c2es.org/site/assets/up...daptation-what-federal-agencies-are-doing.pdf
Scientific Consensus - NASA Science
It’s important to remember that scientists always focus on the evidence, not on opinions. Scientific evidence continues to show that human activities (primarily the human burning of fossil fuels) have warmed Earth’s surface and its ocean basins, which in turn have continued to impact Earth’s...
In fact, none of the predictions of the warmer scaremongers has ever proven to be correct...As in NONE.
BTW, volume of appeal-to-authority political gobbledygook ≠ substance.
Last edited:
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,125
- 47,278
- 2,180
That's just one great big appeal to authority, a logical fallacy.
So what's the evidence?
Your ideological dogma appears to be impervious to science, but if you are really trying to grasp reality, I'll provide it with little hope that you are capable of accepting it.
The research falls into nine independently studied, but physically related, lines of evidence:
- Simple chemistry – When we burn carbon-based materials, carbon dioxide (CO2) is emitted (research beginning in the 1900s).
- Basic accounting of what we burn, and therefore how much CO2 we emit (data collection beginning in the 1970s).
- Measuring CO2 and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere and trapped in ice to find they are increasing, with levels higher than anything we've seen in nearly a million years (measurements beginning in the 1950s).
- Chemical analysis of the atmospheric CO2 that reveals the increase is coming from burning fossil fuels (research beginning in the 1950s).
- Basic physics that shows us that CO2 absorbs heat (research beginning in the 1820s).
- Monitoring climate conditions to find that the air, sea and land is warming, as we would expect with rising greenhouse gas emissions; as a response, ice is melting and sea level is rising (research beginning in the 1930s).
- Ruling out natural factors that can influence climate like the sun and ocean cycles (research beginning in the 1830s).
- Employing computer models to run experiments of natural versus human-influenced simulations of Earth (research beginning in the 1960s).
- Consensus among scientists who consider all previous lines of evidence and make their own conclusions (polling beginning in the 1990s).
9 ways we know humans caused climate change
Scientists have amassed an overwhelming amount of evidence that humans are the main cause of climate change. Here are 9 ways the evidence stacks up.If you prefer a failed casino operator's evidence-free claim that it is all a Chinese hoax, there is nothing that could convince you of the truth, of course.
You can vehemently reject all the scientific authorities that differ with your failed casino operator. Here are a few of the Trump apostates as compiled by NASA:
AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC SOCIETIES
Statement on Climate Change from 18 Scientific Associations
"Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver."
American Association for the Advancement of Science
"Based on well-established evidence, about 97% of climate scientists have concluded that human-caused climate change is happening."
American Chemical Society
"The Earth’s climate is changing in response to increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and particulate matter in the atmosphere, largely as the result of human activities."
American Geophysical Union
"Based on extensive scientific evidence, it is extremely likely that human activities, especially emissions of greenhouse gases, are the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century. There is no alterative explanation supported by convincing evidence."
American Medical Association
"Our AMA ... supports the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s fourth assessment report and concurs with the scientific consensus that the Earth is undergoing adverse global climate change and that anthropogenic contributions are significant." (2019)6
American Meteorological Society
"Research has found a human influence on the climate of the past several decades ... The IPCC (2013), USGCRP (2017), and USGCRP (2018) indicate that it is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-twentieth century." (2019)7
American Physical Society
"Earth's changing climate is a critical issue and poses the risk of significant environmental, social and economic disruptions around the globe. While natural sources of climate variability are significant, multiple lines of evidence indicate that human influences have had an increasingly dominant effect on global climate warming observed since the mid-twentieth century." (2015)8
The Geological Society of America
"The Geological Society of America (GSA) concurs with assessments by the National Academies of Science (2005), the National Research Council (2011), the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2013) and the U.S. Global Change Research Program (Melillo et al., 2014) that global climate has warmed in response to increasing concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases ... Human activities (mainly greenhouse-gas emissions) are the dominant cause of the rapid warming since the middle 1900s (IPCC, 2013)." (2015)9SCIENCE ACADEMIES
International Academies: Joint Statement
"Climate change is real. There will always be uncertainty in understanding a system as complex as the world’s climate. However there is now strong evidence that significant global warming is occurring. The evidence comes from direct measurements of rising surface air temperatures and subsurface ocean temperatures and from phenomena such as increases in average global sea levels, retreating glaciers, and changes to many physical and biological systems. It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities (IPCC 2001)." (2005, 11 international science academies)10
U.S. National Academy of Sciences
"Scientists have known for some time, from multiple lines of evidence, that humans are changing Earth’s climate, primarily through greenhouse gas emissions."11U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
U.S. Global Change Research Program
"Earth’s climate is now changing faster than at any point in the history of modern civilization, primarily as a result of human activities." (2018, 13 U.S. government departments and agencies)12INTERGOVERNMENTAL BODIES
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
“Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, and since the 1950s, many of the observed changes are unprecedented over decades to millennia. The atmosphere and ocean have warmed, the amounts of snow and ice have diminished, and sea level has risen.”13
“Human influence on the climate system is clear, and recent anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases are the highest in history. Recent climate changes have had widespread impacts on human and natural systems.”14OTHER RESOURCES
List of Worldwide Scientific Organizations
The following page lists the nearly 200 worldwide scientific organizations that hold the position that climate change has been caused by human action.
List of Worldwide Scientific Organizations - Office of Planning and Research
U.S. Agencies
The following page contains information on what federal agencies are doing to adapt to climate change.
https://www.c2es.org/site/assets/up...daptation-what-federal-agencies-are-doing.pdf
Scientific Consensus - NASA Science
It’s important to remember that scientists always focus on the evidence, not on opinions. Scientific evidence continues to show that human activities (primarily the human burning of fossil fuels) have warmed Earth’s surface and its ocean basins, which in turn have continued to impact Earth’s...
- Sep 19, 2020
- 7,237
- 8,367
- 2,138
>Sure only 1 degree in 40 years does not seem like much
Scientific Consensus: Earth's Climate Is WarmingView attachment 511064
[Scientific Consensus: Earth's Climate is Warming]
The residue of anti-scientific ideologues cite Trump's rectal thermometer.
Oh My GAIA, it's gone up a degree in only 140 years...
Fucking anti-science Nazi loon....
Sure only 1 degree in 40 years does not seem like much, but consider the mass of the earth, oceans, and atmosphere.
That is huge, so that is a massive amount of retained energy, and it is not only already having deadly effects, such as desertification, floods, storms, heat waves, etc., but is a rapidly accelerating curve that is an indicator of far more harmful problems in the future. For example, they estimate that an increase of 9 degrees more would end all life on the planet
It's not much.
schmidlap
Platinum Member
- Oct 30, 2020
- 10,010
- 6,571
- 938
- Thread starter
- #99
Most folks, hardcore ideologues excepted, seem to get it.>Sure only 1 degree in 40 years does not seem like much
It's not much.
Exclusive poll: America catches up with climate science
By the numbers:
The poll found that 84% of Democrats and 77% of independents were aware that climate scientists overwhelmingly agree that climate change is caused by human activities, and that the world is off track to meet the Paris targets.
Republicans had the lowest share of correct answers, but a slight majority — 52% — were aware of both the scientific consensus and the reality that the world hasn't made enough progress toward the Paris targets.
The poll also found significant differences by education, with 80% of people with college degrees or higher answering the question correctly, compared to 73% of people with some college and 65% of those with a high school degree or less.
America catches up with climate science, poll says
A new Ipsos poll found that seven out of 10 Americans are aware of the scientific consensus.
www.axios.com
Polls aren't science either, dullard.Most folks, hardcore ideologues excepted, seem to get it.>Sure only 1 degree in 40 years does not seem like much
It's not much.
Exclusive poll: America catches up with climate science
By the numbers: The poll found that 84% of Democrats and 77% of independents were aware that climate scientists overwhelmingly agree that climate change is caused by human activities, and that the world is off track to meet the Paris targets.Republicans had the lowest share of correct answers, but a slight majority — 52% — were aware of both the scientific consensus and the reality that the world hasn't made enough progress toward the Paris targets.
The poll also found significant differences by education, with 80% of people with college degrees or higher answering the question correctly, compared to 73% of people with some college and 65% of those with a high school degree or less.
America catches up with climate science, poll says
A new Ipsos poll found that seven out of 10 Americans are aware of the scientific consensus.
But since you brought them up, guess which issue lands dead last, or very near it, in the list of things and issues that most people believe that gubmint should be tending to?...That's right, Goebbels warming.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 14
- Views
- 216
- Replies
- 79
- Views
- 816
- Replies
- 115
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 29
- Views
- 890
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 113
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 24
- Views
- 132
- Replies
- 51
- Views
- 394
- Replies
- 110
- Views
- 419
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8291
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 476
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-