AOC wants to ban bump stocks

[Daryl Hunt]

New pistol being marketed for the far left gun experts.
View attachment 251702

I'd say to arm all extreme RWNutjobs with one but they would still miss and hit all the bystanders.

 

[flacaltenn]

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Twitter

How many of you liberals are with her on this???


Go AOC go AOC go go go AOC!!!

Someone who cares ought to clue her in that this is ALREADY a done deal.. Not even the NRA really opposes this..

Yeah -- she's that stupid...

AND -- someone should also into her left ear that it was an OBAMA era ruling that ALLOWED THEM...

And I guarandamntee you'll hear echoes from her RIGHT ear.....

 

[blackhawk]

New pistol being marketed for the far left gun experts.
View attachment 251702

I'd say to arm all extreme RWNutjobs with one but they would still miss and hit all the bystanders.

At least the right doesn't call for a ban on something that has already been banned.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

She's an idiot.

Actually you are (a "stupid moron"***)
She is not yet 30, her life experience at 10 was Columbine, and since then these are the numbers of mass shootings since then:
List of Mass Shootings Since Columbine Massacre
***quote from post #4

Reality:
1982-2018, about 4 kids die each year in school shootings; less than 2 of these are killed with 'assault weapons'
Kids are two orders of magnitude more likely to die on a school bus than in a school shooting.

No one is talking about school bus accidents...

Look at you, trying to downplay the fact that school shootings are the LEAST likely way for a kid to die.

Why do you need a gun? Why are you so obsessed with guns?

Why do you care, and what business is it of yours ?

 

[Wry Catcher]

No one is talking about school bus accidents, which - unless you have facts to prove otherwise - are accidents and not planned events.

School bus drivers are vetted, licensed and trained, not all gun owners are.

The failure of the general US population to be armed and trained so that mercenaries like paid police and military take over instead, cost the lives of millions of Vietnamese, about a million innocent Mideasterners, and destroyed the lives of millions of Blacks in the US.here
Without a mercenary military, with its for profit Military Industrial Complex, none of these fake and illegal wars would have happened. If not for gun control causing us to need police, there would be no War on Drugs, no illegal murders of unarmed Blacks, etc.

Clearly the only possible goal of any gun control is to create even more of a fascist police state.
The idea of trying to make society safer by making it harder for honest people to get weapons, is insane, anti-democratic, and clearly illegal. There is no authorization in the Constitution for any federal weapons laws at all. Not a single one.

And there is nothing in there about NOT having them at state level either.

Sure. Some weapons regulations at the state and local level is to be expected, just not federal.

However, under the 14th amendment, if the police are going to have something like ARs, then everyone must be able to.
You can't have a multi tiered society where government employees have something no one else can at all.
That would be an unequal, privileged state that is illegal in a democratic republic.

And the reason the cops went to the LE6920 (AR-15) was because they found they were outgunned. Better for them to outgun than the other way around.

Actually no.
No one is attacking the police to rob them.
England proves that ordinary police are better off unarmed, and they are safer then as well.
Police must never be better armed than the general population, or else you have a police state and no longer have a democratic republic.
It is average citizens who are attacked and need to defend themselves, from criminals, gangs, and dictators.
As well as disasters, invasions, civil wars, riots, etc.
Again, remember the LA riots.

You seem to have contradicted your opinions in the final two paragraphs.

Here is some food for thought:

 

[Wry Catcher]

Actually you are (a "stupid moron"***)
She is not yet 30, her life experience at 10 was Columbine, and since then these are the numbers of mass shootings since then:
List of Mass Shootings Since Columbine Massacre
***quote from post #4

Reality:
1982-2018, about 4 kids die each year in school shootings; less than 2 of these are killed with 'assault weapons'
Kids are two orders of magnitude more likely to die on a school bus than in a school shooting.

No one is talking about school bus accidents...

Look at you, trying to downplay the fact that school shootings are the LEAST likely way for a kid to die.

Why do you need a gun? Why are you so obsessed with guns?

Why do you care, and what business is it of yours ?

Why do you care and what business is it of yours?

Typical of right winger, total hypocrite.

 

[M14 Shooter]

She's an idiot.

Actually you are (a "stupid moron"***)
She is not yet 30, her life experience at 10 was Columbine, and since then these are the numbers of mass shootings since then:
List of Mass Shootings Since Columbine Massacre
***quote from post #4

Reality:
1982-2018, about 4 kids die each year in school shootings; less than 2 of these are killed with 'assault weapons'
Kids are two orders of magnitude more likely to die on a school bus than in a school shooting.

No one is talking about school bus accidents...

Look at you, trying to downplay the fact that school shootings are the LEAST likely way for a kid to die.

Why do you need a gun? Why are you so obsessed with guns?
'And, why did you twice post only a part of my comments on post 171? So you could lie by omission?

What's that?
You -hate- the fact a school shooting is the least likely way for a kid to die?
That's sick, and a clear indicator of a mental disorder.
Under your standards, you should not be allowed to have a gun.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Actually you are (a "stupid moron"***)
She is not yet 30, her life experience at 10 was Columbine, and since then these are the numbers of mass shootings since then:
List of Mass Shootings Since Columbine Massacre
***quote from post #4

Reality:
1982-2018, about 4 kids die each year in school shootings; less than 2 of these are killed with 'assault weapons'
Kids are two orders of magnitude more likely to die on a school bus than in a school shooting.

No one is talking about school bus accidents...

Look at you, trying to downplay the fact that school shootings are the LEAST likely way for a kid to die.

Why do you need a gun? Why are you so obsessed with guns?
'And, why did you twice post only a part of my comments on post 171? So you could lie by omission?

What's that?
You -hate- the fact a school shooting is the least likely way for a kid to die?
That's sick, and a clear indicator of a mental disorder.
Under your standards, you should not be allowed to have a gun.

You need a gun, your Zimmerman Syndrome is apparent. What would a coward like you do if you didn't have a gun when faced with a real man armed with his wits and physical strength? Piss your pants? Run?

 

[Sunsettommy]

Another screaming gun attack thread, that again fails to address what causes mass shooting in the first place. Bump stocks have nothing to do with mass shootings of people, neither does the existence of so called "assault" weapons cause mass shootings.

Guns used to be carried around openly right into the 1960's, not a single mass shooting happened in schools then. Could easily buy a gun without a background check through the mail system for many decades, still no mass shootings occurred.

When will the debate shift from useless gun bans to addressing the real cause of mass shootings?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Reality:
1982-2018, about 4 kids die each year in school shootings; less than 2 of these are killed with 'assault weapons'
Kids are two orders of magnitude more likely to die on a school bus than in a school shooting.

No one is talking about school bus accidents...

Look at you, trying to downplay the fact that school shootings are the LEAST likely way for a kid to die.

Why do you need a gun? Why are you so obsessed with guns?
'And, why did you twice post only a part of my comments on post 171? So you could lie by omission?

What's that?
You -hate- the fact a school shooting is the least likely way for a kid to die?
That's sick, and a clear indicator of a mental disorder.
Under your standards, you should not be allowed to have a gun.

You need a gun, your Zimmerman Syndrome is apparent. What would a coward like you do if you didn't have a gun when faced with a real man armed with his wits and physical strength? Piss your pants? Run?

Oh look - an internet mall ninja.
:yawn:
Let us know when you have something meaningful to add to the conversation.
I shan't wait up.

 

[M14 Shooter]

When will the debate shift from useless gun bans to addressing the real cause of mass shootings?

A mass shooting continues until a good guy with a gun shows up.
Thus, gun-free zones get people killed.
As intended.

 

[M14 Shooter]

STILL waiting for a respnse

Assuming the shooter was committed to the particular shooting he perpetrated - from that room, into that crowd, firing at an area target rather than point target - and was unable to get a bump stock, what alternative(s) did he have?

 

[Wry Catcher]

When will the debate shift from useless gun bans to addressing the real cause of mass shootings?

A mass shooting continues until a good guy with a gun shows up.
Thus, gun-free zones get people killed.
As intended.

Gee, another novel post for the thousand's time, one with no legs but run on hot air.

 

[Wry Catcher]

STILL waiting for a respnse

Assuming the shooter was committed to the particular shooting he perpetrated - from that room, into that crowd, firing at an area target rather than point target - and was unable to get a bump stock, what alternative(s) did he have?

Q. unable to get a bump stock, what alternative(s) did he have

A. Save the time, the carnage and bullets by turning the gun on himself.

 

[iceberg]

don't wanna bump no mo, no big fat bump stock...

 

[M14 Shooter]

When will the debate shift from useless gun bans to addressing the real cause of mass shootings?

A mass shooting continues until a good guy with a gun shows up.
Thus, gun-free zones get people killed.
As intended.

Gee, another novel post for the thousand's time, one with no legs but run on hot air.

Funny how you say that without explaing how it is wrong.

 

[M14 Shooter]

STILL waiting for a respnse
Assuming the shooter was committed to the particular shooting he perpetrated - from that room, into that crowd, firing at an area target rather than point target - and was unable to get a bump stock, what alternative(s) did he have?

Q. unable to get a bump stock, what alternative(s) did he have
A. Save the time, the carnage and bullets by turning the gun on himself.

Oh look - another anti-gun loon that cannot intelligently address the question.

 

[iceberg]

tell her next up she needs to ban breaking the law.

 

[irosie91]

She's an idiot.

She has more twitter followers than Pelosi. She’s the leader of the party

she is entertaining

 

[Papageorgio]

I agree with her.

If only that fat slob Trump would do something!

He won't because he is not governing in the best interest of the nation, only for the 30 percent who SHD.

He signed the bill to ban bumpstocks in December 2018, the ban went into effect in March of 2019. Seems you are wrong, again, even after the fact!