AOC votes not to fund government.

[fncceo]

No matter what ... I'll always have a food supply ..

 

[Billy000]

Lol okay so one of those is something ABC news said and another is from 1922 when there as barely any research done. Luckily some forecasts have turned out to not he true, but that was before the entire world’s scientists have invested decades of research into this. Science isn’t perfect, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t work. It still makes a hell of a lot more sense than just blindly believing the GOP and Fox News that it is all a myth. If they both weren’t sucking fossil fuel industry dick, they wouldn’t bother denying it.

Let me explain something to you: Politicians (particularly on the left) have been trying to gain more and more control over the people. To some degree, they have had great success. The only two things stopping them from total control are energy and healthcare. If they could have total control over those two things, they will have total control over the people.

The point of my posts is that GB is nothing but a scare. Sucking the dicks of fossil fuel industries? Let me ask: where do you think all these scientists get their paychecks from? Where does their funding come from?

Climate models are wrong today and always were wrong. Their accuracy is 0%.

Okay, so just so I get this straight. You think the scientists are purely motivated by financial gain, but the GOP isn’t even though we know the fossil fuel industry has bought them? If the GOP isn’t motivated by financial gain, what is motivating them? It’s not like their dumbasses understand science on any level. If they wanted to, they could be skeptical about any scientific theory. Instead they chose this one where they stand to gain money from by denying.

Not at all. Look where our country was at before the drastic decrease in fuel prices. Believe it or not, fuel runs this country. It makes zero sense to limit fuel or make it so expensive it's a major expenditure. The more disposable income we have, the better for our economy.

For the most part, science gets their money from governments. It only makes sense to do their bidding. And like I said, fuel is also a way to control people, and governments around the world would like nothing more. What do you think was behind the Paris Accord?

Global warming is a theory, not a science. We've spent trillions of dollars because of this theory and there are more unhappy people today than when we started. The people who orchestrate this fear? They are flying around the world in private planes or driving around in gas guzzling SUV's, taking expensive vacations and living in homes that consume the amount of energy of 20 average houses in America.

When I have these discussions, I often think about kids in the future. I envision a classroom in about 100 years from now, and the teacher telling the students at one time, man though they could control the climate, and the children bust out in laughter as we did when our teachers told us man once thought the earth was flat, and if you go to far, you'd fall off.

Yeah, fuel does run our country and it’s a damn shame. It’s what makes it so discouraging that the US won’t do jack shit to re-Invent itself. We already know alternative energy can be very profitable. If we just make that necessary transition, it will work. The odds of doing it are just pretty bleak. I know that doesn’t bother you but it really should.

Your reasoning really doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. You’re saying that the reason why the climate theory is a scam is because governments funding science programs and pay scientists? What does that have to do with climate change exactly? If climate change was all a hoax, what incentive would governments have in pushing for it if it would just be easier for them to accept the status quo and become powerful off of fossil fuels? As you said it runs the world, therefore there wouldn’t be any point in rocking the boat. If it was a hoax, these governments don’t stand to gain anything by passing up a lucrative economic policy like fossil fuels just to transform their economies. It’s also dumb to just be skeptical about it simply becuaw scientists get paid. I mean come on really? Obviously these people have to make a living.

You are talking out of both sides of your mouth. On one hand, you say Republicans are in the pockets of fuel producers because it benefits them, and on the other hand, you say that scientists who get their paychecks from government that wants total control over fuel is not an incentive for them to create bogus theories.

If alternative energy could be profitable, you wouldn't need government. Private markets would have cornered that already. Government subsidizes things that nobody wants like electric cars, windmills and solar panels. Without those subsidies, nobody would want them.

The reason government can't get a piece of fossil fuels is because most of it in our country comes from private land. If government were to regulate it to the point they are the main beneficiaries, it would be too expensive to produce.

See, actually, because big oil became as profitable as they did, they intentionally undermined the growth of ANY form alternative energy. I’m not talking honest competition here. I’m talking about utter sabotage just to remain the #1 energy source. That is how nefarious big oil has become over the years.

The difference with governments paying scientists is that they aren’t trying to control a narrative. Governments don’t pay them to spread climate change as being a hoax. If it really was a hoax, there would be no incentive to pretend it was real. Again, a government does fine on the profit of fossil fuels by themselves if all they cared about was money. It’s really just a matter of these world leaders realizing we can’t continue on this same path if we want human civilization to continue for 100s of years to come.

 

[fncceo]

The difference with governments paying scientists is that they aren’t trying to control a narrative.

I don't know whether to laugh at that joke or cry that you actually think it might be true.

 

[Billy000]

The difference with governments paying scientists is that they aren’t trying to control a narrative.

I don't know whether to laugh at that joke or cry that you actually think it might be true.

This is just something that sounds good. It’s not like you have evidence that proves wrong.

 

[22lcidw]

Let me explain something to you: Politicians (particularly on the left) have been trying to gain more and more control over the people. To some degree, they have had great success. The only two things stopping them from total control are energy and healthcare. If they could have total control over those two things, they will have total control over the people.

The point of my posts is that GB is nothing but a scare. Sucking the dicks of fossil fuel industries? Let me ask: where do you think all these scientists get their paychecks from? Where does their funding come from?

Climate models are wrong today and always were wrong. Their accuracy is 0%.

Okay, so just so I get this straight. You think the scientists are purely motivated by financial gain, but the GOP isn’t even though we know the fossil fuel industry has bought them? If the GOP isn’t motivated by financial gain, what is motivating them? It’s not like their dumbasses understand science on any level. If they wanted to, they could be skeptical about any scientific theory. Instead they chose this one where they stand to gain money from by denying.

Not at all. Look where our country was at before the drastic decrease in fuel prices. Believe it or not, fuel runs this country. It makes zero sense to limit fuel or make it so expensive it's a major expenditure. The more disposable income we have, the better for our economy.

For the most part, science gets their money from governments. It only makes sense to do their bidding. And like I said, fuel is also a way to control people, and governments around the world would like nothing more. What do you think was behind the Paris Accord?

Global warming is a theory, not a science. We've spent trillions of dollars because of this theory and there are more unhappy people today than when we started. The people who orchestrate this fear? They are flying around the world in private planes or driving around in gas guzzling SUV's, taking expensive vacations and living in homes that consume the amount of energy of 20 average houses in America.

When I have these discussions, I often think about kids in the future. I envision a classroom in about 100 years from now, and the teacher telling the students at one time, man though they could control the climate, and the children bust out in laughter as we did when our teachers told us man once thought the earth was flat, and if you go to far, you'd fall off.

Yeah, fuel does run our country and it’s a damn shame. It’s what makes it so discouraging that the US won’t do jack shit to re-Invent itself. We already know alternative energy can be very profitable. If we just make that necessary transition, it will work. The odds of doing it are just pretty bleak. I know that doesn’t bother you but it really should.

Your reasoning really doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. You’re saying that the reason why the climate theory is a scam is because governments funding science programs and pay scientists? What does that have to do with climate change exactly? If climate change was all a hoax, what incentive would governments have in pushing for it if it would just be easier for them to accept the status quo and become powerful off of fossil fuels? As you said it runs the world, therefore there wouldn’t be any point in rocking the boat. If it was a hoax, these governments don’t stand to gain anything by passing up a lucrative economic policy like fossil fuels just to transform their economies. It’s also dumb to just be skeptical about it simply becuaw scientists get paid. I mean come on really? Obviously these people have to make a living.

You are talking out of both sides of your mouth. On one hand, you say Republicans are in the pockets of fuel producers because it benefits them, and on the other hand, you say that scientists who get their paychecks from government that wants total control over fuel is not an incentive for them to create bogus theories.

If alternative energy could be profitable, you wouldn't need government. Private markets would have cornered that already. Government subsidizes things that nobody wants like electric cars, windmills and solar panels. Without those subsidies, nobody would want them.

The reason government can't get a piece of fossil fuels is because most of it in our country comes from private land. If government were to regulate it to the point they are the main beneficiaries, it would be too expensive to produce.

See, actually, because big oil became as profitable as they did, they intentionally undermined the growth of ANY form alternative energy. I’m not talking honest competition here. I’m talking about utter sabotage just to remain the #1 energy source. That is how nefarious big oil has become over the years.

The difference with governments paying scientists is that they aren’t trying to control a narrative. Governments don’t pay them to spread climate change as being a hoax. If it really was a hoax, there would be no incentive to pretend it was real. Again, a government does fine on the profit of fossil fuels by themselves if all they cared about was money. It’s really just a matter of these world leaders realizing we can’t continue on this same path if we want human civilization to continue for 100s of years to come.

They started this lie near 50 years ago. Spouting all of the beaches will be gone. They are still there and if there is any loss it is by nature or by man's encroachment. They screwed up. The globalists should have waited until they took full control of the schools. No matter, they will eventually get their way if a progressive socialist sellout is elected at some point and more Americans will get poorer.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Let me explain something to you: Politicians (particularly on the left) have been trying to gain more and more control over the people. To some degree, they have had great success. The only two things stopping them from total control are energy and healthcare. If they could have total control over those two things, they will have total control over the people.

The point of my posts is that GB is nothing but a scare. Sucking the dicks of fossil fuel industries? Let me ask: where do you think all these scientists get their paychecks from? Where does their funding come from?

Climate models are wrong today and always were wrong. Their accuracy is 0%.

Okay, so just so I get this straight. You think the scientists are purely motivated by financial gain, but the GOP isn’t even though we know the fossil fuel industry has bought them? If the GOP isn’t motivated by financial gain, what is motivating them? It’s not like their dumbasses understand science on any level. If they wanted to, they could be skeptical about any scientific theory. Instead they chose this one where they stand to gain money from by denying.

Not at all. Look where our country was at before the drastic decrease in fuel prices. Believe it or not, fuel runs this country. It makes zero sense to limit fuel or make it so expensive it's a major expenditure. The more disposable income we have, the better for our economy.

For the most part, science gets their money from governments. It only makes sense to do their bidding. And like I said, fuel is also a way to control people, and governments around the world would like nothing more. What do you think was behind the Paris Accord?

Global warming is a theory, not a science. We've spent trillions of dollars because of this theory and there are more unhappy people today than when we started. The people who orchestrate this fear? They are flying around the world in private planes or driving around in gas guzzling SUV's, taking expensive vacations and living in homes that consume the amount of energy of 20 average houses in America.

When I have these discussions, I often think about kids in the future. I envision a classroom in about 100 years from now, and the teacher telling the students at one time, man though they could control the climate, and the children bust out in laughter as we did when our teachers told us man once thought the earth was flat, and if you go to far, you'd fall off.

Yeah, fuel does run our country and it’s a damn shame. It’s what makes it so discouraging that the US won’t do jack shit to re-Invent itself. We already know alternative energy can be very profitable. If we just make that necessary transition, it will work. The odds of doing it are just pretty bleak. I know that doesn’t bother you but it really should.

Your reasoning really doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. You’re saying that the reason why the climate theory is a scam is because governments funding science programs and pay scientists? What does that have to do with climate change exactly? If climate change was all a hoax, what incentive would governments have in pushing for it if it would just be easier for them to accept the status quo and become powerful off of fossil fuels? As you said it runs the world, therefore there wouldn’t be any point in rocking the boat. If it was a hoax, these governments don’t stand to gain anything by passing up a lucrative economic policy like fossil fuels just to transform their economies. It’s also dumb to just be skeptical about it simply becuaw scientists get paid. I mean come on really? Obviously these people have to make a living.

You are talking out of both sides of your mouth. On one hand, you say Republicans are in the pockets of fuel producers because it benefits them, and on the other hand, you say that scientists who get their paychecks from government that wants total control over fuel is not an incentive for them to create bogus theories.

If alternative energy could be profitable, you wouldn't need government. Private markets would have cornered that already. Government subsidizes things that nobody wants like electric cars, windmills and solar panels. Without those subsidies, nobody would want them.

The reason government can't get a piece of fossil fuels is because most of it in our country comes from private land. If government were to regulate it to the point they are the main beneficiaries, it would be too expensive to produce.

See, actually, because big oil became as profitable as they did, they intentionally undermined the growth of ANY form alternative energy. I’m not talking honest competition here. I’m talking about utter sabotage just to remain the #1 energy source. That is how nefarious big oil has become over the years.

The difference with governments paying scientists is that they aren’t trying to control a narrative. Governments don’t pay them to spread climate change as being a hoax. If it really was a hoax, there would be no incentive to pretend it was real. Again, a government does fine on the profit of fossil fuels by themselves if all they cared about was money. It’s really just a matter of these world leaders realizing we can’t continue on this same path if we want human civilization to continue for 100s of years to come.

That's ridiculous. Oil sells itself. It needs no sabotage or political payoff. Whatever oil we don't want, somebody else will gladly take and pay gloriously for it.

Now if you have any credible evidence of this urban legend that fuel companies paid-off alternative energy, please supply it. Again I stress the word credible.

Yes, governments are trying to control a narrative. Get their scientists to backup or promote their claims, and eventually people will beg government to save our lives from this terrible outcome. Per the OP, this flake Cortez is a perfect example.

Years ago Democrats changed the threat from Global Warming to Climate Change. Why? Simply put, there is plenty of evidence out there that our planet is not getting warmer. In fact, the last few decades, has remained steady.

Okay, so how do we continue advancing this hoax since we were proven wrong about global warming? Simple: change the narrative to climate change. Why? Because nobody can prove them wrong. The climate has been changing since God made the place.

Try this: ask any environmentalist exactly what it is they want, what goals they want to achieve, and how much it will cost to achieve them. Anybody wiling to answer will stutter a lot. Green is a bottomless pit. There isn't enough money in the entire country to fill it. No matter what we do to pander to these people, it will never be enough. They will always want more.

Ray from Cleveland's rule of thumb: You can't make an environmentalist happy; it isn't possible. We've been trying for the last several decades, and they are more unhappy now than they've ever been.

 

[justoffal]

Man, this obsession you people have with this chick is kind of bizarre.

not even close to the obsession you and the MSM have for Trump

 

[justoffal]

Uh

Man, this obsession you people have with this chick is kind of bizarre.

She is a once in a lifetime opportunity for us.

Unlike the left who had to get a comedian to try and make Palin look stupid, this broad needs no help whatsoever. Every time you think she said the stupidest thing, she says something even dumber.

Are you shitting me right now? Trump says retarded things on a daily basis but you pretend otherwise and harp on something AOC says every once in a while? Good god. Trump is an international embarrassment. It blows my mind you people are in still in denial about it.

Uh oh

That sounds like.....gassssp! WHATABOUTISM!

JO

 

[danielpalos]

We have an express establishment clause for naturalization not immigration.

We should have no illegal problem for the right wing to whine about.

 

[Synthaholic]

Man, this obsession you people have with this chick is kind of bizarre.

She is a once in a lifetime opportunity for us.

Unlike the left who had to get a comedian to try and make Palin look stupid, this broad needs no help whatsoever. Every time you think she said the stupidest thing, she says something even dumber.

Are you shitting me right now? Trump says retarded things on a daily basis but you pretend otherwise and harp on something AOC says every once in a while? Good god. Trump is an international embarrassment. It blows my mind you people are in still in denial about it.

What did Trump ever say that was dumber than the world will end in 12 years because of global warming?


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

She didn’t say that. And this is why I rarely engage with you on this site. You’re just a fucking liar.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Man, this obsession you people have with this chick is kind of bizarre.

She is a once in a lifetime opportunity for us.

Unlike the left who had to get a comedian to try and make Palin look stupid, this broad needs no help whatsoever. Every time you think she said the stupidest thing, she says something even dumber.

Are you shitting me right now? Trump says retarded things on a daily basis but you pretend otherwise and harp on something AOC says every once in a while? Good god. Trump is an international embarrassment. It blows my mind you people are in still in denial about it.

What did Trump ever say that was dumber than the world will end in 12 years because of global warming?


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

She didn’t say that. And this is why I rarely engage with you on this site. You’re just a fucking liar.

I don't care if you do or not. But suggestion: read all the previous posts before responding to avoid looking like a fool. I posted the video of exactly what she said.

 

[my2¢]

Just dropped in to see what OAC referred to. I take it that it's that representative from New York that I don't pay attention too and consider none of my business. Sorry for the interruption, carry on.

 

[Natural Citizen]

So how could we protect this country without a standing army?

The problem we're having is that these intelligence agencies are routinely declaring war on the electorate in the absurd name of security. They're effectively weaponizing democracy in the states the very same way they've done it abroad for decades while simultaneously pissing al over our civil liberties with the aid of the executive, legislative, and judicial. Actually, the Congress is completely derelict of its duty to put a leash on those cats, they're letting the executive and judicial run the joint.

It's one thing to have a standing army. But it's quite another thing to let them run roughshod and unchecked all over the electorate the way they have been since 911. Actually since their inception, they've been doing that. And they've grown. Just look at how many unconstitutional federal police agencies they've created since then. TSA for one. Look at what the intelligence agencies have done in the states for years. They're getting a free pass and this is what the Framers warned us of. And Eisenhower, if we recall.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Man, this obsession you people have with this chick is kind of bizarre.

Should I count the times you mentioned Trump ?

 

[justoffal]

Man, this obsession you people have with this chick is kind of bizarre.

She is a once in a lifetime opportunity for us.

Unlike the left who had to get a comedian to try and make Palin look stupid, this broad needs no help whatsoever. Every time you think she said the stupidest thing, she says something even dumber.

Are you shitting me right now? Trump says retarded things on a daily basis but you pretend otherwise and harp on something AOC says every once in a while? Good god. Trump is an international embarrassment. It blows my mind you people are in still in denial about it.

What did Trump ever say that was dumber than the world will end in 12 years because of global warming?


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

Christ. What she said was that the world will inevitably end if radical change isn’t made within 12 years. As in, if nothing is done within 12 years, the world will go down an irreversible path of cataclysm after that point. The climate change report released said the same thing. After that 12 year tipping point, humans will be extinct within 100 years.

Even so, it doesn’t get any dumber than suggesting climate change is a hoax invented by the Chinese. Good god.

Funny I Remember the exact same statement being made roughly....12 years ago.

Jo

 

[justoffal]

Man, this obsession you people have with this chick is kind of bizarre.

Yeah um about that junior,

It's not her. She's new to the scene. It's her politics ... That's not new. In fact the Marxist onslaught in North America dates back to late 40's and Frank Marshall Davis liason and co-scum with Elijah Muhammed. The reaction you're seeing is not bizarre. It's intelligent. Don't be scared it's alright to expand your horizons.

Jo

 

[Ambivalent1]

Man, this obsession you people have with this chick is kind of bizarre.

Well sure, she is truly representative of the Left's lack of any real intellectual substance. They/you have ONE idea, take money from other people and give it to the people you count on to vote for you.

 

[OldLady]

The new socialist wonder AOC has voted with Republicans not to fund the government. Why? It's because the bill funds ICE, something she wants to get rid of.

That's right everyone, not only does she want to prolong federal employees from getting hired, in addition, she wants to do away with some 20,000 federal jobs.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Is Only Democrat To Vote Against Reopening Government

It's either what her constituents want or she'll be finding a new apartment in NYC in two years. Big deal.

 

[justoffal]

Man, this obsession you people have with this chick is kind of bizarre.

Well sure, she is truly representative of the Left's lack of any real intellectual substance. They/you have ONE idea, take money from other people and give it to the people you count on to vote for you.

Exactly.... The Hilarious thing is she sees it as a righteous crusade and probably could not even tell you who Karl Marx is or even what Marxism is. So yeah... It's funny to watch but at the same time it's actually terrifying to consider.

Jo

 

[BlueGin]

Man, this obsession you people have with this chick is kind of bizarre.

Well sure, she is truly representative of the Left's lack of any real intellectual substance. They/you have ONE idea, take money from other people and give it to the people you count on to vote for you.

Exactly.... The Hilarious thing is she sees it as a righteous crusade and probably could not even tell you who Karl Marx is or even what Marxism is. So yeah... It's funny to watch but at the same time it's actually terrifying to consider.

Jo

Well facts don’t matter as long as you believe you are morally right. Isn’t that the new Liberal slogan?