Appealing to R-W'ers' "Objectivity"...

[TemplarKormac]

1. If we had been attacked by terrorists during Obama's tenure, would you be bashing him?

We were, in Boston, in Fort Hood, and in Benghazi.

2. If the stock market was in the gutter, would you be bashing him?

Yes. The same way you were bashing Bush for putting it there. Whoops.

3. If gas prices were over $4.50 per gallon, would you be bashing him?

Again, yes. He can introduce legislation just like anyone else in Congress can, and he can just as easily introduce a bill to help mitigate the high gas prices. It would be a great use for his pen and phone.

4. If unemployment were at about 10-11%, would you be bashing him?

Uh, yeah? You didn't mind going after Bush because of it. As in the previous answer, Obama can easily introduce legislation that would do something to lower the unemployment rate.

5. If U.S. soldiers' body bags from Iraq had kept coming in at Dover AFB, would you be bashing him?

Nope. Those soldiers knew what they were getting into. You don't understand anything about the sacrifices they made for their country.

NOW, bear in mind that ALL of the above was happening under Cheney's (and, oh, yes, with his sidekick, Bush) administration.

Oh, another one of these "Bush is evil" threads.

 

[Papageorgio]

You obviously confuse objectivity with self-delusional circular argument, namely that any criticism of Obama or his administration is based solely on racial prejudice. Your tiresome reference to Cheney merely underscores your own lack of objectivity.

...and you, obviously, don't have an ounce of objectivity...First in denying that Cheney ran the Bush administration, and, second, that your life has gone to the dogs since Obama was sworn in....

You absolutely cannot by any stretch of anyone's imagination be objective, you are a partisan nutter.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Unlike how President Obama was treated during and after the Benghazi assault and the Arab riots of 2012.

Ahh, yes. Obama is always the victim. What you don't realize is that Bush didn't blame 9-11 on a video. He blamed it on terrorists.

What you don't realize is that all of the countries that were hosts to these riots were praised as success stories, but are now in turmoil and under threat from ISIS.

 

[Stephanie]

Its no secret that right wingers.....especially on here.....have nothing but contempt for the Obama administration. Nonetheless, here's a small test to R-W'ers' objectivity:

1. If we had been attacked by terrorists during Obama's tenure, would you be bashing him?

2. If the stock market was in the gutter, would you be bashing him?

3. If gas prices were over $4.50 per gallon, would you be bashing him?

4. If unemployment were at about 10-11%, would you be bashing him?

5. If U.S. soldiers' body bags from Iraq had kept coming in at Dover AFB, would you be bashing him?

NOW, bear in mind that ALL of the above was happening under Cheney's (and, oh, yes, with his sidekick, Bush) administration.

1. No, he would have little control of course that didn't stop leftwingers.

2. Be irritated but not to bash him, not like the left wingers bashed Bush.

3. No, he has no control over gas prices. For the record the left bashed Bush and they were not at $4.50.

4. Probably, but not as much as the left bashed Bush.

5. Yes, just as the left and I bashed Bush.


Kind of blows the left wingers objectivity out the window, thanks for pointing it out.

Most of them live in some twilight zone bubble or world or something. dear goodness
like little Obot cult members

 

[The Rabbi]

Its no secret that right wingers.....especially on here.....have nothing but contempt for the Obama administration. Nonetheless, here's a small test to R-W'ers' objectivity:

1. If we had been attacked by terrorists during Obama's tenure, would you be bashing him?

2. If the stock market was in the gutter, would you be bashing him?

3. If gas prices were over $4.50 per gallon, would you be bashing him?

4. If unemployment were at about 10-11%, would you be bashing him?

5. If U.S. soldiers' body bags from Iraq had kept coming in at Dover AFB, would you be bashing him?

NOW, bear in mind that ALL of the above was happening under Cheney's (and, oh, yes, with his sidekick, Bush) administration.

1. We have been attacked by terrorists. But anyway the circumstances are different. If we had a major terrorist attack tomorrow of course it's Obama's fault. He's had 6 years in office.
2. The economy sucks and it is the result of 6 years of Obama being in office.
3. The fact that gas prices are low is despite Obama, not because of him. There hasnt been a less friendly president to carbon based fuel ever.
4. Unemployment by any true measure is about 10%. And yes it si the result of 6 years of Obama's policies.
5. I have no idea what this even means.

But we see the problem. Dems/libs take one factoid and think it explains everything. They cannot conceive that events and decisions are the results of complex factors.

 

[nat4900]

Kind of blows the left wingers objectivity out the window, thanks for pointing it out.

Keep thinking that and have dreams of Ted Cruz sitting in the oval office.

 

[TemplarKormac]

1. If we had been attacked by terrorists during Obama's tenure, would you be bashing him?

I would stand behind him in the effort to kill or capture those responsible. If he were to use that tragedy to invade and occupy a nation that did not attack us on that day I would oppose it. Just like I did with President Bush.

Blah, blah, blah...you've spent six years on your knees in front of Obungles

Pseudo-con objectivity.

Childish...but you're a left loon so expected. You don't really think you impress anyone with that garbage do you?

Most of the country stood behind President Bush after 9-11. Didn't you? Wouldn't you have stood behind President Obama under similar circumstances?

No. Because there were never "similar circumstances" under Obama. In both instances (Ft. Hood, Boston) where America was attacked by radical jihadis, he either called it "work place violence" or refused to refer to the culprits as Muslim.

 

[Billy000]

Its no secret that right wingers.....especially on here.....have nothing but contempt for the Obama administration. Nonetheless, here's a small test to R-W'ers' objectivity:

1. If we had been attacked by terrorists during Obama's tenure, would you be bashing him?

2. If the stock market was in the gutter, would you be bashing him?

3. If gas prices were over $4.50 per gallon, would you be bashing him?

4. If unemployment were at about 10-11%, would you be bashing him?

5. If U.S. soldiers' body bags from Iraq had kept coming in at Dover AFB, would you be bashing him?

NOW, bear in mind that ALL of the above was happening under Cheney's (and, oh, yes, with his sidekick, Bush) administration.

1. No, he would have little control of course that didn't stop leftwingers.

2. Be irritated but not to bash him, not like the left wingers bashed Bush.

3. No, he has no control over gas prices. For the record the left bashed Bush and they were not at $4.50.

4. Probably, but not as much as the left bashed Bush.

5. Yes, just as the left and I bashed Bush.


Kind of blows the left wingers objectivity out the window, thanks for pointing it out.

Lol "out the window"? Four of your numbered responses are all pretty much the same answer.

 

[BlindBoo]

Unlike how President Obama was treated during and after the Benghazi assault and the Arab riots of 2012.

Ahh, yes. Obama is always the victim. What you don't realize is that Bush didn't blame 9-11 on a video. He blamed it on terrorists.

What you don't realize is that all of the countries that were hosts to these riots were praised as success stories, but are now in turmoil and under threat from ISIS.

Hindsight is 20/20. For example we now know that President Bush was doing his best to blame it on Iraq from day 1. But that doesn't change the objective view that I, like most Americans stood behind the president on that day in the objective to .......

 

[The Rabbi]

Unlike how President Obama was treated during and after the Benghazi assault and the Arab riots of 2012.

Ahh, yes. Obama is always the victim. What you don't realize is that Bush didn't blame 9-11 on a video. He blamed it on terrorists.

What you don't realize is that all of the countries that were hosts to these riots were praised as success stories, but are now in turmoil and under threat from ISIS.

Hindsight is 20/20. For example we now know that President Bush was doing his best to blame it on Iraq from day 1. But that doesn't change the objective view that I, like most Americans stood behind the president on that day in the objective to .......

We know no such thing. Bush never blamed 9/11 on Iraq. Only idiots think that.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Unlike how President Obama was treated during and after the Benghazi assault and the Arab riots of 2012.

Ahh, yes. Obama is always the victim. What you don't realize is that Bush didn't blame 9-11 on a video. He blamed it on terrorists.

What you don't realize is that all of the countries that were hosts to these riots were praised as success stories, but are now in turmoil and under threat from ISIS.

Hindsight is 20/20. For example we now know that President Bush was doing his best to blame it on Iraq from day 1. But that doesn't change the objective view that I, like most Americans stood behind the president on that day in the objective to .......

We know no such thing. Bush never blamed 9/11 on Iraq. Only idiots think that.

You'll have to excuse the ones with Booooosh Syndrome, all they know is what their masters have instructed them to spew

 

[TemplarKormac]

Unlike how President Obama was treated during and after the Benghazi assault and the Arab riots of 2012.

Ahh, yes. Obama is always the victim. What you don't realize is that Bush didn't blame 9-11 on a video. He blamed it on terrorists.

What you don't realize is that all of the countries that were hosts to these riots were praised as success stories, but are now in turmoil and under threat from ISIS.

Hindsight is 20/20. For example we now know that President Bush was doing his best to blame it on Iraq from day 1. But that doesn't change the objective view that I, like most Americans stood behind the president on that day in the objective to .......

Don't. Just don't. Bush never blamed Iraq for 9-11.

Bush No Iraq link to 9 11 found - seattlepi.com

 

[Katzndogz]

wow, what frikken reality or twilight zone are YOU living in?

You bow to Obama, the MAJORITY of the people not just RWers can't stand him

look at his APPROVALS

OK, lets look at his approvals (sic)

Obama Approval Soars President Is Now More Popular Than Bush and Equal To Reagan
Obama Approval Soars: President Is Now More Popular Than Bush and Equal To Reagan

You are seriously citing a link that calls itself real liberal politics?

 

[Papageorgio]

Kind of blows the left wingers objectivity out the window, thanks for pointing it out.

Keep thinking that and have dreams of Ted Cruz sitting in the oval office.

Who said anything about Cruz? I'm for Hillary, her connections with Wall St. will make for great corporate ventures and opportunities to make big bucks and then get out before it falls, just like Bill. Her and her "stand by her man" attitude will keep the women libbers at bay for 8 years. She is a dream Democrat.

 

[Papageorgio]

Its no secret that right wingers.....especially on here.....have nothing but contempt for the Obama administration. Nonetheless, here's a small test to R-W'ers' objectivity:

1. If we had been attacked by terrorists during Obama's tenure, would you be bashing him?

2. If the stock market was in the gutter, would you be bashing him?

3. If gas prices were over $4.50 per gallon, would you be bashing him?

4. If unemployment were at about 10-11%, would you be bashing him?

5. If U.S. soldiers' body bags from Iraq had kept coming in at Dover AFB, would you be bashing him?

NOW, bear in mind that ALL of the above was happening under Cheney's (and, oh, yes, with his sidekick, Bush) administration.

1. No, he would have little control of course that didn't stop leftwingers.

2. Be irritated but not to bash him, not like the left wingers bashed Bush.

3. No, he has no control over gas prices. For the record the left bashed Bush and they were not at $4.50.

4. Probably, but not as much as the left bashed Bush.

5. Yes, just as the left and I bashed Bush.


Kind of blows the left wingers objectivity out the window, thanks for pointing it out.

Lol "out the window"? Four of your numbered responses are all pretty much the same answer.

The questions were all pretty much the same, bright boy.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

'Appealing to R-W'ers' "Objectivity".'..

One cannot appeal to something that doesn't exist.

 

[Papageorgio]

'Appealing to R-W'ers' "Objectivity".'..

One cannot appeal to something that doesn't exist.

Yeah because we all know the left wingers have no objectivity.

That is what is stupid about this thread, both sides are not objective.

 

[Billy000]

'Appealing to R-W'ers' "Objectivity".'..

One cannot appeal to something that doesn't exist.

Yeah because we all know the left wingers have no objectivity.

That is what is stupid about this thread, both sides are not objective.

You know what is objective? Facts. Not just facts, but facts with context. Putting social issues aside, the leftwing ideology is driven by factual information. The rightwing is almost purely emotional and philosophical.

 

[nat4900]

Out of all the right wing responses not a one "dared" to state, "yeah, during the 8 years of Bush, with $3 Trillion unpaid, wars, tax-cuts on a credit card, 4000 caskets of our soldiers, 200,000 Iraqis killed, OBL doesn't matter anymore, sure we've embolden Iran, sorry, but we did lose 100,000 jobs per month, and yeah, Medicare Part D is unpaid for, etc....." that Bush royally screwed the country's treasure, reputation and future for the next half century.....NOT A ONE.....

 

[nat4900]

That is what is stupid about this thread, both sides are not objective.

Doesn't that fence hurt your ass?

On another thread I posted why I don't like Hillary and wished that other dems. would step up...When was the last time you heard from your ilk that some repub. is an idiot who should have never been elected?