Why? I believe the Bible, but why on earth are we wasting so much time citing archaelogy as though that somehow proves everything the Bible true? How on earth can archaelogy prove the reality of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ? Yet, always I hear "Archaelogy proves the Bible". No it doesn't. Is it any wonder athiests don't take you seriously when you try to claim that? The best argument for the resurrection is the witness of the Apostles who saw Christ and the Holy Spirit. It's our own personal witnesses. Why waste our time trying to prove the Spiritual with physical evidence? It's a misdirection. That's all it is. The adversary is trying to distract you into arguing useless information so that you neglect what's really important. I wanted to rant, thanks for listening.